Basic concepts
- n magnetization reversal (1)
Static properties : coherent reversal and beyond
Stanislas ROHART Laboratoire de Physique des Solides Université Paris Sud and CNRS Orsay, France
Basic concepts on magnetization reversal (1) Static properties : - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Basic concepts on magnetization reversal (1) Static properties : coherent reversal and beyond Stanislas ROHART Laboratoire de Physique des Solides Universit Paris Sud and CNRS Orsay, France Introduction: Hysteresis loop Manipulation of a
Stanislas ROHART Laboratoire de Physique des Solides Université Paris Sud and CNRS Orsay, France
Introduction: Hysteresis loop
Manipulation of a magnetization : Application of a magnetic field
Zeeman energy : Ez=-µ0 H.MS H M Remanent Magnetization MR Coercive field HC Spontaneous Magnetization MS
2
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Introduction: Soft and Hard materials
H M H M Hard Materials SoftMaterials Applications : Permanent magnets, motors, magnetic recording Ex: Cobalt, NdFeB, CoSm, Garnets Applications : Transformer, flux guide (for electromagnets…), magnetic shielding Ex : Iron, FeCo, Permalloy (Fe20Ni80)
3
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Introduction: Energies in magnetic systems
Exchange energy Magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy Zeeman energy Dipolar energy
( )
2
θ ∇ = − = A S S J E
j i ex
r r
( )
2
.e m K EMC r r =
(simplest form, may be more complicated) reflects the cristal symmetry
H M EZ r r . µ − =
j ij i ij ij ij i D
m r m r r r m E r r r r r . ) . ( 3 4
3 5
− − = π µ
For practical use : shape anisotropy
M N M H M E
d D
r r r r ] .[ 2 1 . 2 1 µ µ − = − =
4
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Introduction: Micromagnetism: Typical Length Scales
Bloch wall
( )
θ θ
2 2
sin K dx d A E + =
Bloch wall parameter Bloch wall width Bloch wall energy
K A
B =
δ K A dB π = AK
B
4 = σ
Typical value : 2-3 nm (hard)
Exchange length
Λ 6 . 2 ~
2
2
S
M A µ = Λ
Typical value : 5-10 nm Ex : Magnetic vortex
5
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Quality factor ( )
2 2
2 δ µ Λ = =
S
M K Q
1 1 << > Q Q
hard soft
Introduction: Magnetic Domains
Bulk materials Mesoscopic scale Nanometric scale Complex magnetic paterns Self organization of domains Small number of possible configuration. Well defined states Magnetic single domain but non collinearities are still possible True collinear state at very reduced dimensions (< few Λ)
Cowburn et al. PRL 81, 5414 (1998) Cowburn J.Phys.D: Appl. Phys. 33, R1 (2000)
(square dots – 500 nm)
essential role [competition between dipolar energy (long range) and domain wall energy (local)].
hard material .
6
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
120 µm 130 µm
I. Coherent reversal
propagation
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 7
Coherent reversal: Macrospin hypothesis
Hypothesis : m(r)=cte=M (strong approximation)
H M M G E r r r . ) ( µ − =
Exchange energy is constant Dipolar energy equivalent to anisotropy energy Simplest model : Stoner and Wohlfarth
) cos( sin
2 H S eff
H M K E θ θ µ θ + − =
d mc eff
k K K + =
Anisotropy field :
S eff K
M K H / 2 µ =
Dimensionless equation :
) cos( 2 sin2
H
h e θ θ θ + − =
Easy axis
M
H θ θ θ θ θ θ θ θΗ
Η Η Η
Different names : Uniform rotation, coherent rotation, macrospin, Stoner and Wohlfarth model…
8
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
e
θ
−π/2 π/2 π 3π/2
e
θ
−π/2 π/2 π 3π/2
e
θ
−π/2 π/2 π 3π/2
e
θ
−π/2 π/2 π 3π/2
e
ϕ
−π/2 π/2 π 3π/2
e
θ
−π/2 π/2 π 3π/2
>0
Coherent reversal: Equilibrium states and switching
=
H
θ
(Field aligned with the anisotropy axis)
) (cos sin 2 cos 2 sin2 h e h e + = ∂ ∂ − = θ θ θ θ θ π θ θ θ θ θ θ
h e
m
: sin : cos = = = − = ⇒ = ∂ ∂
Stability
θ θ θ θ θ θ cos 2 2 cos 4 cos 2 cos 2 sin 2
2 2 2 2 2
h h e + − = + + − = ∂ ∂ ) 1 ( 2 ) ( ) 1 ( 2 ) ( ) 1 ( 2 ) (
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
h e h e h e
m
− = ∂ ∂ > − = ∂ ∂ + = ∂ ∂ π θ θ θ θ
h = 2 h = 1 h = 0 h = -0.5 h = -1 h = -2 >0 >0 <0
m=M/MS h
Square hysteresis loop Hswitch = HK
9
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Coherent reversal: Equilibrium states
θ θ cos 2 sin2 h e − =
m=M/MS h
Energy barrier
( ) (
) ( )
2 2 2
1 2 2 1 ) ( ) ( h h h h e e e
m
+ = − − + − = − = ∆ ϕ
For arbitrary angle :
Important for thermally activated switching
10
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Coherent reversal: Hysteresis Loops
) cos( 2 sin2
H
h e θ θ θ + − =
1 2
0.0 0.5 1.0
m h
θ = 0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0.0 0.5 1.0
m
h
θΗ = π/3
e
ϕ
−π/2 0
π/2 π 3π/2
e
ϕ
−π/2 0
π/2 π 3π/2
e
ϕ
−π/2 0 π/2 π 3π/2e
ϕ
−π/2 π/2 π 3π/2HC Hswitch Switching field (or reversal field)
Coercive field : M.H = 0
Hswitch=HC
11
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
0.0 0.5 1.0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 0.0 0.5 1.0
Coherent reversal: Switching field plot : astroids
Astroid curve : Polar plot of Hswitch
( )
2 / 3 3 / 2 3 / 2
cos sin
H H K switch
H H θ θ + =
] [ @ 4 3 ; 4 2 sin 2 1 ] [ @ 4 ; 4 π π π θ θ π π π θ ∈ − ∈ =
H H H switch C
if if H H
12
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
J.C. Slonczewski (1956)
Coherent reversal: Switching field plot : astroids
0.0 0.5 1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0
hy hx
( )
θ θ sin , cos . 2 ) ( = − = m m h m G e r r r r
Equilibrim condition
. 2 ) ( ' = − = e h m G d de r r r θ
with
( )
θ θ cos , sin − = e v
to the critial astroid curve, directed along m Stability condition
. 2 ) ( " ² ² > + = m h m G d e d r r r θ
2 stable states 1 stable state
J.C. Slonczewski Research Memo RM 003.111.224, IBM Research Center (1956)
13
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Easy axis Hard axis
Coherent reversal: Switching field plot : astroids
θ θ ² cos ² sin = G ) 6 / ²( sin ² cos ² sin π θ θ θ + + = G
(Cubic anisotropy) (Cubic anisotropy + uniaxial)
Thiaville PRB 61, 12221 (2000) Thiaville JMMM 182, 5, (1998)
14
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Coherent reversal: Experimental relevance
First observation (2D) : Co (D = 25 nm) cluster Wernsdorder et al. PRL 78, 1791 (1997) In 3 D: (same Co cluster) E. Bonnet et al PRL 83, 4188 (1999) 3 nm Co cluster : M. Jamet et al PRL 86, 4676 (2001)
15
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Coherent reversal: Experimental relevance
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 16
In technological application : memory cells Measurements of the astroids of elliptical M-RAM cells
(Dimensions in µm)
Conclusion : Good agreement with coherent rotation only for smallest elements. ⇒Apply coherent reversal with great care! ⇒In most systems Hswitch<<HK «Brown’s paradox» Sun et al. APL 78, 4004 (2001)
nanoparticles?
sufficient for coherent magnetization reversal?
magnetization reversal?
