BEYOND BARYCENTRIC ALGEBRAS AND CONVEX SETS A. KOMOROWSKI, A. B. - - PDF document

beyond barycentric algebras and convex sets
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BEYOND BARYCENTRIC ALGEBRAS AND CONVEX SETS A. KOMOROWSKI, A. B. - - PDF document

BEYOND BARYCENTRIC ALGEBRAS AND CONVEX SETS A. KOMOROWSKI, A. B. ROMANOWSKA Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland J. D. H. SMITH Department of Mathematics, Iowa State


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BEYOND BARYCENTRIC ALGEBRAS AND CONVEX SETS

  • A. KOMOROWSKI, A. B. ROMANOWSKA

Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland

  • J. D. H. SMITH

Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OUTLINE

  • Affine spaces, convex sets and

barycentric algebras

  • Extended barycentric algebras
  • q-convex sets and

q-barycentric algebras

  • Threshold barycentric algebras

and threshold affine spaces

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

AFFINE SUBSPACES of Rn R - the field of reals; I◦ :=]0, 1[= (0, 1) ⊂ R. The line Lx,y through x, y ∈ Rn: Lx,y = {xy p = x(1 − p) + yp ∈ Rn | p ∈ R}. A ⊆ Rn is a (non-trivial) affine subspace of Rn if, together with any two distinct points x and y, it contains the line Lx,y. One obtains an algebra (A, {p | p ∈ R}).

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CONVEX SUBSETS of Rn The line segment Ix,y joining the points x, y: Ix,y = {xy p = x(1 − p) + yp ∈ Rn | p ∈ I◦}. C ⊆ Rn is a (non-trivial) convex subset of Rn if, together with any two distinct points x and y, it contains the line segment Ix,y. One obtains an algebra (C, {p | p ∈ I◦}).

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

AFFINE SPACES F - a subfield of R An affine space over F (or affine F-space)

  • an algebra (A, F), where

F = {p | p ∈ F} and xyp = p(x, y) = x(1 − p) + yp. Note: (A, F) is equivalent to the algebra

  • A,

n

  • i=1

xiri

  • n
  • i=1

ri = 1 in F

  • .

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

THE VARIETY OF AFFINE F-SPACES THEOREM: The class F of all affine F-spaces is a variety (equationally-defined class). It is axiomatized by the following: idempotence: xxp = x, entropicity: xyp ztp q = xzq ytq p, affine identities: xyp xyq r = xy pqr, trivial identities: xy0 = x = yx1, for all p, q, r ∈ F. For each p ∈ F with p = 0, 1, the reduct (A, p)

  • f an affine F-space (A, F) is an (idempotent

and entropic) quasigroup. Hence the algebra (A, F \ {0, 1}) is an (idempotent and entropic) multi-quasigroup.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

BARYCENTRIC ALGEBRAS F - a subfield of R, I◦ :=]0, 1[= (0, 1) ⊂ F. A convex set over F (or convex F-set) - an algebra (A, Io), where Io = {p | p ∈ I◦}. The class C of convex F-sets forms a quasivariety. The variety generated by C is the variety B

  • f barycentric algebras.

The variety B is axiomatized by the following: idempotence (I): xxp = x , skew-commutativity (SC): xy p = xy 1 − p =: xy p′ , skew-associativity (SA): [xyp] z q = x [yz q/(p ◦ q) ] p ◦ q for all p, q ∈ I◦, where p ◦ q = (p′q′)′ = p + q − pq.

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

EXAMPLES

  • Convex subsets of affine F-spaces under the
  • perations

xy p = xp′ + yp = x(1 − p) + yp for each p ∈ I◦. The subquasivariety C of the variety B is defined by the cancellation laws (xy p = xz p) → (y = z) for all operations p of I◦.

  • “Stammered” semilattices (S, ·) with the
  • peration x · y = xyp for all p ∈ I◦.

They form the subvariety SL of B defined by xy p = xy r for all p, r ∈ I◦.

  • Certain sums of convex sets
  • ver semilattices.

THEOREM: Each barycentric algebra is a subalgebra of a P lonka sum of convex sets over its semilattice replica.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

EXTENDED BARYCENTRIC ALGEBRAS Barycentric algebras may be considered as extended barycentric algebras (A, I), where I = [0, 1] ⊂ R, and with the operations 0 and 1 defined by xy 0 = x and xy 1 = y. Skew associativity may also be written as: [xyp ]zq = x[ yz (p ◦ q → q) ] p ◦ q (SA), where p → q =

  

1 if p = 0; q/p

  • therwise

Proposition: The class B of extended barycentric algebras is a variety, specified by the identities (I), (SC), (SA) and the two above.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

EXTENDING THE CONCEPTS

  • f a CONVEX SET

and of a BARYCENTRIC ALGEBRA Want to extend the concepts of a convex set and a barycentric algebra, while retaining as many key properties of barycentric algebras as possible. Two types of extensions obtained by:

  • 1. using different intervals of the field F;
  • 2. using more general rings.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

q-CONVEX SETS A convex subset C of an affine F-space A is an I◦-subreduct of A (subalgebra of (A, I◦)). Replace the interval I◦ by an open interval ]q, q′[, where q ∈ F with q ≤ 1/2 and q′ = 1 − q. A subalgebra

  • C, ]q, q′[
  • f
  • A, ]q, q′[
  • is called

a q-convex set. The class Cq of all q-convex subsets of affine F-spaces is a quasivariety. The variety Bq generated by the quasivariety Cq is called the variety of q-barycentric algebras. Note: C0 = C, and B0 = B. B1/2 = CBM (the variety of commutative binary modes)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SOME BASIC PROPERTIES Proposition: Let t ∈ F. If −∞ < t < 0, then under the operations of [t, t′] the line F is generated by {0, 1}. If 0 < t < 1/2, then under the operations of [t, t′] the interval I is generated by {0, 1}. Proposition: Free Bq-algebra over X is isomorphic to the subalgebra generated by X in the ]q, q′[-reduct (XF, ]q, q′[) of the free affine F-space (XF, F) over X. Corollary: In each q-convex set, the

  • perations of [t, t′], for t = 0 and t = 1/2,

either generate all operations of I◦,

  • r all operations of F.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CLASSIFICATION THEOREM Let q ∈ F with q ≤ 1/2. Then each variety Bq is equivalent to one of the following: (a) the variety CBM of commutative binary modes, if q = 1/2 ; (b) the variety B of barycentric algebras, if 0 ≤ q < 1/2 ; (c) the variety A of affine F-spaces, if q < 0.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

THRESHOLD ALGEBRAS Set a threshold t, where t = −∞ or t ∈ F with t ≤ 1/2. For elements x, y of an affine F-space, define xy r =

      

x if r < t; xy r = x(1 − r) + yr if t ≤ r ≤ t′; y if r > t′ for r ∈ F. Then the binary operations r are described as threshold-t affine combinations (small, moderate and large respectively). For a given threshold t, the algebra (A, F), where F = {r | r ∈ F}, is called a threshold-t affine F-space.

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proposition: Let t be a threshold. Let A be an affine F-space. Then under the threshold-t affine combinations r for r ∈ F, the threshold- t affine F-space (A, F) is idempotent, entropic and skew-commutative. For a given threshold t, the class At of threshold-t affine F-spaces is the variety generated by the class of affine F-spaces under the threshold-t affine combinations. For 0 ≤ t ≤ 1/2, similar definitions provide the concepts of threshold-t convex combinations, threshold-t convex sets, and the variety Bt

  • f threshold-t barycentric algebras.

If t = −∞, then A = A−∞. If t = 1/2, then A1/2 ≃ B1/2 ≃ CBM, If 0 < t < 1/2, then At ≃ Bt ≃ B, A0 ≃ B.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

MAIN RESULT THEOREM Each variety of threshold affine F-spaces is equivalent to one of the following classes: (a) the variety A of affine F-spaces; (b) the variety B of extended barycentric algebras; (c) the variety CBM of extended commutatve binary modes.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Some references

  • Gudder, S.P.: Convex structures and
  • perational quantum mechanics, Comm. Math.
  • Phys. 29 (1973), 249–264.
  • Jeˇ

zek, J., Kepka, T.: The lattice of varieties

  • f commutative abelian distributive groupoids,

Algebra Universalis 5 (1975), 225–237.

  • Komorowski, A., Romanowska, A., Smith,

J.D.H.: Keimel’s problem on the algebraic axiomatization of convexity, Algebra Universalis (2018), 79-22.

  • Komorowski, A., Romanowska, A., Smith,

J.D.H.: Barycentric algebras and beyond, Algebra Universalis (2019), 80:20.

  • Neumann, W.D.: On the quasivariety of

convex subsets of affine spaces, Arch. Math. (Basel) 21 (1970), 11–16.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Or

lowska, E., Romanowska, A.B., Smith, J.D.H.: Abstract barycentric algebras, Fund. Informaticae 81 (2007), 257–273.

  • Ostermann, F., Schmidt, J.:

Der baryzentrische Kalk¨ ul als axiomatische Grundlage der affinen Geometrie,

  • J. Reine Angew. Math. 224 (1966), 44–57.
  • Romanowska, A.B., Smith, J.D.H.:

Modal Theory, Heldermann, Berlin, 1985.

  • Romanowska, A.B., Smith, J.D.H.: On the

structure of barycentric algebras, Houston J.Math. 16 (1990), 431–448.

  • Romanowska, A.B., Smith, J.D.H.: Modes,

World Scientific, Singapore, 2002.

  • Skornyakov, L.A.: Stochastic algebras,
  • Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. 29 (1985),

3–11.