atta c hme nt adole sc e nt ha rmful se xua l be ha viour
play

Atta c hme nt & Adole sc e nt Ha rmful Se xua l Be ha viour Be - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Atta c hme nt & Adole sc e nt Ha rmful Se xua l Be ha viour Be x Da r by NSPCC (UK) Na tiona l Clinic a l Asse ssme nt & T r e a tme nt Se r vic e Intr oduc tion Ac tivity - A pilo t in the use o f AAI , pa re nts inte


  1. Atta c hme nt & Adole sc e nt Ha rmful Se xua l Be ha viour Be x Da r by NSPCC (UK) Na tiona l Clinic a l Asse ssme nt & T r e a tme nt Se r vic e

  2. Intr oduc tion • Ac tivity - A pilo t in the use o f AAI , pa re nts’ inte rvie w a nd T AAI in a sse ssme nt o f a do le sc e nts who displa y ha rmful se xua l b e ha vio ur. Se tting - A spe c ia list ha rmful se xua l b e ha vio ur se rvic e within a na tio na l UK c hild pro te c tio n c ha rity (the NSPCC). the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  3. Pur pose • As the ne w ma na g e r o f this multi-disc iplina ry te a m, whic h de sc rib e s itse lf a s a tta c hme nt info rme d, I wa nte d to se e ho w the DMM mo de l o f a tta c hme nt a nd F a mily F unc tio na l F o rmula tio n c o uld impa c t upo n the a sse ssme nts c urre ntly pro duc e d a nd inte rve ntio ns c urre ntly o ffe re d/ re c o mme nde d b y this te a m. • My te a m is c o mprise d o f fo ur so c ia l wo rke rs, a fa mily syste mic psyc ho the ra pist, a c o nsulta nt c linic a l psyc ho lo g ist, a psyc hia trist – a nd me ! the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  4. Pr oble m I n the c o urse o f the pilo t I wa nte d to unde rsta nd: Ho w we ll fa milie s wo uld e ng a g e with the a dditio na l • me e ting s a nd the pa rtic ula r style o f the inte rvie w/ s Whe the r re fe rre rs to o ur se rvic e wo uld b e willing to pa y • the a dditio na l c o st/ e sta b lish the ir fina nc ia l thre sho ld Ho w c o uld the c o nc e pts a nd c o nstruc ts o f the AAI / T AAI • a nd DMM b e sha re d me a ning fully with a te a m no t ye t tra ine d in the mo de l? Ho w c o uld the F F F b e inte g ra te d in to o ur c urre nt • a sse ssme nt re po rts? Whe the r the ne w info rma tio n wa s use ful to re fe rre rs • (usua lly so c ia l wo rke rs) a nd b e ne fic ia l to fa milie s. the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  5. Me thod • One c a se / fa mily wa s se le c te d a s a pilo t whe re b y a n AAI fo r e a c h pa re nt, a T AAI fo r the a do le sc e nt a nd the par vie w wo uld b e e nts inte r c o nduc te d, c o de d a nd inte g ra te d in to o ur multi-disc iplina ry re po rt a s a F mulation . amily F unc tional F or the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  6. Me thod All inte r vie ws a re c o nduc te d b y me a s a sta nda lo ne • pie c e o f wo rk (i.e . no ne o f the fa mily me t me in a ny o the r c o nte xt). Coding o f the tra nsc ripts is pro vide d b y the DMM • c o mmunity via Pa t Critte nde n (b y Pa t he rse lf in this c a se !) e tation o f individua l c la ssific a tio ns a nd F a mily Inte r pr • F unc tio na l F o rmula tio n is unde rta ke n b y the a utho rize d c o de r a nd sha re d with NSPCC re po rt a utho rs a nd wide r te a m in o ur c linic a l me e ting prio r to inc lusio n in the writte n a sse ssme nt. e e dba c k is o b ta ine d fro m the fa mily a nd re fe rring F • se rvic e o nc e the multi-disc iplina ry re po rt ha s b e e n sha re d. the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  7. T he family • 16 ye a r o ld b o y • De c e a se d o lde r b ro the r • Mo the r a g e d 42 • F a the r a g e d 48 the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  8. F amily histor y Childr e n’s se r vic e s Ke y c onc e rns/ pr oc e sse s e ve nts F irst re fe rra l to c hildre n’ s se rvic e s PND, ma te rna l se lf-ha rm & a tte mpte d • • o ve rdo se whe n T urb o is 6 we e ks o ld Do me stic dispute s, pa te rna l a lc o ho l • F ive e piso de s unde r a Child • misuse , lo w inc o me , ? de pre ssio n, NAI s Pro te c tio n Pla n fro m a g e 1y9m Child a g g re ssio n, so iling , spe e c h de la y • to 15 yrs se xua lise d b e ha vio ur a t sc ho o l, po o r pe rso na l hyg ie ne L e g a l pro c e e ding s (i.e . re mo va l) • c o nside re d twic e a t a g e 9y7m E lde st c hild dro wns a g e d 15 (T urb o is • 11y4m). T urb o thre a te ns to se t se lf a lig ht a nd 14y 8m sho rtly a fte rwa rds Multi-Syste mic T he ra py fo r Child • Vio le nt a nd se xua lise d b e ha vio ur pe rsists • Ab use a nd Ne g le c t (MST -CAN) a t sc ho o l de live re d a g e 10y6m to 11y7m; Ra pe a lle g a tio n whe n T urb o a g e d • pe rio d spa ns de a th o f e lde st 14y5m (NF Ad due to unre lia b le witne ss c hild a nd T urb o ’ s ina b ility to unde rsta nd c o nse nt) Re fe rra l to NSPCC a g e d 15y 10m • the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  9. Be rtino ro , 2008 Camb ridg e , 2010 Re sults? F rankfurt, 2012 Miami, 2015

  10. Pr e liminar y findings 1 a mily e ng a g e me nt : • F • F a mily (pa re nts) re fuse to tra ve l fo r me e ting s b ut pa rtic ipa te in AAI s a t lo c a l c hildre n’ s se rvic e s o ffic e • T urb o a vo ids b e ing se e n a t ho me ; pa re nts ‘ una b le ’ to pe rsua de him. ? Sa b o ta g e • T urb o se e n a t sc ho o l, suc c e ssfully • PI a rra ng e d a t sc ho o l ‘ fo rg o tte n’ ; q uic kly re sc he dule d a t ho me b ut T urb o re fuse s to b e in c a me ra sho t; he le a ve s ha lfwa y thro ug h the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  11. Pr e liminar y findings 2 • Re fe r r e r ’s inve stme nt • F a lse po sitive re . c o st – we o ffe r this a t no e xtra c o st due to pilo t sta tus • Ve ry suppo rtive o f a nd a c tive in lia ising with NSPCC, fa mily a nd sc ho o l to c o o rdina te a ppo intme nts the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  12. Pr e liminar y findings 3 ate gie s : • F amily attac hme nt str • T urb o : Dp Ul(a ) se lf l&tr(dp,dn) Bro (dn) PE N A4/ 6 • F a the r: (Dp) Ul(dpl) son→F re j se lf (p) b la me o the rs We sle y (ds) ma ny tr(p) re j b y F A1C+ • Mo the r: Dp Ul(a ) se lf, T urb o l&tr(dx,dp ,dn) We sle y tr(dp) b ully, F C (p&dp) CSA (dn) PE N A7 F the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  13. Pr e liminar y findings 4 itic a l c a use of dysfunc tion : • F F F & c r • Re je c tio n b y pa re nts le a ding to de pre ssio n in a ll fa mily me mb e rs, de lusio na l ide a liza tio n b y mo the r o f he r ne g le c tful fa the r, fe ig ne d he lple ssne ss b y fa the r, a nd c o mpulsive c o mplia nc e a nd se lf-re lia nc e b y T urb o who se e ks to c a re fo r his dise ng a g e d mo the r. the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  14. Pr e liminar y findings 5 Unspoke n and unspe akable : • • I c o nside r it po ssib le , e ve n like ly, tha t We sle y’ s de a th wa s fro m suic ide . I re c o g nize tha t no o ne ha s me ntio ne d suic ide (fro m so c ia l c a re o r the fa mily). T urb o sa ys no o ne ta lks a b o ut We sle y’ s de a th a t ho me . Sure ly no o ne did in the Pa re nts I nte rvie w with the so c ia l wo rke r. But e ve ryo ne spo ke o f it in the ir o wn pe rso na l inte rvie w. I f the re is an ide a that We sle y mig ht have c o mmitte d suic ide , it make s se nse in this family that no o ne wo uld disc uss it b e c ause it wo uld b e to o painful and it mig ht trig g e r the ne xt suic ide . the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  15. Comme ntar y on c hildr e n’s se r vic e s involve me nt • Ba se d o n the Pa re nts I nte rvie w, the pa re nts a re c o mplia nt with So c ia l Se rvic e s, b ut ha ve no t impro ve d in the ir c hild-re a ring . • …up to no w, e ithe r the pro b le m ha s no t b e e n unde rsto o d pro pe rly o r the se rvic e s o ffe re d we re ina ppro pria te fo r the fa mily o r b o th. the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  16. Inte gr ation & F e e dbac k • Gue ss wha t? T hing s didn’t g o to pla n! • Ca se disc ussio ns (inc luding DMM ma te ria l) will ta ke pla c e e a rly July. • I nte g ra te d re po rt to b e pro duc e d mid- la te July • F e e db a c k to b e o b ta ine d in writing a nd in pe rso n fro m pro fe ssio na ls a nd fa mily a s pa rt o f fina l re vie w me e ting the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  17. What c an this pilot c ontr ibute to the DMM? • Pro vide e vide nc e a s to ho w b e ne fic ia l the DMM c a n b e in unde rsta nding the pa thwa y to a nd c o nte xt a ro und ha rmful se xua l b e ha vio ur • Hig hlig ht whe re to fo c us inte rve ntio n fo r the yo ung pe rso n a nd the ir fa mily • I ntro duc e a n a g re e d fo rm o f la ng ua g e fo r e a c h c a se ne two rk fo r de sc rib ing a nd func tio na lly a na lysing a tta c hme nt b e ha vio ur. • I ntro duc e multiple re fe rring a g e nc ie s to the DMM • Pro vide a n e vide nc e b a se re lia b le e no ug h fo r sma ll sc a le re se a rc h in the future …? the inte rna tio na l a sso c ia tio n fo r the stud y o f a tta c hme nt

  18. Be rtino ro , 2008 Camb ridg e , 2010 T o download pr ogr am mate r ials, c lic k he r e https:/ / www.ia sa - dmm.org / ia sa - c onfe re nc e / F rankfurt, 2012 Miami, 2015

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend