biconservative surfaces in riemannian manifolds
play

Biconservative surfaces in Riemannian manifolds Simona Nistor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Biconservative surfaces in Riemannian manifolds Simona Nistor Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Ia si Harmonic Maps Workshop Brest, May 15-18, 2017 1 / 55 Content The motivation of the research topic 1 2 / 55 Content The


  1. Characterization results Theorem ([Loubeau, Montaldo, Oniciuc – 2008]) A submanifold φ : M m → N n is biharmonic if and only if � T = 0 R N ( · , H ) · � trace A ∇ ⊥ · H ( · )+ trace ∇ A H + trace and � ⊥ = 0 , ∆ ⊥ H + trace B ( · , A H ( · ))+ trace R N ( · , H ) · � where H = trace B / m ∈ C ( NM ) is the mean curvature vector field. Proposition Let φ : M m → N n be a submanifold. The following conditions are equivalent: M is biconservative; 1 � T = 0 ; � R N ( · , H ) · · H ( · )+ trace ∇ A H + trace trace A ∇ ⊥ 2 � T = 0 ; m � | H | 2 � � R N ( · , H ) · + 2trace A ∇ ⊥ · H ( · )+ 2trace 2 grad 3 2trace ∇ A H − m | H | 2 � � 2 grad = 0 . 4 13 / 55

  2. Examples of biconservative submanifolds Proposition Let φ : M m → N n be a submanifold. If ∇ A H = 0 , then M is biconservative. 14 / 55

  3. Examples of biconservative submanifolds Proposition Let φ : M m → N n be a submanifold. If ∇ A H = 0 , then M is biconservative. Proposition Let φ : M m → N n be a submanifold. If N is a space form, i.e., has constant sectional curvature, and M is PMC , i.e., has H parallel in NM , then M is biconservative. 14 / 55

  4. Properties of biconservative submanifolds Proposition ([Balmu¸ s, Montaldo, Oniciuc – 2013]) Let φ : M m → N n be a biconservative submanifold. Assume that M is pseudoumbilical, i.e., A H = | H | 2 I , and m � = 4 . Then M is CMC . 15 / 55

  5. Properties of biconservative submanifolds Proposition ([Balmu¸ s, Montaldo, Oniciuc – 2013]) Let φ : M m → N n be a biconservative submanifold. Assume that M is pseudoumbilical, i.e., A H = | H | 2 I , and m � = 4 . Then M is CMC . Proposition([N. – 2017]) Let φ : M 2 → N n be a CMC biconservative surface and assume that M is compact. If K ≥ 0 , then ∇ A H = 0 and M is flat or pseudoumbilical. 15 / 55

  6. Properties of biconservative submanifolds Proposition ([Balmu¸ s, Montaldo, Oniciuc – 2013]) Let φ : M m → N n be a biconservative submanifold. Assume that M is pseudoumbilical, i.e., A H = | H | 2 I , and m � = 4 . Then M is CMC . Proposition([N. – 2017]) Let φ : M 2 → N n be a CMC biconservative surface and assume that M is compact. If K ≥ 0 , then ∇ A H = 0 and M is flat or pseudoumbilical. Proposition ([Montaldo, Oniciuc, Ratto – 2016]) Let φ : M 2 → N n be a biconservative surface. Then � A H ( ∂ z ) , ∂ z � is holomorphic if and only if M is CMC . 15 / 55

  7. Characterization theorems Theorem([Ou – 2010]) If φ : M m → N m + 1 is a hypersurface, then M is biharmonic if and only if � T = 0 , Ricci N ( η ) � 2 A ( grad f )+ f grad f − 2 f and ∆ f + f | A | 2 − f Ricci N ( η , η ) = 0 , where η is the unit normal vector field along M in N and f = trace A is the mean curvature function. 16 / 55

  8. Characterization theorems Theorem([Ou – 2010]) If φ : M m → N m + 1 is a hypersurface, then M is biharmonic if and only if � T = 0 , Ricci N ( η ) � 2 A ( grad f )+ f grad f − 2 f and ∆ f + f | A | 2 − f Ricci N ( η , η ) = 0 , where η is the unit normal vector field along M in N and f = trace A is the mean curvature function. A hypersurface φ : M m → N m + 1 ( c ) is biconservative if and only if A ( grad f ) = − f 2 grad f . 16 / 55

  9. Characterization theorems Theorem([Ou – 2010]) If φ : M m → N m + 1 is a hypersurface, then M is biharmonic if and only if � T = 0 , Ricci N ( η ) � 2 A ( grad f )+ f grad f − 2 f and ∆ f + f | A | 2 − f Ricci N ( η , η ) = 0 , where η is the unit normal vector field along M in N and f = trace A is the mean curvature function. A hypersurface φ : M m → N m + 1 ( c ) is biconservative if and only if A ( grad f ) = − f 2 grad f . Every CMC hypersurface in N m + 1 ( c ) is biconservative. 16 / 55

  10. Content The motivation of the research topic 1 Introducing the biconservative immersions 2 Biharmonic and biconservative submanifolds 3 Biconservative surfaces in 3 -dimensional space forms 4 Local intrinsic characterization of biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Complete biconservative surfaces in R 3 Complete biconservative surfaces in S 3 17 / 55

  11. Biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a non- CMC biconservative surface. Local results Global results

  12. Biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a non- CMC biconservative surface. extrinsic Local results Global results

  13. Biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a non- CMC biconservative surface. extrinsic extrinsic Local results Global results

  14. Biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a non- CMC biconservative surface. extrinsic extrinsic Local results Global results intrinsic

  15. Biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a non- CMC biconservative surface. extrinsic extrinsic Local results Global results intrinsic intrinsic 18 / 55

  16. Biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) grad f � = 0 on M extrinsic Local conditions c − K > 0 on M , grad K � = 0 on M , intrinsic and the level curves of K are certain circles

  17. Biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) grad f � = 0 on M extrinsic Local conditions c − K > 0 on M , grad K � = 0 on M , intrinsic and the level curves of K are certain circles ( M , g ) complete and the above properties Global conditions hold on an open and dense subset of M 19 / 55

  18. Local results Theorem ([Caddeo, Montaldo, Oniciuc, Piu – 2014]) Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a biconservative surface with grad f � = 0 at any point of M . Then the Gaussian curvature K satisfies (i) the extrinsic condition K = det A + c = − 3 f 2 4 + c ; (ii) the intrinsic conditions c − K > 0 , grad K � = 0 on M , and its level curves are circles in M with constant curvature κ = 3 | grad K | 8 ( c − K ) ; (iii) ( c − K ) ∆ K −| grad K | 2 − 8 3 K ( c − K ) 2 = 0 , where ∆ is the Laplace-Beltrami operator on M . 20 / 55

  19. Content The motivation of the research topic 1 Introducing the biconservative immersions 2 Biharmonic and biconservative submanifolds 3 Biconservative surfaces in 3 -dimensional space forms 4 Local intrinsic characterization of biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Complete biconservative surfaces in R 3 Complete biconservative surfaces in S 3 21 / 55

  20. Local intrinsic characterization Theorem ([Fetcu, N., Oniciuc – 2016]) � M 2 , g � Let be an abstract surface and c ∈ R a constant. Then, M can be locally isometrically embedded in N 3 ( c ) as a biconservative surface with grad f � = 0 at any point if and only if c − K > 0 , grad K � = 0 , at any point, and its level curves are circles in M with constant curvature κ = 3 | grad K | 8 ( c − K ) . 22 / 55

  21. Local intrinsic characterization Theorem ([Fetcu, N., Oniciuc – 2016]) � M 2 , g � Let be an abstract surface and c ∈ R a constant. Then, M can be locally isometrically embedded in N 3 ( c ) as a biconservative surface with grad f � = 0 at any point if and only if c − K > 0 , grad K � = 0 , at any point, and its level curves are circles in M with constant curvature κ = 3 | grad K | 8 ( c − K ) . If the surface M is simply connected, then the theorem holds globally, but, in this case, instead of a local isometric embedding we have a global isometric immersion. 22 / 55

