aircraft layout choices
play

Aircraft Layout Choices Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aircraft Layout Choices Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace Engineering Department IIT Bombay Many letters of English Alphabet !!! TAIL PLANE LAYOUT AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2 Requirements from the Tailplane Horizontal Tail


  1. Aircraft Layout Choices Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace Engineering Department IIT Bombay

  2. Many letters of English Alphabet !!! TAIL PLANE LAYOUT AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

  3. Requirements from the Tailplane  Horizontal Tail  Vertical Tail  Trim  Trim o Wing pitching moment o Engine failure o Single engine asymmetry  Stability  Stability o Pitching motion o Yawing motion  Control o Dutch roll damping o Nosewheel liftoff  Control o Low speed flight with flaps down o Engine out flight at low speeds o Transonic maneuvering o Maximum roll rate o Spin recovery

  4. Aft Tailplane Configuration Options Conventional tail is seen in nearly 70% a/c

  5. T-Tail  Smaller vertical tail due to end-  Heavier plate effect  Deep stall  Clear of wing and prop wash  Ease in mounting of rear engines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_stall#Deep_stall Source: Wikipedia

  6. T-Tail v/s Conventional Tail  Advantages (of T-Tail)  Disadvantages  Looks Faster  Pilots don’t like it o When pilots add power on a  Lesser FOD from Eng. & LG single-engined aircraft, they  Allow rear-mounted engines get additional control authority  Bad for maintenance o Alaska MD-83's accident o http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn /2002/AAR0201.htm AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

  7. Some aircraft with T-Tail F101-Voodoo ETA glider Canadair CRJ Piper Tomahawk

  8. Cruciform Tail  Compromise between Conventional & T-Tail JS-31, DHC-6, Falcon 20, ATR-42 

  9. Twin Tail  Lower overall height  Avoid fuselage wake on rudder  spin resistance  higher structural weight Many examples AN-225, F-15, MiG-25 http://www.atlasaerospace.net/image/f_pilotag8.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Buran_On_Antonov225.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:F-15,_71st_Fighter_Squadron,_in_flight.JPG

  10. H and Triple Tail  H Tail Triple Tail  undisturbed airflow on VT at lower VT to fit into hangers high AOA  VT in propwash to enhance engine-out controllability  Smaller HT due to endplate effect P-38 Lockheed Constellation

  11. Butterfly or V- Tail  Reduction of one tail surface  Lower interference drag  Lower weight  Higher Complexity o Mixing unit required Beechcraft Bonanza F-117A

  12. Other Aircraft with V Tail Eclipse 400 Cirrus Vision SF 50 Fouga CM 120 Magister RQ4/MQ4 Global Hawk AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

  13. WING GEOMETRY AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

  14. C 0 = root chord Wing Geometry C T = tip chord b = wing span s = wing semi-span S = wing ref. area t = thickness c = chord α = angle of attack Λ = Taper Ratio = C T /C 0 AR = Aspect Ratio = b 2 /S t/c = Thickness Ratio Source: Fielding, J. P., Introduction to Aircraft Design AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

  15. Effect of Wing Geometry: Aerodynamics and Weight Geometrical Effecting on wing Trends Effecting on wing Range of Values polar and C L weight Parameter Airfoil Camber C L W wing ~ const C L 0 – 6 % C D α 5 - 18 % subs. Airfoil C L max W wing 3 - 7 % supers. C L Thickness ratio C D α 7 – 9 subs. Aspect Ratio C D ind W wing C L 2 – 4 supers. K C D 4 - 14 subs. Taper Ratio C Di W wing C L 2 - 5 supers. C D 0 - 35 subs. Leading-edge C D0 W wing C y C L 35 - 70 supers. sweep angle C Di C D subs. = subsonic flight supers. = supersonic flight AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

  16. Wing Layout Parameters  Reference wing planform = Trapezoidal  Aspect Ratio (b 2 /s or b/c for rectangular wing) o Increase in AR  Reduces induced drag  Reduces stalling AOA  Increases subsonic (L/D) max  Increases wing weight  Sweep  Taper Ratio  Twist  Incidence  Dihedral

  17. Taper ratio  λ = tip chord / root chord  (root chord / tip chord in USA)  λ = 1 (Rectangular wing)  Heavy  Ease in construction  Low λ  Lower wing root BM  lighter wing  tip stalls before root  poor stalling behavior  Compromise Value: usually 0.4 to 0.6

  18. Number of Engines  No clearcut indication from Accident/Emergency stats  > Airlines prefer smallest number of engines  Often dictated by availability  2 engines for extended over-water flights  ETOPS clearance

  19. Illustration of ETOPS D. AL T E.ALT 1 Destination ETP2 E.ALT 2 (CP) EEP Departure ETP 1 EEP : ETOPS Entry Point ETOPS Segment ETP : Equitime Point 60 minute circles E.ALT : En-route Alternate Airport Maximum diversion time circles D.ALT: Destination Alternate Unauthorised area Area of Operation AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

  20. Choose your pick ! MANY CONFIGURATIONS AND LAYOUT POSSIBILITIES EXIST AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-2

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend