Antimicrobial Stewardship A case-based approach Disclosures: - - PDF document

antimicrobial stewardship a case based approach
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Antimicrobial Stewardship A case-based approach Disclosures: - - PDF document

Antimicrobial Stewardship A case-based approach Disclosures: Consultant for Actelion, prior research studies with Cerexa, Merck, Cubist Sarah Doernberg, MD, MAS Outline Warm-up Warm-up exercise Find someone sitting next to you Why


slide-1
SLIDE 1

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 1

Antimicrobial Stewardship A case-based approach

Sarah Doernberg, MD, MAS

Disclosures: Consultant for Actelion, prior research studies with Cerexa, Merck, Cubist Outline

  • Warm-up exercise
  • Why is antimicrobial stewardship important?
  • What is stewardship?
  • Stewardship cases
  • ASP case studies

Warm-up

  • Find someone sitting next to you
  • 2 minutes: Think about a time where you think antibiotic

management could have gone better. Please share with the person sitting next to you and share what factors contributed

  • Then, summarize with 1-2 words and write on your index card
  • E.g. Treated viral infection with antibiotics due to pressure from

patientFamily pressure, treatment of non-bacterial infection

slide-2
SLIDE 2

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 2

Factors contributing to imperfect antibiotic management

Almost 40% of inpatients receive antibiotics

  • n a given day

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 10;168(20):2254-60.

  • In 2006, 63.5% of patients at 35 University Health System Consortium hospitals

received at least one dose of antibiotics during their hospitalization

Hecker MT et al. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:972-978.

30% of inpatient antibiotic use is unnecessary

  • 58% received ≥ 1 day of unnecessary antibiotics

Noninfectious

  • r nonbacterial

33% Colonization or contamination 16% Duration too long 34% Adjustment not made 3% Redundant coverage 10% Spectrum not indicated 4%

30% of outpatient use is unnecessary!

  • Over 12% of outpatient visits

result in an antibiotic

  • 1 outpatient antibiotic

prescription per every 2 people annually

  • Only half of rx’s for

respiratory conditions were estimated to be needed

Fleming-Dutra KE et al. JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1864-73. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/p0503- unnecessary-prescriptions.html

slide-3
SLIDE 3

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 3

Sir Alexander Fleming, 1945 Nobel Prize Lecture

https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1945/fleming-lecture.pdf

Prevailing attitude from another Nobel Prize winner, Sir Frank MacFarlane Burnet

“If one looks around the medical scene in North America or Australia, the most important current change he sees is the rapidly diminishing importance of infectious diseases. The fever hospitals are vanishing or being turned to other uses. With full use of the knowledge we already possess, the effective control of every important infectious disease, with the one

  • utstanding exception of poliomyelitis, is possible”

Pier GB. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47: 1113-1114

Timeline of antibiotic resistance

http://chicago-mosaic.medill.northwestern.edu/antibiotic-resistance-superbugs/

CDC’s top drug-resistant threats

Urgent Serious Concerning

  • C. difficile

MDR Acinetobacter VRSA CRE Drug-R Campylobacter Erythromycin-R Gp A Strep Drug- resistant gonorrhea Fluc-R Candida Clinda-R Gp B Strep ESBL VRE MDR Pseudomonas Drug-R Salmonella Drug-R Shigella MRSA Drug-R Strep pneumo MDR/XDR TB

https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html

slide-4
SLIDE 4

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 4

“Last resort” antibiotics are endangered

Presehttps://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/s0531-mcr-1.htmlntation

Timeline of drug development

FDA filing, approval, launch preparation

Phase III Phase II Phase I

Pre-human research

Clinical development

IND review NDA/BLA review Year 0 Year 10 Year 5

From the IOM

“The absence of new classes in the pipeline… is alarming when

  • ne considers the ever-increasing

number of antibiotic-resistant

  • rganisms.”

Smolinski MS, et al., 2003.

New approved antimicrobials in the US

Adapted from Spellberg B et al., 2004; Boucher et al., 2009

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1983- 1987 1988- 1992 1993- 1997 1998- 2002 2003- 2007 2008- 2011

slide-5
SLIDE 5

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 5

Current pipeline is looking up

http:// http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/multimedia/data-visualizations/2016/the-critical-need-for-new-antibiotics

87% of physicians agree that AMR is a public health problem, but…

Metlay JP, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:87-94.

Risk avoidance depends on the clinical population

Metlay JP, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:87-94.

Antibiotic use also varies by prescribers

Laxminarayan et al., Science 2016

slide-6
SLIDE 6

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 6

% of people in Europe rx’d for cold/flu/sore throat ranges from 11% to 81%

Validated national cultural dimensions explain almost half of this antibiotic variation

  • Uncertainty avoidance
  • Extent the society tolerates

uncertainty and ambiguity

  • Masculinity
  • Distribution of emotional

roles between genders

  • Assertive and competitive

http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/antimicrobial-resistance-and-consumption/antimicrobial-consumption/esac-net- database/Pages/geo-distribution-consumption.aspx Borg MA. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:763-768

So what can be done to improve

  • ur antibiotic use?

What is antimicrobial stewardship?

Improve patient

  • utcomes

Decrease antimicrobial resistance Decrease costs

Interventions designed to optimize the appropriate use

  • f antimicrobials

Key assumptions

  • Prescribing behaviors

can be changed

  • Antimicrobial use is a

primary driving force in the development of AMR

  • ↓ in antimicrobial use

will ↓ resistance

  • Appropriate use

improves patient

  • utcomes and reduces

costs

MacDougall C and Polk RE. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:638-56.

The stewardship program ASP

P+T Pharmacy Clinical Services HEIC IT systems Quality and Safety

slide-7
SLIDE 7

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 7

Opportunities for stewardship

Diagnostic work-up for suspected infection

Guidelines Stewardship of laboratory testing Rapid diagnostics

Empirical therapy started

Institutional guidelines Antibiogram available Computerized decision support Allergy testing Formulary restriction Prospective audit and feedback Automatic stops

Definitive therapy

Prospective audit and feedback Antibiotic time-out Guidelines Cascade reporting Pharmacy interventions

What are the requirements for antimicrobial stewardship?

  • 6/2016 the Joint Commission announced a new Antimicrobial

Stewardship standard which will be evaluated starting 1/2017

  • CMS has issued a proposed rule that would mandate ASPs in

acute care and critical access hospitals as a Condition of Participation (CoP) in the Medicare Program

CARB

“By 2020, significant outcomes

  • f Goal 1 will include:
  • Establishment of antibiotic

stewardship programs in all acute care hospitals and improved antibiotic stewardship across all healthcare settings.

  • Reduction of inappropriate

antibiotic use by 50% in

  • utpatient settings and by 20% in

inpatient settings.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/national_action_plan_for_combating_antibotic- resistant_bacteria.pdf

California Department of Public Health: Abuse Antibiotics, Go to Jail

  • 2008: Senate Bill (SB) 739
  • “…all general acute care hospitals develop processes for evaluating the

judicious use of antibiotics and monitor results using appropriate quality improvement committees“

  • No enforcement provisions or funding
  • 2010: SB 739 Enforcement
  • Medical lead for ASP hired, development of ASP programs
  • Evaluation of SB 739 compliance – without consequences
  • 2014: SB 1311
  • Adopt and implement ASP policy, identify MD and PharmD leads, ensure

formal ASP training, report activities to hospital quality

  • “…violation…constitutes a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to

exceed $1,000, by imprisonment in a county jail, or by both that fine and imprisonment.”

Slide courtesy of Conan MacDougall, PharmD Trivedi K, Rosenberg J. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:379-384 http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB1311

slide-8
SLIDE 8

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 8

Case-based approach to stewardship

Case

  • 51 y/o F presents to you in clinic with 1 week of rhinorrhea, facial

pain, and low-grade fever. She recalls getting a “Z-pak” the last time she had this, after which she felt better within 3 days.

  • She asks you for another course of antibiotics as she has an

event approaching and wants to be better by that time.

  • What is your next step?

