Biggest No-Brainer in the HIST STORY of the Automotive Industry! - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

biggest no brainer in the hist story of the automotive
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Biggest No-Brainer in the HIST STORY of the Automotive Industry! - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Biggest No-Brainer in the HIST STORY of the Automotive Industry! Frank is a principal at OConnor & Drew, P.C., a regional accounting firm that services approximately 300 automobile dealers. He has been the Director of Internal


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Biggest No-Brainer in the HIST STORY of the Automotive Industry!

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Frank is a principal at O’Connor & Drew, P.C., a regional accounting firm that

services approximately 300 automobile dealers.

 He has been the Director of Internal Audit and Fraud Investigation at O’Connor

and Drew, P.C. for the past 13 years and has serviced auto dealers for over 18 years.

 Frank has successfully calculated, submitted, and obtained warranty rate increases

for hundreds of dealerships in a variety of states across the country including Vermont, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 First passed in the state of Florida in 2008  The Alliance of Auto Manufacturers filed two lawsuits:

  • Connecticut – Dismissed by trial court in 2014
  • Florida – Alliance dropped suit

 Approximately 38 states have favorable laws on the

books

 Approximately 24 state laws include the 100 repair order

analysis

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 Signed into law several years ago  Strengthened language on warranty parts reimbursement

law

 Explicitly defines method of calculation (100 RO

analysis)

 Allows for two submissions per calendar year  Hundreds of dealers have been approved in various

states including Vermont

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. Minimal bottom line impact
  • 2. Manufacturer will seek retribution
  • 3. MSRP is retail
  • 4. Manufacturers refuse

approval

  • 5. Waiting is not costly
slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Results in thousands of additional gross per month  Will vary based on the following:

  • Volume of warranty parts sales
  • Approved retail rate

 Maximizing rate by data analytics

  • Avoid landmines

 Time-sensitive nature of submission

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A quick look inside the numbers:

Sales Gross Profit Cost Potential Additional Income

Warranty Sales Currently @ 40% Mark-up Warranty Cost Dealers @ 60% Mark-up Dealers @ 75% Mark-up Dealers @ 90% Mark-up $250,000 $71,429 $178,571 $35,714 $62,500 $89,285 $400,000 $114,286 $285,714 $57,142 $100,000 $142,857 $500,000 $142,857 $357,143 $71,429 $125,000 $178,571 $800,000 $228,571 $571,429 $114,286 $200,000 $285,715

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tactics of Manufacturers for Submission:

 Inclusion of Non-Warranty Parts in Analysis

  • BMW – Tires
  • Ford – Body Shop Repairs
  • Ford and Chrysler – Brakes and Wipers
  • Chrysler - Maintenance Services

 Requiring customer RO copy:

  • Hyundai
slide-9
SLIDE 9

No evidence of direct retribution

Tactics of Manufacturers after Approval:

 Recoupment – Nissan & Infiniti  Failure to pay on all parts:

  • BMW, Hyundai, Mazda, and Nissan

 GM – Option A versus Option C

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Manufacturers have found ways to manipulate the law to

their benefit

 Language the law should include:

  • 100 RO and 60 day analysis
  • Specify parts and repairs to be excluded:

 Maintenance services  Tires  Government fleet and body shop repairs  Accessories

  • Avoid the “reasonableness clause”
  • Include a non-recoupment clause
slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Don’t be deceived: Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price

is still a rate controlled by the Manufacturer

 MSRP is commonly thought of as 67% Mark-Up, however

  • Nissan: 49% - 55%
  • Toyota: 56% - 59%
  • Audi: 56% - 60%
  • Volkswagen: 56% - 60%
  • Mercedes*:

55% - 60% *Pays MSRP on newer models

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Approv

  • ved M

d Manufactu ture rers Manufactu ture rers w withou

  • ut A

t Approv

  • vals

ls

slide-13
SLIDE 13

When you fail to submit for a warranty reimbursement you are losing:

slide-14
SLIDE 14

 Obtain downloaded report (in Excel) from your operating system

containing required pertinent information

 Run advanced data analytical software to determine your ideal range of

repair orders which will provide the highest mark-up rate

 Analyze and select the qualified parts  Trace the selection to the actual repair orders to account for discounts, non-

factory parts, aftermarket warranties, goodwill adjustments, etc.

 Calculate the mark-up percentage for the selected sample  Prepare package for submission to the factory

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 The Vermont law permits a dealer to submit for a parts rate

increase twice per calendar year

 Very few dealers take advantage of this stipulation  Beware of the “Reasonableness

Clause”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

fobrien@ocd.com O’Connor & Drew, P.C. 25 Braintree Hill Office Park Suite 102 Braintree, MA 02184 (617) 471-1120

Today’s slides will also be available for download at: http://www.ocd.com/vada-presentation/