asymptotics of higher genus string integrands
play

Asymptotics of higher genus string integrands Boris Pioline String - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Asymptotics of higher genus string integrands Boris Pioline String theory from a worldsheet perspective, GGI, FLorence, 16/4/2019 based on 1712.06135, 1806.02691, 1810.11343 in collaboration with Eric dHoker and Michael B. Green B.


  1. Asymptotics of higher genus string integrands Boris Pioline “String theory from a worldsheet perspective”, GGI, FLorence, 16/4/2019 based on 1712.06135, 1806.02691, 1810.11343 in collaboration with Eric d’Hoker and Michael B. Green B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 1 / 31

  2. Modular graph functions beyond genus one I In perturbative closed string theory, scattering amplitudes of N external states at h loop involve an integral over the moduli space M h , N of genus h curves Σ with N punctures z 1 , . . . z N . At fixed complex structure, this reduces to an integral over N copies of Σ . At genus one, the low energy expansion of the resulting integrand produces an infinite family of real-analytic modular forms labelled by certain graphs, known as modular graph functions. They exhibit remarkable asymptotics near the cusp ( finite Laurent polynomial plus exponential corrections ) and transcendentality properties. My goal will be to describe some hints of a similar structure at higher genus, primarily for N = 4 , g = 2. B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 2 / 31

  3. String integrand I Recall that the genus h contribution to N -point scattering amplitude is of the form � A h ( { k i , ǫ i } ) = I h ( { k i , ǫ i } ) M h , N where I h ( { k i , ǫ i } ) ∼ � � N i = 1 V k i ,ǫ i ( z i ) � 3 h − 3 | ( b , µ ) | 2 � is a correlator j = 1 in the worldsheet conformal field theory. The moduli space M h , N is fibered over M h ≡ M h , 0 , with fiber Σ 1 × · · · × Σ N . The vertex operators V k i ,ǫ i are ( 1 , 1 ) -forms over Σ i , while the ghost part produces a volume form on the base M h . I will focus on 1 ≤ h ≤ 3, where M h is isomorphic to a fundamental domain F h for the action of Sp ( h , Z ) on the Siegel upper half-plane H h (away from some divisors). B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 3 / 31

  4. String integrand II In the RNS formalism, I h originates from an integrand I h over the moduli space of super Riemann curves M h , N , after summing over spin structures and integrating over fermionic moduli. There is no canonical projection M h , N → M h , n , leading to total derivative ambiguities [Donagi Witten’13] . State of the art: h = 2 , N = 4 [D’Hoker Phong ’05] In Berkovits’ pure spinor formalism, b is a composite field involving powers of ( λ ¯ λ ) − 1 , leading to potential divergences from the region λ ¯ λ → 0. State of the art: idem, with partial results for h = 2 , N = 5 [Gomez Mafra Schlotterer ’15] and h = 3 , N = 4 [Gomez Mafra ’13] B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 4 / 31

  5. Modular graph functions beyond genus one I Although we do not know the integrand I h in general, for type II strings on T d we expect a result of the form � I h = δ ( k i ) Z KN ( { k i } ) Z T d P h ( { k i , ǫ i , z i } ) µ h where Z KN ( { k i , z i } ) = exp ( � i < j s ij G ( z i , z j )) is the Koba-Nielsen factor, with s ij = − α ′ 2 k i · k j the Mandelstam variables and G ( z i , z j ) the scalar Green function. Z T d is the genus- h Siegel theta series for a lattice of signature ( d , d ) P h ( { k i , ǫ i , z i } ) is a (1,1)-form in each position z i , and a Lorentz invariant homogeneous polynomial in k i , ǫ i µ h is the Siegel volume form over M h ≃ F h B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 5 / 31

  6. Canonical forms on compact curves I Let A I , B I ( I = 1 . . . h ) be a canonical basis of H 1 (Σ) , such that A I ∩ A J = B I ∩ B J = 0 , A I ∩ B J = δ IJ . Choose ω I a basis of � holomorphic differentials on Σ such that A I ω J = δ IJ . The period � matrix τ IJ = B I ω J satisfies τ > 0, hence τ ∈ H h . Under Sp ( h , Z ) change of basis, τ �→ ( a τ + b )( c τ + d ) − 1 . The I ≤ J | d τ IJ | 2 � Siegel volume form µ h = ( det Im τ ) h + 1 is invariant. An example of (1,1) form on Σ i is the canonical Kähler form 2 h Im τ IJ ω I ( z i )¯ i κ ( z i ) = ω J ( z i ) . Examples of ( 1 , 1 ) forms on Σ i × Σ j are κ ( z i ) κ ( z j ) and | ν ( z i , z j ) | 2 with ν ( z i , z j ) = Im τ IJ ω I ( z i ) ω J ( z j ) . Another example on h copies of Σ is | ∆( z 1 , . . . z h ) | 2 where ∆( z 1 , . . . z h ) = ǫ I 1 ... I h ω I 1 ( z 1 ) . . . ω I h ( z h ) is a (1,0)-form in each variable. B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 6 / 31

  7. Canonical forms on compact curves II The Arakelov Green function G ( z , w ) is a symmetric function on Σ × Σ defined by ∂ z ¯ ∂ z G ( z , w ) = − πδ ( 2 ) ( z , w ) + π κ ( z ) , � G ( z , w ) κ ( w ) = 0 , Σ � The r.h.s. integrates to zero thanks to Σ κ = 1, allowing G to be globally well-defined. � w In genus one, setting v = z ω = α + βτ , ′ 2 + 2 π � � ( Im v ) 2 = τ 2 e 2 π i ( m β − n α ) � ϑ 1 ( v ,τ ) � G ( z , w ) = − log � � η π | m + n τ | 2 τ 2 � ( m , n ) ∈ Z 2 B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 7 / 31

  8. Genus-one modular graph functions I After Taylor expanding in powers of s ij , and integrating over the positions z i of the vertex operators, the integrand is a linear combination of genus one modular graph functions, of the type κ ( z ) = d z d ¯ � z � � B Γ ( τ ) = G ( z i , z j ) κ ( z i ) 2 i Im τ Σ N / Σ ( i , j ) ∈ Γ i where ( i , j ) runs over the edges of the graph Γ (possibly dressed with derivatives wrt z i ) [d’Hoker Green Gurdogan Vanhove ’15] By construction, B Γ are real analytic modular functions. e.g. � • • G ( v ) k κ ( v ) D k ( τ ) = Σ gives E 2 for k = 2, E 3 + ζ ( 3 ) for k = 3. B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 8 / 31

  9. Genus-one modular graph functions II Modular graph functions satisfy an intricate set of algebraic and differential equations. Their expansion near the cusp τ → i ∞ has the remarkable form 1 − w a n ( πτ 2 ) n + O ( e − 2 πτ 2 ) � B Γ ( τ ) = n = w where w is the number of edges (i.e. degree in G ). The coefficients a n are single valued multizeta values of transcendentality degree w − n . d’Hoker Green Gurdogan Vanhove Zerbini Kaidi Basu Kleinschmidt Verschinin Gerken Schlotterer Duke . . . B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 9 / 31

  10. Genus-one modular graph functions III After integrating over τ ∈ F 1 , the coefficient of the effective 3 R 4 at one-loop (where σ n = s n + t n + u n ) is given interaction σ p 2 σ q by a regularized theta lifting, � E ( 1 , d ) � B Γ ( τ ) Z T d ( G ij , B ij ; τ ) µ 1 ( p , q ) = α Γ F 1 ( L ) Γ O ( d , d ) where G ij , B ij parametrize the Narain moduli space O ( d ) × O ( d ) and F 1 ( L ) = F 1 ∩ { τ 2 < L } is the truncated fundamental domain. The powerlike terms in B Γ ( τ ) are responsible for infrared divergences as L → ∞ . The full amplitude including non-analytic terms is finite when D > 4. More on this later. B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 10 / 31

  11. Higher genus modular graph functions I For h = 2, N = 4, the precise integrand is d’Hoker Phong ’05 k i ) R 4 |Y| 2 Z KN Z T d det Im τ µ 2 � I 2 = δ ( where Y = ( t − u )∆( z 1 , z 2 ) ∆( z 3 , z 4 ) + perm Z KN = e s [ G ( z 1 , z 2 )+ G ( z 3 , z 4 )]+ t [ G ( z 1 , z 4 )+ G ( z 2 , z 3 )]+ u [ G ( z 1 , z 3 )+ G ( z 2 , z 4 )] Σ 4 | ∆( 1 , 2 ) ∆( 3 , 4 ) | 2 ∝ 1 / det Im τ . At leading order, Z KN ≃ 1 and � The coefficient of the ∇ 4 R 4 interaction at genus 2 is then ( 1 , 0 ) = π � E ( d , 2 ) Z T d µ 2 ∝ E O ( d , d ) d − 3 2 2 Λ 2 F 2 ( L ) B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 11 / 31

  12. Higher genus modular graph functions II At next-to-leading order, one power of G ( z 1 , z 2 ) comes down from Z KN . The integral over z 3 , z 4 is easy. The coefficient of the ∇ 6 R 4 interaction at genus-two is [d’Hoker Green’13] � E ( d , 2 ) ( 0 , 1 ) = π ϕ KZ Z T d µ 2 F 2 ( L ) where ϕ KZ is the Kawazumi-Zhang invariant, defined by ϕ KZ = − 1 � | ν ( z 1 , z 2 ) | 2 G ( z 1 , z 2 ) 4 Σ × Σ where ν ( z 1 , z 2 ) = Im τ IJ ω I ( z 1 ) ω J ( z 2 ) . This is the simplest genus-two modular graph function, associated • • 1 2 (but the measure need to be specified) to the graph B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 12 / 31

  13. Higher genus modular graph functions III Using standard theory of complex structure deformations, one may show that ϕ KZ is an eigenmode of the Laplacian on M 2 , ϕ KZ = − 2 π det Im τ δ ( 2 ) ( v ) � � ∆ Sp ( 4 ) − 5 � which makes it east to compute F 2 ϕ KZ µ 2 [d’Hoker Green BP Russo’14] Integrating against Z T d , it follows that [BP Russo’15] � 2 � 2 � � E ( d , 2 ) E ( d , 1 ) E O ( d , d ) � � ∆ O ( d , d ) − ( d + 2 )( 5 − d ) ( 0 , 1 ) = − ∝ d − 2 ( 0 , 0 ) 2 Λ 1 hence E ( d , 2 ) ( 0 , 1 ) is not an Eisenstein series. Combined with information about asymptotics (see below), this shows that ϕ KZ can be obtained as a Borcherds’ type theta lift of 1 /η 6 from SL ( 2 ) to SO ( 3 , 2 ) = Sp ( 4 ) . This the weak Jacobi form θ 2 gives access to the full Fourier expansion [BP’15] . B. Pioline (LPTHE) Higher genus string integrands GGI, 16/4/2019 13 / 31

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend