AQRF Referencing Report of Malaysia Date of submission: 13 September - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
AQRF Referencing Report of Malaysia Date of submission: 13 September 2018 Version: Draft Referencing Report C1 Malaysian C1 Mala sian Hi Higher Edu her Education ation - An An Introd Introduction tion Page 10 age 10 to 21 o 21
Malaysian Education & Training System Pre-Tertiary [Pre-School, Primary & Secondary] Tertiary [Higher Education & TVET]
Laws Types of Institutions Progression & Pathways Certification & Qualifications Statistics on Institutions Statistics on Learners Recognition of Prior Learning
C1 Ma C1 Malaysi laysian n Hig igher E her Educati ucation
n Int ntroduc roduction [ ion [Page Page 10 10 to to 21 21] ]
An An i int nter-se sect ctori rial al co comm mmit itte tee which consists of representatives from key ministries, government agencies, higher education and training providers and well as the industries and employees
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION MINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INDUSTRY MINISTRY OF TOURISM & CULTURE MALAYSIAN FEDERATION OF EMPLOYERS MALAYSIAN TRADE UNION CONGRESS MALAYSIAN ASSOCIATION OF PRIVATE COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Ac Accr cred edit itat atio ion n of
MQA QA, , Pr Prof
essi sion
al B Bod
ies s & & DSD DSD Eq Equi uiva vale lenc ncy In Inte tern rnat atio iona nal l Co Comp mpar arab abil ilit ity y Ex Exer erci cise se
Ob Obje ject ctiv ives es Levels Levels Qu Qual alif ific icat atio ion n Titles Titles Le Lear arni ning ng Do Doma main ins Se Sect ctor
METHO HODO DOLO LOGY GY Broad ad Struc uctu tura ral l Compa pari riso son Diffe fere renc nces es & Simil ilar arit itie ies Compa pari ring ng Defin init itio ions ns Compa pari ring ng Learn rnin ing g Outco come mes s & Level el Descr crip ipto tors rs Learn rnin ing g Outco come me Domai ain n Analy lysi sis Level el-to to- level el Descr crip ipto tors rs Analy lysi sis Socia ial l Match chin ing g Conte text xt
Over eral all l the he find nding ings s show
idenc nce e of suffi ffici cien ent t and nd clea ear r GOOD OD FIT T betwe tween en MQF F and d AQRF QRF
MQF Comparability AQRF
Overall, there is a GOOD FIT between the two levels descriptors notwithstanding the
There is a GOOD FIT between the two levels as the outcomes are highly similar.
The outcomes are highly comparable and similar even though MQF requires more capabilities of the learners. A GOOD FIT is concluded.
Similar and comparable in terms of knowledge and skills and therefore a GOOD FIT between the two levels is appropriate.
There are some differences, which arguably are not structural. It can be argued that these differences are present in MQF in an implicit manner. MQF have more requirements than AQRF to function effectively. Overall, there is a GOOD FIT between the two levels.
The descriptors in Level 3 of MQF appears to be more complex, demanding in the field of TVET than Level 3 of AQRF, although issues of autonomy and application context is not explicit in MQF. Overall, there is a GOOD FIT between the two levels.
The levels descriptors are comparable although the element of discretion in dealing with familiar issues is not explicitly mentioned in MQF as compared to AQRF. A GOOD FIT conclusion is submitted.
The outcomes are similar and there is a GOOD FIT between MQF and AQRF descriptors
MQA
Procedures for Standard Development
Code of Practices [COPPA & COPIA] Program Standards Guidelines of Good Practices Policy on Credit Transfer Professional Bodies e.g. Engineering Program Accreditation Manual e.g. Eng. Tech. Program Accreditation Manual
Skills Development Procedures for NOSS Development Code of Practices for Skills Program Accreditation Malaysian Occupational Skills Qualifications Framework National Occupational Skills Standards
Quali lity ty Assurance System for Education
Mal Malay aysia sian n Qual ualit ity y Sys Syste tem i m in n Edu Educa catio tion n Trai raini ning ng
Mal Malay aysia sian n Qua Quali lity ty Ass Assur uranc ance e Sys Syste tem m
enable enables a more pr s a more precise expla ecise explanation for nation for the the implem implementation of entation of QA in vari QA in various sectors
develo developed by stak ped by stakeholders in eholders in the Southe the Southeast ast Asian Asian region and region and is an indig is an indigenous syste enous system of m of the re the region gion MQA MQA-AQ AQAF Alignmen AF Alignment 2017 t 2017 – th the most curr e most current ent inform information to be ation to be used used
Vision, mission & common goals Legal Mandates [Bridging Provisions] Autonomy for Decision Making [Policies, Standards, Accreditation] Appointment of Boards Good Governance [Structure & Management System] New Development & Innovation Adequate & Sufficient Resources Stakeholders Engagements [Domestic & International] Reliable System Dissemination of Public Information Student and Society- Focused QA Standard and QA Development Processes Quality Assurance Processes [Complete Cycle & Variation] Commitment to Timeliness Training of Assessors Assessors’ Ethical Conduct CQI of Quality Assurance Appeal Mechanism
Criterion 7 – stakeholders consultation Criterion 8 - involvement of international experts Criterion 9 & 10 – publication & dissemination
MQF 2.0 COPPA 2.0 Single QA TVET
Keep abreast with IR 4.0 and Beyond