Assessing the risks associated with the dispersion of novel genes/alleles into the environment Nathalie Isabel et al. NASEM, Washington DC
5 April 2018
1
Assessing the risks associated with the dispersion of novel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
1 Assessing the risks associated with the dispersion of novel genes/alleles into the environment Nathalie Isabel et al. NASEM, Washington DC 5 April 2018 2 Outline 1. Background 2. Research framework 3. Studied System: Main Results
1
2
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) The Canadian Environmental Protection Act The Seeds Act, etc. «… safety concerns are posed primarily by the presence of a novel trait or substance in a product, rather than how novelty was introduced… »
Background
Canada
reviewed by Bonfils TGG 2005
mutagenesis, conventional breeding techniques, and gene editing technology.
3
Background
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/plants-with-novel-traits/eng/1300137887237/1300137939635 4
2006
GM poplars Field Trial (CFS) established in 1997 Courtesy of Armand Séguin, NRCan
Background
5
Background
The CFIA’s environmental safety assessment takes into account:
plant
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/plants-with-novel-traits/eng/1300137887237/1300137939635 6
Background
2006
GM poplars Field Trial (CFS) established in 1997 Courtesy of Armand Séguin, NRCan Poplars with exotic components
7
Background
2006
GM poplars Field Trial (CFS) established in 1997 Courtesy of Armand Séguin, NRCan Poplars with exotic components
8
Research Framework
9
Exposure: The probability that a defined hazard will occur Hazards: Potential of an agent or situation to cause and adverse effect
Elements of exposure and progress towards the hazards
Research Framework
Old
Natural forests
Contemporary
Plantations vs Natural forests
10
Contact Zones
Studied systems
11
Studied systems
12
(LN) x D L x N B x D
Native hybrid Hybrid with exotic component
Studied systems 13
SNP
Gros-Louis et al. 2005 TGG Meirmans et al. (2007) Can J Bot Talbot et al. (2011) Can J For Res Isabel et al. (2013) TGG Floate et al. (2015) New Phytol
Simulations
Studied systems
14
Studied species
Eastern Canada Central Canada
Step Region 15
16
17
Eastern Canada
500 m
Hybrids & Exotics Meirmans et al. 2010 Am J Bot
Agroforestry Forest
Hybridization Eastern Canada
Agroforestry Forest
Hybrids & exotics
Eastern Canada
More than 1000 male clonal varieties
Fragmented habitat Recipient (15-30-yr-old) Distance: 17-531 m Natural forest Recipient (50-yr-old) Distance: 18-282 m
Meirmans et al. 2010 Am J Bot
Hybridization
18
19
(all P. balsamifera)
Hybridization Central Canada Talbot et al. 2012 For Ecol Manag
Watson
Blakley
Talbot et al. 2012 For Ecol Manag
Hybridization
Central Canada
20
Fragmented habitat Recipient (20-50-yr-old) Multiclonal Distance: 20m - 1.5km
Talbot et al. 2011 Can J For Res
Russian (LN) poplars (100-yr-old)
Russian Northwest
Walker Others Assiniboine
Over 34 million trees distributed (1909-2006)
The Shelterbelt Centre (Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada)
Hybridization Central Canada
21 21 Density of pollen and seed production
Backcrossing to recipient
22
23
Saskatchewan
Backcrossing to recipient Central Canada
Ronald & Steele 1974 Can J Bot
Manitoba
23 Density of pollen and seed production (S. DiFazio 2004)
Fragmented habitat Recipient (30-50-yr-old) Distance: up to 1 km
Backcrossing to recipient Eastern Canada 24
hybrides Québec Chicoutimi Sherbrooke 15 pops 635 samples
2.4%
Thompson et al. 2010 Mol Ecol
Backcrossing to recipient Eastern Canada 25
Natural to disturbed habitats Recipient (50-yr-old) Distance: 18-282 m
Base-de-plein-air Sainte-Foy
Eastern Canada Fitness
26
Disturbed habitat Recipient (20-50-yr-old) Distance: from 100m to few km
19.6% (27/138)
2009
No significant difference between native and hybrids
Rust susceptibility Uredia / cm2 Roe et al. 2014 Ecol & Evol a, b
Eastern Canada Fitness
27
28
native species in natural settings?
Do they reproduce ? Where?
Yes, genotypes/recipient species, environment Yes, seed mediated gene flow, disturbed habitats
For many characters they are intermediate
Recipient species Donor species
& hybrids
Studied systems 29
Bonaventure Lotbinière
Seeds
Recruits
Recruits
5000 seed, 1000 recruits
30
Research Framework
Contemporary
Plantations vs Natural forests
31
Contact Zones
Fct: 0.063 100 nuclear SNPs 1200 individuals Meirmans et al. 2017 JEB
32
Research Framework
Old
Natural forests
Contemporary
Plantations vs Natural forests
33
Contact Zones
34
Central Canada Biotic interactions
35
Floate et al. 2016 New Phytol.
Central Canada Biotic interactions
Patrick Meirmans et al. 2009 Evol Appl Amanda Roe et al. 2014a,b Ecol Evol Patrick Meirmans et al. 2010 Am J Bot StaceyThompson et al. 2010 Mol Ecol Patricia Talbot et al. 2012 For Ecol Manag Patrick Meirmans et al. 2013 TGG Jared LeBoldus et al. 2013 Plos One Kevin Floate et al. 2015 New Phytologist
36
Meirmans et al. 2017 JEB Julie Godbout et al. unpublished
Conclusions
37
Howlett & Migone 2010 Technology in Society
Conclusions
38
Julie Godbout Manuel Lamothe Marie-Claude Gros-Louis Audrey Lachance Eric Dussault Daniel Plourde Philippe Tanguay Josyanne Lamarche Amanda Roe Chris McQuarrie Tannis Beardmore Dale Simpson Bill Schroeder Kevin Floate Jared LeBoldus Patrick Meirmans Jean Bousquet Damase Khasa Barb Thomas Peter Blemis Pierre Périnet’s team Martin Perron’ team Stewart Rood Tom Whitham Matt Lau