  22. Local intrinsic characterization Theorem ([Fetcu, N., Oniciuc – 2016]) � M 2 , g � Let be an abstract surface and c ∈ R a constant. Then, M can be locally isometrically embedded in N 3 ( c ) as a biconservative surface with grad f � = 0 at any point if and only if c − K > 0 , grad K � = 0 , at any point, and its level curves are circles in M with constant curvature κ = 3 | grad K | 8 ( c − K ) . If the surface M is simply connected, then the theorem holds globally, but, in this case, instead of a local isometric embedding we have a global isometric immersion. We remark that unlike in the minimal immersions case, if M satisfies the hypotheses from above theorem, then there exists a unique biconservative immersion in N 3 ( c ) (up to an isometry of N 3 ( c ) ), and not a one-parameter family. 22 / 55

  23. Local intrinsic characterization Theorem ([N., Oniciuc – 2017]) � M 2 , g � Let be an abstract surface with Gaussian curvature K satisfying c − K ( p ) > 0 and ( grad K )( p ) � = 0 at any point p ∈ M , where c ∈ R is a constant. Then, the level curves of K are circles in M with constant curvature κ = 3 | grad K | / ( 8 ( c − K )) if and only if one of the following equivalent conditions holds 23 / 55

  24. Local intrinsic characterization Theorem ([N., Oniciuc – 2017]) � M 2 , g � Let be an abstract surface with Gaussian curvature K satisfying c − K ( p ) > 0 and ( grad K )( p ) � = 0 at any point p ∈ M , where c ∈ R is a constant. Then, the level curves of K are circles in M with constant curvature κ = 3 | grad K | / ( 8 ( c − K )) if and only if one of the following equivalent conditions holds du 2 + dv 2 � (i) locally, g = e 2 ρ � , ρ = ρ ( u ) satisfies ρ ′′ = e − 2 ρ / 3 − ce 2 ρ and ρ ′ > 0 ; � ρ d τ u ( ρ ) = + u 0 , � − 3 e − 2 τ / 3 − ce 2 τ + a ρ 0 where ρ is in some open interval I , ρ 0 ∈ I and a , u 0 ∈ R ; 23 / 55

  25. Local intrinsic characterization Theorem ([N., Oniciuc – 2017]) � M 2 , g � Let be an abstract surface with Gaussian curvature K satisfying c − K ( p ) > 0 and ( grad K )( p ) � = 0 at any point p ∈ M , where c ∈ R is a constant. Then, the level curves of K are circles in M with constant curvature κ = 3 | grad K | / ( 8 ( c − K )) if and only if one of the following equivalent conditions holds du 2 + dv 2 � du 2 + dv 2 � (i) locally, g = e 2 ρ � (ii) locally, g = e 2 ρ � , , ρ = ρ ( u ) satisfies ρ = ρ ( u ) satisfies 3 ρ ′′′ + 2 ρ ′ ρ ′′ + 8 ce 2 ρ ρ ′ = 0 , ρ ′′ = e − 2 ρ / 3 − ce 2 ρ and ρ ′ > 0 ; ρ ′ > 0 and c + e − 2 ρ ρ ′′ > 0 ; � ρ � ρ d τ d τ u ( ρ ) = + u 0 , u ( ρ ) = + u 0 , � − 3 be − 2 τ / 3 − ce 2 τ + a � − 3 e − 2 τ / 3 − ce 2 τ + a ρ 0 ρ 0 where ρ is in some open interval where ρ is in some open interval I , ρ 0 ∈ I and a , u 0 ∈ R ; I , ρ 0 ∈ I and a , b , u 0 ∈ R , b > 0 . 23 / 55

  26. Content The motivation of the research topic 1 Introducing the biconservative immersions 2 Biharmonic and biconservative submanifolds 3 Biconservative surfaces in 3 -dimensional space forms 4 Local intrinsic characterization of biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Complete biconservative surfaces in R 3 Complete biconservative surfaces in S 3 24 / 55

  27. Local extrinsic results in R 3 25 / 55

  28. Local extrinsic result in R 3 Theorem ([Hasanis, Vlachos – 1995]) Let M 2 be a surface in R 3 with ( grad f )( p ) � = 0 at any p ∈ M . Then, M 2 is biconservative if and only if, locally, it is a surface of revolution, and the curvature κ = κ ( u ) of the profile curve σ = σ ( u ) , | σ ′ ( u ) | = 1 , is positive solution of the following ODE κ ′′ κ = 7 κ ′ � 2 − 4 κ 4 . � 4 26 / 55

  29. Local extrinsic result in R 3 Theorem ([Caddeo, Montaldo, Oniciuc, Piu – 2014]) Let M 2 be a biconservative surface in R 3 with ( grad f )( p ) � = 0 at any p ∈ M . Then, locally, the surface can be parametrized by � � C 0 ( θ , v ) = θ cos v , θ sin v , u ˜ C 0 ( θ ) , X ˜ where � �� �� 3 � 1 � C 0 θ 1 / 3 + C 0 θ 2 / 3 − 1 + C 0 θ 2 / 3 − 1 θ 1 / 3 ˜ ˜ ˜ C 0 ( θ ) = � ˜ u ˜ log 2 ˜ C 0 C 0 � � C − 3 / 2 with ˜ ˜ C 0 a positive constant and θ ∈ , ∞ . 0 �� � � C − 3 / 2 ˜ We denote X ˜ , ∞ × R = S ˜ C 0 . C 0 0 27 / 55

  30. Global extrinsic results in R 3 28 / 55

  31. Global extrinsic result in R 3 Proposition ([Montaldo, Oniciuc, Ratto – 2016, N. – 2016]) If we consider the symmetry of Graf u ˜ C 0 , with respect to the O θ (= Ox ) axis, we get a smooth, complete, biconservative surface ˜ C 0 in R 3 . Moreover, its mean S ˜ curvature function has its gradient grad ˜ C 0 is different from zero at any point of f ˜ an open dense subset of ˜ C 0 . S ˜ 29 / 55

  32. S ˜ C 0 30 / 55

  33. S ˜ C 0 30 / 55

  34. S ˜ C 0 ˜ S ˜ C 0 30 / 55

  35. Local intrinsic results corresponding to c = 0 31 / 55

  36. Local intrinsic result; c = 0 Proposition ([N. – 2016]) du 2 + dv 2 �� M 2 , g = e 2 ρ � � Let an abstract surface. Then g satisfies the local intrinisic conditions with c = 0 if and only if du 2 + dv 2 � g C 0 = C 0 ( cosh u ) 6 � , where C 0 > 0 is a constant. 32 / 55

  37. Global intrinsic results corresponding to c = 0 33 / 55

  38. Global intrinsic result; c = 0 Theorem ([N. – 2016]) � du 2 + dv 2 �� R 2 , g C 0 = C 0 ( cosh u ) 6 � Let . Then, we have: 34 / 55

  39. Global intrinsic result; c = 0 Theorem ([N. – 2016]) � du 2 + dv 2 �� R 2 , g C 0 = C 0 ( cosh u ) 6 � Let . Then, we have: � R 2 , g C 0 � (i) is complete; → R 3 given by � R 2 , g C 0 � (ii) the immersion φ C 0 : σ 1 C 0 ( u ) cos ( 3 v ) , σ 1 C 0 ( u ) sin ( 3 v ) , σ 2 � � φ C 0 ( u , v ) = C 0 ( u ) is biconservative in R 3 , where √ C 0 √ C 0 � 1 � ( cosh u ) 3 , σ 1 σ 2 C 0 ( u ) = C 0 ( u ) = 2 sinh ( 2 u )+ u , u ∈ R . 3 2 34 / 55

  40. Uniqueness Theorem ([N., Oniciuc – 2017]) Let M 2 be a biconservative regular surface in R 3 . If M is compact, then M is CMC . 35 / 55

  41. Uniqueness Theorem ([N., Oniciuc – 2017]) Let M 2 be a biconservative regular surface in R 3 . If M is compact, then M is CMC . Theorem Let M 2 be a biconservative, complete and non-compact regular surface in R 3 . Then M = ˜ C 0 . S ˜ 35 / 55

  42. Content The motivation of the research topic 1 Introducing the biconservative immersions 2 Biharmonic and biconservative submanifolds 3 Biconservative surfaces in 3 -dimensional space forms 4 Local intrinsic characterization of biconservative surfaces in N 3 ( c ) Complete biconservative surfaces in R 3 Complete biconservative surfaces in S 3 36 / 55

  43. Local extrinsic results in S 3 37 / 55

  44. Local extrinsic result in S 3 Theorem ([Caddeo, Montaldo, Oniciuc, Piu – 2014]) Let M 2 be a biconservative surface in S 3 with ( grad f )( p ) � = 0 for any p ∈ M . Then, locally, the surface viewed in R 4 , can be parametrized by �� � � 2 � 2 � � 4 C 1 θ − 3 / 4 4 C 1 θ − 3 / 4 C 1 ( θ , v ) = 3 √ ˜ cos µ ( θ ) , 3 √ ˜ sin µ ( θ ) , Y ˜ 1 − 1 − (1) � C 1 θ − 3 / 4 cos v , C 1 θ − 3 / 4 sin v 3 √ ˜ 4 3 √ ˜ 4 , where ( θ , v ) ∈ ( θ 01 , θ 02 ) × R , θ 01 and θ 02 are positive solutions of the equation − 16 9 θ 2 − 16 θ 4 + ˜ C 1 θ 7 / 2 = 0 � θ and µ ( θ ) = ± θ 0 E ( τ ) d τ + ˜ c k ∈ R , k ∈ Z , and θ 0 ∈ ( θ 01 , θ 02 ) . c k , with ˜ If k = 0 , we denote by S ˜ C 1 = Y ˜ C 1 (( θ 01 , θ 02 ) × R ) . 38 / 55

  45. Global extrinsic results in S 3 39 / 55

  46. Global extrinsic result in S 3 The idea of the construction is to start with a surface S ˜ C 1 and then to consider � � , where T k is a linear orthogonal transformation of R 4 that acts on T k S ˜ C 1 span { e 1 , e 2 } as an axial orthogonal symmetry and leaves invariant span { e 3 , e 4 } , for k ∈ Z ∗ . We perform it infinitely many times. 40 / 55

  47. Using the stereographic projection, this construction can be illustrated in R 3 . 41 / 55

  48. Using the stereographic projection, this construction can be illustrated in R 3 . N ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 ) k ∈ {− 2 , − 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 } 41 / 55

  49. Using the stereographic projection, this construction can be illustrated in R 3 . N ′ ( 1 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) N ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 ) k ∈ {− 2 , − 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 } k ∈ {− 2 , − 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 } 41 / 55

  50. Local intrinsic results corresponding to c = 1 42 / 55

  51. Local intrinsic result; c = 1 Proposition ([N. – 2016]) be an abstract surface with g = e 2 ρ ( u ) ( du 2 + dv 2 ) , where u = u ( ρ ) � M 2 , g � Let satisfies � ρ d τ u = + u 0 , � − 3 be − 2 τ / 3 − e 2 τ + a ρ 0 where ρ is in some open interval I , a , b ∈ R are positive constants, and u 0 ∈ R � M 2 , g � is a constant. Then is isometric to � � 3 � d ξ 2 + 1 ξ 2 d θ 2 D C 1 , g C 1 = , − ξ 8 / 3 + 3 C 1 ξ 2 − 3 ξ 2 � � � 3 3 / 2 � � where D C 1 = ( ξ 01 , ξ 02 ) × R , C 1 ∈ 4 / , ∞ is a positive constant, and ξ 01 and ξ 02 are the positive vanishing points of − ξ 8 / 3 + 3 C 1 ξ 2 − 3 , with 0 < ξ 01 < ξ 02 . 43 / 55

