Aquatic Plant Management Planning Project Project Background - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

aquatic plant management
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Aquatic Plant Management Planning Project Project Background - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Amnicon & Dowling Lakes Aquatic Plant Management Planning Project Project Background Aquatic Invasive Species Education, Prevention and Planning Grant Application Submitted to WDNR in August 2011 Awarded in October 2011


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Amnicon & Dowling Lakes Aquatic Plant Management Planning Project

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Project Background

  • Aquatic Invasive Species Education, Prevention

and Planning Grant Application

– Submitted to WDNR in August 2011 – Awarded in October 2011

  • $33,374.00 Total Project Cost

– State Share = $25,030.00 – Amnicon-Dowling Lake Management District Share = $8,344.00

  • Original End Date – June 30, 2013

– Extended End Date – December 31, 2013

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objective of the Project

  • What is an Aquatic Plant Management (APM) Plan?

– A working document used to guide appropriate aquatic plant management – A tool for the Lake District to use to educate and inform property owners and lake users – A valuable exercise in planning to help understand the complexities in dealing with aquatic plants – DNR required document to complete aquatic plant management including non-native invasive species and native plants

Complete an Aquatic Plant Management (APM) Plan for both lakes

  • Approved by both the ADLMD

and the WDNR

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Parts of the Project

  • Aquatic plant survey on both lakes

– Early season curly-leaf pondweed and Eurasian water milfoil – Mid season all aquatic plants

  • Water quality review

– Current – historical paleocore

  • Gather public input

– Lake Use Survey – Draft APM Plan comment

  • Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS)

– Watercraft inspection, AIS monitoring, AIS education and outreach, purple loosestrife beetle assessment

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Aquatic Plant Surveys - 2012

  • Completed by Endangered Resource Services, LLC

– Matt Berg, Proprietor

  • Final Aquatic Plant Survey reports completed in late

2012 and distributed to the Lake District

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Highlights of the Plant Survey Work

Curly-leaf Pondweed (CLP) Eurasian water milfoil (EWM)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Curly-leaf Pondweed in Amnicon

  • 5.4 acres in 2012
  • 1.4% of total lake surface area
  • Found in 4-9 ft of water
  • Monotypic at 6-ft
  • Exploits disturbed areas
  • Fills in where other plants begin

to thin

  • Likely impacting wild rice growth
slide-8
SLIDE 8

More AIS

Purple Loosestrife Reed Canary Grass Chinese Mystery Snails

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Native Plants – Amnicon

The Good!

501 points sampled, Maximum depth of plant growth = 11-ft, (43.5%) of total surface area

  • Littoral Zone =

56% of the lake

  • 60 different plant

species

  • 3.66 species/site
  • 7 extremely high

value or sensitive species

  • Ave CC value =

6.8 out of 10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Wild Rice

Widely scattered in south and southwest bays, none dense or harvestable 23 survey points with wild rice

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Native Plants – Amnicon Not so Great…

Average Density 2.21 out of 3

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Native Plants – Dowling The Good…but not so great

253 points sampled, Maximum depth of plant growth = 7-ft, 11.5% of total surface area, only 30% of littoral zone

  • Littoral Zone =

38% of the lake

  • 33 different plant

species

  • 1.79 species/site
  • Only 3 high value
  • r sensitive species
  • Ave CC value =

6.3 out of 10

  • No wild rice
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Native Plants – Dowling Not so great…

  • Not much vegetation in

the lake

Nitella sp. Watershield

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Current Water Quality – Amnicon & Dowling

  • Amnicon

– Plant dominated – Ave. water clarity = 6-ft – Ave. Total Phosphorus = 24.6 ug/l – Ave. Chlorophyll a = 8.3 ug/l

  • Dowling

– Algae dominated – Ave. water clarity = 3.6 ft – Ave. Total Phosphorus = 35.5 ug/l – Ave. Chlorophyll a = 18.7 ug/l

Amnicon Dowling

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Trophic Status

http://www.hillsborough.wateratlas.usf.edu/shared/learnmore.asp?toolsection=lm_tsi

X X

Amnicon Dowling

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Historic Water Quality – Amnicon & Dowling

Top-Bottom Paleocore

  • Amnicon

– Top (current) TP: 26 ug/L – Bottom (historic) TP: 25 ug/L – Top: > aquatic vegetation – Bottom: < aquatic vegetation

  • Dowling

– Top (current) TP: 80 ug/L – Bottom (historic) TP: 26 ug/L – Top: < aquatic vegetation – Bottom: > aquatic vegetation

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Public Use Survey

300 surveys mailed out, 95 returned (31.6%)

  • Amnicon

– 59 surveys returned – Residency

  • Permanent – 29
  • Undeveloped Land – 1
  • 2nd Home – 7
  • Cabin – 23

– Ave. Time on Lake

  • 26.4 years

– Minimum – 1 year – Maximum – 90 years

  • Dowling

– 36 surveys returned – Residency

  • Permanent – 10
  • Undeveloped Land – 4
  • 2nd Home – 3
  • Cabin – 19
  • Mobile Home – 1

– Ave. Time on Lake

  • 21.3 years

– Minimum – 1 year – Maximum – 84 years

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Top Lake Uses

  • Amnicon

– Swimming – Rest/Relaxation – Fishing – Wildlife viewing – Quiet Sports

  • Changes

– Split between “no changes” and “worsened” – Greatest Changes

  • Game fishing, pan

fishing, motorized sports, and swimming

  • Dowling

– Swimming – Fishing – Rest/Relaxation – Quiet Sports – Wildlife viewing

  • Changes

– Slightly “worsened” – Greatest Changes

  • Game fishing, pan fishing,

and swimming

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lake Characteristics

  • Amnicon

– Rooted vegetation, green scum, motorized boats, and use of jetskis increased – Wild rice decreased

  • Septic System Check

– 55.9% would support – 18.6% would oppose

  • Water Quality

– 61% Fair, 15% Good, 20% Poor

  • Dowling

– Green scum, use of jetskis, and noise pollution increased – Public use and garbage in the lake decreased

  • Septic System Check

– 44.4% would support – 11.1% would oppose

  • Water Quality

– 28% Fair, 14% Good, 47% Poor

slide-21
SLIDE 21

What Most Affects Water Quality?

  • Amnicon

– Faulty septic systems – Dead and dying vegetation – Lawn runoff and shoreland erosion – Others

  • Water level, road next to

lake, AIS, flooding

  • Dowling

– Faulty septic systems – Dead and dying vegetation – Others

  • Water level

The Lake Community generally supports removing AIS from the system, providing property improvement incentives, dredging, and update of septic systems.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Knowledge of Aquatic Invasive Species

LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW SOME SOME

At least 55.8% would attend an AIS Training Session!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Support for Aquatic Plant Management Alternatives

  • Amnicon

– Most Support

  • Mechanical

harvesting

  • Physical removal

– Least Support

  • No management
  • Chemical herbicides

– Who Should Be Responsible?

  • ADLMD
  • WDNR
  • Dowling

– Most Support

  • Physical removal
  • Mechanical harvesting

– Least Support

  • Chemical herbicides
  • Biological control

– Who Should Be Responsible?

  • ADLMD
  • WDNR
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Wild Rice

2010 Ceded Territory Manoomin Inventory

ERS, August 2012 SEH, August 2012

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Conclusions

  • Property owners on both lakes support

implementing aquatic plant management actions

  • Management of CLP is necessary on Amnicon
  • Management of nuisance native aquatic

vegetation is necessary on Amnicon

  • Protection of existing beds of aquatic plants and

possible reestablishment of aquatic plants is necessary on Dowling

  • Greater AIS education effort on both lakes is

needed to help protect the lakes from future introductions

  • Wild rice protection will impact all aquatic plant

management options; at least on Amnicon

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Preliminary Aquatic Plant Management Recommendations

  • Continue AIS prevention and monitoring efforts on

both lakes

  • Provide greater AIS Education efforts for property
  • wners on both lakes
  • Continue water quality monitoring on both lakes
  • Protect and enhance wild rice waters in Amnicon

– Possibly reestablish/introduce wild rice on Dowling

  • Continue purple loosestrife and other AIS

management efforts

  • Implement aquatic plant management actions that will

maintain or improve water quality in both lakes

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Aquatic Plant Management Actions

  • Encourage/support physical removal of nuisance

aquatic plants and aquatic invasive species

– NR 107 – It is legal to remove aquatic vegetation from the lake in an area up to 30-ft wide without a permit provided all plant material is removed from the lake – Physical removal of AIS is not restricted provided it is removed from the lake

  • Mechanical harvesting

– Of CLP in areas where wild rice will not be impacted – Of nuisance aquatic vegetation in designated navigation channels – Of access corridors between docks and open water or navigation channels

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Management Actions continued:

  • Work with Tribal Resources to determine a wild

rice restoration plan in Amnicon

– Re-seeding in CLP harvesting areas

  • Consider dredging of navigation corridors if

aquatic plant harvesting does not provide adequate relief

– Will require a separate “dredging” plan to be devised

  • Implement a more complete water level

monitoring and management program

– Lake level monitoring – Stream flow between lakes

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Management Actions continued:

  • Provide education materials related to shoreland

improvements and best management practices

  • Design and implement a shoreland improvement

incentives program

– Design and installation of rain gardens, buffer zones, shoreland restoration, and runoff diversion projects

  • Individual property owners
  • Roadway right-of-ways
  • Consider comprehensive lake management planning for

water quality

– Near shore and watershed runoff – Septic system survey – Internal loading

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The End Questions?