Below the Knee Interventions Are they ever justified for - - PDF document

below the knee interventions are they ever justified for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Below the Knee Interventions Are they ever justified for - - PDF document

Below the Knee Interventions Are they ever justified for Claudication? Shant Vartanian, MD Associate Professor of Surgery Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery University of California, San Francisco 4/5/2019 Case Presentation 59


slide-1
SLIDE 1

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 1

Below the Knee Interventions Are they ever justified for Claudication?

4/5/2019

Shant Vartanian, MD Associate Professor of Surgery Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery University of California, San Francisco

Case Presentation

§ Half block claudication

  • Pain every day at work
  • Walks every day

§ Quit smoking > 10 years ago § Taking atorvastatin, ASA § Resting ABI 0.94 § Exercise ABI 0.73

  • Unable to complete exercise ABI protocol (heel raise) due to calf

pain 59 year old construction worker

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 2

Case Presentation

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 3

Case Presentation

§ A. Plain balloon angioplasty § B. Vessel prep + Drug Eluting Balloon § C. Oribital atherectomy § D. Angioplasty with Drug Eluting Stent § E. Rotational atherectomy § F. Molding balloon § G. Not interventional: Add Cilostazol and propose work modification The next best treatment option for this patient is?

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 3

Claudication

§ Body pain § Walking impairment § Progressive loss of independence § Decline in physical conditioning § Depression Negative impact on Quality of Life

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 5 4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 6

  • 1508 patients with claudication seen from 1947 – 1953
  • Most diagnosed with angiography
  • Seen every 3 months with treadmill walking test
  • No patients treated surgically
  • Diabetes in 4%

Bloor K.. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1961 Jan;28(1):36-52.2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 4

Atherosclerosis of the Lower Extremities

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 7

§ Benefit persist over 5 years for those that live that long § 60% of mortality due to cardiac disease Natural History

55% Improved 35% Stable

Atherosclerosis of the Lower Extremities

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 8

Natural History

slide-5
SLIDE 5

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 5

Claudication: Practice Guidelines

§ Medical therapy and Supervised Exercise

  • Improved pain-free and total walking distance in IC compared

§ Revascularization

  • Estimate of disease-specific disability
  • Lack of improvement with first-line measures (OMT + SET)
  • Individualized risk-benefit analysis for the interventions under

consideration SVS and AHA

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 9

Clinical Trials in Claudication

§ Pelvic collateral circulation ≠ geniculate collateral circulation How much benefit can we extrapolate to infra-popliteal disease? Primary Evidence

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 10

Trial Anatomic Location CLEVER Aortoiliac MIMIC Aortoiliac & Femoropopliteal ERASE Aortoiliac or Femoropopliteal Masari et al (Hull) Femoropopliteal Bo et al Aortoiliac or Femoropopliteal

slide-6
SLIDE 6

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 6

BTK for Claudication

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 11

BTK for Claudication

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 12

3x 2x

slide-7
SLIDE 7

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 7

BTK for Claudication

§ High technical success of endovascular interventions § Trend to OBL, outpatient therapy § Economic incentives for interventions § We can do it. Should we? Has the threshold for intervention lessened?

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 13

Goals of Treatment

§ Relief of lower extremity pain § Improvement in ambulatory function § Hemodynamic parameters correlate poorly with the degree of functional impairment § Anatomic patterns of disease correlate poorly with symptom severity or limb prognosis For Intermittent Claudication

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 14

Quality of Life

slide-8
SLIDE 8

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 8

State of the Evidence

§ Objective and self-reported functional outcomes

  • Walking Scores
  • QOL

§ No studies of BTK interventions with endpoints relevant to claudication Endpoints of Relevance

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 15

State of the Evidence

§ Anatomic patency is directly linked to hemodynamic improvement

  • Necessary but not sufficient for functional gain

§ Some threshold of durability for an invasive procedure should be expected

  • SVS: goal > 50% primary patency at 2 years

§ Weigh technical factors that affect interventional durability

  • Lesion length
  • Calcification
  • CTO vs stenosis

Endpoints of Relevance

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 9

BTK Interventions

§ Device trials for regulatory approval are designed to test the devices, not address the GOC for claudication § TLR

  • Device specific performance for repeat clinical procedures

§ Clinically driven TLR

  • Many patients who lose patency may not need or want a

reintervention § Repeat interventions of any kind are a major clinical event Does anything work well enough?

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 17

Infra-popliteal PTA 439 limbs

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 18

Lo RC J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jun;57(6):1455–63.

1 yr primary patency < 50% Worst patency outcomes with: § Lesion length > 10cm § Dense calcification § ESRD

SVS: goal > 50% primary patency at 2 years

slide-10
SLIDE 10

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 10

§ Limitations include variability as to how patency was assessed and defined § At 1 year: ‒ Repeat interventions in 18% ‒ Major amputation 15% ‒ All cause mortality 15%

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 19

52 studies with 9399 infra-popliteal lesions in analysis

JA Mustapha. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016 Primary patency through 1 year with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal atherosclerotic lesions.

J.A. Mustapha et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003468

SVS: goal > 50% primary patency at 2 years

slide-11
SLIDE 11

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 11

Drug Eluting Balloons

§ Mechanical disruption combined with drug delivery § Paclitaxel (high concentration) + excipient § In.Pact-Deep Trial

  • DCB vs PTA in 358 patients
  • Patency endpoints broadly similar

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 21

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(15):1568–76.

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 22

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(15):1568–76.

Lesion length 10cm 40% CTO SVS: goal > 50% primary patency at 2 years

slide-12
SLIDE 12

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 12

Drug Eluting Stents

§ BMS bail out option for flow limiting dissection § Loss of bypass targets § Cost § Do the benefits of DES in CAD also apply in the below knee arteries

  • 5 randomized trials comparing DES vs PTA
  • Mix of claudication and CLI

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 23

Hammad TA Curr Cardiol; 2017 Jul;19(7):58.

§ Patency seems to favor DES over PTA or BMS

  • Small numbers
  • 12 month restenosis 25%
  • 12 month primary patency 45%-75%

Sirolimus or Everolimus eluting stents

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 24

Yukon Achilles Destiny Patients 161 200 140 Lesion Length 31 mm 27 mm 27 mm Trial DES vs BMS DES vs PTA DES vs BMS

Drug Eluting Stents

SVS: goal > 50% primary patency at 2 years

slide-13
SLIDE 13

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 13

Hammad TA Curr Cardiol; 2017 Jul;19(7):58.

Quality of Evidence is Suboptimal

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 25

Summary of Atherectomy Device Selection Below the Knee

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 26

slide-14
SLIDE 14

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 14

Risks of Intervention

§ Accelerated progression and multiple re-interventions § Risk of converting IC to limb threat § Treatment failure are not innocuous The Treatment Trap

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 27

Consequences of Failed PTA

§ Distal anastomotic site was negatively impacted in 28% of failed endovascular infrainguinal interventions § Risk of target site change is greater in CLI than claudication

  • 42% vs. 11%

§ Decreased long term secondary patency

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 28

Joels CS, York JW, et al. JVS 2008 vol. 47 (3) pp. 562-5

No free lunch!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 15

First, do no harm…

§ Medicare claims data § 1440 patients undergoing atherectomy for claudication § Stratified by hospital based vs office based venue § Tibial atherectomy for claudication

  • 40% reintervention rate
  • 6-11% any amputation
  • 5-8% major amputation

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 29

Worse than the natural history of untreated disease

Is there any suitable anatomy?

Every rule has an exception

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 30

slide-16
SLIDE 16

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 16

Summary

§ Goal of Care for claudication ≠ chronic limb threat ischemia § Revascularization considered only after optimization of 1st line therapies § Individualized risk/benefit assessment

  • Know the limitations of BTK interventions

‒ Durability and Risk

  • First do no harm

§ Extremely selective (if ever) application of PVI for BTK in claudication Below Knee Interventions for Claudication

4/5/2019 BTK for Claudication 31

slide-17
SLIDE 17

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 4/8/19 17

Specialty Balloons

§ Chocolate Registry Study § Single arm – 180 patients with infrapopliteal interventions § <2% flow limiting dissection § Short follow up with technical endpoints § Unclear is any additional clinical value over traditional PTA

4/21/18 UCSF Vascular Symposium 33

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(15):1568–76.

Pathogenesis of the Limb Manifestations and Exercise Limitations in Peripheral Artery Disease, Volume: 116, Issue: 9, Pages: 1527-1539, DOI: (10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303566)