Before the Environmental Review Tribunal April 2009 1 The Tribunal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

before the environmental review tribunal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Before the Environmental Review Tribunal April 2009 1 The Tribunal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Overview of the Hearing Process Before the Environmental Review Tribunal April 2009 1 The Tribunal and its Members Established by legislation Arms length, independent and impartial Members appointed by Cabinet Members have


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An Overview of the Hearing Process Before the Environmental Review Tribunal

April 2009

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Established by legislation  Arm’s length, independent and

impartial

 Members appointed by Cabinet  Members have diverse backgrounds

Members Wear Three Hats:

1.

Environmental Review Tribunal

2.

Niagara Escarpment Hearing Office

3.

Office of Consolidated Hearings

The Tribunal and its Members

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Efficiently and effectively resolve

environmental and development issues through:

Mediation Public hearings Decisions/recommendations

 Provide excellent customer service

through:

Website search engine Guides

The Tribunal Role

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ERT/NEHO/OCH Proceedings

 Clean Water Act, 2006  Consolidated Hearings Act  Environmental Assessment Act  Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993  Environmental Protection Act  Greenbelt Act, 2005  Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act  Nutrient Management Act, 2002  Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, 2001  Ontario Water Resources Act  Pesticides Act  Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Appeals

 Clean Water Act, 2006; Environmental Protection Act; Ontario

Water Resources Act; Nutrient Management Act, 2002; Pesticides Act; Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002

 Director’s Order*  Director’s refusal to issue, or cancellation or suspension

  • f an approval*

 Terms and conditions of an approval  Right to appeal within 15 days*  Further right of appeal to Divisional Court and/or to

Minister of the Environment (except Clean Water Act, 2006) 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Leave to Appeal under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993

 Act’s purpose is broad  Standing (s. 38 (1))

 A person seeking Leave to Appeal a decision regarding a Class I or II instrument must be an Ontario resident and have an “interest” in the decision

 Two-part test for Leave to Appeal (s. 41)

 Leave to appeal a decision shall not be granted unless it appears to the appellate body that,

  • There is good reason to believe that no reasonable person, having

regard to the relevant law and to any government policies developed to guide decisions of that kind, could have made the decision; and

  • The decision in respect of which an appeal is sought could result

in significant harm to the environment.

 Hearing usually conducted by written submissions  No right of appeal

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Applications Under:

 The Environmental Assessment Act

Protection, conservation and wise management of the environment Undertakings Terms of Reference for an Environmental Assessment (EA) Government and Public Review of EA. Public may request that the Minister refer a matter to the Tribunal for a Hearing Minister can approve the EA or require a Hearing Terms of Reference for a Hearing

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Applications Under:

 The Environmental Protection Act

Protect and conserve the natural environment Approvals for waste disposal sites and waste management systems Discretionary/ mandatory Hearings Relevant considerations Appeal to Cabinet and Divisional Court

 The Ontario Water Resources Act

Conserve, protect and manage Ontario’s waters Prevent impairment of any water body Sewage works Discretionary/mandatory Hearings Appeal to Cabinet and Divisional Court

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Proceedings Under:

 The Consolidated Hearings Act

A Joint Board conducts all hearings (ERT and OMB members) Proponent requests consolidation Broad powers Establishment of a Joint Board Right to appeal to Cabinet

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proceedings Under:

 The Greenbelt Act, 2005 (“GA”)

 Greenbelt Plan amendments, OMB and Joint Board appeals stayed under the GA, municipal official plan and zoning by-law amendments referred by the Minister to conform with the Greenbelt Plan  After hearing – provide a summary of the evidence and recommendations to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing  No statutory right of appeal

 The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, 2001 (“ORMCA”)

 Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan amendments, OMB appeals stayed under the ORMCA, municipal official plan and zoning by-law amendments referred by the Minister to conform with the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan  After hearing – provide a summary of the evidence and recommendations to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing  No statutory right of appeal

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Appeal of a decision of the Niagara Escarpment

Commission regarding development permits

 Hearing Officer  Recommendations and reports given to the Minister of

Natural Resources

Plan Amendment Applications

 Must consider Act’s objectives  Hearing Officer  Recommendations provided to the Niagara Escarpment

Commission

 Commission recommends to the Minister of Natural

Resources

 Lieutenant Governor in Council considers the Minister’s

recommendations

Development Permit Appeals

Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act (“NEPDA”)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Mediation

 Voluntary  Conducted after the Preliminary Hearing  Members are trained and experienced  Confidential and without prejudice  Governed by Rules of Practice and Practice Directions  Not applicable to NEPDA, ORMCA and GA

proceedings 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Hearing Process

 Governed by the procedures provided by:

the enabling legislation the Statutory Powers Procedure Act (where applicable) the Tribunal’s Rules of Practice and Practice Directions the Tribunal member conducting the hearing

 Usual steps in the hearing process

Tribunal provides Notice of Hearing Preliminary Hearing/ Pre-Hearing Conference The Hearing

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Preliminary Hearings/ Pre-Hearing Conferences  Are usually conducted in person, except under NEPDA,

where the Pre-Hearing Conference is usually conducted by teleconference

 Identify/Designate persons who wish to participate

Parties Participants Presenters

 Determine and simplify issues  Determine whether any agreed facts  Identify the witnesses  Set deadlines for exchange of information  Schedule dates, set location for the hearing  Develop Procedural Directions, if appropriate  Hear preliminary motions

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Participating in a Hearing

15

 As Presenter

May be a witness and present evidence at a pre-arranged time Be questioned by the Tribunal and the Parties Upon request, receive a copy of documents exchanged by the Parties Cannot call or cross-examine witnesses, make submissions, seek review, ask for or be subject to costs

 As Participant

In addition to the above, make oral and written submissions to the Tribunal

 As Party

All of above plus, call or cross-examine witnesses Seek costs (if legislation or Rules permit) Seek review of the Tribunal’s Decision, where available

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Witnesses / Sharing Information

16

 Rules of Practice and Practice Directions for Technical/Opinion

Evidence

fair and full disclosure plain language

 A witness statement should indicate:

the witness’ interest in the application whether the evidence is factual or opinion a complete statement of the evidence

 Rules regarding summons to witness do NOT apply to proceedings

under the ORMCA and GA

Exchange of Documents

 Relevant documents must be disclosed, and documents relied on by the

Parties that are submitted to the Tribunal prior to the start of the Hearing,

  • ther than the Appeal or Application, shall be provided in duplicate

Representatives

 Where a Party, Participant or Presenter is represented, all communication

to them from either the Tribunal or the other Parties shall be through their representative

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Tribunal’s Decision: Dismissal

17

 Dismissal for non-compliance

 Failure to comply with Rules, orders, undertakings or written requests from the Tribunal that cause persistent undue delay maybe result in dismissal of the proceedings  Does NOT apply to proceedings under ORMCA and GA, or to Niagara Escarpment Plan amendments under NEPDA, unless the Niagara Escarpment Plan amendment is under the CHA

 Motion for Dismissal: A party may bring a motion to dismiss

proceedings if:

 The matter is outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal  The matter is frivolous, vexatious or is commenced in bad faith  Statutory requirements have not been met  Another party has caused undue delay or has not complied with the Rules,

  • rders, undertakings, or written requests from the Tribunal

 Does NOT apply to: NEPDA, ORMCA or GA

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Tribunal’s Decision: Dismissal (cont’d)

 Dismissal on Tribunal’s initiative

 The matter is outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal  Statutory requirements have not been met  Does NOT apply to proceedings under ORMCA and GA, or to Niagara Escarpment Plan amendments under NEPDA, unless the Niagara Escarpment Plan amendment is under the CHA

 Motion for Dismissal of Appeals of Development

Permits under NEPDA: a party may bring motion to dismiss proceedings if:

 The appeal does not disclose a planning justification, is not in the public interest, is without merit, is frivolous or vexatious or is made

  • nly for the purpose of delay

 Notice of appeal does not specify reasons for appeal  Person who appealed decision has not responded to a request by the Tribunal for further information within the time specified by the Tribunal  The matter is outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Tribunal’s Decision: Review

 A Party can apply for a reconsideration of an Order or Decision of

the Tribunal. The Party must:

 Serve and file a Notice of Motion within

  • 10 days for orders and decisions made under the Environmental Bill of

Rights or the Consolidated Hearings Act

  • 30 days for any other statute

 Factors Tribunal will consider:

  • jurisdiction
  • material errors of law or fact
  • new evidence
  • extent to which any person or other Party relied on the order or

decision

  • whether decision is under appeal or judicial review
  • whether the public interest in finality of orders and decisions is
  • utweighed by the prejudice to the requester

 NOT applicable to:

  • EAA, NEPDA, ORMCA or GA proceedings

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Power to Award Costs

Two Tiers of Cost Powers:

1. Broad cost powers under specific statutes

  • Consolidated Hearings Act – section 7
  • Environmental Assessment Act – section 21
  • Environmental Protection Act – section 33
  • Ontario Water Resources Act – section 7

 Costs do not follow the event  Are not limited to considerations that govern the award of costs in any Court

2. Under section 17.1 of SPPA Tribunal has limited authority to award costs in situations of improper conduct

 applies to all proceedings before the Tribunal except proceedings under ORMCA and GA, and Niagara Escarpment Plan Amendments under NEPDA  When will tribunal make order for costs?

– The conduct of a party has been unreasonable, frivolous or vexatious or a party has acted in bad faith

Only Parties are liable to pay cost orders and are eligible to receive cost awards.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

For Further Information . . .

(416) 314-4600 www.ert.gov.on.ca ERTTribunalSecretary@ontario.ca

Environmental Review Tribunal 655 Bay Street, Suite 1500 Toronto, ON M5G 1E5

21 Fax (416) 314-4506