Analytic Combinatorics of the Mabinogion and OK-Corral Urns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

analytic combinatorics of the mabinogion and ok corral
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Analytic Combinatorics of the Mabinogion and OK-Corral Urns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral Analytic Combinatorics of the Mabinogion and OK-Corral Urns Philippe Flajolet Based on joint work with Thierry Huillet and Vincent Puyhaubert ALEA08 , Maresias, Brazil, April 2008 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Analytic Combinatorics

  • f the Mabinogion and OK-Corral Urns

Philippe Flajolet

Based on joint work with Thierry Huillet and Vincent Puyhaubert

ALEA’08, Maresias, Brazil, April 2008 1 / 20

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Analytic Combinatorics

  • f the Mabinogion and OK-Corral Urns

Philippe Flajolet

Based on joint work with Thierry Huillet and Vincent Puyhaubert

ALEA’08, Maresias, Brazil, April 2008 1 / 20

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion MABINOGION

Population of N sheep that bleat either A[aah] or B[eeh]. At times t = 0, 1, 2, . . ., a randomly chosen sheep bleats and convinces one sheep of the other kind to change its opinion. Time to reach unanimity? Probability that one minority group wins?

2 / 20

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion MABINOGION

Population of N sheep that bleat either A[aah] or B[eeh]. At times t = 0, 1, 2, . . ., a randomly chosen sheep bleats and convinces one sheep of the other kind to change its opinion. Time to reach unanimity? Probability that one minority group wins?

E.g.: French election campaign (2007): N = 60, 000, 000. Probability of reversing of majority of 51%? In the “fair” case (N/2, N/2), time to reach unanimity?

2 / 20

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

OK Corral OK CORRAL

Population of N gangsters of gang either A or B. At times t = 0, 1, 2, . . ., a randomly chosen gangster kills a member of the other group. Time to win? Probability that one minority group survives?

3 / 20

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

OK Corral OK CORRAL

Population of N gangsters of gang either A or B. At times t = 0, 1, 2, . . ., a randomly chosen gangster kills a member of the other group. Time to win? Probability that one minority group survives?

E.g.: The OK Corral fight at Tombstone. (Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday)

3 / 20

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Urn models (1)

An urn contains balls of 2 possible colours A fixed set of rules governs the urn evolution: Draw:    Red (A) Blue (B)

Place

  • Red (A)

Blue (B)

α β γ δ Balanced urns: α + β = γ + δ =: σ

Classically: β, γ ≥ 0 and σ > 0. Convention: The ball “drawn” is not withdrawn (not taken out)!

4 / 20

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Urn models (2)

All (classical) balanced 2 × 2 models are “integrable”! = An urn

  • α

β γ δ

  • ;

= A partial differential operator D = xα+1y β∂x + xγy δ+1∂y ; = An ordinary nonlinear system { ˙ X = X α+1Y β, ˙ Y = X γY δ+1} . Refs: [Fl-Ga-Pe’05]; [Fl-Dumas-Puyhaubert’06] [Conrad-Fl’06] [Hwang-Kuba-Panholzer’07+]; [Mahmoud⋆]. Cf also: Janson⋆♥♥♥

5 / 20

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

§1. Ehrenfest & Mabinogion

6 / 20

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Ehrenfest

Ehrenfest’s two chambers E =

  • −1

1 1 −1

  • ;

Formally: D = x∂y + y∂x; { ˙ X = Y ; ˙ Y = Y }; Combinatorics of set partitions: histories from (N, 0) to

(N − k, k) are partitions with N − k even classes and k odd classes: P [(N, 0) → (k, N − k), N steps] = n! Nn · N k

  • · [zn] sinhk(z) coshN−k(z)

Also: path in a special graph

3 1 2

Also: special walks on the interval k − 1

k/N

← − k

(N−k)/N

− → k + 1

7 / 20

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion (1)

Ehrenfest: k − 1

k/N

← − k

(N−k)/N

− → k + 1 Mabinogion: k − 1

(N−k)/N

← − k

k/N

− → k + 1 + absorption

Time-reversal relates M[N] and E[N + 2], with fudge factors

Theorem M1. Absorption time T of the Mabinogion urn: P(T = n + 1) = N − 1 Nn+1 N − 2 k − 1

  • n! [zn](sinh z)k−1(cosh z)N−k−1.

8 / 20

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Trajectories

0.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.3 1.5 0.2 1.0 2.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.0

9 / 20

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion (2)

Theorem M2. Probability ΩN,k of majority reversal: k = xN is initial # of A’s, with x > 1

2; A’s become extinct

− lim

N→∞

1 N log ΩN,k = log 2 + x log x + (1 − x) log(1 − x).

10 / 20

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion (2)

Theorem M2. Probability ΩN,k of majority reversal: k = xN is initial # of A’s, with x > 1

2; A’s become extinct

− lim

N→∞

1 N log ΩN,k = log 2 + x log x + (1 − x) log(1 − x).

  • Proof. Laplace transform + Laplace method (peak at end-point).

ΩN,k = · · · ∞ e−z(sinh z)k−1(cosh z)N−k−1 dz = · · · 1 (1 − y)k−1(1 + y)N−k−1 dy ∼ 2−N+1 N − 2 k − 1

  • 1

2x − 1.

N = 60, 000, 000: 51% → 10−5,215; 50.1% → 10−54.

10 / 20

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion (3)

Theorem M3. Time T till absorption , when k = xN is initial number of A’s, with x < 1

2:

P T − Nτ σ √ N

1 √ 2π t

−∞

e−w2/2 dw. τ(x) = 1 2 log 1 1 − 2x ; σ(x)2 = x(1 − x) (1 − 2x)2 + 1 2 log(1 − 2x).

