Agenda Purpose of Forum Problem Statement and Goal Problem - - PDF document

agenda
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Agenda Purpose of Forum Problem Statement and Goal Problem - - PDF document

7/21/2011 CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE Cost Containment and the LIHTC Program July 2011 Public Forums Agenda Purpose of Forum Problem Statement and Goal Problem Statement and Goal


slide-1
SLIDE 1

7/21/2011

CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE

Cost Containment and the LIHTC Program July 2011 Public Forums

Agenda

  • Purpose of Forum
  • Problem Statement and Goal
  • Problem Statement and Goal
  • Presentation and discussion of Costs per Unit in

2010 and 2011

– Historical cost data – Line item data – Local issues – Other metrics (cost per unit vs. cost per square foot)

  • Discussion of moving forward to meet the goal
  • Closing comments

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ywvutsrqponmljihgfedcbaYXWVUTSRQPONMLJIHGFEDCBA

7/21/2011

Problem Statement and Goal

Occasionally, TCAC and other funding sources make awards to extremely costly sources make awards to extremely costly

  • projects. TCAC-awarded projects

generally may be more costly than necessary, fostering the public perception that affordable housing is too expensive. Effective in 2012 TCAC reservations Effective in 2012, TCAC reservations would go only to cost-reasonable projects, and outlier-cost projects would no longer be awarded by TCAC or other funders.

Average Per Unit Costs: 2005 - 2011(First Round)

$350,000 $400,000 er Unit $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 Total Development Cost pe All 9% Projects 9% New Construction (Adaptive Resue in Acq-Rehab) 9% Acq-Rehab (Adpative Reuse in Acq- Rehab) $0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

*2011 only includesr awardees from the First Round.

Note: Historically, TCAC has used “total development cost” when calculating per unit cost. To accurately depict all six years together, the above chart is based on total development cost, which includes commercial cost.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

7/21/2011

CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE

Total Federal and State Credits per Unit (9%) 2005 – 2011(First Round)

$200,000 $180,000 $160,000 Credit per Unit $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $155,732 $193,490 $186,732 $187,543 $199,334 $189,502 $138,325 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* *2011 only includes awardees from the First Round

CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE Total Low Income Units Awarded Credit, 2005-2011(Estimate Based on First Round)

7,000 6,000 5,000 Total Units 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 4,761 4,098 4,424 4,640 4,840 4,170 6562 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011*

* 2011 only includes awardees from the First Round and is doubled for comparison with prior years

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

7/21/2011 YEAR TO YEAR COMPARISON : 2010 to 2011 First Round

2010 Results 2011 First Round Results Number of Projects 75 53 Total Units Total Units (includes manager units) 4,245 3,353

  • Avg. Residential Cost per Unit

$311,772 $286,664

  • Avg. Credit per Unit

$188,370 $138,325

  • Avg. Public Funds per Project

$7,484,612 $8,722,569

  • Avg. Public Funds per Unit

$132,237 $137,875 Public Funds for 2010 and 2011 are based on the Requested Public Funds Points Section of the awarded applications.

2011 FIRST ROUND DATA (AWARDEES)

ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ACQUISITION- REHAB NUMBER OF PROJECTS 53 37 16 AVG COST PER UNIT*

  • AVG. COST PER UNIT*

(RESIDENTIAL COST) $286,664 $309,889 $241,175 TOTAL UNITS 3,353 2,189 1,164

  • AVG. UNITS

63 59 73 HIGHEST RESIDENTIAL PER UNIT COST $614,849 $614,849 $440,655 LOWEST RESIDENTIAL PER UNIT COST $95,192 $150,089 $95,192 *Average residential cost per unit reflects applications as applicants self identified- adaptive reuse projects self reported as acquisition-rehabilitation.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

S C SCO $35 $3 $ $

7/21/2011 5 2011 First Round Residential per Unit Cost by Region

ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION SAN FRANCISCO $351,774 $379,720 , 9, CENTRAL COAST $214,826 $428,609 CAPITAL & NORTHERN $259,002 $259,002 SOUTH & WEST BAY $473,446 $598,128 ORANGE COUNTY $336,291 $337,860 INLAND EMPIRE $288,473 $288,473 SAN DIEGO COUNTY $346,780 $344,647 NORTH & EAST BAY $274,710 $350,232 CENTRAL REGION $232,630 $237,870 LOS ANGELES COUNTY $356,880 $333,715

MOST COSTLY REGION LEAST COSTLY REGIONS

, , RURAL $209,395 $255,549

Analyzing the Most Costly Projects

10 12

Histogram

2011(First Round) Residential Cost per Unit

2 4 6 8 Freqeuncy Frequency Range - Residential Cost per Unit

Note: The horizontal axis indicates projects up to each listed amount. For example, the first bar at “$100,000” includes all projects between $50,000 and $100,000. There are no projects below $50,000 or above $650,000.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ywvutsrqponmljihgfedcbaYXWVUTSRQPONMLJIHGFEDCBA

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaYXWUTSRPONMLJIHGFEDCBA

“ ”

7/21/2011 Analyzing the Most Costly Projects

70 80

Histogram

2006 - 2011(R1) Total Development Cost per Unit

10 20 30 40 50 60 Frequency Frequency Range - Total Development Cost per Unit

Note: Historically, TCAC has used “total development cost” when calculating per unit cost. To accurately depict all six years together, the above histogram is based on total development cost, which includes commercial cost.

Development Budget Line Item Analysis

Land Cost ◄ Acquisition Cost Off-Site Improvements ◄ Total Rehab Cost Total New Construction Cost Total New Construction Cost Site Work ◄ Structures ◄ Total Architectural Cost ◄ Total Survey and Engineering Total Construction Interest and Fees Total Perm Financing Cost Total Attorney Cost Total Reserve Cost Total Reserve Cost Total Appraisal Cost Total Contingency Cost ◄ Total Other Cost Local Development Impact Fees ◄ Total Developer Cost Total Residential Project Cost TCAC has begun by analyzing items marked with ◄

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7/21/2011

Discussion

The Local Component The Local Component

Discussion

Metrics

7