Bee Network Engagement Event @GmWalks #BeeNetwork The purpose of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bee network engagement event
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bee Network Engagement Event @GmWalks #BeeNetwork The purpose of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bee Network Engagement Event @GmWalks #BeeNetwork The purpose of todays event Learn more about the Bee Network and the principles behind the network across Greater Manchester Learn more about walking infrastructure Contribute to the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bee Network Engagement Event

@GmWalks #BeeNetwork

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The purpose of todays event

  • Learn more about the Bee Network and the principles behind the

network across Greater Manchester

  • Learn more about walking infrastructure
  • Contribute to the discussion and create a louder ‘Walking Voice’ for

Greater Manchester

  • Widen audience engagement in consultation of the Network
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Todays Agenda

9:40am The GM Walking vision and opportunity Chris Boardman, GM Walking and Cycling Commissioner 9:55am The Bee Network Andy Howard, Planning & Delivery Officer TfGM 10:10am What is Walking Infrastucture? Becki Cox, Principal Technical Advisor, Living Streets 10:25am Questions to panel (Chaired by Jenny Wiles) Chris Boardman, Andy Howard and Becky Cox

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Todays Agenda

10:40am Workshops

1) Walking Infrastructure in Action Becki Cox and Jenny Wiles (Living Streets) 2) Walking: Barriers and Accessibility Nick Brelsford (Sustrans) 3) The Bee Network: Connecting to Greenspace Alan Manning (The Ramblers) 4) Walking In Their Shoes - How Can We Create Active Neighbourhoods & Engage With Everyone? Pauline Johnston (Levenshulme Bee Network)

12:20 Next Steps and Close- Alan Manning

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Join the GM Walking Voice

www.gmwalking.co.uk Greater Manchester Walking Ambition:

Progress so far and Evaluation Event

Thursday, 26 September 2019 9:30 – 13:00 First Floor Hall, King's House Conference Centre, King's Church, Sidney Street, Manchester M1 7HB info@gmmoving.co.uk

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Chris Boardman’s slides…

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Greater Manchester Bee Network

11th September 2019

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Plan open for public comment for 4

months

  • Over 4,000 online geo-referenced

comments received

  • Comments used to inform Plan updates
  • Many comments not resulting in Plan

changes still be valuable in informing scheme development/design

  • in excess of 1,000 mapping updates and

changes to the Plan across GM

  • v2.1 of the plan published June 2019

Bee Network evolution…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Bee Network Plan v2.1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Updated Bee Network Plan is…

  • A combined, joined-up walking and cycling network
  • A plan of what is needed, not necessarily what is possible
  • The result of many hundreds of hours of officer time;
  • Substantially revised with fewer errors;
  • Showing a significantly extended network with greater

geographical coverage; and

  • The starting point for districts planning MCF-funded

walking and cycling schemes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Updated Bee Network Plan is not …

  • Perfect or without error;
  • The finished article – it will always be a live

document;

  • Absolutely rigid;
  • A plan of ‘shovel-ready’ schemes; or
  • A final commitment to deliver specific schemes.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

How to turn the Plan… …into schemes on the ground?

Bee Network v2.1 Should be the starting point for all schemes Programme entry (approval sought from GMCA) Business case (approval sought from GMCA)

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Bee Network Standard tests:

  • Double Buggy
  • Unaccompanied 12 year old
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Design Check for MCF Schemes

Quality Criteria/Level of Service:

  • 72-point check
  • All MCF schemes must pass
  • 12 “criticals”
  • Of which, 8 relate directly to

walking

  • Of the overall 72 criteria, 57

relate directly or indirectly to walking

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How can I get involved?

Community-led schemes: Schemes generated by people for the areas they live in

  • What are the issues in your neighbourhood that

make cycling and walking difficult? Street audit.

  • What are the potential solutions? What

improvements would you like to see?

  • Engage with other local people
  • Demonstrate support for measures eg filtered

neighbourhoods

  • Engage with your local Council

Consultation

  • Take part – be heard!
  • Be an advocate for schemes you support
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thanks for listening.

Andy.Howard@tfgm.com

slide-21
SLIDE 21

WALKING INFRASTRUCTURE: THINKING BEYOND THE FOOTWAY

Becki Cox Principal Technical Advisor

@becksmoo

slide-22
SLIDE 22

WHAT IS CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE?

A little test…

slide-23
SLIDE 23

WHAT IS CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

WHAT IS WALKING INFRASTRUCTURE?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

LEEDS CITY CENTRE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

LEEDS CITY CENTRE

slide-27
SLIDE 27

UNDERSTANDING WALKING AND CYCLING

2011 report from Lancaster, Leeds and Oxford Brooks Universities Qualitative research Main barriers to walking:

  • Fears around physical safety (fear of
  • thers and of injury)
  • Discomfort – getting wet etc
  • Perception of abnormality
  • Complex family routines
slide-28
SLIDE 28

COMMUNITY STREET AUDIT

R O YA L B O R O U G H O F K E N S I N G T O N A N D C H E L S E A

Safety and perception of crime Lack of wayfinding Lack of places for young people Fly-tipping, rubbish, maintenance Attractiveness and green space Street / footway at railway station

slide-29
SLIDE 29

THREE LEVELS OF INFRASTRUCTURE

  • Macro – network planning, connectivity
  • LCWIP guidance
  • Treating walking as a transport mode
  • Guarding against piecemeal approach
  • Micro – finer detail (important to get right)
  • Crossings, dropped kerbs, footways, tactiles
  • Desire lines
  • Emotional – infrastructure that affects perception (secondary)
  • Lighting
  • Wayfinding
  • Conflict management (shared use paths)
  • Timings on crossings
slide-30
SLIDE 30

THREE LEVELS OF INFRASTRUCTURE

  • Macro – network planning, connectivity
  • LCWIP guidance
  • Treating walking as a transport mode
  • Guarding against piecemeal approach
  • Micro – finer detail (important to get right)
  • Crossings, dropped kerbs, footways, tactiles
  • Desire lines
  • Emotional – infrastructure that affects perception (secondary)
  • Lighting
  • Wayfinding
  • Conflict management (shared use paths)
  • Timings on crossings
slide-31
SLIDE 31

THREE LEVELS OF INFRASTRUCTURE

  • Macro – network planning, connectivity
  • LCWIP guidance
  • Treating walking as a transport mode
  • Guarding against piecemeal approach
  • Micro – finer detail (important to get right)
  • Crossings, dropped kerbs, footways, tactiles
  • Desire lines
  • Emotional – infrastructure that affects perception (secondary)
  • Lighting
  • Wayfinding
  • Conflict management (shared use paths)
  • Timings on crossings
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

THREE LEVELS OF INFRASTRUCTURE

  • Macro – network planning, connectivity
  • LCWIP guidance
  • Treating walking as a transport mode
  • Guarding against piecemeal approach
  • Micro – finer detail (important to get right)
  • Crossings, dropped kerbs, footways, tactiles
  • Desire lines
  • Emotional – infrastructure that affects perception (secondary)
  • Lighting
  • Wayfinding
  • Conflict management (shared use paths)
  • Timings on crossings
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

THREE LEVELS OF INFRASTRUCTURE

  • Macro – network planning, connectivity
  • LCWIP guidance
  • Treating walking as a transport mode
  • Guarding against piecemeal approach
  • Micro – finer detail (important to get right)
  • Crossings, dropped kerbs, footways, tactiles
  • Desire lines
  • Emotional – infrastructure that affects perception (secondary)
  • Lighting
  • Wayfinding
  • Conflict management (shared use paths)
  • Timings on crossings
slide-36
SLIDE 36

LOW TRAFFIC NEIGHBOURHOODS

Modal Filters

Bollards or similar (trees, seats, playgrounds!) that prevent vehicle access but allow people walking and cycling to pass through. Prevent rat running and create people friendly streets.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

LOW TRAFFIC NEIGHBOURHOODS

Continuous footway

Step change for walking! Give pedestrians priority over side road crossings; vehicles must wait.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Raised up to level

  • f footway

Should use the same materials so appear continuous Pulled back give way markings for drivers Ramped up to reiterate priority

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Footway level cycle track

New and improved shared use path! Visual contrast Should have a slight step between cycle track and footway Can have mini zebras

slide-40
SLIDE 40

3 TAKE HOME POINTS

  • Walking infrastructure is more than footways,

crossings and dropped kerbs

  • It is essential to understand perception

(especially of fear) and how infrastructure can affect it

  • Cycling infrastructure won’t automatically cater

for walking but good cycling infrastructure can and should cater for walking

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Becki Cox Principal Technical Advisor rebecca.cox@livingstreets.org.uk @becksmoo

Thanks for listening

WALKING INFRASTRUCTURE: THINKING BEYOND THE FOOTWAY

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Panel Discussion – Q & A

Chaired by Jenny Wiles, Regional Director (North), Living Streets Panellists

  • Chris Boardman, GM Walking and Cycling Commissioner
  • Andy Howard, Planning & Delivery Officer, TfGM
  • Becki Cox, Principal Technical Advisor, Living Streets
slide-43
SLIDE 43

The Workshops (40 minutes each)

1) Walking Infrastructure in Action (15 max) Becki Cox and Jenny Wiles (Living Streets) 2) Walking: Barriers and Accessibility Nick Brelsford (Sustrans) 3) The Bee Network: Connecting to Greenspace Alan Manning (The Ramblers) 4) Walking In Their Shoes - How Can We Create Active Neighbourhoods & Engage With Everyone? Pauline Johnston (Levenshulme Bee Network)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Next Steps & Close

@GmWalks #BeeNetwork