After Wayfair: What Are State Use Taxes Worth? John L. Mikesell, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

after wayfair what are state use taxes worth
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

After Wayfair: What Are State Use Taxes Worth? John L. Mikesell, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ONEILL SCHOOL OF PUBLIC & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS After Wayfair: What Are State Use Taxes Worth? John L. Mikesell, Professor Emeritus Justin M. Ross, Associate Professor INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON In this Presentation 1.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

After Wayfair: What Are State Use Taxes Worth?

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

O’NEILL SCHOOL OF PUBLIC & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS John L. Mikesell, Professor Emeritus Justin M. Ross, Associate Professor

slide-2
SLIDE 2

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

In this Presentation

  • 1. Background on Use Tax
  • 2. South Dakota vs. Wayfair
  • 3. Early evidence of Wayfair impact on Indiana tax collections
slide-3
SLIDE 3

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Use Tax Confusion

  • Often Conflated with the Sales Tax
  • Levied when a buyer purchases a good/service outside of a state but…
  • Does not pay sales tax in origin state and
  • Purchase would be taxable if purchased in destination state
  • To legally avoid interference with interstate commerce, it is levied by

destination state on the “first use” of the good after acquisition.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Use Tax History

  • Depression: Retail sales tax becomes popular among the states, but tax competition and

cross-border shopping an immediate concern.

  • 1935: California & Washington first adopters of tax “on the first use of the product

purchased in the state.”

  • Criz (1941: 1): “The function of the use tax is to eliminate avoidance of the sales tax.”
  • Supreme Court accepted the tax not as applying to transactions in interstate commerce,

but to the privilege of use after the interstate commerce was over.

  • Vendor collection limited to cases with physical nexus, resulting in low-compliance.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Use Tax Share of Total Tax Revenue, 2017

slide-6
SLIDE 6

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Growth of Use Tax Share of S&U, 2017-2010

slide-7
SLIDE 7

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

South Dakota v. Wayfair

  • Quill v. North Dakota (1992): Out-of-State vendors must register for use

tax collection if they have a physical presence in the state.

  • South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018): Overturns Quill and accepts an “economic

nexus” provided it does not create undue burden on interstate commerce

  • r vendors with limited contact.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Nexus: Selected Threshold & Requirements

State Economic Presence Date Threshold Requirement Alabama 10/1/2018 $250,000 and solicit orders Vendors: remote vendors who can demonstrate that marketplace facilitator is collecting and remitting will be relieved of requirement, otherwise register and collect; Marketplace facilitators: collect or notify and report. Indiana 10/1/2018 $100,000 or 200 transactions Vendors: register and collect Oklahoma 7/1/2018 $10,000 sales Vendor, Marketplace, Referrer: collect or notify and report.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Economic Nexus Adoption (as of 12/2018)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Early Evidence on Wayfair Impact from Indiana

slide-11
SLIDE 11

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Case Study: Indiana

  • Use tax in 2017 was 13% of all S&U tax revenue; already collecting from

Amazon since 2014

  • July 1, 2017: Statutorily (HEA 1129) adopted economic nexus, held in

abeyance during Wayfair

– Vendors must register and collect if gross sales exceed $100,000 or represent more than 200 separate transactions

  • June 22, 2018: Wayfair Decision
  • October 1, 2018: Indiana Department of Revenue begins enforcement
slide-12
SLIDE 12

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Indiana Out-of-State Vendor Registrations

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 CY2017 CY2018

slide-13
SLIDE 13

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Synthetic Control Method

  • Data mining case study technique for causal investigation
  • Synthetic Control Using Lasso Regression: Hollingsworth & Wing (2018)
  • Outcome: Indiana’s total monthly sales and use taxes due (source: IDOR)
  • January 2017 to December 2018
  • Potential Control Group Predictors:
  • 1200+ Monthly economic indicators (source: BLS) from non-adopting states as of

12/2018

slide-14
SLIDE 14

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Economic Nexus Adoption (as of 12/2018)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Top 10 Synthetic Indiana Contributors

Share Predictor 73.5% Intercept 0.1% Arizona Retail Trade, Total Average Weekly Hours of Production Employees 0.8% Arkansas Leisure and Hospitality, Total All Employees, In Thousands 7.0% Florida Retail Trade, Department Stores All Employees, In Thousands 0.1% Massachusetts Leisure and Hospitality, Total Average Weekly Hours of All Employees 3.5% Montana Wholesale Trade, Total All Employees, In Thousands 3.5% Ohio Retail Trade, Total Average Weekly Earnings of Production Employees, In Dollars 0.3% Ohio Retail Trade, Building Material and Supplies Dealers All Employees, In Thousands 5.3% Tennessee Leisure and Hospitality, Total All Employees, In Thousands 4.6% Virginia Leisure and Hospitality, Total All Employees, In Thousands 1.2% Virginia Leisure and Hospitality, Accommodation and Food Services All Employees, In Thousands

slide-16
SLIDE 16

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Indiana (Red) vs Synthetic Indiana (black dash)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Indiana (Red) vs Synthetic Indiana (black dash)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Indiana (Red) vs Synthetic Indiana (black dash)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Indiana vs. Placebo Donors (logged % diff)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Levels Month Treatment Effect (%) p-value October, 2018 1.0 0.349 November, 2018 0.0 0.949 December, 2018 2.3 0.164

slide-21
SLIDE 21

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Levels Logged Values Month Treatment Effect (%) p-value Treatment Effect (%) p-value October, 2018 1.0 0.349 0.1 0.828 November, 2018 0.0 0.949 0.4 0.571 December, 2018 2.3 0.164 3.7 0.072

slide-22
SLIDE 22

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Conclusion

  • Novel data on use tax shows…
  • Small share of total tax revenues (average 3%)
  • Varies substantially across states as share of all sales and use tax revenue

(1%-20%).

  • Preliminary evidence from Indiana monthly collections
  • Most optimistic estimate is a 3.7% percent boost to use tax revenue
slide-23
SLIDE 23

INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON

Thank you!

Justin M. Ross justross@iu.edu