Arlington County Fund Balance and Reserves Discussion
April 2017
Arlington County Fund Balance and Reserves Discussion April 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Arlington County Fund Balance and Reserves Discussion April 2017 Prudent Financial Management is Important Sound financial management ensures: High credit ratings Market access for: capital financing, key economic development, or
April 2017
– High credit ratings – Market access for: capital financing, key economic development, or
– Sound reserve levels – Fully funded pension plan – Funding plans in place for retiree health care – Conservative financial forecasting – Moderate debt levels – Adoption of structurally balanced budgets – Formal adoption & adherence to written financial policies
– All three agencies have given County the highest rating possible
2
which reflects prior legislative decisions (committed), or
(assigned or “reserved”) by policy on annual basis, or
immediately succeeding fiscal year (e.g., contingent or stabilization reserves),
hardship to address unexpected challenges (e.g., operating reserves)
3
4
5
6
7
FY 2012 – 2016 General Fund Savings Net of Unspent AHIF Funds
43.4 19.8 30.0 25.6 16.5 13.2 25.3 22.7 21.1 13.2 6.8 7.8 11.2 9.8 10.6 3.8 8.3 8.7 3.7 3.6 6.3 6.7 5.9 8.5 5.9
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Schools County Operations Debt & Capital Unspent Contingents Studies, Planning & Misc.
$ Millions
$68.7 $67.9 $78.6 $73.5 $49.8
– Savings driven by personnel, health care, debt service, utilities, etc. – Savings are directed by School Board to budget and / or enrollment contingents and one-time expenditures like capital projects or technology
– Using one-time $, County has funded variety of budget stabilization and compensation contingents – Contingency for BPOL released in FY 2016
– Refunding of bonds – driven by low interest rate environment – Multi-year capital projects – primarily technology
8
9
FY 2012 – 2016 General Fund Savings County Operations Only
$5.3 $8.0 $6.0 $6.9 $6.7 $7.9 $17.3 $16.7 $14.2 $6.5 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 County Operations Only Personnel vs Non-Personnel Personnel Non-Personnel
$ Millions
$25.3 $13.2 $21.1 $22.7 $13.1
10
$467 $536 $560 $550 $420 $440 $460 $480 $500 $520 $540 $560 $580 2013 2014 2015 2016
Millions
Fund Balance - Total Governmental Funds
$200 $233 $200 $191 $150 $160 $170 $180 $190 $200 $210 $220 $230 $240 2013 2014 2015 2016
Millions
Fund Balance - General Fund
Fund Balance - Total Governmental Funds as of June 30, 2016
11
Self insurance reserve 1% Subsequent years' County budgets 2% Capital projects and Subsequent years' capital projects 64% Operating reserve 11% Economic & revenue stabilization / BPOL contingent / Economic Stabilization Reserve 1% Incomplete projects 1% Affordable Housing Investment Fund 11% Subsequent years' Schools budget 5% FreshAIRE program 0% Seized Assets 0% Debt Service 4% Grants 0% Prepaid Expenses 0%
Total Fund Balance Assigned and Committed
12
13
General Fund Balance - $191.2 Million All general fund dollars are allocated to County Board-approved projects, services or by policy
Self insurance reserve 2% Subsequent years' County budgets 13% Capital projects and Subsequent years' capital projects 10% Operating reserve 28% Economic & revenue stabilization / BPOL contingent / Economic Stabilization Reserve 4% Incomplete projects 3% Affordable Housing Investment Fund 26% Subsequent years' Schools budget 13% FreshAIRE program 1%
Fun Fund Bal alance Ass Assigned an and Com
itted
– Schools – AHIF – Capital projects – Economic and Revenue Stabilization – Subsequent year’s county budget – Self-insurance reserve – Incomplete projects – Operating Reserve
– Schools – AHIF – Capital projects – Economic and Revenue Stabilization – Subsequent year’s county budget – FreshAIRE – Incomplete projects – Increases to the General Fund Operating Reserve to maintain it at 5% of the total General Fund; this supports the County’s triple- AAA rating
14
15
– Conservative forecasting is considered a credit and management strength – Using one-time funds for one-time expenditures is considered sound financial practice – avoids structural imbalance
16