Assessing the Biological Threat: A Delphi Study Crystal Boddie, MPH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

assessing the biological threat a delphi study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Assessing the Biological Threat: A Delphi Study Crystal Boddie, MPH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Assessing the Biological Threat: A Delphi Study Crystal Boddie, MPH December 16, 2015 BWC MSP, Geneva Assessing the Bioweapons Threat In assessing the threat posed by biological weapons use we often rely on expert opinion There are few


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Assessing the Biological Threat: A Delphi Study

Crystal Boddie, MPH December 16, 2015 BWC MSP, Geneva

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Assessing the Bioweapons Threat

  • In assessing the threat posed by biological

weapons use we often rely on expert opinion

– There are few historical examples – Intelligence information is limited

  • We were interested in assessing how US

experts define the threat

– We conducted a modified Delphi study – And found that there is large disagreement among US experts about the threat

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

About the Study

  • Modified Delphi Study

– 59 experts at the nexus of biology and security

  • In biological science, biodefense, biosecurity, biosafety,

national security, public health, veterinary medicine, nonproliferation, defense, counterterrorism, international security policy

– 2 Rounds of a Delphi Survey

  • Focused on obtaining collective expert opinion, but

avoiding “groupthink,”

  • Preserves the anonymity of participant inputs
  • Iterated response and feedback
  • Statistical aggregation of expert judgments
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Likelihood of a large-scale biological weapons attack to occur within the next 10 years

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Most and Least Likely Actors

  • Wide range of opinions, with some significant

findings:

– State bioweapons use thought to be significantly less likely than non-state or terrorist use (p<0.001)

  • Particularly overt use by a state actor

– Religious extremist use was thought to be most likely, but not significantly more likely than other non-state actors

  • Others included right and left wing violent non-state

actors, disgruntled individuals

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Likelihood that a biological agent will be used as a weapon in the next 10 years

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Non spore- forming bacteria Spore-forming bacteria Viruses Biological toxins Prions Fungi Synthetic pathogens Likelihood of agent use in a biological attack

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Percentage Likelihood of Actionable Intelligence Warning of a Biological Attack

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Number of Responses Likelihood of Intelligence Warning (%)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Threat Characterization Research

  • Additional Delphi Data focused on expert

judgment about biological threat characterization research

  • Is there a “red line” for research?

– A majority of Experts said yes (51/59), but few defined the “red line”

  • We are analyzing other questions on threat

characterization

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thank You

Acknowledgements

  • Co-Authors: Matthew Watson and Gigi Kwik

Gronvall (UPMC Center for Health Security) and Gary Ackerman (University of Maryland START Center)

  • Support from the US Department of

Homeland Security