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 17
Nanoparticles: Phase diagram of nanostructures
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 18
Single domain state
(magnetization along easy axis)
3 2 2
3 4 6 1 2 R M M NV E
S S SD d
π µ µ × = =
DW DW d SD d SD
E E E R + = ⇔
2
36
S SD
M AK R µ =
centre -> exchange and anisotropy cost :
is closed in two domains:
AK R R E
BW DW 2 2
4π σ π = = 2 /
SD d DW d
E E =
Non uniform state : 1 domain wall
Domain wall width is neglected
anisotropy materials
θa θb θa θb
Nanoparticles: Phase diagram of nanostructures
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 19
Hypothesis : 2 localized moments at
2 /
/
R x
b a
± = 2 /
/
V M m
S b a
=
( ) ( )(
)
b a S b a S
H M K M R A V E
2 2 2 2 2
2 4 1 24 1 θ θ µ θ θ µ + − + − − =
Stability analysis : diagonalize the 2x2 matrix and find H that changes the sign of one eigenvalue
∂ ∂ ∂
j i
E θ θ
2
The two eigenmodes are :
K coh b a
H H = ⇒ =θ θ
2
8 3 R M A M H H
S S K incoh b a
µ θ θ + − = ⇒ − =
(coherent rotation)
incoh incoh H
H <
if
2
24
S
M A R µ >
Remarks :
SD coh R
R <
for real materials anisotropy does not enter in the criterion
Nanoparticles: Phase diagram of nanostructures
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 20
( ) ( )(
)
b a S b a S
H M K M R A V E
2 2 2 2 2
2 4 1 24 1 θ θ µ θ θ µ + − + − − =
Exchange : the two moments are distant of R and the angle variation is ∆=θa-θb. The exchange energy density is A(dm/dx)²~A(θa-θb)²/R² Dipolar energy : if θa=θb, the dipolar energy is µ0MS²/6. If the two angles are different, the total magnetization is lower so that Ed decreases by
Anisotropy energy : each hemisphere of volume V/2 has the anisotropy energy K[sin²θ]*V/2~2Kθ²V/4 Zeeman energy : each hemisphere of volume V/2 has the Zeeman energy
Real reversal mechanisms : Coherent Curling, Buckling
Nanoparticles: Phase diagram of nanostructures
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 21
For curling :
2
67 . 8 3 R M A M H H
S S K sw
µ + − =
2
26
S crit
M A R µ =
See: Aharoni Introduction to the theory of Ferromagnetism (1996) Skomski and Coey Permanent Magnetism (1999)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
HSW/HK R/Rcoh
Incoherent Reversal Coherent Reversal
Nanoparticles: Phase diagram of nanostructures
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 22
Phase diagram for a flat disk with surface anisotropy Keff = KS/t Skomski et al. PRB 58, 3223 (1998)
Nanoparticles : Influence of nanostructure inhomogeneity
Dipolar field effect
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 23
Uhlig and Shi APL 84, 759 (2004)
cte W t M H Oe H
S C K
+ = = 3 5000
Shape anisotropy ~ MS L/W but switching field intependant of L
Nanoparticles : Influence of nanostructure inhomogeneity
Dipolar field effect
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 24
Nanoparticles : Influence of nanostructure inhomogeneity
Edge and surface anisotropy in very small elements
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 25
Origin : enhanced magnetic anisotropy at low coordinated atoms Gambardella et al. Science 300, 1130 (2003) Jamet et al. PRL 86, 4676 (2001) Co islands on Pt(111) Nearly spherical Co cluster Néel pair anisotropy model
∑
> <
=
. . , 2
) . (
n n j i ij a
u m L E r r
On spherical clusters, atom anisotropy axis are perpendicular to the local surface
Kachkachi and Dimian PRB 66,174419 (2002) Néel J. Phys. Radium 15, 225 (1954)
Nanoparticles : Influence of nanostructure inhomogeneity
Edge and surface anisotropy in very small elements
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 26
Consequence of surface anisotropy axis distribution Non colinear magnetic configuration Atomic simulation : L/J=2 (unphysically strong surface anisotropy!) 1 particle assembly of many coupled spins h mz J ~ Ksurface >> Kvolume h mz J >> Ksurface = Kvolume 1 particle 1 macrospin Kachkachi and Dimian PRB 66,174419 (2002) Garanin and Kachkachi PRL 90 065504 (2003)
Nanoparticles : Influence of nanostructure inhomogeneity
Edge and surface anisotropy in very small elements
0.0 0.5 1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0
HZ/HK HX/HK
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 27
0.7155 0.7500 0.7845 0.8190 0.8535mZ Y (u.a.) X (u.a.)
Typical astroid with a 4th order anisotropy
Rohart et al. PRB 76, 104401 (2007) Garanin and Kachkachi PRL 90 065504 (2003)
Example: flat disk with edge anisotropy
Twisted inhomogeneous configuration
Exchange Shape anisotropy (in plane) Edge anisotropy (out of plane)
Effective anisotropy model
Nanoparticles: Vortices
⇒Strongly inhomogeneous magnetic state Cowburn et al. PRL 83, 1042 (1999) Wachowiak et al. Science 298 577 (2002) Four degenerated states :
28
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Nanoparticles: Vortices
Cowburn et al. PRL 83, 1042 (1999) Guslienko and Metlov PRB 63, 100403R (2001)
Stable vortex state Stable uniform state
The energy cost to expell the vortex core
29
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Hysteresis loop with IN PLANE magnetic field
Nanoparticles: Vortices
Shinjo et al. Science 289, 930 (2000)
30
Normal vortex state : magnetization is perpendicular to minimize exchange energy Vortex with Bloch point: magnetic moment are all almost in plane, mean magnetization is zero at the core
AR d drd r r E E r A r E
ex BP ex
π ϕ θ θ 8 sin ) ( / 2 ) (
2
∫∫∫
= = =
Beyond micromagnetism
Thiaville et al. PRB 67, 094410 (2003) Images from R. Dittrich http://magnet.atp.tuwien.ac.at/gallery/bloch_point/index.html
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Vortex core magnetization reversal Magnetic field is coupled to the vortex core only but coherent reversal of vortex core magnetization is topologically impossible
Nanoparticles: Vortices
31
Thiaville et al. PRB 67, 094410 (2003) Images from R. Dittrich http://magnet.atp.tuwien.ac.at/gallery/bloch_point/index.html Experiments : Okuno et al. JMMM 240, 1 (2006)
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Vortex core magnetization reversal
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 32
Is the macrospin model relevant for thin films ?
⇒Coherent reversal is unreallistic : need for micromagnetic modelling. ⇒Defect (even at very low density) may drive the switching field if domain wall propagation is involved
Brown’s paradox
Thin Films: Hard axis hysteresis loops
In some cases, coherent reversal can be applied to hard axis hysteresis loops H M H M 2K/µ0MS MS
prevented (the two orientation energies are the same) and coherent rotation is possible. => Application: determination of magnetic anisotropy and MS Example1: Soft magnetic film Permalloy thin film
anisotropy => Loop with perpendicular field yields a saturation field of MS
2 2 1 S d
M E µ =
Example2: « Anisometry » Ga(Mn)As thin film (with perpendicular magnetization)
with quasi in plane field (α)
( )
θ α θ θ cos ; cos 2 sin
s S eff
M M M K H = + =
MScos(α) MS -> Keff = 272 mT
J.P. Adam PhD. Thesis 2008
33
Principle/Application: Grolier et al. J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5939 (1993)
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Thin Films: Brown’s paradox
Origin of the lower coercivity : magnetic defects, temperature
34
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Thin Films: Nucleation vs. Propagation
First magnetization curve indicates the type of coercivity H M Nucleation limited reversal
followed by domain wall propagation
loops Pinning center Propagation limited reversal
Ex : Recording media Magnetization reversal is controlled by the micro/nanostructure
create nucleation centers
create pinning centers
35
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
Switching field of a Co(1 nm) film grown on Au(233)
well defined in plane anisotropy (step edges)
unpublished (2003)
Thin Films: Nucleation – « 1/cos θΗ law »
36
Nucleation of a reversed domain on defect -> Nucleation volume Nucleation cost (domain wall, anisotropy energy ) is compensated by Zeeman energy gain (plus thermal energy)
E
If : M is aligned with easy axis
H S z
vH M E θ µ cos 2 − = ∆
K c
H H <<
( )
H C H C z
H
H H kT E E θ θ
θ
cos 25
, =
= ⇒ − = ∆
Magnetization reversal if
Kondorsky, J. Exp. Theor. Fiz. 10, 420 (1940) See also : Givord JMMM 72, 247 (1988)
M H θH
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011
3
δ ≈ v
Thin Films: Nucleation vs. DW propagation Importance of dynamics
European School on Magnetism - Targosite 2011 37
Key ingredient :
Coercive field may not be an intrinsic property (ie. only linked to micromagnetic parameters)
See second part of the lecture
slow dynamics Pt/Co/Pt (From J. Vogel)
Some readings
Some readings
To go further
Take home messages
reversal mechanism
38