Aligning Law and Action
a conceptual and computational inquiry G i- v
- L
- r
- f
- f
Aligning Law and Action a conceptual and computational inquiry P - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Aligning Law and Action a conceptual and computational inquiry P h . D . T h e s i s D e f e n s e 8 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 6 G i o v a n n i S i l e n o L e i b n i z C e n t e r f o
Aligning Law and Action
a conceptual and computational inquiry G iProblem context
Problem context, consequences
I n p r a c t i c e , t h e s a m e e x p e c t a t iProblem context, consequences
→ I n c r e a s e d e x p e c t a t iInitial research question
a r e t h r e e m a t t e r s
l y l
e l y c
p l e d
Three frictioning “realities”
Three representational domains
sThree representational domains
sf r i c t i
s i d e n t i fj e d b y a l i g n m e n t c h e c k i n g
l e g a l c a s e s l e g a l nCommon representational ground?
s?
l e g a l c a s e s l e g a l na c t i
s . . r
e s !
l e g a l c a s e sn a r r a t i v e r
e s i n s t i t u t i
a l r
e s
e r a t i
a l r
e s f u n c t i
a l r
e s s
i a l r
e s
n a r r a t i v e r
e s i n s t i t u t i
a l r
e s
e r a t i
a l r
e s f u n c t i
a l r
e s s
i a l r
e s
agent-role:
a b s t r a c t iWhat's in an agent-role model?
Normative positions
Institutional positions
First Hohfeldian square
C L A I M R I G H T D U T Y cSecond Hohfeldian square
P O WE R A B I L I T Y L I A B I L I T Y S U B J E C T I O N cSimilar asymmetries
T h e s e a s y m m e t r i e s c a n b e e x p l a i n e d b y r e f e r r i n g tA E I O
A L L S O ME N O N E S O ME N O T ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cThe (existential) Aristotelian Square
A E I O
A L L N O N E S O ME N O T S O MEY U
A L LA E I O
A L L N O N E S O ME N O T S O MEY U
A L LA E Y
f+
Deontic triangle of contrariety
pA E Y
f+
A E Y
f+
First Hohfeldian Prism
E Y
“ p e r m ” , f a c u l t y t+
+
A
Second Hohfeldian Prism
( pNegative liability – confirmation
“Know all men by these presents [..] we have unanimously and deliberately declared [..] that the King of Spain has forfeited, ipso jure, all hereditary right to the sovereignty of those countries, and are determined from henceforward not to acknowledge his sovereignty or jurisdiction [..], nor suffer others to do it.”Agentive positions
From institutional to agentive
Why is this important?
Cognitive grounding
→ M a p p i n g“It is obligatory to finish the thesis in four years.” “It is forbidden that four years are spent without finishing the thesis.”
A r e t h e y t h e s a m e ?“It is obligatory to finish the thesis in four years.”
~ o b l ( t h e s i s ¬ 4 y p a s s e d ) ∨“It is forbidden that four years are spent without finishing the thesis.”
~ f“It is obligatory to finish the thesis in four years.” “It is forbidden that four years are spent without finishing the thesis.”
B u t i n p r i n c i p l e t h e y a c t i v a t e d i fg e r e n t p a t t e r n s ( A C Q U I R E v s P R E V E N T ) → d i fg e r e n t s u s c e p t i b i l i t i e s !
Returning on agility
p u n c t u a l
c a s e sa d a p t i v e
nL
i n g f
f r i c t i
s . . .
l e g a l nChecking alignment between models
NChecking alignment between models
a r e t h e y “ cn
m a t i v e m
e l i s s u e d a f t e r i n t e r p r e t a t i
Checking alignment between models
a r e t h e y “ cn
m a t i v e m
e l i s s u e d a f t e r i n t e r p r e t a t i
Conclusion
Outlining the kernel of agency
,
Key points
requires guidance ≠ control more knowledge less data