behavior education plan
play

Behavior Education Plan March 31, 2014 Supported by Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Behavior Education Plan March 31, 2014 Supported by Research National research shows that exclusionary practices are ineffective in changing student behavior. Research also shows: - Suspension and expulsion predict higher rates of


  1. Behavior Education Plan March 31, 2014

  2. Supported by Research • National research shows that exclusionary practices are ineffective in changing student behavior. • Research also shows: - Suspension and expulsion predict higher rates of future misbehavior - School removals are associated with a higher likelihood of school dropout - Suspension and expulsion increase the likelihood that the child or youth will enter the criminal justice system

  3. L ost Instr uc tion Days of Instruction Lost - Out-of-School Suspensions 7064 6640 6327 6278 6075 1117 983 1174 1143 461 958 604 808 582 513 722 844 686 4548 4467 4421 4074 3618 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Asian African American Hispanic Two or more races White In 2013-13, students lost more than 6,000 days of instruction due to suspensions.

  4. Dispr opor tionality MMSD Demographics Spring 2013 Out-of-School Suspensions 2012-13 8% 13% 19% 15% 1% 19% 60% 45% 11% 9% African American Hispanic Asian White Two or more races African American Hispanic Asian White Two or more races Large disparities exist between MMSD demographics and shares of suspensions 15% 51% 52% 52% 72% 76% 84% 91% 85% 49% 48% 48% 28% 24% 16% 9% Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of MMSD Suspensions MMSD Suspensions MMSD Suspensions MMSD Suspensions Not low-income Not ELL Not Special Education Male Low-income ELL Special Education Female

  5. Our current state requires a shift in our thinking and our day-to- day practices.

  6. Developing the Behavior Education Plan • Board started the process and created the ad hoc committee on September 16 • Series of eight focus groups • Survey to all MMSD families • Input from principals, teachers, families, students, community leaders collected • Guidance from national expert and other urban districts

  7. Guiding Principles • We are grounded in a strong focus on engagement and learning. • Whenever possible, we avoid exclusionary practices. • We believe in teaching and intervention over consequences and punishment. • We support progressive discipline, not zero tolerance.

  8. Guiding Principles • We believe that strong school-family partnerships are important. • We will use disaggregated data to identify disparities, monitor progress and drive decisions. • We believe that every child, when provided with appropriate support, can learn and succeed. • We support proactive problem-solving on behalf of students.

  9. Overview of Behavior Education Plan • Teaching and learning model rather than rules and consequences model - Plan outlines interventions rather than only disciplinary consequences - Discipline must be paired with interventions • Progressive discipline - Always start at the lowest level and increase interventions as necessary

  10. Overview of Behavior Education Plan • Decrease exclusionary practices - Suspension no longer allowed for response levels one and two - Use of school suspension dramatically decreased – by 20 violations in elementary, 10 in secondary - Elimination of aggravating factors - Increased use of restorative practices

  11. Overview of Behavior Education Plan • Parents included as partners at problem- solving table • Plan requires staff to contact parents immediately if a suspension occurs, within 24 hours if there is no suspension • Plan requires regular data analysis and problem-solving by school teams and central office

  12. Implementation • Integrating BEP into School Improvement Plans - Goals and measures around behavior in climate and culture section • BEP toolkit • Focus on professional development • Regular data monitoring, adjustments as needed • BEP coordinator to work with schools

  13. Intensive Support Like in our school support system, some schools will require intensive support in implementation: • Funding or seats at professional development on classroom management • Additional PBS support through increased internal coach or consultation with external coach • Additional psychologist, social worker to provide tier two or three interventions • Additional support for restorative practices Through school improvement planning process, SBLTs and principals work to identify what would best support implementation in their school.

  14. Questions

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend