b wet national reporting and evaluation
play

B-WET National Reporting and Evaluation Bronwen Rice B-WET - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

B-WET National Reporting and Evaluation Bronwen Rice B-WET National Coordinator National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fall 2017 < B-WET Gulf of Mexico Purpose Review how grantees are asked to report on their grant


  1. B-WET National Reporting and Evaluation Bronwen Rice B-WET National Coordinator National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fall 2017 < B-WET Gulf of Mexico

  2. Purpose • Review how grantees are asked to report on their grant activities Progress reports 1. National evaluation 2. system 2 < B-WET Chesapeake

  3. Meaningful Watershed Educational Experiences (MWEEs) • The B-WET supports Meaningful Watershed Educational Experiences (MWEEs) for students and related professional development. • MWEEs are multi-stage activities that include learning both outdoors and in the classroom, and aim to increase the environmental literacy of all participants. • In 2016 the B-WET program adopted a revised MWEE definition: http://www.noaa.gov/explainers/noaa- meaningful-watershed-educational-experience 3 < B-WET Great Lakes

  4. Progress Reports vs. National Evaluation PROGRESS REPORTS NATIONAL EVALUATION Platform Grants Online Qualtrics web-based surveys What does the Uploads Word document (see 1) completes the grantee survey; PI do? progress report guidance) to 2) provides teacher contact info Grants Online for teacher survey Purpose Tracks progress toward Tracks satisfaction with, and specific tasks in a grant outcomes of, the B-WET and MWEE approach Scale Project/local level evaluation, National/regional level data reviewed by grant evaluation of B-WET approach, data reviewed in aggregate Timing Every 6 months from the start At the end of each grant year, of your grant (or as and periodically during grant for 4 established in your award) PD projects

  5. Progress Reports vs. National Evaluation PROGRESS REPORTS NATIONAL EVALUATION Example Your progress report will The National Evaluation will indicate progress toward indicate the effectiveness of your project goals as B-WET, and the MWEE measured by your project approach, to improving evaluation. For example, a environmental knowledge and PI in Alabama may want to conservation regardless of the know if "teachers location and specific local understand how oyster reef watershed environmental restoration can benefit issues. coastal Alabama and specifically the communities in the Mobile Bay watershed?" 5

  6. Progress Report Updates Progress report guidance (optional), • available here: http://www.noaa.gov/office- education/bwet/grantee-resources We're required to report on numbers • of teachers and students served by B- WET, your progress reports are the only way for us to get this info! MWEE definition includes Stewardship • Action Projects 6 < B-WET Hawai’i

  7. Stewardship Action Projects Grantees are now asked to report on stewardship activities as appropriate as part of your regular progress reports (metric units preferred, see guidance for details) Examples of stewardship actions include: Watershed Restoration or Protection (e.g., create schoolyard • habitat, planting trees or grasses, invasive species removal) Everyday Choices (e.g., reduce/reuse/recycle/upcycle, • composting, energy conservation, water conservation) Community Engagement (e.g., presentations, social media, • event-organizing, messaging at community events/fairs/festivals, mentoring, PSAs, flyers, posters) Civic Action (e.g., town meetings, voting, writing elected • 7 officials/decision makers, advocating for policy change)

  8. The B-WET National Evaluation System Collects information from grantees and from teacher participants in grantees’ professional development programming. Focuses on Meaningful Watershed Educational Experiences (MWEEs) Will answer these evaluation questions: To what extent do regional B-WET programs support grantees in • implementing Meaningful Watershed Educational Experiences (MWEEs) How are MWEEs implemented by grantees and teachers? • To what extent do B-WET funded projects increase teachers’ knowledge of • watershed concepts, their confidence in their ability to integrate MWEEs into their teaching practices, and the likelihood that they will implement high quality MWEEs? To what extent do B-WET funded projects increase students’ knowledge of • watershed concepts, attitudes toward watersheds, inquiry and stewardship 8 skills, and aspirations towards protecting watersheds?

  9. Components of the National Evaluation System For Grantees: Provide teacher contact info (email addresses) • Complete an online survey at the end of the grant period • (annually) For Teachers: Complete an online survey following their professional • development (“PD Survey”) Also receive a follow-up survey at the end of the following • school year (“MWEE Survey”) All information is collected via an online survey 9 management system (Qualtrics)

  10. What will we do with the data? • Ensure anonymity – intention is not to evaluate an individual teacher or grantee • B-WET and NOAA will review data in aggregate at the regional and national levels • Grantees may view their post-PD Survey and follow-up MWEE implementation survey results in aggregate through password protected private reports • Hope to be able to provide the aggregate data set to researchers to inform the field 10 < B-WET Great Lakes

  11. Some Results (Examples) The following examples are based on aggregate national data. Grantee reports will have the same results – just limited to the respondents associated with that grant. Grantees can access their project-specific PD survey results via a link provided in monthly reminder emails. The links stay the same, but results will update as teachers respond. 11 < B-WET Gulf of Mexico

  12. Grantee Survey About how many hours of MWEE professional development and/or support did your organization typically provide for any one teacher this past grant year? 12

  13. Teacher PD Survey Scale of 1-7 from (1) Strongly disagree to (7) Strongly agree Teachers also asked about their INTENTION to do these things in the future: 80% intend to Implement MWEEs in the future 13

  14. MWEE In the past 12 months, did you implement a Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience Survey (MWEE) with your students? 14

  15. What component(s) of the MWEE professional development best prepared you to teach your students about local watersheds? “I feel that the resources (photos, videos, lesson • plans/activities, and equipment) will make the most impact in allowing me to teach about our local watersheds.” “The web site that listed all the watersheds in my state. • It was easy to see how they are all connected.” “LOVE the data resources on-line.” • “Sharing ideas with other teachers on their plans and • being given great resources which I can access to create lesson plans and activities.” 15

  16. What is the most important benefit of MWEEs for your students? 16

  17. Evaluation Report Key Findings Stewardship Actions: 72% of teachers participated in at least one stewardship behavior during their professional development (PD), primarily in watershed restoration/protection (35%). 82% of teachers engaged their students in stewardship behaviors as part of their MWEEs, primarily in everyday choices (57%). Few teachers experienced civic actions during their PD (3%), engaged their students in these actions during MWEEs (11%), and expected students to engage in civic actions as a result of MWEEs. 17

  18. Evaluation Report Key Findings Teacher Professional Development Practices: MWEE PD increases teachers’ confidence and intention to implement MWEEs and their watershed literacy. There are some specific PD practices that predict teacher confidence and teacher perceptions of student outcomes. 75% of teachers implemented MWEEs with their students within 12 months of their PD. Teachers who were more confident in their abilities to implement MWEEs were more likely to do so. Preliminary evidence suggests that teachers who implemented MWEEs had spent more time outdoors during their PD. 18

  19. Question Break Questions? Could these (kinds of) results benefit your project and your work in general? 19 < B-WET California

  20. How the Data is Collected Beginning End of Grant Year Beyond of Grant Contact Info Survey Teacher Professional Grantee Survey Follow-up Teacher Development Survey “MWEE” Survey PD End Date MWEE and PD implementation Teacher Contact Info Expected teacher and student outcomes Descriptive information PD experiences MWEE implementation Instruction intentions Expected student Expected student outcomes outcomes 20 Descriptive information Descriptive information

  21. Grantee Survey • All grantees (regardless of project type) will be asked to complete an online survey at the end of your grant period (or once per year if your grant is multiple years). • What is asked on the annual grantee survey: Grantee satisfaction with B-WET program • Student MWEE goals and implementation • PD goals and implementation • Project descriptive information • 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend