Beam Windows f or high t ransverse densit y beams By t he CERN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

beam windows
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Beam Windows f or high t ransverse densit y beams By t he CERN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Beam Windows f or high t ransverse densit y beams By t he CERN Groupe Mthodes L. Bruno Present ed by Targets & Dumps Section AB/ ATB NBI 2003 7-11 November 2003 1 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB) Beam Windows For


slide-1
SLIDE 1

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

1

Beam Windows

f or high t ransverse densit y beams

By t he CERN «Groupe Méthodes» Present ed by

  • L. Bruno

AB/ ATB

Targets & Dumps Section

slide-2
SLIDE 2

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

2

Beam Windows

For high t ransverse densit y beams

OUTLI NE

  • 1. Statement of the problem
  • 2. Standard window systems
  • 3. New developments
  • 4. Window materials
  • 5. Summary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

3

The structural problem

Primary st at ic membrane st resses

q=1 bar

Solid circular disc f ixed and held under unif ormly dist ribut ed pressure

σc Titanium a = 30 mm (Beam Line) σc = 264 MPa yc = 1. 4 mm a = 50 mm (Target Unit ) σc = 339 MPa yc = 2. 7 mm Thickness t=0. 1mm

The structural problem implies large displace- ments (yc>t/ 2), which call f or iterative solutions.

= 0°

slide-4
SLIDE 4

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

4

Comparison: Beryllium windows

Primary st at ic membrane st resses

q=1 bar

Solid circular disc f ixed and held under unif ormly dist ribut ed pressure

σc Beryllium Ø 2. 5” (a=~32mm) (Beam Line) σc = 166 MPa yc = 0. 37 mm Ø 4” (a=~51mm) (Target Unit ) σc = 222 MPa yc = 0. 84 mm Thickness Ø 2. 5”: t=0. 020” (0.508mm) Ø 4” : t=0. 025” (0.635mm)

The structural problem implies large displace- ments (yc>t/ 2), which call f or iterative solutions.

= 0°

slide-5
SLIDE 5

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

5

Temperature distribution

CNGS beam paramet ers

200 400 600 800

  • 0. 5

1

  • 1. 5

2

  • 2. 5

r [mm] Temperature [° C]

  • M. Sans

Nominal intensity Ultimate intensity

Beam sigma = 0.53 mm Nominal int . = 2.4 1013 p Ult imat e int . = 3.5 1013 p

r [mm]

The temperature distribution induced by the CNGS beam was evaluated by FLUKA. Temperatures higher than 50°C are af f ected by statistical errors <1%. The simulation covered 3 107 events with a 0. 25mm x 0. 1mm axi- symmetric binning.

544°C 758°C

Temperatures too high

slide-6
SLIDE 6

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

6

Comparison: Beryllium windows

CNGS beam paramet ers

50 100 150 200 250

  • 0. 5

1

  • 1. 5

2

  • 2. 5

3

Temperature [° C]

  • M. Sans

Nominal intensity Ultimate intensity

Beam sigma = 0.530 mm Nominal int . = 2.4 1013 p Ult imat e int . = 3.5 1013 p

r [mm]

The temperature distribution induced by the CNGS beam was evaluated by FLUKA. Temperatures higher than 50°C are af f ected by statistical errors <1%. The simulation covered 3 107 events with a 0. 4mm x 0. 1mm axi- symmetric binning.

150°C 205°C

SF=0.64 @ 200°C SF=0.73 @ 300°C a=~32mm SF=0.85 @ 200°C SF=0.97 @ 300°C a=~51mm

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

7

Temperature distribution

Test case: Beam sigma = 0.795 mm

100 200 300 400

  • 0. 5

1

  • 1. 5

2

  • 2. 5

3

r [mm] Temperature [° C]

  • M. Sans

Nominal intensity Ultimate intensity

Beam sigma = 0.795 mm Nominal int . = 2.4 1013 p Ult imat e int . = 3.5 1013 p

r [mm]

The temperature distribution induced f or a test case beam was evaluated by FLUKA. Temperatures higher than 50°C are af f ected by statistical errors <1%. The simulation covered 3 107 events with a 0. 4mm x 0. 1mm axi- symmetric binning.

266°C 372°C

SF=0.61 @ 300°C SF=0.69 @ 400°C a=30mm SF=0.78 @ 300°C SF=0.88 @ 400°C a=50mm

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

8

Temperature evolution

at t he beam spot – Test case

t [ms]

Titanium has a relatively low thermal dif f usivity of 2. 7 mm

2/ s (as a comparison, graphite

has 75 mm2/ s). This value implies a build- up of temperature at the second extraction. 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 5 10 50 100 500

266°C

T [°C]

Beam sigma = 0.795 mm Nominal int . = 2.4 1013 p

199°C @ t=50ms

slide-9
SLIDE 9

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

9

Brazed Windows

(SPS beam obst acles and monit ors) Foil Vacuum Air

Brazed joint

Flange “knif e”

Weld

“knif e” Flange

slide-10
SLIDE 10

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

10

Captive Windows

(nTOF Fast I nduct ion Chamber) Helicof lex j oint Foil Vacuum Air

Vacuum system

slide-11
SLIDE 11

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

11

Helicof lex j oint Foil Vacuum Air Reinf .

Reinf orced Captive Windows

slide-12
SLIDE 12

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

12

Window Materials

200 400 600 800 200 400 600 800

σy [MPa]

Cp [J kg-1K-1]

Ref ract ory Alloys

(Ti45.5Al2Nb2Cr ) (@704C-815C)

Ti- β Ti- α Ti- γ Ti 99%

(T111 - Ta8W2Hf ) (@540C-870C) (Nb10W2.5Zr @580C) (Ti6Al2Sn4Zr 2Mo) (Ti15Mo3Nb3Al.2Si)

Co Alloys

(Haines 188 @ 540C-870C) (I nconel 713LC) (@ 540C-870C)

Ni Alloys St . St eel

Captive reinf orced windows Captive windows

(L.Bruno, S.Sgobba)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

7-11 November 2003 NBI 2003 Present at ion by L.Bruno (CERN AB/ ATB)

13

Status and Future Activities

1. High specif ic heat, thermal dif f usivity and physical/ chemical stability (e. g. crystal growth,

  • xidation resistance) are key f actors;

2. De- coupling the pressure- bearing f rom the leak- tighness f unction eases design and lowers costs; 3. Standard iterative analytical design f ormulas are very conservative f or ductile materials. 4. Thermal stresses, stress waves, f atigue, axial shocks are to be studied. 5. Tests are planned at CERN under CNGS nominal beam load.