An entire transcendental family with two singular values and a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an entire transcendental family with two singular values
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An entire transcendental family with two singular values and a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An entire transcendental family with two singular values and a persistent Siegel disk Facultat de Matem` atiques de la Universitat de Barcelona Toulouse, June 17, 2009 R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB) ETF family with 2 SV and a SD


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An entire transcendental family with two singular values and a persistent Siegel disk

Facultat de Matem` atiques de la Universitat de Barcelona

Toulouse, June 17, 2009

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 1 / 19

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Setup

We introduce the family of entire transcendental functions fa(z) = λa(ez/a(z − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)), where z ∈ C, a ∈ C∗ and λ = eiθ, θ ∈ (R \ Q) ∩ B is FIXED. fa(0) = 0 and f ′

a(0) = λ ⇒ fa has a Siegel disk ∆a around z = 0.

fa has two singular values simple crit. value fa(c) where c = −1 is a critical point.

  • asymp. value va = λa(a −1). It has one finite preimage at pa = a −1.

One of the two singular orbits must accumulate on ∂∆a, but they may alternate.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 2 / 19

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Setup

We introduce the family of entire transcendental functions fa(z) = λa(ez/a(z − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)), where z ∈ C, a ∈ C∗ and λ = eiθ, θ ∈ (R \ Q) ∩ B is FIXED. fa(0) = 0 and f ′

a(0) = λ ⇒ fa has a Siegel disk ∆a around z = 0.

fa has two singular values simple crit. value fa(c) where c = −1 is a critical point.

  • asymp. value va = λa(a −1). It has one finite preimage at pa = a −1.

One of the two singular orbits must accumulate on ∂∆a, but they may alternate.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 2 / 19

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Setup

We introduce the family of entire transcendental functions fa(z) = λa(ez/a(z − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)), where z ∈ C, a ∈ C∗ and λ = eiθ, θ ∈ (R \ Q) ∩ B is FIXED. fa(0) = 0 and f ′

a(0) = λ ⇒ fa has a Siegel disk ∆a around z = 0.

fa has two singular values simple crit. value fa(c) where c = −1 is a critical point.

  • asymp. value va = λa(a −1). It has one finite preimage at pa = a −1.

One of the two singular orbits must accumulate on ∂∆a, but they may alternate.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 2 / 19

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Setup

We introduce the family of entire transcendental functions fa(z) = λa(ez/a(z − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)), where z ∈ C, a ∈ C∗ and λ = eiθ, θ ∈ (R \ Q) ∩ B is FIXED. fa(0) = 0 and f ′

a(0) = λ ⇒ fa has a Siegel disk ∆a around z = 0.

fa has two singular values simple crit. value fa(c) where c = −1 is a critical point.

  • asymp. value va = λa(a −1). It has one finite preimage at pa = a −1.

One of the two singular orbits must accumulate on ∂∆a, but they may alternate.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 2 / 19

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Motivation 1

This family ”contains” three very important examples. the semistandard map f1(z) = λzez; the exponential family fa(z) − →

a→0 λ(ez − 1);

the quadratic polynomial fa(z) − →

a→∞ λ(z + z2 2 )

λ(ez − 1) λzez λ(z + z2

2 )

It might provide a link between them.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 3 / 19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Motivation 1

This family ”contains” three very important examples. the semistandard map f1(z) = λzez; the exponential family fa(z) − →

a→0 λ(ez − 1);

the quadratic polynomial fa(z) − →

a→∞ λ(z + z2 2 )

λ(ez − 1) λzez λ(z + z2

2 )

It might provide a link between them.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 3 / 19

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Motivation 1

This family ”contains” three very important examples. the semistandard map f1(z) = λzez; the exponential family fa(z) − →

a→0 λ(ez − 1);

the quadratic polynomial fa(z) − →

a→∞ λ(z + z2 2 )

λ(ez − 1) λzez λ(z + z2

2 )

It might provide a link between them.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 3 / 19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Motivation 1

This family ”contains” three very important examples. the semistandard map f1(z) = λzez; the exponential family fa(z) − →

a→0 λ(ez − 1);

the quadratic polynomial fa(z) − →

a→∞ λ(z + z2 2 )

λ(ez − 1) λzez λ(z + z2

2 )

It might provide a link between them.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 3 / 19

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Motivation 1

In fact, if we conjugate by u = z/a, we obtain ga(u) = λ(eu(au − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)) Then, if we write a = a0 + ε, the perturbation is of the form ga(z) = ga0(z) + εu2h(u), with h(0) = 0. This type of perturbations were used to relate the semistandard map to the quadratic family and, in particular, to prove the necessity of the Brjuno condition for the semistandard map (see [Geyer01]).

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 4 / 19

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Motivation 1

In fact, if we conjugate by u = z/a, we obtain ga(u) = λ(eu(au − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)) Then, if we write a = a0 + ε, the perturbation is of the form ga(z) = ga0(z) + εu2h(u), with h(0) = 0. This type of perturbations were used to relate the semistandard map to the quadratic family and, in particular, to prove the necessity of the Brjuno condition for the semistandard map (see [Geyer01]).

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 4 / 19

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Motivation 1

In fact, if we conjugate by u = z/a, we obtain ga(u) = λ(eu(au − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)) Then, if we write a = a0 + ε, the perturbation is of the form ga(z) = ga0(z) + εu2h(u), with h(0) = 0. This type of perturbations were used to relate the semistandard map to the quadratic family and, in particular, to prove the necessity of the Brjuno condition for the semistandard map (see [Geyer01]).

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 4 / 19

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Motivation 2

fa(z) = λa(ez/a(z − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)), This family contains all ETF functions (up to conformal conjugacy) with the following properties finite order,

  • ne asymptotic value va, with exactly one finite preimage pa of va,

a fixed point (at 0) of multiplier λ ∈ C a simple critical point (at z = −1) and no other critical points. It follows that va = λa(a − 1) and pa = a − 1. One parameter family, but no singular orbit has a predetermined behaviour.

Previous work: S. Zakeri, Dynamics of cubic Siegel polynomials,

  • Comm. Math. Phys., 1999.
  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 5 / 19

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Motivation 2

fa(z) = λa(ez/a(z − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)), This family contains all ETF functions (up to conformal conjugacy) with the following properties finite order,

  • ne asymptotic value va, with exactly one finite preimage pa of va,

a fixed point (at 0) of multiplier λ ∈ C a simple critical point (at z = −1) and no other critical points. It follows that va = λa(a − 1) and pa = a − 1. One parameter family, but no singular orbit has a predetermined behaviour.

Previous work: S. Zakeri, Dynamics of cubic Siegel polynomials,

  • Comm. Math. Phys., 1999.
  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 5 / 19

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Motivation 2

fa(z) = λa(ez/a(z − (a − 1)) + (a − 1)), This family contains all ETF functions (up to conformal conjugacy) with the following properties finite order,

  • ne asymptotic value va, with exactly one finite preimage pa of va,

a fixed point (at 0) of multiplier λ ∈ C a simple critical point (at z = −1) and no other critical points. It follows that va = λa(a − 1) and pa = a − 1. One parameter family, but no singular orbit has a predetermined behaviour.

Previous work: S. Zakeri, Dynamics of cubic Siegel polynomials,

  • Comm. Math. Phys., 1999.
  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 5 / 19

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Goals

Long term goal: to find a path linking the quadratic polynomial with the semistandard map (or other functions), to study properties of ∂∆a. More inmediate goals:

◮ To study the possible scenarios for the dynamical plane of fa; ◮ To investigate the parameter space: regions of J−stability and their

boundaries, capture components, semi-hyperbolic components,....

◮ To produce examples of bounded or unbounded Siegel disks with

particular properties.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 6 / 19

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Goals

Long term goal: to find a path linking the quadratic polynomial with the semistandard map (or other functions), to study properties of ∂∆a. More inmediate goals:

◮ To study the possible scenarios for the dynamical plane of fa; ◮ To investigate the parameter space: regions of J−stability and their

boundaries, capture components, semi-hyperbolic components,....

◮ To produce examples of bounded or unbounded Siegel disks with

particular properties.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 6 / 19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Possible scenarios

At least one of the singular orbits (SO) must accumulate on ∂∆a. We see different dynamical planes depending on which SO is accumulating. The other SO is free.

◮ If the free SO is attracted to an attracting periodic orbit, we say that a

is a semihyperbolic parameter and a ∈ H = Hc ∪ Hv.

◮ If the free SO intersects the Siegel disc ∆a we say that a is a capture

parameter, and a ∈ C = C c ∪ C v.

◮ If the free SO escapes to infinity, we say that a is an escaping

parameter and a ∈ E c ∪ E v.

◮ The six sets Hc, Hv, C c, C v, E c and E v are pairwise disjoint.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 7 / 19

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Possible scenarios

At least one of the singular orbits (SO) must accumulate on ∂∆a. We see different dynamical planes depending on which SO is accumulating. The other SO is free.

◮ If the free SO is attracted to an attracting periodic orbit, we say that a

is a semihyperbolic parameter and a ∈ H = Hc ∪ Hv.

◮ If the free SO intersects the Siegel disc ∆a we say that a is a capture

parameter, and a ∈ C = C c ∪ C v.

◮ If the free SO escapes to infinity, we say that a is an escaping

parameter and a ∈ E c ∪ E v.

◮ The six sets Hc, Hv, C c, C v, E c and E v are pairwise disjoint.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 7 / 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Possible scenarios

At least one of the singular orbits (SO) must accumulate on ∂∆a. We see different dynamical planes depending on which SO is accumulating. The other SO is free.

◮ If the free SO is attracted to an attracting periodic orbit, we say that a

is a semihyperbolic parameter and a ∈ H = Hc ∪ Hv.

◮ If the free SO intersects the Siegel disc ∆a we say that a is a capture

parameter, and a ∈ C = C c ∪ C v.

◮ If the free SO escapes to infinity, we say that a is an escaping

parameter and a ∈ E c ∪ E v.

◮ The six sets Hc, Hv, C c, C v, E c and E v are pairwise disjoint.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 7 / 19

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Possible scenarios

At least one of the singular orbits (SO) must accumulate on ∂∆a. We see different dynamical planes depending on which SO is accumulating. The other SO is free.

◮ If the free SO is attracted to an attracting periodic orbit, we say that a

is a semihyperbolic parameter and a ∈ H = Hc ∪ Hv.

◮ If the free SO intersects the Siegel disc ∆a we say that a is a capture

parameter, and a ∈ C = C c ∪ C v.

◮ If the free SO escapes to infinity, we say that a is an escaping

parameter and a ∈ E c ∪ E v.

◮ The six sets Hc, Hv, C c, C v, E c and E v are pairwise disjoint.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 7 / 19

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Possible scenarios

At least one of the singular orbits (SO) must accumulate on ∂∆a. We see different dynamical planes depending on which SO is accumulating. The other SO is free.

◮ If the free SO is attracted to an attracting periodic orbit, we say that a

is a semihyperbolic parameter and a ∈ H = Hc ∪ Hv.

◮ If the free SO intersects the Siegel disc ∆a we say that a is a capture

parameter, and a ∈ C = C c ∪ C v.

◮ If the free SO escapes to infinity, we say that a is an escaping

parameter and a ∈ E c ∪ E v.

◮ The six sets Hc, Hv, C c, C v, E c and E v are pairwise disjoint.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 7 / 19

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Parameter plane

Hv

2

Hv

2

Hv

1 1 1 1

Escape algorithm. Main capture component C v

λ = e2πiθ, θ = 1+

√ 5 2

.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 8 / 19

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Parameter plane

E c (black) and E v (grey) Components of Hc

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 9 / 19

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Parameter plane

Theorem

a) All components of H ∪ C are open and simply connected. b) Every component of Hv is unbounded while every component of Hc is bounded. c) If a ∈ H ∪ C, then fa is J-stable. Hence, in any component of H ∪ C, the boundary ∂∆a moves holomorphically with the parameter. This allows us to spread ”properties” to whole components of J −stability, as long as they are satisfied for one parameter value.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 10 / 19

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Parameter plane

Theorem

a) All components of H ∪ C are open and simply connected. b) Every component of Hv is unbounded while every component of Hc is bounded. c) If a ∈ H ∪ C, then fa is J-stable. Hence, in any component of H ∪ C, the boundary ∂∆a moves holomorphically with the parameter. This allows us to spread ”properties” to whole components of J −stability, as long as they are satisfied for one parameter value.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 10 / 19

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Parameter plane

Theorem

a) All components of H ∪ C are open and simply connected. b) Every component of Hv is unbounded while every component of Hc is bounded. c) If a ∈ H ∪ C, then fa is J-stable. Hence, in any component of H ∪ C, the boundary ∂∆a moves holomorphically with the parameter. This allows us to spread ”properties” to whole components of J −stability, as long as they are satisfied for one parameter value.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 10 / 19

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Parameter plane

Theorem

a) All components of H ∪ C are open and simply connected. b) Every component of Hv is unbounded while every component of Hc is bounded. c) If a ∈ H ∪ C, then fa is J-stable. Hence, in any component of H ∪ C, the boundary ∂∆a moves holomorphically with the parameter. This allows us to spread ”properties” to whole components of J −stability, as long as they are satisfied for one parameter value.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 10 / 19

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Parameter plane

Theorem

a) All components of H ∪ C are open and simply connected. b) Every component of Hv is unbounded while every component of Hc is bounded. c) If a ∈ H ∪ C, then fa is J-stable. Hence, in any component of H ∪ C, the boundary ∂∆a moves holomorphically with the parameter. This allows us to spread ”properties” to whole components of J −stability, as long as they are satisfied for one parameter value.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 10 / 19

slide-30
SLIDE 30

proof

Most arguments for this proof are standard but it needs the following fact.

Proposition

The set E c (escaping parameters for the critical orbit) contains curves a(t) → 0 as t → ∞. As a consequence, no component of H ∪ C can suround a = 0.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 11 / 19

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Dynamical planes

a ∈ Hv a = 1 ∈ C v

0 (SS Map)

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 12 / 19

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Dynamical plane: a ∈ Hc

Unbounded Siegel disk and attracting basin for a ∈ Hc

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 13 / 19

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Large values of |a| (for any λ)

Theorem

There exists M > 0, such that fa(z) is polynomial-like of degree two for |a| > M. Moreover the small filled Julia set (and in particular ∆a) is contained in D(0, R) with R independent of a.

Corollary

The main capture component C v

0 = {a ∈ C | va ∈ ∆a} is bounded

The set Hc ∪ C c ∪ E c is bounded. For |a| > M and θ ∈ CT, the boundary of ∆a is a quasicircle containing the critical point. By J−stability, this is true for all a ∈ Hv, for example. In fact, for |a| > M, the map fa,θ is linearizable iff Qθ is linearizable and, moreover, the two Siegel disks are ”quasiconformally related”.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 14 / 19

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Large values of |a| (for any λ)

Theorem

There exists M > 0, such that fa(z) is polynomial-like of degree two for |a| > M. Moreover the small filled Julia set (and in particular ∆a) is contained in D(0, R) with R independent of a.

Corollary

The main capture component C v

0 = {a ∈ C | va ∈ ∆a} is bounded

The set Hc ∪ C c ∪ E c is bounded. For |a| > M and θ ∈ CT, the boundary of ∆a is a quasicircle containing the critical point. By J−stability, this is true for all a ∈ Hv, for example. In fact, for |a| > M, the map fa,θ is linearizable iff Qθ is linearizable and, moreover, the two Siegel disks are ”quasiconformally related”.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 14 / 19

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Large values of |a| (for any λ)

Theorem

There exists M > 0, such that fa(z) is polynomial-like of degree two for |a| > M. Moreover the small filled Julia set (and in particular ∆a) is contained in D(0, R) with R independent of a.

Corollary

The main capture component C v

0 = {a ∈ C | va ∈ ∆a} is bounded

The set Hc ∪ C c ∪ E c is bounded. For |a| > M and θ ∈ CT, the boundary of ∆a is a quasicircle containing the critical point. By J−stability, this is true for all a ∈ Hv, for example. In fact, for |a| > M, the map fa,θ is linearizable iff Qθ is linearizable and, moreover, the two Siegel disks are ”quasiconformally related”.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 14 / 19

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Large values of |a| (for any λ)

Theorem

There exists M > 0, such that fa(z) is polynomial-like of degree two for |a| > M. Moreover the small filled Julia set (and in particular ∆a) is contained in D(0, R) with R independent of a.

Corollary

The main capture component C v

0 = {a ∈ C | va ∈ ∆a} is bounded

The set Hc ∪ C c ∪ E c is bounded. For |a| > M and θ ∈ CT, the boundary of ∆a is a quasicircle containing the critical point. By J−stability, this is true for all a ∈ Hv, for example. In fact, for |a| > M, the map fa,θ is linearizable iff Qθ is linearizable and, moreover, the two Siegel disks are ”quasiconformally related”.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 14 / 19

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Large values of |a| (for any λ)

Theorem

There exists M > 0, such that fa(z) is polynomial-like of degree two for |a| > M. Moreover the small filled Julia set (and in particular ∆a) is contained in D(0, R) with R independent of a.

Corollary

The main capture component C v

0 = {a ∈ C | va ∈ ∆a} is bounded

The set Hc ∪ C c ∪ E c is bounded. For |a| > M and θ ∈ CT, the boundary of ∆a is a quasicircle containing the critical point. By J−stability, this is true for all a ∈ Hv, for example. In fact, for |a| > M, the map fa,θ is linearizable iff Qθ is linearizable and, moreover, the two Siegel disks are ”quasiconformally related”.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 14 / 19

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Unbounded Siegel disks

This situation is in contrast with what happens for |a| < M, where we find unbounded Siegel disks, and hence with non-locally connected boundary [Baker+Dominguez]. Recall CT ⊂ D ⊂ H ⊂ B.

Proposition

Let θ ∈ H. (a) If a ∈ E c. Then ∆a is unbounded and va ∈ ∂∆a. (b) If a ∈ Hc ∪ C c, then ∆a is unbounded or ∂∆a is an indecomposable continuum. Part (a) is an adaptation of Herman’s proof of the fact that the exponential map has unbounded Siegel disks for these rotation

  • numbers. Part (b) uses additionally results of Rogers, generalized to

ETF of bounded type.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 15 / 19

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Unbounded Siegel disks

This situation is in contrast with what happens for |a| < M, where we find unbounded Siegel disks, and hence with non-locally connected boundary [Baker+Dominguez]. Recall CT ⊂ D ⊂ H ⊂ B.

Proposition

Let θ ∈ H. (a) If a ∈ E c. Then ∆a is unbounded and va ∈ ∂∆a. (b) If a ∈ Hc ∪ C c, then ∆a is unbounded or ∂∆a is an indecomposable continuum. Part (a) is an adaptation of Herman’s proof of the fact that the exponential map has unbounded Siegel disks for these rotation

  • numbers. Part (b) uses additionally results of Rogers, generalized to

ETF of bounded type.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 15 / 19

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Unbounded Siegel disks

This situation is in contrast with what happens for |a| < M, where we find unbounded Siegel disks, and hence with non-locally connected boundary [Baker+Dominguez]. Recall CT ⊂ D ⊂ H ⊂ B.

Proposition

Let θ ∈ H. (a) If a ∈ E c. Then ∆a is unbounded and va ∈ ∂∆a. (b) If a ∈ Hc ∪ C c, then ∆a is unbounded or ∂∆a is an indecomposable continuum. Part (a) is an adaptation of Herman’s proof of the fact that the exponential map has unbounded Siegel disks for these rotation

  • numbers. Part (b) uses additionally results of Rogers, generalized to

ETF of bounded type.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 15 / 19

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Proof ingredients

Theorem (Herman 85)

Suppose θ ∈ H and ∆ bounded. If f |∂∆ is a homeomorphism, then ∂∆ contains a critical point.

Theorem (Rogers 92, generalized)

Let f ∈ B and ∆ be a bounded Siegel disk of f . If ∂∆ is a decomposable continum, then ∂∆ separates C into exactly two complementary domains.

Theorem (Rottenfusser 08?)

If f ∈ B, then I(f ) ∪ {∞} is arc-connected.

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 16 / 19

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Two questions

Question 1: Is the boundary of C v

0 a Jordan curve? (curve where both

singular orbits are on the boundary of ∆a) – Yes for cubics [Zakeri’99].

1 1

Question 2: What is the nature of ∂∆a when a ∈ ∂C v

0 ?

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 17 / 19

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Two questions

Question 1: Is the boundary of C v

0 a Jordan curve? (curve where both

singular orbits are on the boundary of ∆a) – Yes for cubics [Zakeri’99].

1 1

Question 2: What is the nature of ∂∆a when a ∈ ∂C v

0 ?

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 17 / 19

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Two examples

a1, a2 ∈ ∂C v

0 . Both singular values are conjectured to be on the boundary.

fa1 fa2

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 18 / 19

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Thank you for your attention!!

  • R. Berenguel and N. Fagella (Fac. Mat. UB)

ETF family with 2 SV and a SD Toulouse, June 17, 2009 19 / 19