Bill Bill 73 73 Smar Smart t Gr Growth wth for or Our Communi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bill bill 73 73 smar smart t gr growth wth for or
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bill Bill 73 73 Smar Smart t Gr Growth wth for or Our Communi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Building Markhams Future Together Journey to Excellence Bill Bill 73 73 Smar Smart t Gr Growth wth for or Our Communi Our Communities ties Act, Act, 2015 2015 Development Services Committee May 19, 2015 Building Markhams


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Bill Bill 73 73 – Smar Smart t Gr Growth wth for

  • r

Our Communi Our Communities ties Act, Act, 2015 2015

Development Services Committee

May 19, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

This his pr prese esent ntation tion Intr Introd

  • duc

uction tion to to Bil Bill l 73 73 Par art t 1: 1: La Land nd Use Use Pl Plan anning ning R Ref efor

  • rms

ms Par art t 2: 2: De Develop elopmen ment t Cha Charge ges s System System Ref efor

  • rms

ms What’s Next?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Bil Bill l 73 73 – What is it’s purpose?

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 3

  • Proposed amendments to the Development Charges

Act and the Planning Act

  • Government response to consultations which took place in

2013/2014 throughout Ontario

  • Intended to ensure both systems are predictable,

transparent, cost effective and responsive to the needs of Ontario communities

  • Currently in draft form, has received first and second

reading in the Legislature

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Pr Provincial vincial co consu nsulta ltation tions s to took

  • k place

place i in n 20 2013 13-2014 2014

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 4

  • From October 2013 - January 2014 the Province consulted with

various stakeholders respecting Land Use Planning and Appeals System and Development Charges System

  • Province heard from municipalities, development industry, legal

sector, community groups, citizens and other stakeholders

  • As a result of comments received, Province developed legislation

aimed at reforming both the Planning Act and the Development Charges Act

  • Bill 73 introduced in Legislature on March 5, 2015, with second

reading April 21, 2015, and now in debate period

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Province’s stated intent with respect to the legislation

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 5

  • Give residents more say in how their communities

grow

  • Set out clearer rules for land use planning
  • Give municipalities more independence to make local

decisions and resolve disputes

  • Give municipalities more opportunities to fund growth-

related infrastructure

  • Make development charges, Section 37 and parkland

dedication systems more predictable, transparent and accountable

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Par art 1: Lan t 1: Land d Use Use Plann Planning ing Ref efor

  • rms

ms

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Two-yea ear r mor morato torium rium on

  • n cer

certa tain in de develop elopmen ment a t app ppli lica cation tions

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 7

Official Plan Amendments two years after all or part of a new OP comes into effect Zoning By-law Amendments two years after Council repeals and replaces all of its zoning by-laws (i.e. New comprehensive zoning by-law) Minor Variances two years after a zoning by-law amendment is approved

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Two-yea ear r mor morato torium rium on

  • n cer

certa tain in de develop elopmen ment a t app ppli lica cation tions

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 8

Staff Position: Staff do not support the proposed moratorium OPAs: Certain OP amendments may be necessary after approval of the new Official Plan, in order to reflect subsequent Council decisions on land use matters ZBAs: Certain Zoning amendments would be necessary, as it is not Markham’s current practice to “pre-zone” lands in accordance with the Official Plan. As well, new OP provides for “discretionary uses” which require rezoning to proceed Variances: Minor Variance applications within 2 years could proceed if Council permits. No criteria for this “allowance” developed, also adds time and cost to process for applicants

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Pr Prop

  • pose
  • sed li

d limita mitation tions s on

  • n a

app ppea eals ls to to th the e Ont Ontar ario io Municipa Municipal l Boa Board

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 9

OPs and OP Amendments – failure of approval authority to make a decision

Staff Position: Support. Provides more certainty with respect to the timing and costs of OMB appeals

No global (whole plan) appeals permitted

Staff Position: Support. Would reduce the resources and time needed to scope the issues to be adjudicated by the Board.

No appeal of determination that OPA is not in conformity with Regional Plan

Staff Position: Support. consistent with idea of maintaining conformity with upper-tier and Provincial policy.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Pr Prop

  • pose
  • sed li

d limita mitation tions s on

  • n a

app ppea eals ls to to th the e Ont Ontar ario io Municipa Municipal l Boa Board

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 10

Inconsistency with Provincial Plans or Upper-Tier (Regional) Official Plan

Staff Position: Support. The amendment requires appellants to provide more robust information and justification in their appeals

Greenbelt, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Areas, Growth Plan forecasts, others

Staff Position: Support as it applies to private-sector appeals, as it provides greater certainty with respect to the supremacy of the provincial plans over local official plans. City should retain the right to appeal upper-tier policy though.

Alternative dispute resolution may be initiated prior to referral to OMB

Staff Position:. General Support. Allows for local mediation rather than OMB.. Cost of implementing such a system would have to be evaluated if this were to be considered

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Cha Chang nges to es to req equir uireme ement nts s for

  • r pu

public blic co consu nsulta ltation tion

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 11

Alternate forms of public consultation extended to subdivisions or consents

Staff Position: Support. Staff considers it reasonable Markham’s OP already allows alternative forms of public consultation that go beyond the minimum requirements of the Planning Act

Official Plans to articulate procedures for public consultation

Staff Position: Clarification Required. The Planning Act already provides requirements with respect to public consultation. Does this amendment require repeating information from the Planning Act in our Official Plan? Require further clarification from the Province on this matter.

Council to articulate in decisions the effect of oral and written presentations

Staff Position: General Support. Our recommendation reports regularly include an explanation on how public submissions were considered. Often problematic to adequately capture/interpret oral submissions, and so they are generally characterized and categorized around common themes.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Par arklan kland d Ded Dedica ication tion

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 12

Parks Plan Required Before adopting a by-law which provides for parkland dedication on a “per-unit” basis, a parks plan must be in place that establishes the City’s parkland needs

Staff Position: Support. Plan would be beneficial for quantifying parkland needs. Resources can then be more effectively distributed, and longer-term planning for parks may occur. Assists in justifying any parkland dedication required through development approvals. Staff intend to initiate a parks plan exercise in 2016, subject to Council budget approval, and regardless of the status of Bill 73

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Par arklan kland d Ded Dedica ication tion

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 13

Cash-in-lieu Rate Change Current Planning Act maximum: 1.66 ha per 500 units (1 ha/300 units) Markham’s current OP cap: 1.21 ha per 500 units (apartments/high density) Proposed Bill 73 maximum: 1.0 ha per 500 units 40% drop in cash-in-lieu for lower density singles/semis/townhomes development 17.6% drop in cash-in-lieu for higher density/apartment development

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Par arklan kland d Ded Dedica ication tion

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 14

Staff Position: Non-support Staff are not in support of this amendment, as it provides for an arbitrary figure of reduced parkland dedication cash-in-lieu, which is not tied to the actual parkland needs of the City. The proposed amendment would have a financial impact on Markham that will have to be quantified. There would be a reduction of 40% cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication for lower and medium density units, and a 17.6% reduction for higher density apartment units.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Ad Addition ditional al Bil Bill l 73 73 Chan Change ges

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 15

 Potential for new prescribed criteria for determination of “minor variance”  Extension of review cycles for Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Plans, OP  Additional transparency and accounting requirements for Section 37 receipts

Staff Position: Support. Staff would like to be involved in working group discussions respecting prescribed criteria for minor variances. Staff support alignment of timelines for municipal and provincial plans, and additional transparency and accounting practices respecting Section 37 funds

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Par art 2: De t 2: Develop elopmen ment t Cha Charge ges s Sys Syste tem m R Ref efor

  • rms

ms

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

a) Expansion of Services Eligible for Development Charges (DCs)

  • Waste diversion will be removed from the list of ineligible services

Staff Position

  • Broaden the scope of the amendment to include all waste management
  • Remove hospitals and municipal administration offices from the list of ineligible services

b) Increased Emphasis on Area-Specific Development Charges

  • Municipalities will be required to examine the use of area specific development charges

(ASDCs)

  • Province can impose the application of ASDCs

Staff Position

  • The City already uses ASDCs and would like to retain the flexibility to use it based on the City’s

circumstances

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

c) Developments Requiring Multiple Building Permits

  • DCs will be payable upon the first building permit being issued
  • Will impact the assessment of DCs for high-rise developments

Staff Position

  • Negative Impact on Revenues – Development industry can consciously lock in DC

rates early in the process

  • Province will be requested to fix the date of collection of DCs at a time more closely

related to the construction of a given development

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

d) Utilization of a Forward-Looking Service Level Calculation

  • Province to set out service(s) to be changed from a 10-year historical to a forward

looking calculation

  • List of services that will benefit not yet available (general view – transit)

Staff Position

  • It is unclear how this will be implemented but staff would like to see it expanded to

include indoor recreation, park development, library services, fire services & public works

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

e) Transit Recovery

  • Removal of the mandatory 10% reduction for transit
  • Has no direct financial impact to the City but will be favourable for the Region

Staff Position

  • Would like to see the amendment expanded to include all other soft services such as indoor

recreation, park development and library services

f) Requirement to Adopt an Asset Management Plan

  • Demonstrates that all assets funded by DCs are financially sustainable over their full life cycle
  • Not clear if asset management plans prepared for other purposes will satisfy any new

requirements Staff Position

  • Province requested to consult with Markham before finalizing the amendments

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

g) Voluntary Payments

  • Municipalities will not be permitted to impose a charge related to a development, or a

requirement to construct a service, except as permitted by the DCA or another Act

  • New section will not affect charges already imposed before the amendment comes

into force

  • Exceptions may be made under the DCA but the details of these are not currently

known Staff Position

  • Province requested to consult with Markham before finalizing the amendments
  • May limit the services that the City can request developers to construct on its behalf

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

h) Improved Reporting Requirements

  • Creates more detailed disclosure requirements to increase transparency
  • Identify capital assets not funded through DCs
  • Statement of compliance that City is not imposing voluntary payments

Staff Position

  • City already tracks information and have no problem with increased transparency

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

Issues Not Addressed in Bill 73

i) Powers of the OMB

  • OMB cannot issue a ruling that will increase DCs payable
  • Creates an uneven playing field - appellants and municipalities bear different levels of risks and

accountability Staff Position

  • Would like to see an amendment to the DCA to repeal this section

j) Use of Alternate Methodology to Calculate Service Levels

  • The City used the Gross and Alternative methodologies in its 2009 and 2013 DC by-laws
  • OMB rejected both approaches – Instituted the Net Population Approach

Staff Position

  • Net Population Approach does not fully recover for the cost of growth
  • Recommends that the Province expand the permitted methodologies

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

What’s Next?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence

  • Bill 73 has received First and Second Reading in the Legislature
  • Commenting period ends on June 3, 2015
  • Province will set up working groups to address further refinements to Bill
  • Staff would like to be part of any working groups formed by Province
  • Recommend that this report be forwarded to the Province as our official submission
  • Once Bill 73 is approved, Staff will report back to Council with additional info
  • Staff will also report back to Council respecting Parkland Dedication By-law Review

Bill 73 – Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Building Markham’s Future Together Journey to Excellence