behavior in social networking services sns martin falck
play

Behavior in Social Networking Services (SNS) Martin Falck-Ytter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Empirical Study of Valuation and User Behavior in Social Networking Services (SNS) Martin Falck-Ytter Infrastructure Engineer marf@steria.no www.steria.com An Empirical Study of Valuation and User Behavior in Social Networking


  1. An Empirical Study of Valuation and User  Behavior in Social Networking Services (SNS) Martin Falck-Ytter Infrastructure Engineer marf@steria.no  www.steria.com

  2. An Empirical Study of Valuation and User  Behavior in Social Networking Services Harald Øverby Associate Professor haraldov@item.ntnu.no Steria Corporate presentation  www.steria.com 23/03/2012 2

  3.  Motivation  Is each network connection of equal value?  Does content productivity increase with network size?  What generates value in a network and how do you model it?  www.steria.com

  4.  Agenda I. Introduction A. Network Effects B. Network Laws: - Sarnoff’s law - Metcalfe’s law - Zipf’s law II. Our Study Content popularity: SNS and Zipf’s Law A. B. Correlation between productivity and network size in SNS C. Proposed model for SNS valuation  www.steria.com

  5.  Network Effects  Utility of consumption is affected by the number of other users using the same or compatible products  Examples include telephone networks and social networking services  www.steria.com

  6.  Sarnoff’s law   www.steria.com

  7.  Metcalfe’s law   www.steria.com

  8.  Zipf’s law   www.steria.com

  9.  Zipf’s law  www.steria.com

  10.  Agenda I. Introduction A. Network Effects B. Network Laws: - Sarnoff’s law - Metcalfe’s law - Zipf’s law II. Our Study A. Content popularity: SNS and Zipf’s Law B. Correlation between productivity and network size in SNS C. Proposed model for SNS valuation  www.steria.com

  11.  Content popularity - Twitter and Zipf’s Law  Zipf’s law was used to model popularity of Twitter users  An Internet page containing statistics for the 10 020 most popular Twitter users was used as data basis  The value of the exponent, s, in Zipf’s law was optimized to find the best-fit Zipf probability mass function  www.steria.com

  12.  Raw data from Twitter 6 6x 10 5 Number of followers 4 3 2 1 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Popularity rank  www.steria.com

  13.  Optimization of the exponent, s (Twitter)   www.steria.com

  14.  Twitter compared with Zipf’s law  www.steria.com

  15.  Content popularity - Youtube and Zipf’s Law  Zipf’s law was used to model popularity of Youtube videos  Number of views for the 160 most popular Youtube videos was retrieved  The value of the exponent, s, in Zipf’s law was optimized to find the best-fit Zipf probability mass function  www.steria.com

  16.  Raw data from Youtube 8 6 x 10 5 4 Number of views 3 2 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Popularity rank  www.steria.com

  17.  Optimization of the exponent, s (Youtube)  The procedure performed was the same as with the fitting of Zipf’s law with Twitter.  The optimal value of the exponent this time, s , was 0.45  www.steria.com

  18.  Youtube compared with Zipf’s law  www.steria.com

  19. Correlation between productivity and network  size in SNS  The relationship between network size and content created in SNS was studied to see whether content productivity increases with network size  15 social networking services provided information about network size and content productivity  Various best-fit functions were calculated and tested  www.steria.com

  20. Correlation between productivity and network  size in SNS  www.steria.com

  21. Correlation between productivity and network  size in SNS  The quadratic model fitted the data significantly better than the linear model  Consequently, average productivity increased with network size for SNS studied  www.steria.com

  22.  Estimated value of Social Networking Services  Three alternative response surface models for valuation of SNS were based on network size, average content created per day and actual market value in United States dollar  Only five social networks were able to provide the information needed for our valuation model  The software Mathematica 8 was used to calculate a best-fit linear, quadratic and power response surface  www.steria.com

  23.  Estimated value of Social Networking Services   www.steria.com

  24.  Estimated value of Social Networking Services  www.steria.com

  25.  Conclusions   www.steria.com

  26.  Questions? Martin Falck-Ytter Infrastructure Engineer marf@steria.no  www.steria.com

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend