An Auditors Perspective on Healthcare Sergei Pekh MBA, CPA, CMA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an auditor s perspective
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An Auditors Perspective on Healthcare Sergei Pekh MBA, CPA, CMA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Auditors Perspective on Healthcare Sergei Pekh MBA, CPA, CMA Audit Principal Doug McKenzie CA, LLB Audit Principal Who Are We Alberta legislatures independent audit office audit provincial departments and crown corps


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An Auditor’s Perspective

  • n Healthcare

Sergei Pekh MBA, CPA, CMA Audit Principal Doug McKenzie CA, LLB Audit Principal

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Who Are We

  • Alberta legislature’s independent audit office
  • audit provincial departments and crown corps
  • “clients” include MLAs and Albertans
  • financial audits
  • systems (or value for money) audits:

systems to ensure economy and efficiency

processes to measure and report effectiveness

  • ~150 staff in Edmonton and Calgary, plus agents
  • 2015-16 budget = $27M

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Three Examples

  • chronic disease management
  • mental health services
  • seniors care

common themes:

– continuity of care over time and across continuum – integration of AHS and primary care – information sharing

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why We Audited CDM

  • affects all of us – individuals, family, friends, community
  • prevalence high and increasing
  • cost to public healthcare = $ billions
  • medicine has developed systems to manage

chronic disease effectively:

1) patient’s medical home (continuity, care team) 2) clinical practice guidelines (e.g., diabetes care) 3) patient engagement in care planning

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CDM - Main Conclusions

  • CDM is critical to health of Albertans and

sustainability of public healthcare

  • significant opportunities exist to improve

CDM in Alberta

  • improvement will take time, but dramatic

action must be taken now

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What is CDM?

  • patients need continuity of care:

– a family doctor – a care plan that is actively managed – a care team

  • good information systems to support

physicians, care teams and patients

  • patient engagement

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Our Hope Today—Encouragement

  • LPNs are key providers and members
  • f the patient’s team
  • across the system, we see improvements

driven from the ground up (vs. top down)

  • support efforts to improve outcomes

measurement and evidence-based practice

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

High Priority Chronic Diseases

“Long-lasting condition, usually progressive, and cannot be cured”

  • Hypertension
  • Heart failure
  • Heart disease
  • Depression
  • Diabetes
  • COPD
  • Asthma
  • Obesity

8

Ministry Priorities 

slide-9
SLIDE 9

High Priority Chronic Diseases

“Long-lasting condition, usually progressive, and cannot be cured”

  • Hypertension
  • Heart failure
  • Heart disease
  • Depression
  • Diabetes
  • COPD
  • Asthma
  • Obesity

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Affects All of Us

  • ~25% of Albertans will develop diabetes
  • > 90% will have high BP by age 80
  • > 20% will have a mental illness at some point
  • 1/5 women and 1/6 men will have a stroke
  • cost to Alberta’s public healthcare system

is $ billions/year

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Annual Cost

735,000 patients w hypertension, diabetes, COPD, heart disease:

1.8M hospital days (60%) = $2.9B

ALOS 11.8 days (~2½ x avg)

6M GP visits (34%) = $385M

4M specialist visits (38%) = $645M

> 10M prescriptions = $470M

575K ER visits (27%) = $105M 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Drivers

  • Growing population
  • Aging
  • Unhealthy lifestyle factors

lack of exercise

poor diet

smoking

excessive alcohol consumption

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Rising Burden

14

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1957 1985 2000 Age Year

Albertans' Life Expectancy at Birth

Disabled years Disability-free years

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The “M” in CDM

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What We Examined

Whether Ministry of Health has systems to:

  • manage the business of providing healthcare to

individuals with CD

  • actively link all Albertans with a family physician

and care team

  • plan and evaluate CDM delivered by AHS

and Primary Care Networks

  • support CD patients through care plans
  • support CDM with IT, including:

– EMRs in physician offices and AHS, and – personal health records 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What We Did Not Audit

  • social determinants of health (income, education, housing)
  • social/economic impacts (pain & suffering, productivity)
  • health promotion and prevention programs provided to all
  • CD services by specialists, hospitals, home care,

long-term care or referral processes between them and family physicians

  • the work of any specific individual physician or provider

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Findings - Department

“Alberta’s Primary Health Care Strategy describes the key elements of CDM. However, the department does not currently have a structured approach or business model to deliver CDM services at the level of a high-performing healthcare system.”

The ministry has:

  • not set clear expectations for CDM services (e.g., care plans and care teams)
  • no system to determine CDM demand or see it is met
  • does not have formal processes to obtain assurance physicians or AHS

provide CDM in accordance with good practice

  • does not have adequate systems to evaluate CDM effectiveness
  • privacy concerns re sharing patient info but can overcome them

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Findings—GPs & PCNs

  • ministry has no process to know if CD patients have a

family physician

many PCN physicians have identified their patients but most have not

~490,000 Albertans do not (>16,000 with CD)

  • no requirement for PCN physicians to identify CD patients
  • r patients with risk factors (e.g., pre-diabetes)
  • ministry has not determined optimal size and distribution
  • f care teams
  • 750 GPs not in a PCN (> 520,000 patients/84,000 w CD)

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Findings – Care Plans

  • no expectations set for physician care plans

– what it should contain – how it should be implemented – program coverage

  • < 20% of individuals with chronic disease have a care plan, and the

number of patients without a care plan is increasing as the incidence

  • f chronic disease rises
  • no ongoing process to evaluate and improve care plan effectiveness

(data exists – e.g., AHS inpatient and lab)

  • many GPs lack information systems to manage care plans effectively
  • AHS does not obtain process to obtain patient’s care plan or

inform GP if it considers changes are necessary

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Care Plans

21

Physician Care Plans 128,725

Pharmacist Care Plans 70,700

16,975

Long-term Care Plans?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Care Plans

22

Physician Care Plans 128,725

Pharmacist Care Plans 70,700

16,975

Physio Care Plans?

Long-term Care Plans?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Care Plans

23

Physician Care Plans 128,725

Pharmacist Care Plans 70,700

16,975

Physio Care Plans?

Long-term Care Plans?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Care Plans

24

Physician Care Plans 128,725

Pharmacist Care Plans 70,700

16,975

Physio Care Plans?

Long-term Care Plans?

Mental Health Care Plans?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Findings—IT

AHS shares its hospital, lab, and DI data through Netcare

X > 12 different EMR systems and none communicate with others X clusters of EMR excellence are emerging but most GPs do not currently use their systems to manage care plans, maintain a chronic disease registry, or measure and report CDM effectiveness X the ministry and other providers have no access to GP EMRs X the ministry does not currently provide Albertans access to their personal health information

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Public Mental Health System

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Mental Health—Findings

no follow through on mental health strategies

no integrated case management – still work in silos

  • fragmented care planning
  • lack of care pathways
  • no operating model to support care teams
  • family physicians and AHS operate separately

IT systems remain incompatible and outdated

  • CIS is still 10 years out – can patients wait?
  • performance measurement and HoNOS
  • thoughts on privacy and information sharing
slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Mental Health—Findings

housing supports needed as part of integrated care

  • no meaningful change at the front line from 2008
  • supply/demand gap analysis not done
  • no waitlist management (with few exceptions)
  • lack of standardized assessment tool
  • no coordinated placement mechanisms… even for

spaces AHS funds directly

  • community placement for ALC patients in hospitals is

a problem – what about patients treated in the community?

  • many entities are involved in housing—why should AHS

take the lead?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Long-term Care

  • continuing care = home care,

assisted living and long-term care

  • we focused on long-term care
  • 170 LTC facilities with 14,370 beds
  • facilities receive:

– $910M from AHS for healthcare services – $285M from residents for accommodation services

  • care plans
slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Resident Care

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

LTC Facility Oversight

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

LTC Facility Oversight

No single program or function is responsible to manage overall performance of individual facilities, including authority to act on poor

  • performance. Data to do so exists.

No process to identify high risk facilities, and no standard set of proactive compliance tools to escalate action based on risk.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

What Needs To Be Done

 skills, resourcefulness and dedication of providers  many good practices in Alberta

Leadership and action is needed at the system level:

  • the orchestra needs a conductor
  • recognize vested interest and instill sense of purpose
  • patient-centered and population-focused
  • long-term commitment beyond annual fiscal cycles

and 4-year political terms You are vital as care providers and ministry allies in reshaping and revitalizing healthcare, including CDM.

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Questions