Attention, Binding, and Consciousness 1. Perceptual binding, - - PDF document

attention binding and consciousness
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Attention, Binding, and Consciousness 1. Perceptual binding, - - PDF document

4/18/17 Attention, Binding, and Consciousness 1. Perceptual binding, dynamic binding 2. Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Binocular rivalry 3. Attention vs. consciousness 4. Binding revisited: Split-brain, split-consciousness 2 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

4/18/17 1

Attention, Binding, and Consciousness

1. Perceptual binding, dynamic binding

  • 2. Neural Correlates of Consciousness:

Binocular rivalry

  • 3. Attention vs. consciousness
  • 4. Binding revisited:

Split-brain, split-consciousness

2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

4/18/17 2

Attention conclusions

  • Attention enhances detection and reaction times
  • Spatial or feature attention can turn up the firing

rates of relevant neurons or their synchronization

  • Top-down attention (search) engages frontal areas

first, and emphasizes synchronization at lower frequencies (22-34 Hz)

  • Bottom-up attention (pop-out) engages posterior

parietal cortex first, and emphasizes synchronization at higher frequencies (35-55 Hz)

Neural Correlates of Consciousness (NCC)

The minimal neural activity sufficient for any one specific conscious percept.

4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

4/18/17 3

6

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4/18/17 4

Binocular rivalry: “follow the percept”

Sheinberg & Logothetis 1997 Inferior temporal (IT) cortex neurons

7

Inferior Temporal cortex

Superior temporal sulcus (STS) neuron

8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4/18/17 5 STS

9

NCC Conclusions so far

  • Most cells in higher visual areas (STS,

IT) “follow the percept” during rivalry, fewer in lower areas (V4, MT, V1/V2), suggesting that the NCC is not in V1.

10

slide-6
SLIDE 6

4/18/17 6

11

Dynamic binding by neural synchronization?

12

“By momentarily synchronizing the fast

  • scillations generated by different regions of cortex,

perhaps the brain binds together various neural components into a single perceptual construction. The evidence for this idea is indirect, far from proven, and understandably controversial.” —Bear p.592

slide-7
SLIDE 7

4/18/17 7

13

Gamma synchrony is

  • rganized

by theta rhythm before stable percept

  • nsets

14

slide-8
SLIDE 8

4/18/17 8

More NCC Conclusions

  • Most cells in higher visual areas (STS,

IT) “follow the percept” during rivalry, fewer in lower areas (V4, MT, V1/V2), suggesting that the NCC is not in V1.

  • Conscious perception may also

correspond to bursts of gamma synchronized neural activity organized by theta rhythms

15

Attention, Binding, and Consciousness

1. Perceptual binding, dynamic binding

  • 2. Neural Correlates of Consciousness:

Binocular rivalry

  • 3. Attention vs. consciousness
  • 4. Binding revisited:

Split-brain, split-consciousness

16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4/18/17 9

17 18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

4/18/17 10

19 20

slide-11
SLIDE 11

4/18/17 11

Attention and awareness recruit different oscillation frequencies

21

Neural Synchrony Conclusions

  • 1. Attention and awareness (and dreaming) are

all associated with increased synchronization

  • f gamma oscillations
  • 2. Distinct processes recruit distinct areas and

frequencies

  • 3. à “A fundamental mechanism engaged

whenever neural cooperativity is required.”

22

slide-12
SLIDE 12

4/18/17 12

Attention, Binding, and Consciousness

1. Perceptual binding, dynamic binding

  • 2. Neural Correlates of Consciousness:

Binocular rivalry

  • 3. Attention vs. consciousness
  • 4. Binding revisited:

Split-brain, split-consciousness

23

A single integrated whole: the intrinsic unity

  • f conscious

experience

slide-13
SLIDE 13

4/18/17 13

WHAT UNITY OF CONSCIOUSNESS?

Mike Gazzaniga 1967

slide-14
SLIDE 14

4/18/17 14

Communicating with a single hemisphere

“…let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth.” Matthew 6:3

slide-15
SLIDE 15

4/18/17 15

Multitasking: splitting the attentional bottleneck

Inter-hemispheric interference

slide-16
SLIDE 16

4/18/17 16

Serial search — in parallel!

SPLIT-BRAIN < 700 ms WHOLE-BRAIN ~ 700 ms

The left- hemisphere interpreter establishes a running narrative and self-concept

slide-17
SLIDE 17

4/18/17 17

Hemispheric specialization

Left is better at

  • Speaking, language
  • Problem solving, planning,

intelligence

  • Interpretation,

hypothesizing, story- making, confabulation

  • Voluntary smiling, top-down

attention Right is better at

  • Pattern matching
  • Face recognition
  • Perceptual grouping/illusory

contours

  • Dual tasks
  • 3D drawing
  • Being veridical
  • Global attention

Conclusions from split-brain studies

  • Although the right hemisphere has very limited

verbal abilities, surgically separating the hemispheres appear to result in two independent consciousnesses, one in each hemisphere: split-brain, split consciousness.

  • This result does not conflict with the observation
  • r claim that consciousness is an intrinsically

unified state

34