Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK Boundary layer scheme development - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

adrian lock met office uk boundary layer scheme
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK Boundary layer scheme development - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK Boundary layer scheme development arising from EUROCS stratocumulus simulation Convection scheme development spawned by shallow cumulus simulation Boundary layer scheme plus development 1 st order


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK

Boundary layer scheme development

arising from EUROCS stratocumulus simulation

Convection scheme development

spawned by shallow cumulus simulation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Boundary layer scheme plus development

1st order specified K-profile closure

Diagnose vertical extent of K-profiles by imposing a

limit on the buoyancy consumption of TKE, using subgrid cloud-base height diagnosis: With D=0.1 taken from the LES of the diurnal cycle

  • f marine stratocumulus

' ' ' '

i i

z z

w b dz D w b dz

slide-3
SLIDE 3

SCM stratocumulus: decoupled phase (11Z local time)

Inversion

K profiles Kh

top

Kh

surf

Cloud base

Buoyancy flux

If well-mixed Decoupled

l profile

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Impact of the new subgrid cloud-base diagnosis JJA means

New method Old method Difference Occurrence of decoupling Total cloud fraction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Climate model cloud fraction – 5 year JJA mean

ISCCP New model

Old model (HADAM3) – ISCCP New model (HADGEM1) – ISCCP

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Convection scheme plus developments

Gregory and Rowntree (1990) mass-flux scheme

(with RH-dependent CAPE closure for deep convection) plus:

Trigger at the LCL using explicit cumulus diagnosis

Cap K-profile at LCL

Shallow convection parametrized with:

Grant and Brown (1999) entrainment/detrainment rates mLCL = 0.03 w* parcel just saturated with wv LCL = - 0.2 wv S

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Parcel perturbation gives warmer/drier sub-cloud layer Larger entrainment/detrainment rates give

Colder and moister cloud layer Lower cloud top

Profiles at end of simulation

Revised Original Original Revised

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Same warmer/drier

sub-cloud layer

Same colder and

moister cloud layer

Same lower cloud top

Cross-section 1, July mean, New – Old

Theta Humidity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Revised Original

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Cloud-top lower but

little impact on cloud cover except towards the ITCZ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Original Revised

Massflux time-height sections from a point near Hawaii

Partly a more robust trigger, partly more balanced increments...

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NWP representation of stratocumulus (T+12)

Old NWP model (Ri bl scheme) New NWP model (non-local bl scheme) Radiosonde ascent

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Both K-profile boundary layer and revised

convection schemes are now operational for NWP

Further work required on the interaction between

cumulus and stratocumulus

Extend the principle of K-profile mixing between

layer interfaces to:

cumulus convection (both shallow and deep) stable boundary layers