Advances In Aeration Control MWEA Fall Process Seminar November 6, - - PDF document

advances in aeration control mwea fall process seminar
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Advances In Aeration Control MWEA Fall Process Seminar November 6, - - PDF document

10/27/2013 Advances In Aeration Control MWEA Fall Process Seminar November 6, 2013 11:15 AM 11:15 AM East Lansing, MI Thomas E. Jenkins President JenTech Inc. Je JenTe nTech I h Inc. 6789 N. Elm Tree Road Milwaukee, WI 53217 414 352


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/27/2013 1

Advances In Aeration Control MWEA Fall Process Seminar November 6, 2013

11:15 AM 11:15 AM East Lansing, MI Thomas E. Jenkins President JenTech Inc.

Je JenTe nTech I h Inc. 1

6789 N. Elm Tree Road Milwaukee, WI 53217 414‐352‐5713 info@jentechinc.com

  • Importance of Aeration Control
  • Advances in Aerators

Diffused

Advances in Aeration Control

  • Diffused
  • Mechanical
  • New Blower Technologies
  • Turbo
  • Screw Blowers
  • Advances in VFDs

2

  • Advances in VFDs
  • Improved Instrumentation & Control Strategies
  • DO Control Techniques
  • Feedforward Control

2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/27/2013 2

  • More Demanding Permit Requirements

Factors Driving Advances in Aeration Control

  • More Complicated Processes
  • Higher Energy Costs

3

  • Increased Global Technology Transfer
  • Improved Instrumentation Hardware

3

  • Process Performance Comes First!

Improved Control Means More Stable Processes

  • Adapting Automatically to Upsets and Changes

Can Improve Performance

  • Control Strategies Must Integrate Process

Equipment Characteristics

4

  • Most Municipal WWTPs Operate at 1/3 of Design

Capacity CONSIDER TAKING TANKS OUT OF SERVICE

4

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/27/2013 3

Aeration is the Most Significant Energy Use in a WWTP Energy Is A significant Concern, and Can Be Used To Justify Systems WWTP

34% 55% Pumping and Other HVAC 5

5

11% Aeration

Most Utilities Offer $ Incentives for Reducing Energy Use Rates vary with:

  • Time of Day

Energy Consumpon ≠ Energy Cost

  • On‐peak, Off‐Peak
  • Day of Week
  • Size of Costumer
  • Demand (kW) and Consumption (kWh)

6

6

The First Goal of an ECM (Energy Conservation Measure) is to Reduce Cost While Maintaining or Improving Process Performance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/27/2013 4

Variable Speed or On/Off Mechanical Aerators Mechanical Aerators

2.0 2.5 gth

Power

4 0

SAE

7

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 30 50 70 90 bhp/ft. rotor leng rpm 5 10 30 50 70 90 OTR lb/hr/ft rotor length rpm

SOTR

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 SAE lb/hp hr rpm

Coarse Bubble Diffused Aeration

Changing to Fine Pore Diffusers Should Always Be Examined!

8

8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/27/2013 5

New Aeration Technologies:

  • Mixing and Aeration

Combined

  • Actually Re‐invention of

Older Technology

  • Allows Separate Control
  • f Oxygen Transfer and

Mixing Energy

ff

9

9

  • New Diffuser Geometries

and Materials

  • Fouling Resistance
  • Improved OTE
  • Proportional to Submergence
  • Deeper is Better

Diffused Aeration Energy

  • Also Requires Higher Blower Power
  • Proportional to Air Flow per Diffuser
  • Flux Rate (1 to 10 SCFM/ft2 Typical)
  • Lower is better

P ti l t A t l DO C t ti

10

10

  • Proportional to Actual DO Concentration
  • Lower is Better
  • DO Control is Significant
  • Most Plants Are Too Conservative In DO Setpoint
slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/27/2013 6

4.00 4.50

er

Blower Power Ratio (Compared to 2.0 ppm DO)

actual

C Q 

 * 20

. 2

Diffused Aeration

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50

Nominal Power Multiplie

actual

C C Q  

 * 20 . 2

11

11

Excess DO means significantly more aeration power.

