Slow Extraction Workshop 2019, Fermilab, July 22nd-24th 2019 Fiona Faber Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center
Advanced RF-KO excitation methods for high quality spills Slow - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Advanced RF-KO excitation methods for high quality spills Slow - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Advanced RF-KO excitation methods for high quality spills Slow Extraction Workshop 2019, Fermilab, July 22nd-24th 2019 Fiona Faber Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center Overview HIT-Facility Accelerator RF-KO Examined
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 2
Overview
- HIT-Facility
- Accelerator
- RF-KO
- Examined excitation methods
- Simulated micro spill structure
- Extraction process
- Experimental results
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 3
Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center
Cancer therapy using p and C-ions Particle energy defining depth in matter
Irradiating tumor slice by slice Slow extraction used for scanning the tumor 668 patients in 2018
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 4
HIT-Facility
Synchrotron, (48 - 430 MeV/u) 3 Ion sources Linac (7 MeV/u) 3 treatment rooms Gantry Beam dump High energy beam transport Experimental area Treatment: p (~1010 particles/spill), C (~108 particles/spill) Experiments: p, He, C, O
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 5
Extraction method
RF-KO
- Excitation of 3rd order resonance
- Triangular stable phase space area is formed (separatrix)
- Optical elements constant during extraction
- Increase of transversal emittance with RF-signal
- The signal of the excitation function defines the quality of the spill
- K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 374 (1996)
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 6
Extraction method
RF-KO
- Excitation of 3rd order resonance
- Triangular stable phase space area is formed (separatrix)
- Optical elements constant during extraction
- Increase of transversal emittance with RF-signal
- The signal of the excitation function defines the quality of the spill
- K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 374 (1996)
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 7
Extraction method
RF-KO
- Excitation of 3rd order resonance
- Triangular stable phase space area is formed (separatrix)
- Optical elements constant during extraction
- Increase of transversal emittance with RF-signal
- The signal of the excitation function defines the quality of the spill
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 8
- Intensity feedback loop
enables controlled mean extraction rates (PID)
- Higher average intensity
- > faster irradiation
Intensity feedback loop
Exciter Ionization chambers
- C. Schoemers et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A vol. 795
(2015), pp. 92 - 99.
- Less machine tuning
- Fast variation of extraction rates
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 9
Motivation
To prevent peaks exceeding the measurement limit the mean intensity is reduced
- > increasing the treatment time
Increasing spill quality:
- Higher mean intensity
- > decreasing treatment time
- Higher comfort for patients
- Increasing number of patients
Spill with intensity control and AM
C: 1.55 · 108 extracted particles E: 430.1 MeV/u Resolution: 50 ms/bin
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 10
Frequency modulation methods used at HIMAC
1995 2002
- K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 374
(1996) 269-277
Time Scale: 200 ms/div
- K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 492
(2002) 253 - 263
Time Scale: 2 ms/div | 500 ms/div
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 11
Simulation
- Combining MADX for tracking
& Python for analysis
- Only synchrotron lattice
- Space charge and positioning
inaccuracies neglected
- Start distribution:
Gaussian particle distribution after acceleration
- Extracted defined by passing
electrostatic septum Exciter Electrost. septum
- Magn. septum
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 12
Exemplary excitation signal
Pseudo random binary phase shift keying (PRBPSK)
Excitation methods
Excitation spectrum
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 13
Simulated micro spill structure for PRBPSK
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 14
Frequency modulation
Single frequency modulation (FM)
Excitation methods
Exemplary excitation signal
Idea by K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 492 (2002), pp. 253 - 263
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 15
Single frequency modulation (FM)
Excitation spectrum
Excitation methods
Exemplary excitation signal
Idea by K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 492 (2002), pp. 253 - 263
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 16
Simulated micro spill structure for single FM
Frequency modulation Spill
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 17
Simulated micro spill structure for single FM
Frequency modulation Spill PRBPSK Single FM
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 18
Dual frequency modulation (FM)
Frequency modulation
Excitation methods
Exemplary excitation signal
Idea by K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 492 (2002), pp. 253 - 263
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 19
Dual frequency modulation (FM)
Excitation spectrum
Excitation methods
Exemplary excitation signal
Idea by K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 492 (2002), pp. 253 - 263
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 20
Simulated micro spill structure for dual FM
Frequency modulation Spill
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 21
Simulated micro spill structure for dual FM
Frequency modulation Spill PRBPSK Dual FM
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 22
Excitation process
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 23
Excitation process
Washed out spill -> high quality Caused by exciting the diffusion region* Direct excitation + synchrotron motion (Chromaticity ≠ 0 & bunched)
*Idea by K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and
- Meth. A 492 (2002), pp. 253 - 263
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 24
Excitation process
Caused by exciting the extraction region* Driven oscilation effect
*Idea by K. Noda et al., Nucl. Instr. and
- Meth. A 492 (2002), pp. 253 - 263
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 25
Excitation process
Simulation of isolated driven oscillation
- f betatron amplitudes of particles
3 particles starting at 100%, 50% and 5%
- f the initial emittance while excited by
the single FM
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 26
Excitation process
Simulation of isolated driven oscillation
- f betatron amplitudes of particles
3 particles starting at 100%, 50% and 5%
- f the initial emittance while excited by
the single FM Kick at cycle restart depending on phase
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 27
Frequency modulation
Extended frequency modulation (FM)
Excitation methods
Exemplary excitation signal
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 28
Excitation spectrum
Extended frequency modulation (FM)
Excitation methods
Exemplary excitation signal
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 29
Simulated micro spill structure for extended FM
Frequency modulation Spill
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 30
Simulated micro spill structure for extended FM
Frequency modulation Spill PRBPSK Extended FM
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 31
Experiment
- Particle: Carbon
- Energy: 430.1 MeV/u
- Particles: 4 · 108 per spill
- Resolution: 50 ms/bin
- Bunched: fsync = 500 Hz
- Chromaticity: -0.79
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 32
Measured macro spills confirming simulations
PRBPSK Single FM 1Hz Dual FM 1Hz Extended FM 1Hz (Constant exciter amplitude)
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 33
Experimental results
Optimized by parameter scans:
- Lower frequency limit
- Higher frequency limit
- Sweep rate
- Frequency limits of additional FM
Extended FM Sweep rate: 1800 Hz PRBPSK (Intensity control + AM)
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 34
Experimental results
Max-to-Mean ratio: Calculation of 200 bins ≙ 10 ms 1.55 · 108 particles extracted in total Extended FM Sweep rate: 1800 Hz PRBPSK
<MM> = 2.18 <MM> = 1.47
(Intensity control + AM)
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 35
Experimental results
Zoom PRBPSK Zoom Extended FM Sweep rate: 1800 Hz Extended FM Sweep rate: 1800 Hz PRBPSK (Intensity control + AM)
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 36
Extraction rate distribution of PRBPSK and extended FM
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 37
Extraction rate distribution of PRBPSK and extended FM
Reduction of spill ripple by 45% !
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 38
Excitation spectrum
Extended FM Sweep rate: 1 Hz
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 39
Excitation spectrum
Extended FM Sweep rate: 1800 Hz
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 40
Extraction rate drops due to increasing gaps in excitation spectrum 1.55 · 108 particles extracted in total Instead of 4 · 108
Excitation spectrum
Extended FM Sweep rate: 1800 Hz
- F. Faber Slow Extraction Workshop 2019 - Fermilab, 22nd-24th July 2019 41
Conclusion
- The extended FM increases the spill quality by decreasing the spill ripple
around 45%
- Extraction rate drops -> more exciter power necessary
- Extended FM will be implemented at HIT
- Total treatment time could be reduced by 18%
Thank You for Your Attention
- O. Boine-Frankenheim, S. Sorge
- J. Adamy
- R. Cee, F. Faber, E. Feldmeier,
- Th. Haberer, M. Galonska, A. Peters,
- S. Riegler, C. Schömers
- C. Krantz, U. Scheeler