AIRS Data Assimilation at SPoRT Brad Zavodsky and Will McCarty (UAH) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

airs data assimilation at sport
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AIRS Data Assimilation at SPoRT Brad Zavodsky and Will McCarty (UAH) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AIRS Data Assimilation at SPoRT Brad Zavodsky and Will McCarty (UAH) Shih-hung Chou and Gary Jedlovec (MSFC) AIRS Science Team Meeting Greenbelt, MD October 10, 2007 1 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS Outline


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS

AIRS Data Assimilation at SPoRT

Brad Zavodsky and Will McCarty (UAH) Shih-hung Chou and Gary Jedlovec (MSFC)

AIRS Science Team Meeting Greenbelt, MD October 10, 2007

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS

Motivation: Use of AIRS measurements within a data assimilation system can potentially provide better atmospheric representation—particularly over data void regions—and improve short-term weather forecasts

♦ SPoRT AIRS Assimilation focuses on short-term regional

forecasts—compliments work at JCSDA

♦ Profile Assimilation (B. Zavodsky)

  • Motivation and review of previous case study work
  • Design of experiment for month-long statistics
  • Results from month-long statistics

♦ Direct Radiance Assimilation (W. McCarty)

  • Channel selection and assimilation cycle
  • Results of case study

♦ SPoRT AIRS DA work presented Sept. 24 and 25 at EUMETSAT/AMS

Satellite Conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Outline

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS ♦ Assimilation of AIRS profiles may benefit regional centers that are influenced by

data sparse areas but are not equipped to handle radiance assimilation

  • Melbourne and Miami NWS WFOs

♦ Previous work at SPoRT has focused on Nov. 20-22, 2005 case study

  • Found that AIRS profiles have positive impact on analyses by shifting large-scale

model first-guess towards rawinsonde observations

  • AIRS-updated initial conditions showed positive impact in temperature, mixing ratio,

and 6-hr cumulative precipitation at most forecast times

♦ More days needed to be run to find new case studies and to obtain a more

robust set of cumulative statistics of forecast impact

  • 33 days of model runs from 17 January to 22 February 2007 were run (missing initial

conditions for 3-5 February and 11 February)

  • These results are shown herein

Profile Assimilation Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS ♦ L2 Version 5 temperature and moisture profiles

assimilated over land and water with quality control using PBest value in each profile

  • Eastern and central CONUS swathes combined into one

swath; assimilation time is mean of the two overpasses

  • Only night time overpasses used

♦ 12-km WRF initialized at 0000 UTC on each forecast

date using 40-km ETA/NAM; ADAS to assimilate profiles

Experiment Design

Valid: 0836-0848 UTC Valid: 0700-0712 UTC AIRS Time: AIRS Time: 0800 UTC 0800 UTC

♦ Results of the 33 days of model runs are validated

using sensible weather parameters compared to

  • bservations
  • Temperature and mixing ratio verified with 50

radiosondes east of 105oW

  • 6-hr cumulative precipitation verified with NCEP Stage

IV data east of 105oW mapped to WRF grid

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS ♦ AIRS reduces temperature bias at most levels

by ≈0.3oC in lower and upper levels

♦ AIRS changes low and mid-level moisture by

as much as 5% at some levels

♦ Temperature and moisture adjustments made

without large increases to RMS error

Results: 36 Hour Forecast Impact

♦ 6-hr cumulative precipitation improves with

inclusion of AIRS profiles

  • Larger ETS (bars) for AIRS runs indicates

improvement in predicted precipitation location and amount

  • Bias scores (lines) closer to 1.0 for AIRS

suggest improvement in coverage of precipitation features

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.254 2.540 6.370 12.70 19.05 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5

Equitable Threat Score Bias Score Minimum Precipitation Threshold (mm)

CNTL AIRS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS

Motivation: Use of AIRS measurements within a data assimilation system can potentially provide better atmospheric representation—particularly over data void regions—and improve short-term weather forecasts

♦ SPoRT AIRS Assimilation focuses on short-term regional

forecasts—compliments work at JCSDA

♦ Profile Assimilation (B. Zavodsky)

  • Motivation and review of previous work
  • Design of experiment for month-long statistics
  • Results from month-long statistics

♦ Direct Radiance Assimilation (W. McCarty)

  • Channel selection and assimilation cycle
  • Results of case study

♦ SPoRT AIRS DA work presented Sept. 24 and 25 at EUMETSAT/AMS

Satellite Conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Outline

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS ♦ In the NCEP Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS), AIRS has already

been shown to have a significant impact in both northern and southern hemisphere global forecasts (Le Marshall et al. 2006)

♦ Previous work focused on preparation of AIRS radiances for data

assimilation

  • CO2 Sorting Technique can detect clouds and determine uncontaminated

channels in hyperspectral data to increase the number of usable channels over a masking approach

♦ The proper use and assessment of these measurements within a regional

system—such as the North American Model (NAM) Data Assimilation System (NDAS)—has yet to be fully assessed

  • Considerations of the proper utilization of AIRS data within the pseudo-
  • perational NDAS environment and a preliminary look at their impact are

investigated herein

Radiance Assimilation Introduction

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS ♦ Operationally, NCEP GFS uses 151

channels of the 281 channel subset

♦ Limitations to using a regional model:

  • lower Ptop (2 hPa; red line)
  • O3 not used in regional model

♦ No shortwave (< 5 µm) channels are used ♦ Plots show profile normalized Jacobians of

each constituent:

♦ Green hashes denote 151 GDAS channels ♦ Red hashes denote 103 regional channels ♦ No additional channels in regional subset

that are not used in global analysis

Channel Selection for Regional Assimilation

Pressure (hPa)

  • 0 +

T q O3

i q i dq b dT 1 . *

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS ♦ All NCEP operational observations are assimilated every 3 hours (± 1.5 hrs) for the

NOAIRS runs; AIRS radiances are the only difference between NOAIRS and AIRS runs

♦ A two-week spin-up period to propagate the impact of the AIRS measurements through

the analysis and allow bias corrections to stabilize

♦ Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) and the Weather Research and Forecasting

Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model (WRF-NMM) used as analysis and model systems

Assimilation Cycle

48hr 00 06 12 18 00 03 09 15 21 48hr 48hr 48hr Time (UTC) 48hr

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS

Initial Results

Analysis AIRS NOAIRS

B A

♦ 48-hr forecast valid at 0000 UTC on 11 April

2007

♦ 500 hPa height anomalies for control (NOAIRS;

blue) and control+AIRS (AIRS; red); corresponding NDAS analysis in black

♦ Solid contours correspond to troughs; dashed

contours correspond to ridges

Pressure (hPa) Height Anomaly A B R σ

♦ A: model domain (dashed lines) ♦ B: subdomain characterisized by

conventional obs in analysis (solid lines)

♦ Both height anomaly correlation (R)

and standard deviation (σ) show significant improvement throughout the troposphere

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS ♦ SPoRT AIRS Assimilation focuses on short-term regional forecasts—compliments

work at JCSDA

♦ Profile Assimilation Conclusions/Future Work

  • For 33 days of model runs in late Jan./early Feb.
  • Biases are reduced in temperature and mixing ratio at most levels
  • 6-hr cumulative precipitation coverage and forecast accuracy improve
  • Further analysis of individual days from case study to determine where AIRS provides

most added value; migrate to 3DVAR

♦ Direct Radiance Assimilation Conclusions/Future Work

  • Limitations in use of AIRS radiances in regional NDAS reduced the number of usable

channels by 17% relative to the 281 subset but still retained 37% of the channels overall

  • An initial case study shows statistically significant forecast improvement throughout the

entire model domain due to the assimilation of AIRS data

  • Further investigate determination of cloud contamination using CO2 sorting technique;

further investigate use of AIRS radiances over a longer set of studies

Summary

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS

Questions? Suggestions? Comments?