BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES Understand traditional barriers of conversion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

behavioral objectives
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES Understand traditional barriers of conversion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES Understand traditional barriers of conversion to PAPRs Understanding the need for increased focus to optimize protection Understand proper protocols/fit test challenges Features to consider when reviewing PPE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BEHAVIORAL OBJECTIVES

  • Understand traditional barriers of conversion to PAPRs
  • Understanding the need for increased focus to optimize

protection

  • Understand proper protocols/fit test challenges
  • Features to consider when reviewing PPE for Bio-Hazards
  • Understanding the positive impact of PAPRs
slide-2
SLIDE 2

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

  • Discuss Historical Standard of Care
  • PAPR Use in Infection Control & Prevention
  • Understand The Difference In The Levels of Protection

Offered Between N95/PAPR

  • Identify & Understand The Critical Elements Involved

In Evaluating Optimum Levels of Protection w/PAPRs

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Changing the Respirator

Standard of Care

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HISTORICAL STANDARD OF CARE (SOC) – N95

  • PROS
  • Simple Device
  • Perceived Ease of Stocking/Distribution
  • Minimal up front/initial purchase price
slide-5
SLIDE 5

HISTORICAL STANDARD OF CARE (SOC) – N95

  • CONS
  • High level of user intolerance leads to high level of non

compliance…poor overall protection

  • Reality of time consuming and complex
  • rdering/stocking/distribution due to different brands, types

and sizes required by HCW differences

  • On-going costs are extremely high
  • Fit testing and fit testing equipment
  • Managing those “no-fit” employees
slide-6
SLIDE 6

HISTORICAL STANDARD OF CARE (SOC) - N95

  • BOTTOM LINE ISSUES
  • N95s currently accepted by many w/o challenge
  • Reluctance by many to consider modern-design PAPR

technology alternatives now available

  • Inherently higher protection factors
  • Demonstrated greater use-tolerance
  • Financial analysis demonstrated lower cost-over-time

implementation

  • Most singular solution for all at-risk personnel
slide-7
SLIDE 7

PAPR USE IN INFECTION CONTROL & PREVENTION

  • Traditional Barriers to Convert to PAPRs
  • Bulky/Heavy
  • Limited freedom of movement
  • Auditory issues – cannot use stethoscope
  • Must be able to hear patient vitals
  • Battery memory
  • No confidence in performance
slide-8
SLIDE 8

PAPR USE IN INFECTION CONTROL & PREVENTION

  • Traditional Barriers to Convert to PAPRs
  • High cost of disinfection
  • Higher cost to replace disposables
  • Complicated instructions for use
  • If HCWs are expected to wear PAPRs…they must be simple

to use

  • High cost of ownership
  • High cost of disposables
  • Increased cost due to premature disposal due to high cost of

disinfection

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PAPR USE IN INFECTION CONTROL & PREVENTION

  • Patient Safety a Major Concern
  • Too long to don traditional PAPRs
  • Bulk and weight limit freedom of movement
  • Noise can inhibit communication w/patient
  • Less patient friendly
slide-10
SLIDE 10

PAPR USE IN INFECTION CONTROL & PREVENTION

  • Focus Needs To Increase On
  • Policy and Quality Education of PAPRs
  • Optimize implementation of PAPRs
  • Battery Maintenance
  • Simplify Cleaning & Storage Requirements
  • Comfort/Protection
  • Real time monitoring of air flow/battery charge
  • Patient safety
  • Utilizing new technology/designs in PAPRs
slide-11
SLIDE 11

N95 DISPOSABLE RESPIRATOR

  • “N” – The respirator is NOT resistant to oil
  • “95” – 95% efficient
  • Estimated efficiency of N95s
  • 80% - 85% due to differing facial structures
slide-12
SLIDE 12

PAPR LEVEL OF PROTECTION

  • 99.97% efficiency
  • “N” rated equivalent/comparable
  • Typically are not used in oily atmospheres
  • Bacterial & Viral contaminants
  • NO chemical protection
slide-13
SLIDE 13

PROPER FIT TEST PROTOCOL

  • Administrative activities
  • Threshold Sensitivity Screening
  • Test subject’

s ability to detect test agent

  • Allow sense of smell to clear
  • 7 breathing exercises
  • Each exercise to last one minute
  • Stop test if subject detects odor
  • Fit with new respirator
  • Complete administrative paperwork
slide-14
SLIDE 14

COMMON MAJOR MISTAKES DURING FIT-TESTING

  • Failure to conduct proper user seal check
  • No threshold sensitivity screening
  • Insufficient # of squeezes – fit test solution
  • Incorrect number/length of exercises
  • Failure to conduct proper type of exercises that may

potentially identify leakage

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Healthcare workers are on duty & must respond to patient care

hindering Fit Testing

  • Fit Testing is time consuming and places a strain on the workload
  • f any Occupational Health Department
  • Cost of Fit Testing is a high expenditure against budgets
  • Fit Testing is required annually placing further burden on human

resources and budgets

FIT TEST CHALLENGES

slide-16
SLIDE 16

GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF PPE FOR INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PPE CONSIDERATIONS – WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN EVALUATING PPE

  • Mobility – ease of movement
  • Comfort – breathing resistance
  • Visibility – peripheral vision
  • Eye protection
  • Hearing
  • Status of system operation
  • Use of primary care equipment
  • Donning/Doffing
  • Disinfection
slide-18
SLIDE 18

PPE CONSIDERATIONS – WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN EVALUATING PPE

  • Decontamination procedures
  • Time
  • Materials
  • Effectiveness
  • Storage
  • Define the role - affected departments
  • Training Provided
slide-19
SLIDE 19

THE BENEFITS OF CONSIDERING THE USE OF PAPRS

  • Higher levels of protection
  • Higher levels of breathing comfort
  • Longer-term protection
  • Greater degree of safety
  • Job performance safety
  • Recent advances in design built around
  • Comfort
  • Safety
  • Designed to enhance safety…comfort…ability to perform work-

related tasks

slide-20
SLIDE 20

COSTS OF NOT CONSIDERING HIGHER LEVELS OF PROPER PPE

  • Increased risk of exposure
  • Reduced safety for the HCW
  • Reduced comfort
  • Higher cost of operation
  • Minimal protection
  • Abuse of protection
  • Hidden costs of employee exposure
slide-21
SLIDE 21

REASONS GIVEN FOR NOT WEARING PAPRS

  • Bulky
  • Uncomfortable
  • Self-conscious
  • Won’t use it
  • Difficult to hear
  • Difficulty in performing duties
  • Patient reaction
  • Use of stethoscope limited
  • Too costly
  • Human Nature – resist change w/the unfamiliarity
  • Vanity
slide-22
SLIDE 22

PAPR USE IN INFECTION CONTROL & PREVENTION

  • Need for commitment to worker safety
  • Protection of HCWs
  • Increased understanding of PPE
  • Appropriate PPE use needs strengthening
  • Convenience does not assure protection
  • Increased protection is not unmanageable
slide-23
SLIDE 23

QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER

  • Is “minimum” or “less than optimal protection” really

acceptable for your HCW’s?

  • Is Fit Testing
  • QLFT/QNFT time
  • Equipment cost
  • Time away from work – to get to “minimum” protection –

really worth it?

  • Are you really prepared?
slide-24
SLIDE 24

THE TAKE HOME MESSAGE IS…

  • Understand the “Sense of Urgency” in your facility
  • Take the time to understand your options
  • Carefully & objectively know the PPE pros & cons
  • Choose the Optimum solution
  • Keep in mind your primary goal…the protection of

your healthcare workers