11 / 20

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion (3)

Theorem M3. Time T till absorption , when k = xN is initial number of A’s, with x < 1

2:

P T − Nτ σ √ N

1 √ 2π t

−∞

e−w2/2 dw. τ(x) = 1 2 log 1 1 − 2x ; σ(x)2 = x(1 − x) (1 − 2x)2 + 1 2 log(1 − 2x).

  • Proof. Laplace transform

E

  • euT

= · · · ∞ e−z sinh uz N k−1 cosh uz N N−k−1 dz Characteristic functions u = eit/

  • N. Laplace method (with peak

inside the interval) and perturbation.

11 / 20

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Experiments

Distribution of absorption time UNFAIR URN FAIR URN

K 1 1 2 3 4 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009

Normal

  • 12 / 20
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion (4)

Theorem M4. FAIR URN N = ν + ν: time T till absorption P( T = n) ∼ 2 ν Ce−te−e−2t; n = 1 2ν log ν + tν.

13 / 20

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Mabinogion (4)

Theorem M4. FAIR URN N = ν + ν: time T till absorption P( T = n) ∼ 2 ν Ce−te−e−2t; n = 1 2ν log ν + tν. (i) Exact distribution ∝

ν/2

  • j=1

Geom 2j − 1 ν 2 . (ii) Saddle point for [zn](sinh z)N when n ≈ N log N, with suitable perturbations.

  • T∞

d

  • ℓ≥1

εℓ − 1 ℓ − 1/2, εℓ ∈ Exp(1).

[Simatos-Robert-Guillemin’08] [Biane-Pitman-Yor*]

13 / 20

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

§2. Friedman & OK-Corral

14 / 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Friedman

Adverse campaign model: F =

  • 1

1

  • = A counterbalance of influences [Friedman 1949]
  • System: { ˙

X = XY , ˙ Y = XY } is exactly solvable Distribution is expressed in terms of Eulerian numbers: rises in perms; leaves in increasing Cayley trees;

  • ther urn models [Mahmoud*] [FlDuPu06].

A(z, u) =

  • n,k

An,kuk zn n! = 1 − u 1 − uez(1−u) An,k =

  • 0≤j≤k

(−1)j n + 1 j

  • (k − j)n

15 / 20

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

OK Corral

Calamity Jane

c Morris & Goscinny

Two gangs of m and n gunwomen At any time, one shooter shoots Survival probabilities? Time till one gang wins ≃ size of surviving population?

[Williams & McIlroy 1998] [Kingman 1999] [Kingman & Volkov 2003]

100 80 60 40 20 100 80 60 40 20

(m, n) = (50, 50)

100 80 60 40 20 100 80 60 40 20

m + n = 100 16 / 20

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

OK Corral (1)

Friedman F =

  • 1

1

  • ; OK Corral O =
  • −1

−1

  • ; i.e., O = −F

Time reversal: PO(m, n ց s) = s m + nPF(s, 0 → m, n) Theorem O1. Probability of s survivors of type A, from (m, n) PO(m, n, s) = s! (m + n)!

m

  • k=1

(−1)m−k k − 1 s − 1 m + n n + k

  • km+n−s

Involves generalized Eulerian numbers and expansions + identities.

Theorem O2. The probability that first group survives is POS(m, n) = 1 (m + n)!

m

  • k=1

Am+n−k = 1 (m + n)!

n

  • k=1

(−1)m−k m + n n + k

  • km+n

17 / 20

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

OK Corral (2)

Theorem O3. NEARLY FAIR FIGHTS: If

m−n √m+n = θ, then

POS(m, n) = 1 √ 2π θ

√ 3 −∞

e−t2/2 dt+O 1 n

  • .

Theorem O4. UNFAIR FIGHTS: Probability of survival with m = αn and α < 1 is exponentially small. It is related to the Large Deviation rate for Eulerian statistics.

Make use of explicit GFs and usual Large Deviation techniques [Quasi-Powers, shifting of the mean]

18 / 20

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Theorem O5. [Kingman] Number of survivors: If (m − n) ≫ √m + n then in probability S → √ m2 − n2; If (m − n) ≪ √m + n then P(S ≤ λn3/4) → 1 √ 2π λ2√

3/8 −∞

e−t2/2 dt. Only dominant asymptotics, indirectly from Kingman et al. Get: Theorem O6. MOMENTS E[Sℓ] = 1 (m + n)!

m

  • k=1

(−1)m−k m + n n − k

  • km+n−1 [fℓ(k)Q(k) + gℓ(k)] ,

where fℓ, gℓ are polynomials and Q(k) = k

k + k(k−1) k2

+ · · · is Ramanujan’s = birthday paradox function. Complex asymptotics ` a la Lindel¨

  • f–Rice.

19 / 20

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Conclusions?

Analytic combinatorics has something to say about balanced urn models, including some nonstandard ones = probabilistic approaches [Mahmoud–Smythe–Janson]. Analysis of imbalanced models??? Higher dimensions?

20 / 20

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Urn models Ehrenfest and Mabinogion Friedman and OK-Corral

Conclusions?

Analytic combinatorics has something to say about balanced urn models, including some nonstandard ones = probabilistic approaches [Mahmoud–Smythe–Janson]. Analysis of imbalanced models??? Higher dimensions? “Rather surprisingly, relatively sizable classes of nonlinear systems are found to have an extra property, integrability, which changes the picture completely. Integrable systems [...] form an archipelago of solvable models in a sea of unknown, and can be used as stepping stones to investigate properties of ‘nearby’ non-integrable systems.” Eilbeck, Mikhailov, Santini, and Zakharov (2001)

20 / 20