ASSESSING THE ARC FLASH RISK Causes of Electric Arcs Dust and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

assessing the arc flash risk causes of electric arcs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ASSESSING THE ARC FLASH RISK Causes of Electric Arcs Dust and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ASSESSING THE ARC FLASH RISK Causes of Electric Arcs Dust and impurities Corrosion Condensation of vapor and water dripping Accidental touching Dropping tools Failure of Insulating Material Improper Design or


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ASSESSING THE ARC FLASH RISK

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Causes of Electric Arcs

 Dust and impurities  Corrosion  Condensation of vapor and water dripping  Accidental touching  Dropping tools  Failure of Insulating Material  Improper Design or Utilization Equipment  Improper Work Procedures

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Intense Heat Cause Sudden Expansion of Air. Lightning is a Natural Arc.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hazards of Arc Flash

 Serious Burns occur when victim is several feet

from arc.

 Spraying of molten metal at high pressure  Blast pressure waves have thrown workers

across rooms or off ladders. Pressure on the chest can be higher than 2000 lbs./sq. ft.

 Clothing can be ignited and burn more severely

than unclothed areas.

 Hearing loss can occur where a blast can have a

magnitude as high as 140 dB at 2 feet from arc.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Nature of Arc Flash

35,000 ˚F Four Times The Surface Temperature of the Sun

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Energy of an Arc Flash is a Function of System Voltage, Fault Current Magnitude, and Fault Duration.

The Nature of Arc Flash

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Arcs in Enclosures Magnify the Blast and Energy Toward Open Side of the Enclosure and Toward the Worker.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Nature of Arc Flash

Copper Expands in Volume by 67,000Times Water Expands in Volume by 1670 Times

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Burn Injury Statistics – Probability of Survival

(Source: American Burn Association, 1991-1993 Study; Revised March 2002)

Probability of Survival Decreases With Age

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Addressing Arc Flash Hazard

 Past National Electric Code (NEC) and other safety

codes primarily concerned with protection from fire, electrocution, and shock hazard.

 The 2005 NEC now has requirements for warning

labels in conjunction with a new standard, NFPA 70E-2004, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace.

 NFPA 70E-2004 is intended for use by employers,

employees, and OSHA.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Addressing Arc Flash Hazard

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Addressing Arc Flash Hazard

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Addressing Arc Flash Hazard

 NFPA 70E-2004 and IEEE Std 1584-2002 provide

guidance on implementing appropriate safety procedures and arc flash calculations.

 Although OSHA doesn't directly state what to do about

arc-flash hazards, OSHA 29 CFR1910.132(d)(1) requires employers to evaluate the workplace for hazards. And based on these assessments, the employer must select and require the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for its employees.

 NFPA 70E-2004 requires a flash hazard analysis be

performed in order to determine the Flash Protection Boundary and PPE required within that boundary.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NFPA 70E Protection Boundaries

Only “qualified” people can enter these boundaries wearing appropriate PPE.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Flash Protection Boundary

 Distance from arc source where potential

incident heat energy on skin is 1.2 calories/cm² .

 An skin exposure would normally result in

a curable 2nd degree burn.

 Within this boundary protective clothing

such as fire resistant shirts and pants and

  • ther equipment is required (PPE).
slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Working Distance – The distance between arc

source and the worker’s face or chest.

 Approach Boundary - The approach working

distance for a qualified personnel.

 Limited Approach Boundary – An approach limit

at a distance from an exposed live part within which a shock hazard exists.

 Restricted Approach Boundary – An approach

boundary limit at a distance from an exposed live part within which there is an increased risk

  • f shock, due to electrical arc over combined

with inadvertent movement, for personnel working in close proximity to the live part.

 Prohibited Approach Boundary – An approach

limit at a distance from an exposed live part within which work is considered the same as making contact with the live part.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Rubber Glove Class Color Maximum Usage 00 Beige, Red 500 VAC

  • r Blue

Red or 1,000 VAC Blue 1 White 7,500 VAC 2 Yellow 17,000 VAC 3 Green 26,500 VAC 4 Orange 36,000 VAC Leather Protector Grove - Always worn over rubber glove to provide needed mechanical protection against cuts, abrasions and punctures and alone do not provide any protection from electrical shock.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Personal Protective Equipment

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Personal Protective Equipment

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Hazard/Risk Classification per NFPA 70E-2004 Table 130.7(C)(11) & modified to MOM standards

Additional PPE is required other than examples above that cover the torso.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Assessing Flash Protection Boundary & Hazard Category

 MOM Policy is to have Arc Flash Protection

Boundary and PPE requirements calculated under engineer supervision using either the NFPA 70E or IEEE Std. 1584 methods of analysis.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Limitations of Assessment

 Equations used are based on test performed in

laboratory and may differ at the facility in question.

 Equations based on range of test values which

should be cross-reference to the facility’s electrical system parameters.

 Random nature of arcs make it difficult to model

  • precisely. The estimates provided by the

equations are “average” values.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584

 NFPA 70E method is believed to be generally

conservative.

 IEEE 1584 method is more realistic and aims to

avoid accidents due to limitations provided by

  • ver-protection to workers. Over-protection can

also lead to the restriction of visibility and movement, discomfort and reduces worker productivity.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Is Your Facility at Risk?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Reasons for Risk Analysis

 Determine the incident energy for each

electrical distribution path to each piece of electrical equipment.

 Determine the level of PPE required when

working on energized circuitry

 Determine labeling requirements  Comply with OSHA regulations through

standards determined by NFPA and IEEE.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Reasons for Risk Analysis

Minimize The Risk of Personal Injury or Death

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Reasons for Risk Analysis

Minimize a Facility’s Vulnerability to Insurance and Legal Issues

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Documentation is Key

The facility one-line diagram is the summary of all electrical documentation. If the one-line diagram is not accurate, further efforts toward analyzing arc flash are futile.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Documentation is Key

 Identification of locations/equipment  Collecting Data  Short Circuit Analysis  Protective Device Coordination  Actual Arc Flash Analysis  Arcing Current  Arcing Times  Determine Incident Energy  Determine Flash Protection Boundary  Determine Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Category  Documentation

Once electrical documentation is in order, you can proceed to analyze the facility.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Continuous Compliance

Once your facility is compliant, you can relax?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

WRONG !!!!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Electrical Distribution System Changes

 Additions or deletions to a electrical

distribution system will alter the energy paths and incident energy across the system.

 CHANGE THE SYSTEM AND YOU MUST

CHANGE YOUR DOCUMENTATION, AND YOU MUST RECALCULATE ALL AFFECTED ENGERY PATHS.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Training & Work Procedures Work Permits Lockout/Tagout

slide-34
SLIDE 34

QUESTIONS ???

Thank You for Your Time !