  52. Theorem ([N. – 2016]) � � Let D C 1 , g C 1 . Then 44 / 55

  53. Theorem ([N. – 2016]) � � Let D C 1 , g C 1 . Then � � (i) D C 1 , g C 1 is not complete; 44 / 55

  54. Theorem ([N. – 2016]) � � Let D C 1 , g C 1 . Then � � (i) D C 1 , g C 1 is not complete; → S 3 given by � � (ii) the immersion φ C 1 : D C 1 , g C 1 C 1 ξ 2 sin ζ ( ξ ) , cos ( √ C 1 θ ) , sin ( √ C 1 θ ) �� � � 1 1 φ C 1 ( ξ , θ ) = 1 − C 1 ξ 2 cos ζ ( ξ ) , 1 − √ C 1 ξ √ C 1 ξ , � ξ is biconservative in S 3 , where ζ ( ξ ) = ± ξ 00 E ( τ ) d τ + c k , with c k ∈ R , k ∈ Z , and ξ 00 ∈ ( ξ 01 , ξ 02 ) . 44 / 55

  55. Global intrinsic results corresponding to c = 1 45 / 55

  56. The key ingredient Theorem � � � � Let D C 1 , g C 1 . Then D C 1 , g C 1 is the universal cover of the surface of revolution in R 3 given by � χ ( ξ ) cos θ , χ ( ξ ) sin θ � ψ C 1 , C ∗ 1 ( ξ , θ ) = , ν ( ξ ) , (2) C ∗ C ∗ 1 1 � ξ � C 1 − 4 / 3 3 / 2 � − 1 / 2 � where χ ( ξ ) = C ∗ ξ 00 E ( τ ) d τ + c ∗ k , C ∗ � 1 / ξ , ν ( ξ ) = ± 1 ∈ 0 , is a positive constant and c ∗ k ∈ R , k ∈ Z . 46 / 55

  57. θ ISOMETRY ξ 01 ξ 02 ξ ( D C 1 , g C 1 ) M 2 , g � �

  58. θ ISOMETRY ξ 01 ξ 02 ξ ( D C 1 , g C 1 ) M 2 , g � � BICONSERVATIVE φ C 1 = φ ± C 1 , ck S 3

  59. θ ISOMETRY ξ 01 ξ 02 ξ ( D C 1 , g C 1 ) M 2 , g � � ISOMETRY = ψ ± ψ C 1 , C ∗ C 1 , C ∗ 1 , c ∗ 1 k BICONSERVATIVE φ C 1 = φ ± S ± 1 ⊂ R 3 C 1 , C ∗ 1 , c ∗ C 1 , ck S 3

  60. θ ISOMETRY ξ 01 ξ 02 ξ ( D C 1 , g C 1 ) M 2 , g � � ISOMETRY = ψ ± ψ C 1 , C ∗ C 1 , C ∗ 1 , c ∗ 1 k BICONSERVATIVE φ C 1 = φ ± S ± 1 ⊂ R 3 C 1 , C ∗ 1 , c ∗ C 1 , ck p l a y i n g w i t h t h e ∗ c c o k a n n s d t . ± S 3 1 ⊂ R 3 complete ˜ S C 1 , C ∗

  61. θ ISOMETRY ξ 01 ξ 02 ξ ( D C 1 , g C 1 ) M 2 , g � � ISOMETRY = ψ ± ψ C 1 , C ∗ C 1 , C ∗ 1 , c ∗ 1 k BICONSERVATIVE φ C 1 = φ ± S ± 1 ⊂ R 3 C 1 , C ∗ 1 , c ∗ C 1 , ck playing with p l a y i n the const. c k and ± , g w i t h t h e Φ C 1 , C ∗ ∗ c c o k a n n s 1 d t . ± S 3 1 ⊂ R 3 complete ˜ S C 1 , C ∗ 47 / 55

