approximation sufficient? anna Flanagan, Cornell & Tanja - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

approximation sufficient
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

approximation sufficient? anna Flanagan, Cornell & Tanja - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detection templates for extreme mass ratio inspirals: Is the radiative approximation sufficient? anna Flanagan, Cornell & Tanja Hinderer, Caltech PRD 78, 064028 (2008) 2009 April APS Meeting Denver, 3 May 2009 Motivation LISA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Detection templates for extreme mass ratio inspirals: Is the radiative approximation sufficient?

2009 April APS Meeting Denver, 3 May 2009 Éanna Flanagan, Cornell & Tanja Hinderer, Caltech PRD 78, 064028 (2008)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation

  • LISA should observe insprials of compact
  • bjects into massive black holes (Gair et al.

2003). Last year of inspiral will contain cycles

  • f waveform in the relativistic, near-horizon regime.
  • Similar inspirals into intermediate mass black holes

could be detected by advanced LIGO out to several hundred Mpc (Brown et al. 2006); event rate could be up to . ∼ 1000

(µ ∼ 1 − 10M⊙) (M ∼ 106M⊙) ∼ M/µ ∼ 105

(M ∼ 103M⊙)

∼ 10/yr

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation: Scientific Payoffs

  • Precision test of general relativity in strong field regime.

Measure multipole moments of central object (Ryan 1997, Li & Lovelace 2008), unambiguous identification as black hole.

  • Measure hole’

s mass and spin to (Barack & Cutler 2004), constrain growth history (merger versus accretion) of black holes (Hughes & Blandford 2003).

∼ 10−4

  • Learn about central parsec of galactic nucleii from event

rate and distribution of inspiralling object’ s masses.

  • Potentially measure Hubble constant to 1 percent (MacLeod

and Hogan 2008), indirectly aiding dark energy studies.

  • However, all of these require templates with fractional

phase accuracy of ∼ 10−5

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Approximation schemes for waveforms

  • Geodesic equation in Kerr with self force can be written

dqα dt = ωα(J) + ε

  • g(1)

diss α

  • (J) + δg(1)

diss α(q, J) + g(1) cons α(q, J)

  • + O(ε2)

dJλ dt = ε

  • G(1)

diss λ

  • (J) + δG(1)

diss λ(q, J) + G(1) cons λ(q, J)

  • + ε2

G(2)

diss λ

  • (J) + . . .

where , with solutions

ε = µ/M qα(t, ε) = ε−1ψ(0)

α (εt)+ε−1/2ψ(1/2) α

(εt)+ψ(1)

α (εt)+ . . .

Jλ(t, ε) = J (0)

λ (εt)+ε1/2J (1/2) λ

(εt)+εJ (1)

λ (εt)+εHλ(J (0) λ , qα) . . .

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Approximation schemes for waveforms

  • Geodesic equation in Kerr with self force can be written

dqα dt = ωα(J) + ε

  • g(1)

diss α

  • (J) + δg(1)

diss α(q, J) + g(1) cons α(q, J)

  • + O(ε2)

dJλ dt = ε

  • G(1)

diss λ

  • (J) + δG(1)

diss λ(q, J) + G(1) cons λ(q, J)

  • + ε2

G(2)

diss λ

  • (J) + . . .

where , with solutions

ε = µ/M qα(t, ε) = ε−1ψ(0)

α (εt)+ε−1/2ψ(1/2) α

(εt)+ψ(1)

α (εt)+ . . .

Jλ(t, ε) = J (0)

λ (εt)+ε1/2J (1/2) λ

(εt)+εJ (1)

λ (εt)+εHλ(J (0) λ , qα) . . .

Adiabatic Approximation: dψ(0)

α

d˜ t = ωα(J (0)), dJ (0)

λ

d˜ t =

  • G(1)

diss λ

  • (J (0)).
  • Dissipative piece of 1st order self force known in principle (Mino

2003, Sago et. al 2006, Sundararajan et al., in prep.), whereas conservative piece not yet known

  • Action variables evolve independently
  • Not equivalent to using self-force computed from dJλ/dt
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Approximation schemes for waveforms

  • Geodesic equation in Kerr with self force can be written

dqα dt = ωα(J) + ε

  • g(1)

diss α

  • (J) + δg(1)

diss α(q, J) + g(1) cons α(q, J)

  • + O(ε2)

dJλ dt = ε

  • G(1)

diss λ

  • (J) + δG(1)

diss λ(q, J) + G(1) cons λ(q, J)

  • + ε2

G(2)

diss λ

  • (J) + . . .

where , with solutions

ε = µ/M qα(t, ε) = ε−1ψ(0)

α (εt)+ε−1/2ψ(1/2) α

(εt)+ψ(1)

α (εt)+ . . .

Jλ(t, ε) = J (0)

λ (εt)+ε1/2J (1/2) λ

(εt)+εJ (1)

λ (εt)+εHλ(J (0) λ , qα) . . .

Post-1/2-Adiabatic:

  • Due to resonances
  • Requires knowledge of all pink forcing terms
  • Does not arise for circular or equatorial orbits
  • See talk by Tanja Hinderer in session L11 this afternoon.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Approximation schemes for waveforms

  • Geodesic equation in Kerr with self force can be written

dqα dt = ωα(J) + ε

  • g(1)

diss α

  • (J) + δg(1)

diss α(q, J) + g(1) cons α(q, J)

  • + O(ε2)

dJλ dt = ε

  • G(1)

diss λ

  • (J) + δG(1)

diss λ(q, J) + G(1) cons λ(q, J)

  • + ε2

G(2)

diss λ

  • (J) + . . .

where , with solutions

ε = µ/M qα(t, ε) = ε−1ψ(0)

α (εt)+ε−1/2ψ(1/2) α

(εt)+ψ(1)

α (εt)+ . . .

Jλ(t, ε) = J (0)

λ (εt)+ε1/2J (1/2) λ

(εt)+εJ (1)

λ (εt)+εHλ(J (0) λ , qα) . . .

Post-1-Adiabatic: dψ(1)

α

d˜ t =

  • g(1)

α

  • + ∂ωα

∂Jλ J (1)

λ ,

dJ (1)

λ

d˜ t =

  • G(2)

diss λ

  • + ”beating terms”.
  • Requires knowledge of all pink and blue forcing terms
  • Gives phase correct to O(1).
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Approximation schemes for waveforms

  • Geodesic equation in Kerr with self force can be written

dqα dt = ωα(J) + ε

  • g(1)

diss α

  • (J) + δg(1)

diss α(q, J) + g(1) cons α(q, J)

  • + O(ε2)

dJλ dt = ε

  • G(1)

diss λ

  • (J) + δG(1)

diss λ(q, J) + G(1) cons λ(q, J)

  • + ε2

G(2)

diss λ

  • (J) + . . .

where , with solutions

ε = µ/M qα(t, ε) = ε−1ψ(0)

α (εt)+ε−1/2ψ(1/2) α

(εt)+ψ(1)

α (εt)+ . . .

Jλ(t, ε) = J (0)

λ (εt)+ε1/2J (1/2) λ

(εt)+εJ (1)

λ (εt)+εHλ(J (0) λ , qα) . . .

Radiative Approximation:

  • Use only radiative (dissipative) peice of self force (Mino 2003)
  • Gives adiabatic waveforms plus a piece of post-1-adiabatic

corrections

  • Will the errors impede signal detection with LIGO/LISA?
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Studies of Radiative Approximation

  • All studies use post-Newtonian approximation to conservative

pieces of self-force to get a rough estimate of phase error

  • Early studies for LISA: PN equations of motion, circular,

equatorial orbits (Burko 2003, Drasco et al. 2005). Extended to finite eccentricity (Favata 2006). Phase errors typically <1 cycle.

  • Similar study for LIGO (Brown et al. 2006) estimated 10

percent reduction in signal-to-noise ratio.

  • Detailed study by Pound and Poisson (2008) used

Schwarzschild geodesic equations supplemented by Kidder-Will- Wiseman hybrid equations of motion self force. Suggested large phase errors from conservative piece of self force.

  • Parameter estimation errors studied by Huerta and Gair

(2008) and by Drasco et al. (2009), next talk.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results of Pound and Poisson

p → 0.9p, e0 = 0.9, µ/M = 0.1 p0 = 50, e0 = 0.9

  • Shows effect is large in weak field regime. But what about

last year of inspiral for LISA sources?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Our Results

  • Max orbital phase error in last year of inspiral. True and

approximate waveforms are lined up at some time t which is

  • ptimized over. Initial data chosen so secular pieces coincide
  • Conclusion: likely good enough for detection templates, but

further study required.