A. Prescribe a course of azithromycin B. Obtain further testing C. Recommend alternative treatments and schedule a follow-up appointment D. A+C E. B+C F. A+B+C

Acute infectious rhinosinusitis

  • Other supportive features: HA, fever, fatigue, maxillary dental pain,

cough, ear fullness

  • 0.5-2% of URIs progress to bacterial infection
  • 40-60% of ABRS resolves without treatment, though antibiotics can

shorten the course

  • Suspect ABRS if:
  • Sxs > 10 days without improvement
  • Sxs < 10 days with initial improvement but then worse (double sickening)

Cardinal symptom Sensitivity Specificity Purulent rhinorrhea PLUS 72% 52% Facial pressure OR 52% 48% Nasal obstruction 41% 80%

Hwang PH. JAMA 2009; 301(17): 1798-807

Inappropriate Rx of URI is common

  • Study #1: 1662 veterans with URIs
  • 57% got antibiotics when not indicated
  • Predictors for inappropriate treatment: penicillin allergy (OR 2.8),

cough (OR 1.6)

  • Study #2: 184,032 ambulatory care visits
  • 12.6% associated with antibiotic use
  • 506 rx/1000 US population annually (or, ½ people)

‒ 154 million prescriptions in ambulatory care ‒ ~50% for respiratory conditions ‒ Only 50% of these deemed appropriate ‒ 34 million unecessary rx’s

Schroeck JL et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Jul;59(7):3848-52. Fleming-Dutra KE et al. JAMA 2016; 315(17): 1864-73

slide-9
SLIDE 9

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 9

CDC/ACP recommendations

  • Do not test or give abx for bronchitis unless you

suspect PNA

  • Test pts suspected to have gp A Strep pharyngitis.

Treat if confirmed positive.

  • Treat ARS only if sxs > 10 days, severe sxs/signs,

double sickening

  • Do not give antibiotics for the common cold!

Harris AM et al. Annals Int Med 2016

Resources for patients

www.cdc.gov/getsmart

Tests to support diagnosis of viral URI

  • Procalcitonin for dx of URI in the primary care setting
  • PCT is released in response specifically to bacterial infections
  • Rises in 3 – 6 hrs, peaks 12 -24 hrs, decline 50% over 24 hours
  • Correlated with infection severity
  • Similar results in the ED setting and on the wards (CAP), though

attenuated antibiotic results

Outcome PCT (2085) Control (2126) P value Treatment failure 159 (31%) 164 (33%) 0.69 Abx initiation 116 (23%) 316 (63%) < 0.001 Abx exposure 0 days 6 days < 0.001

Schuetz P et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012

Delayed Rx strategies

  • RCT in Spain with 4 strategies for management of acute URIs
  • Immediate Rx (91% used abx)
  • Rx collection after 3 days if sxs persisted (23% used abx)
  • Pt led decision about when to fill (33% used abx)
  • No Rx (12% used abx)
  • Immediate Rx group had shorter severe sxs (0.5-1.5 days)
  • Patient satisfaction was high and equal
  • Missed work was ↓ in delayed-strategy gps vs. either other group
  • Those in the delayed-strategy groups had lower belief that abx

worked

De la Poza Abad M et al. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176(1):21-29

slide-10
SLIDE 10

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 10

Stewardship interventions to improve Rx

  • 47 primary care practices in Boston and LA with robust EMRs
  • Interventions:
  • Computerized decision support with OTC medications
  • Accountable justification at time of Rx written
  • Peer comparison

Meeker D et al. JAMA. 2016 Feb 9;315(6):562-70.

Opportunities for stewardship

Diagnostic work-up for suspected infection CDC guidelines PCT Empirical therapy started Computerized decision support with accountable justification or suggested alternatives Peer comparisons Definitive therapy Delayed Rx strategies

Case

  • You are admitting a 53 y/o F from the ED with pyelonephritis. She

has no risk factors for drug-resistant organisms.

  • Her allergy list includes: Penicillin, ciprofloxacin
  • What antibiotic will you choose?
  • A. Ceftriaxone
  • B. Aztreonam plus vancomycin
  • C. Ertapenem
  • D. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
  • E. That’s not a fair question!

Why are drug allergies important?

  • Most common cause of fatal anaphylaxis in the United

States (59%) and increasing incidence (0.27  0.51/million)

  • But, still very rare: ~150 deaths annually
  • And… Inaccurate PCN allergy label  adverse outcomes

Jerschow JACI 2014; Albin AAP 2014; Macy JACI 2014; Rolensky JACI Practice 2015; Blumenthal CID 2015; slide courtesy of Iris Otani, MD

10% ↑ LOS 23%↑C diff 14% ↑ MRSA 30% ↑ VRE 1-10% are true 10-15% report PCN allergy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 11

Allergy evaluation for optimal MSSA Rx

No allergy evaluation Hx-guided allergy eval Skin test allergy eval

Blumenthal CID 2015

What to do if your patient has a reported allergy

  • Take a detailed history of

the reaction

  • What drug?
  • What situation?
  • Character of rash
  • Mucus membrane

involvement?

  • Organ damage?
  • Subsequent exposure

(use EMR)

  • Options
  • Full-dose challenge
  • Test-dose challenge
  • Desensitization
  • Skin testing

What is safe?

Blumenthal AAAI 2015; King AAAI 2016; Chen JACI Practice 2016; courtesy of Iris Otani, MD

Vancomycin 68  37% Aztreonam 12  1% Fluoroquinolones 15  3% No Δ in adverse drug rxns Type II-IV rxn

  • Serum sickness
  • Stevens-Johnson
  • TEN
  • AIN
  • DRESS

Type I (IgE-mediated)

  • Anaphylaxis
  • Angioedema
  • Hives
  • Unknown rxn w/o

TEN, DRESS, etc. Mild

  • Itching
  • Rash (not hives)
  • EMR lists but pt

denies

Avoid PCN or ceph

Test dose for 3rd/4th ceph

  • r –penem

OR Desensitization for 1st/2nd ceph or PCN OR Alternative agent

Full dose for 3rd/4th ceph or -penem OR Test dose for 1st/2nd Ceph or PCN

Opportunities for stewardship

Diagnostic work-up for suspected infection Skin testing for allergy Empirical therapy started Decision support algorithm Test doses Definitive therapy Desensitization

slide-12
SLIDE 12

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 12

Case

  • You inherit the following patient from your colleague when you

come on service:

  • 64 y/o M community-dweller with DMII, COPD, CAD
  • Admitted 3 days ago with shortness of breath, fever, cough
  • ROS negative for GI, urinary, neurological complaints
  • CXR with LLL infiltrate
  • UA with +LE, 10-15 WBCs
  • Urine culture with Enterococcus
  • Blood cultures negative
  • Routine MRSA nasal swab: negative
  • Pt is on ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and vancomycin for “CAP and

UTI”

What antibiotics would you like to give?

  • A. Con’t ceftriaxone, azithro, vancomycin x 10 day course
  • B. Stop the vancomycin, continue ceftriaxone and azithro x 5 day

total course

  • C. Stop the vancomycin, continue ceftriaxone and azithro x 10 day

course

  • D. Stop the ceftriaxone and azithromycin, continue the vancomycin

x 10 day course

When to treat MRSA CAP

  • Very uncommon: 0.7% of large CAP cohort (n = 2259) had MRSA
  • Peaks coincided with respiratory virus season
  • Hemodialysis and DM had ↑rates
  • ~30% of patients were given anti-MRSA agents, though!
  • MRSA nasal swabs:
  • PPV 11-35% but NPV 84-99% for MRSA pneumonia
  • Sputum Gram stain and culture can be useful
  • MRSA coverage should not be routine for CAP
  • Consider if post-viral, hemodialysis, DM
  • Especially if severe

Dangerfield B et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):859-64; Sarikonda KV et al. Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1991-5. Tilahun B et al. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jan;24(1):8-12; Self WH et al. . Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 1;63(3):300-9. Jones BE et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 1;61(9):1403-10. Mandell LA et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases ; 2007 ; 44 : S27 -S72

Duration of therapy for CAP

Study Study Comparison Result

Uranga A et al.

Non-blinded RCT of CAP patients in Spain (n = 312), most rx FQ 5 days, afebrile, and stable vs. treating MD discretion (median 10 days) No Δ in cure, mortality, recurrence

el Moussaoui R et al. Blinded RCT in inpatients

with mild to moderate CAP who have initial improvement 3 days vs. 8 days of rx in patients with initial improvement No Δ in clinical success, symptom resolution, or AEs

Li JZ et al.

Meta-analysis of RCTs of CAP treatment duration in adults, 1980-2006 (n = 15) ≤ 7 days vs > 7 days Macrolides most common No Δ in cure, mortality, bacterial eradication

Dimopoulos G et al.

Meta-analysis of RCTs of CAP treatment duration in adults and kids (n = 7), 3-7 days vs. 7-10 days (adults) 3 days vs. 5 days (peds) No Δ in clinical success, mortality, relapse

Mandell LA, Clinical Infectious Diseases ; 2007 ; 44 : S27 -S72; Uranga A et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; el Moussaoui R et al.

  • BMJ. 2006;332(7554):1355; Li JZ et al. Am J Med. 2007;120(9):783; Dimopoulos G et al. Drugs. 2008;68(13):1841.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 13

Asymptomatic bacteriuria

  • Bacteria in the urine without any symptoms
  • 50-100% also have pyuria
  • Returning to our patient:
  • Admitted 3 days ago with shortness of breath, fever, cough
  • ROS negative for GI, urinary, neurological complaints
  • CXR with LLL infiltrate

Nicolle LE et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases ; 2005 ; 40 : 643 -654; Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. N Engl J Med. 1980 May 15;302(20):1109-17.

No treat No test Test Treat No test

Disease probability Our patient

auker SG, Kassirer JP. N Engl J Med. 1980 May 15;302(20):1109-17.

Take an antibiotic time-out!

  • Consider:
  • Does this patient have a

bacterial infection?

  • If so, is the patient on the

right antibiotic(s), dose, and route?

  • Can a more targeted

antibiotic be used (de- escalate)?

  • How long should the patient

receive the antibiotic(s)?

https://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/healthcare/implementation/core-elements.html

When cultures return (48- 72 hrs) When pt becomes clinically stable After a hand-

  • ff

Opportunities for stewardship

Diagnostic work-up for suspected infection Think about No treat/Test threshold MRSA nasal swab NPV can be useful Empirical therapy started Definitive therapy Take an antibiotic time-out! Shorten duration when able

slide-14
SLIDE 14

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 14

Some ASP case studies

CDC Core Elements

Element Details Leadership support Written statement, Financial support Accountability Physician leader Drug expertise PharmD leader Multidisciplinary ASP Clinicians, ICPs, QI, Micro, RN, IT Policies and guidelines Document dose/duration/indication Local treatment guidelines Specific interventions Time-out, Prior authorization, Prospective audit and feedback Pharmacy interventions IVPO, dose adjustment, PK/PD, duplicative rx alerts, stop

  • rders

Diagnosis-specific guidelines CAP, UTI, surgical ppx, culture-proven ifxns, SSTI, MRSA, CDI Tracking and reporting Process, usage, outcomes, communication to prescribers Education

http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/healthcare/implementation/checklist.html

Rapid diagnostic testing +ASP for BSIs improves mortality

Timbrook TT et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;64(1):15-23

  • With ASP: OR 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51–0.79)
  • Without ASP: OR 0.72 (95% CI, 0.46–1.12)
  • Time to effective Rx ↓ 5 hours
  • LOS ↓ 2.5 days
slide-15
SLIDE 15

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 15

Real-world example: Formulary restriction

Formulary restriction examples

White AC et al. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25:230–9.Pakyz AL et al. Antimicrob Agents

  • Chemother. 2009 May;53(5):1983-6

After implementation of a prior auth system, one center reported:

  • ↓antimicrobials > $70K
  • ↑susceptibility to

antibiotics

  • 83%95% (PsA

imipenem)

  • 84%98%

(Klebsiella imipenem)

  • No Δ LOS or mortality

Collateral damage of formulary restriction

Rahal JJ et al. JAMA. 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1233-7.

  • 80% ↓ cephalosporin use
  • 44% ↓ ceftaz-R Klebsiella
  • ↑69% imipenem-R PsA

Real-world example: Prospective audit and feedback

slide-16
SLIDE 16

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 16

Real-world example: Prospective audit and feedback

Prospective audit and feedback

Elligsen M et al. Infect Control Hosp Epi 2012: 33(4): 354-61

Real-world example: Antibiotic guidelines

idmp.ucsf.edu

Take-home

  • Antibiotics are limited resources
  • Inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotic use is common
  • Antibiotic stewardship is an approach to improving antibiotic use

with the hopes of enhancing individual and societal outcomes

  • There are many approaches you can use to improve your own

antibiotic use

  • Antibiotic stewardship programs also have multiple tools, of which

formulary restriction and prospective audit and feedback are the backbone

slide-17
SLIDE 17

[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS] 2/2/2017 17

Thank you!

Questions?

65