  62. 1 on the Ox 1 x 2 plane is a curve which lies in the The projection of Φ C 1 , C ∗ � � � C 1 ξ 2 � � C 1 ξ 2 � 1 − 1 / 1 − 1 / annulus of radii and . It has self-intersections 01 02 and is dense in the annulus. Choosing C 1 = C ∗ 1 = 1 , we obtain x 2 x 1 48 / 55

  63. The signed curvature of the profile curve of ˜ 1 . S C 1 , C ∗ κ ν 49 / 55

  64. The signed curvature of the curve obtained projecting Φ 1 , 1 on the Ox 1 x 2 plane. κ ν 50 / 55

  65. Open problem Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a biconservative surface. If φ is CMC on an open subset of M , then φ is CMC on M . 51 / 55

  66. Open problem Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a biconservative surface. If φ is CMC on an open subset of M , then φ is CMC on M . φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) is a biconservative surface if and only if A ( grad f ) = − f 2 grad f ; 51 / 55

  67. Open problem Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a biconservative surface. If φ is CMC on an open subset of M , then φ is CMC on M . φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) is a biconservative surface if and only if A ( grad f ) = − f 2 grad f ; if φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) is a biconservative surface, then f ∆ f − 3 | grad f | 2 − 2 � A , Hess f � = 0 . 51 / 55

  68. Open problem Let φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) be a biconservative surface. If φ is CMC on an open subset of M , then φ is CMC on M . φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) is a biconservative surface if and only if A ( grad f ) = − f 2 grad f ; if φ : M 2 → N 3 ( c ) is a biconservative surface, then f ∆ f − 3 | grad f | 2 − 2 � A , Hess f � = 0 . Open problem Let M 2 be a biconservative regular surface in S 3 . If M is compact, then is M a CMC surface? 51 / 55

  69. References I [Balmu¸ s, Montaldo, Oniciuc – 2013] A. Balmu¸ s, S. Montaldo, C. Oniciuc, Biharmonic PNMC submanifolds in spheres , Ark. Mat. 51 (2013), 197–221. [Caddeo, Montaldo, Oniciuc, Piu – 2014] R. Caddeo, S. Montaldo, C. Oniciuc, P . Piu, Surfaces in three-dimensional space forms with divergence-free stress-bienergy tensor , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 193 (2014), 529–550. [Fetcu, N., Oniciuc – 2016] D. Fetcu, S. Nistor, C. Oniciuc, On biconservative surfaces in 3 -dimensional space forms , Comm. Anal. Geom. (5) 24 (2016), 1027–1045. [Hasanis, Vlachos – 1995] Th. Hasanis, Th. Vlachos, Hypersurfaces in E 4 with harmonic mean curvature vector field , Math. Nachr. 172 (1995), 145–169. [Loubeau, Montaldo, Oniciuc – 2008] E. Loubeau, S. Montaldo, C. Oniciuc, The stress-energy tensor for biharmonic maps , Math. Z. 259 (2008), 503–524. 52 / 55

  70. References II [Montaldo, Oniciuc, Ratto – 2016] S. Montaldo, C. Oniciuc, A. Ratto, Biconservative Surfaces , J. Geom. Anal. 26 (2016), 313–329. [Montaldo, Oniciuc, Ratto – 2016] S. Montaldo, C. Oniciuc, A. Ratto, Proper biconservative immersions into the Euclidean space , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 195 (2016), 403–422. [N. – 2016] S. Nistor, Complete biconservative surfaces in R 3 and S 3 , J. Geom. Phys. 110 (2016) 130–153. [N. – 2017] S. Nistor, On biconservative surfaces , preprint, arXiv: 1704.04598. [N., Oniciuc – 2017] S. Nistor, C. Oniciuc Global properties of biconservative surfaces in R 3 and S 3 , preprint, arXiv: 1701.07706. 53 / 55

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend