Autom ated Urban Transport CityMobil Project ( 2 0 0 6 -2 0 1 1 ) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

autom ated urban transport citymobil project 2 0 0 6 2 0
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Autom ated Urban Transport CityMobil Project ( 2 0 0 6 -2 0 1 1 ) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Autom ated Urban Transport CityMobil Project ( 2 0 0 6 -2 0 1 1 ) Michel Parent INRIA-IMARA michel.parent@inria.fr CityMobil ( 2 0 0 6 -2 0 1 1 ) Integrated Project (11M from EC- DG12) Analyses of Automation in Transit 3


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Michel Parent INRIA-IMARA michel.parent@inria.fr Autom ated Urban Transport CityMobil Project ( 2 0 0 6 -2 0 1 1 )

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Integrated Project (11M€ from EC-

DG12)

  • Analyses of Automation in Transit
  • 3 major demonstrations:

– Heathrow (PRT) – Rome (Cybercars) – Valencia (ABRT)

  • Showcases

CityMobil ( 2 0 0 6 -2 0 1 1 )

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Premiers concepts en 1990’s (Serpentine, RUF,

Dedale, Frog, ULTra,… )

  • Premiers prototypes en 1990’s
  • Première exploitation en 1997
  • CyberCars/ CyberMove en 2001
  • Demonstrations Antibes en 2004
  • MobiVIP (2004)
  • CyberC3 (2005)
  • CyberCars2 (2006)
  • CityMobil (2006)
  • Cristal (2007)
  • CityNetMobil (2008)
  • CityMobil2 (2012?)

Cybercars Story

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Dem onstration ABRT - Castellon

  • Spain
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Castellion ABRT

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • High cost due to city remodelling but

cheaper than a tramway

  • Flexibility in the implementation and

in the route

  • Excellent acceptation by the public
  • High quality of service
  • Good acceptation by the drivers

Lessons Learned

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ULTra in Heathrow

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Term inal 5 Station

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Heathrow w aiting tim es

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Heathrow Quality of Service

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Long development on the site

(technology was immature)

  • Difficulties in the certification
  • Ease of deploying the infrastructure
  • Excellent quality of service
  • Excellent image for Heathrow

Lessons learned

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cybercars

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rom e dem onstration

slide-14
SLIDE 14

La Rochelle: site

Electric boat harbour Museums area Technoforum (University area) / BRT line

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Floriades ( Am sterdam )

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

I NRI A CyBus

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Safety Analysis

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Accident

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • DATA COLLECTED MAI 20 TO JULY 30
  • NB OF PASSENGERS 899
  • NB OF INTERVIEWS 200
slide-25
SLIDE 25

CityMobil Presentation

USERS

Fem m e 4 9 % Hom m e 5 1 %

SEXE

< 1 6 ans 9 % 1 6 - 2 5 ans 2 7 % 2 6 - 3 5 ans 8 % 3 6 - 4 5 ans 1 0 % 4 6 - 6 0 ans 1 5 % > 6 0 ans 3 1 %

AGE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

7 3 % 2 7 %

SECURE?

  • ui

non 3 5 % 6 5 %

SAFE?

  • ui

non

Feeling by Passengers

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Cybercars in Cities?

9 4 % 6 %

Adapted to cities?

  • ui

non 9 3 % 7 %

generalized?

  • ui

non

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Lessons learned

  • Cybercars are still under

development but products exist

  • Users are willing to use them
  • Certification difficult
  • No problem with insurance
  • Need infrastructure adaptation
  • Should segregate from most other

vehicles

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Well adapted to car-sharing
  • Strong Drivers’ assistance
  • Full automation for:

– Relocalisation (platooning or automated tracks) – Parking – Dedicated track network – Fleet Management

New Generation Urban Vehicles

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Cristal - Lohr

slide-31
SLIDE 31

SST.2012.3.1-4. Automated urban vehicles Level 2 - CP-IP - Call: FP7-SST-2012-RTD-1 Funding: Possibly 10M€ Content and scope: The aim is to develop a real scale test and validation platform showing that automated urban transport systems have the potential to become a self-sustaining service which can really attract car users and be an efficient passenger transport solution which is complementary to conventional public

  • transport. A link to previous and on-going research activities (e.g. CITYMOBIL, CIVITAS, CYBERCARS II,

EDICT, HAVE-IT and INTERACTIVE) should be established. The proposals should also consider the European ITS communication architecture. The following research actions will be covered: Implement a large-scale pilot platform for technical and socio-economic test and validation in an urban environment. Perform research activities using the pilot demonstration test bed; research into technical, financial/funding, and cultural aspects, ex-post evaluation, behavioural research (accessibility, pricing elasticity, preferences), effects on land use, effects on policy and how new systems could fit into existing infrastructures, the development of a common evaluation methodology, and ideally, investigation into how different system

  • ptions could fit in different environments, e.g. Ground Rapid Transit (GRT) and Personal Rapid Transit

(PRT) in new towns, historic, large and small cities, etc. Carry out awareness campaigns. Awareness campaigns are seen as an integral component of the research to develop automated and space-efficient transport systems in order to promote the sustainability benefits of such schemes.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Michel.Parent@inria.fr w w w .lara.prd.fr w w w .citym obil-project.eu

Merci