Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

alaska department of environmental conservation division
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water- Water Quality Standards October 17, 2018 Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 1 Webinar instructions: For audio please dial: 1-800-315-6338 Access code: 51851


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water- Water Quality Standards October 17, 2018

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Webinar instructions:

 For audio please dial: 1-800-315-6338  Access code: 51851  Note that all lines will be muted during the presentations  Public testimony will be taken at the end of the webinar.

PLEASE BE RESPECTFUL OF ALL PARTICIPANTS

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Provide technical feedback on issues

associated with development of human health criteria (HHC) in state water quality standards

  • Develop a Summary Report
  • Identify key sources of information that

may be applicable to the process

  • Ensure a variety of stakeholder voices are

heard

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Meeting Outline

  • Discuss ADF&G updated FCR
  • Discuss draft HHC Technical Workgroup Report
  • Next steps

4 Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ADF&G Report

 Provides regional and statewide FCR percentiles  Identifies and quantifies consumption by species on a regional basis  Considered 110 communities

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

EPA-Mountain Whisper Light

 Provided an “expert” opinion of methodology and results  Significant interaction between MWL and ADF&G staff

 Worked out some data issues to develop a better baseline

 Reviewed ADF&G Methodology and re-analyzed the data using weighting

 Different number of communities sampled in each region (high in SC/low in SE)  Different number of sampled households in each community that participated  Different number of sampled respondents in each household that participated

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MWL Results

 Sampled and non-sampled communities were generally similar except when it

comes to the number of communities ADF&G sampled in each region

 Pretty large regional differences between percentiles  MWL-derived FCR percentiles were lower than ADF&G when weighting factors

were included

 MWL stated that their approach may underestimate consumption due to

assumption that each member of a household consumes fish equally.

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ADF&G Updated FCR Percentiles

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 8

Target Population-Statewide Summary FCR values Species Included. Rural- Consumer Only - Mean 165.7 g/day (Table 4) 232.8 (Seldovia Study) Salmon, non-marine fish, halibut, herring, marine inverts Rural – Consumer Only -90th 336.1 g/day (Table 4) 528.3 (Seldovia Study) Salmon, non-marine fish, halibut, herring, marine inverts Rural- Consumer Only - Mean 181.2 (Table 5) Salmon, non-marine fish, halibut, herring, marine inverts, seal, sea lion Rural – Consumer Only -90th 364.8 (Table 5) Salmon, non-marine fish, halibut, herring, marine invertebrates, seal, sea lion Rural – Consumer Only – Mean/90th 66.0/160.6 g/day Non-marine fish and marine invertebrates

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Draft HHC TWG Report

 Report- General

 Spent some time trying to make sure there’s consistency in terms and

concepts

 Tried to incorporate all suggestions made by participants  Did our best to make sure the tone was neutral- no DEC biases or policy

preferences

9 Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 The report includes updated language pertaining to cancer risk levels;

salmon and marine mammals; relative source contribution.

 New Appendix (G) with Alternate Viewpoints.

 Incorporated “alternate viewpoints” in the findings and appendix so people

have a way of cross referencing specific concerns.

 Updated Appendix E: ADF&G Preliminary FCR Percentiles

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 10

Draft HHC TWG Report

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Discussion

11 Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Next steps

 DEC will post the three reports on our webpage and accept informal

public comments

 DEC will not issue a formal response to comments  Will use this information as we conduct outreach prior to draft rulemaking

 DEC will conduct outreach to key stakeholders/interested parties in Fall

2018-Spring 2019

 Draft rulemaking in Fall 2019

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Next steps

 At this time DEC does not anticipate holding another HHC TWG meeting

 Fulfilled its purpose of vetting the different issues and providing DEC you

your unique technical perspectives

 13 is bad luck

 Feedback for us is welcome

 How did the process work for you? Pros/Cons

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank you!!

Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Public Comment

15 Improving and Protecting Alaska's Water Quality