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00

Actual DO Concentration, ppm

Based on 500' ASL, 55 °F, 9.9 ppm Csat

  • Lower Air Flow Rates
  • Reduce Valve Sizes

R S l R l Fl T itt

Impact on Control Systems

  • Re‐Scale or Replace Flow Transmitters
  • Mixing Limits
  • Impact on Blowers
  • Turndown May Become an Issue
  • Verify Pressure Capacity (More Submergence)

12

12

  • DO Control
  • Maximizes Savings Opportunity
  • Over‐Aeration More Common
slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/27/2013 7

Efficiency Varies with Blower Type Range is 60% to 80% Aeration Blowers and Energy

13

13

  • Efficiency
  • Across Actual Load Spectrum

Blower Considerations

  • Control
  • Constant Pressure or Flow Based
  • Control and Protection Should Be Integrated
  • Turndown

f h ff

14

14

  • Often More Important Than Efficiency
  • Turndown Limits Must Be Included In Control

Strategy

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/27/2013 8

Example Turbo Blower Characteristics

System Curve

15

15

Example Screw Blower Characteristics

65.0% 66.0% 67.0% 68.0% 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 fficiency kW

Typical Screw Blower Performance at Constant Speed

55 °F Ti 14.4 pi

60.0% 61.0% 62.0% 63.0% 64.0% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 Adiabatic Ef SCFM/k psig Discharge SCFM/kW Wire to Air Efficiency

16

16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/27/2013 9

  • Blower Control Usually Included In Packages
  • Screw Blowers

Blower Control Considerations

  • Typically More Turndown
  • Control Simpler
  • Turbo Blowers
  • Often More Efficient and Lower Cost (CHANGING)

d l d d l

17

17

  • Turndown Limits Must Be Included In Control

Strategy – Surge Is a Concern

  • VFDs Are More Reliable And Less Costly

VFD Applications Have Changed

  • Many Utilities Offer “Automatic” VFD Incentives
  • Can Be Applied to ALL Types of Blowers
  • Proper Selection and Engineering is Required

18

18

  • Medium Voltage (> 600 Volts) Now Cost Effective
  • Increased Competition, Lower Prices
  • Typically Greater Than 750 hp
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/27/2013 10

Payback on Medium Voltage Drives Can Be Good

$6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 umulative Energy

Cumulative Operating Cost

Exisitng Guide Vane Control New 2000 hp motor, 2000 hp VFD

19

19 $- $2,000,000 $4,000,000 5 10 15 20 Capital + Cu Years of Operation

DO Control Can Be Very Cost Effective

  • Will Save 25% Or More Compared to Manual
  • Matches Air Supply To Demand

ll S bili

  • Usually Improves Process Stability
  • DO Is An Indirect Indicator of Process Performance
  • Low Capital Cost May Make Payback Shorter Than

Other Changes

  • Control Complexity Should Be Matched to System
  • Total Blower Air Flow Only

20

20

  • a
  • e
  • O y
  • Individual Basin Flow Control
  • Separate Grid DO and Flow Control Within Basins
  • New Strategies Improve Efficiency
  • Most‐Open‐Valve
  • Direct Flow Control Eliminates Pressure Control
slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/27/2013 11

  • MOST‐Open‐Valve (MOV) Control is NOT

Necessary for DO Control or Blower Control

Most‐Open‐Valve Control

  • Technique for Minimizing System Pressure by

Keeping at Least One Basin Valve at Max Position at All Times

21

21

  • Older Systems Work By Adjusting Pressure Setpoint
  • Newer Strategies Work Directly With Flow Control

Pressure Control

  • If Constant Pressure Is Maintained Changes in One

Valve Won’t Affect Other Basin’s Air Flows

Typical Centrifugal Blower & System Curves

re, psig

9.0 8.0 10.0

Pressure Setpoint

  • If Pressure Setpoint is Too High Power Is Wasted

22

22

5.0

Flow, SCFM Pressu

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 7.0 6.0

Pressure Setpoint Wasted Power

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10/27/2013 12

Direct Flow Control

  • Is Simpler and More Stable
  • Typically Reduces Blower Power 5% to 10%

23

23

  • Optical DO Probes Replacing Membrane Types
  • Multi‐Channel and Remote Transmitters

New Analytic Instruments for Control

  • New Nutrient Analysis Instruments
  • Chiefly for Nutrients – Nitrification/Denitrification
  • Many Still Maintenance Intensive
  • Most Ammonia Control Strategies Used In

Conjunction with DO Control

24

24

Conjunction with DO Control

  • New Feedforward Controls Based on Measuring

Process Demand

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10/27/2013 13

Offgas Based Feed Forward Control

  • Determines Air Demand By Measuring OUR and OTE
  • More Stable and Precise

25

25

  • Process Requirements Come First!

Use Simple Payback To Calculate Cost Effectiveness

  • Use Present Worth for Longer Time Periods
  • Implementation for Energy Conservation

Should Be Justified By Best Payback

 

26

26

         ngs AnnualSavi

  • st

EquipmentC years Payback,

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10/27/2013 14

Over Life of Equipment: Energy Cost is more Significant than Equipment, Installation, or Maintenance Costs Aeration and Energy

27

27

Questions?

28

28

http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd‐1118389980.html