asset prices in business cycle analysis
play

Asset Prices in Business Cycle Analysis David Backus (NYU), Bryan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Asset Prices in Business Cycle Analysis David Backus (NYU), Bryan Routledge (CMU), and Stanley Zin (CMU) New York Fed | November 16, 2007 This version: November 15, 2007 Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 1 / 34


  1. Asset Prices in Business Cycle Analysis David Backus (NYU), Bryan Routledge (CMU), and Stanley Zin (CMU) New York Fed | November 16, 2007 This version: November 15, 2007 Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 1 / 34

  2. Outline Pictures: leads and lags in US data Equations: the usual suspects + bells & whistles Computations: loglinear approximation More pictures: leads and lags in the model Extensions Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 1 / 34

  3. Leads and lags in data Leads and lags in US data Cross-correlation functions of GDP with ◮ Stock price indexes ◮ Interest rates and spreads ◮ Consumption and employment US data, quarterly, 1960 to present Quarterly growth rates ( log x t − log x t − 1 ) except ◮ Interest rates and spreads (used as is) ◮ Occasional year-on-year comparisons (log x t +2 − log x t − 2 ) Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 2 / 34

  4. Leads and lags in data Stock prices and GDP S&P 500 1.00 1.00 Leads GDP Lags GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 −0.50 −0.50 −1.00 −1.00 −10 −5 0 5 10 Lag Relative to GDP Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 3 / 34

  5. Leads and lags in data Stock prices and GDP (year-on-year) S&P 500 (yoy) 1.00 1.00 Cross−Correlation with GDP 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 −0.50 −0.50 −1.00 −1.00 −10 −5 0 5 10 Lag Relative to GDP Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 4 / 34

  6. Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Stock prices and GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 Leads GDP NYSE Composite −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP S&P 500 0 0 Leads and lags in data Lags GDP 5 5 Leads, lags, and logs 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 S&P 500 minus Short Rate Nasdaq Composite −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP 0 0 5 5 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 5 / 34

  7. Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Interest rates and GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 Yield Spread (10y−3m) Short Rate (3m) −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP 0 0 Leads and lags in data 5 5 Leads, lags, and logs 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 Yield Spread (GDP yoy) −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP Real Rate 0 0 5 5 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 6 / 34

  8. Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Consumption and GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP Consumption Nondurables 0 0 Leads and lags in data 5 5 Leads, lags, and logs 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP Durables Services 0 0 5 5 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 7 / 34

  9. Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Investment and GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 Equipment and Software −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP Investment 0 0 Leads and lags in data 5 5 Leads, lags, and logs 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −10 −5 −5 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP Residential Structures 0 0 5 5 10 10 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 8 / 34

  10. Leads and lags in data Employment and GDP Employment (Nonfarm Payroll) Employment (Household Survey) Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −5 0 5 10 −10 −5 0 5 10 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP Avg Weekly Hours (All) Avg Weekly Hours (Manuf) Cross−Correlation with GDP Cross−Correlation with GDP −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −1.00−0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 −10 −5 0 5 10 −10 −5 0 5 10 Lag Relative to GDP Lag Relative to GDP Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 9 / 34

  11. Leads and lags in data Lead/lag summary Things that lead GDP ◮ Stock prices ◮ Yield curve and short rate ◮ Maybe consumption (a little) Things that lag GDP ◮ Maybe employment (a little) Why? Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 10 / 34

  12. The usual suspects (Almost) the usual equations Streamlined Kydland-Prescott except ◮ Recursive preferences (Kreps-Porteus/Epstein-Zin-Weil) ◮ CES production ◮ Adjustment costs ◮ Unit root in productivity ◮ Predictable component in productivity growth Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 11 / 34

  13. The usual suspects (Almost) the usual equations Streamlined Kydland-Prescott except ◮ Recursive preferences (Kreps-Porteus/Epstein-Zin-Weil) ◮ CES production ◮ Adjustment costs ◮ Unit root in productivity ◮ Predictable component in productivity growth Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 11 / 34

  14. The usual suspects Preferences Equations U t = V [ u t , µ t ( U t +1 )] c t (1 − n t ) λ = u t [(1 − β ) u ρ t + βµ ρ t ] 1 /ρ V ( u t , µ t ) = � 1 /α E t U α � µ t ( U t +1 ) = t +1 Interpretation = 1 / (1 − ρ ) IES CRRA = 1 − α α = ρ ⇒ additive preferences Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 12 / 34

  15. The usual suspects Technology: production Equations y t = f ( k t , z t n t ) [ ω k ν t + (1 − ω )( z t n t ) ν ] 1 /ν = y t = c t + i t Interpretation Elast of Subst = 1 / (1 − ν ) ω ( y / k ) − ν Capital Share = Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 13 / 34

  16. The usual suspects Technology: capital accumulation Equations k t +1 = g ( i t , k t ) (1 − δ ) k t + k t [( i t / k t ) η ( i / k ) 1 − η − (1 − η )( i / k )] /η = Interpretation No adjustment costs if η = 1 Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 14 / 34

  17. The usual suspects Productivity Equations log x t +1 = ( I − A ) log x + A log x t + Bw t +1 { w t } ∼ NID(0 , I ) log z t +1 − log z t = log x 1 t +1 (first element) Interpretation A = [0] ⇒ no predictable component Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 15 / 34

  18. Logs Computation overview Scaling ◮ Recast as stationary problem in “scaled” variables Loglinear approximation ◮ Loglinearize value function ( not log-quadratic) ◮ Loglinearize necessary conditions ◮ With constant variances, recursive preferences irrelevant to quantities (but not asset prices) Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 16 / 34

  19. Logs Scaling the Bellman equation Key input: ( V , µ, f , g ) are hd1 Natural version � � c t (1 − n t ) λ , µ t [ J ( k t +1 , x t +1 , z t +1 ] J ( k t , x t , z t ) = max c t , n t V subject to: k t +1 = g [ f ( k t , z t n t ) − c t , k t ) plus productivity process & initial conditions Scaled version [˜ k t = k t / z t , ˜ c t = c t / z t ] � � J (˜ c t (1 − n t ) λ , µ t [ x 1 t +1 J (˜ k t , x t , 1) = max c t , n t V ˜ k t +1 , x t +1 , 1)] ˜ ˜ k t +1 = g [ f (˜ c t , ˜ subject to: k t , n t ) − ˜ k t ] / x 1 t +1 plus productivity process & initial conditions Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 17 / 34

  20. Logs Loglinear approximation Objective: loglinear decision rules [ˆ k t ≡ log ˜ k t − log ˜ k , etc] h ck ˆ k t + h ⊤ ˆ = cx ˆ c t x t h nk ˆ k t + h ⊤ n t ˆ = nx ˆ x t Key input: log J (˜ p 0 + p k log ˜ k t + p ⊤ k t , x t ) = x log x t Solution ◮ Brute force loglinearization of necessary conditions ◮ Riccati equation separable: first p k , then p x ◮ Lots of algebra, but separability allows you to do it by hand Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 18 / 34

  21. Logs Necessary conditions First-order conditions c ρ − 1 (1 − n t ) ρλ (1 − β )˜ = M t g it t c ρ t (1 − n t ) ρλ − 1 λ (1 − β )˜ = M t g it f nt Envelope condition J 1 − ρ J kt = M t ( g it f kt + g kt ) t “Massive expression” β µ t ( x 1 t +1 J t +1 ) ρ − α E t [( x 1 t +1 J t +1 ) α − 1 J kt +1 ] M t = Backus, Routledge, & Zin (NYU & CMU) Leads, lags, and logs 19 / 34

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend