Aditi Banerjee Bryan Keene Pete Bautz Prudential Davis & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

aditi banerjee bryan keene pete bautz
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Aditi Banerjee Bryan Keene Pete Bautz Prudential Davis & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Association of Life Insurance Counsel May 7, 2018 Aditi Banerjee Bryan Keene Pete Bautz Prudential Davis & Harman LLP ACLI Agenda The Legislative Process Overview and General Tax Reforms Life Insurance Industry Tax Reforms


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Association of Life Insurance Counsel May 7, 2018

Aditi Banerjee

Prudential

Bryan Keene

Davis & Harman LLP

Pete Bautz

ACLI

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

 The Legislative Process  Overview and General Tax Reforms  Life Insurance Industry Tax Reforms  Selected International Tax Reforms  Other Implications of Federal Tax Reform

 State Taxes  RBC and Financial Accounting

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • Nov. 2

Initial House Bill

  • Nov. 9

Initial Senate Bill

  • Nov. 16

House Bill Passed

  • Dec. 2

Senate Bill Passed

  • Dec. 20

Compromise Bill Passed

  • Dec. 22

Signed by President

  • Jan. 1

Most Provisions Effective

1

Tax Reform at Lightning Speed

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

President Reagan called for reform in State of the Union address Treasury Dept. submitted comprehensive study

  • n reform

30 days of Ways and Means Committee hearings began 36 days of Senate Finance Committee hearings began Administration submitted proposal to Congress

  • Jan. 25

1984

  • Nov. 27
  • Feb. 27

1985

May 9 May 29 Ways and Means Committee approved bill House passed bill by voice vote Senate Finance Committee approved bill Conference report filed Senate approved conference report Ways and Means Committee markup began Senate Finance Committee markup began Senate passed amended bill, 97-3 House approved conference report President Reagan signed bill (Public Law 99-514) March 19 May 6 June 24

  • Aug. 16
  • Sept. 25
  • Sept. 26
  • Oct. 22

1986 1985

  • Sept. 18
  • Dec. 3 Dec. 17

… vs. the 1986 Tax Reform Timeline

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What’s in a name?

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overview of Key Reforms

 Permanently reduced 35% corporate tax rate to flat 21%  Repealed the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT)  Temporarily allows 100% expensing for certain capital assets  Fundamentally changed taxation of multinational entities  Temporary new deduction for certain income of individuals,

trusts, and estates from passthrough entities, sole proprietorships

 Paid for these business changes through various base-

broadening measures and nearly $1.5 trillion of deficit spending

 Life insurers in particular were targeted with industry-specific

revenue raisers

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview of Key Reforms (cont.)

 Temporarily reduced individual income tax rates,

widened tax brackets, and increased and indexed the standard deduction while repealing personal exemptions and limiting certain itemized deductions

 Temporarily doubled the estate and gift tax exclusion

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

General Corporate Reforms

 Corporate tax rate lowered to 21%

 Conforming changes: 70% dividends received deduction

(DRD) reduced to 50% and 80% DRD reduced to 65%

 Corporate AMT repealed

 Unutilized credits refundable from 2018-2020 at 50% / year  Any leftovers in 2021 are refundable that year  Sequestration issue:

 Refundable credits are sequestered: 6.6% reduction for 2018  Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

General Corporate Reforms (cont.)

 Net Operating Losses (NOLs)

 Special rules for life insurance companies repealed

 3-year carryback and 15-year carryforward eliminated

 General corporate rules modified (and apply to life companies)

 No carryback, unlimited carryforward  Use of loss carryovers limited to 80% of taxable income

 P&C company rules unchanged

 2-year carryback; 20-year carryforward; no percentage limit

 Net interest expense deductions

 Capped at 30% of adjusted taxable income (with special rules)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

General Corporate Reforms (cont.)

 Passthrough entities:

 20% deduction for “qualified business income”  Financial services and other “service” businesses: deduction

phases out at $315,000 taxable income (joint returns)

 Limits on executive compensation under section 162(m)  Deductions for meals, entertainment expenses further

limited

 Restrictions on fringe benefits  Limits on deducting fines, penalties, certain settlements

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

 Tax reserves generally were the greater of a contract’s NSV and

the “federally prescribed reserve”

 The federally prescribed reserve was based on:

 the “tax reserve method” applicable to the contract,  the greater of the “applicable Federal interest rate” or the

“prevailing State assumed interest rate,” and

 the prevailing commissioners’ standard tables,  all determined at issuance of the contract.

 Reserve determined contract-by-contract  Tax reserve capped at the statutory reserve  Some types of reserves not deductible

Life Insurance Reserves: Prior Law

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

 New general rule for life insurance tax reserves:

 The greater of

 The NSV for the contract, or  92.81% of the reserve computed using the NAIC-prescribed

method for the contract

 The NAIC-prescribed method is determined at the valuation

date, not the issue date

 Rules apply contract-by-contract, like prior law  Capped at statutory reserves, like prior law

Life Insurance Reserves: New Rules

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

 New special rule for variable contracts:

 Tax reserve equals the sum of (a) + (b), where …

 (a) is the greater of (i) the NSV for the contract or (ii) the portion of

the reserve that is separately accounted for under Code § 817, and

 (b) is 92.81% of the excess (if any) of (i) the reserve computed

using the NAIC-prescribed method for the contract over (ii) the amount in (a)

 Also subject to statutory reserve cap

Life Insurance Reserves: New Rules (cont.)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

 Effective date and transition rule:

 New rules apply to tax years starting after 12/31/17  Deduct or include differences ratably over 8 years

Life Insurance Reserves: New Rules (cont.)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

 Observations:

 Change to NAIC-prescribed method as of valuation date is

generally helpful for principles-based reserving

 Haircut has greater effect for products without cash values,

such as --

 Immediate annuities, deferred income annuities, term life

insurance, long-term care, disability income

 Non-deductible reserves:

 Asset adequacy reserves  Deficiency reserves and deferred and uncollected premiums  No “double counting”

Life Insurance Reserves: New Rules (cont.)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

 Life insurance company deductions for dividends received are

limited to the “company’s share” of such dividends

 Company’s share was percentage generally equal to:

 the company’s net investment income reduced by “policy

interest,” divided by

 the company’s total net investment income (95% of gross

separate account investment income; 90% for general account)

 Proration also applies to tax-exempt interest and increases in

the cash value of life insurance and annuity contracts

 Reserve decreases and increases are adjusted for the

“policyholders’ share” of those items

 These rules applied based on older regulations that caused

controversy with the IRS

Proration: Prior Law

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

 Company’s share of dividends received is set at 70%  Policyholders’ share of tax-exempt interest and the

increase in the cash values of company-owned life insurance and annuity contracts is set at 30%

 Replaces formulaic approach based on older regulations

that caused controversy between the industry and IRS

 Similar to P&C company tax rules

Proration: New Rules

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

 Base for computing a life insurers’ general account and

separate account DRD also was impacted by a conforming change to the general corporate DRD

 Reduced the 80% DRD to 65% and the 70% DRD to 50%  Adjusts for the benefit of the lower corporate tax rate

 This means the starting point for the proration calculation

is a 50% general DRD

 The proration percentage of 70% is multiplied by the

general DRD percentage of 50%

Proration: New Rules (cont.)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

 Must capitalize “specified policy acquisition expenses”  A proxy was used that capitalizes a portion of general business

expenses based on the percentage of net premiums received for three categories of contracts:

 1.75% for annuity contracts,  2.05% for group life insurance contracts, and  7.7% for all other specified insurance contracts (generally non-

group life insurance and non-cancelable A&H insurance)

 Capitalized expenses deductible ratably over 10 years

 5 years for first $5 million, subject to phase-out at $10 million

DAC Tax: Prior Law

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

 Increases the proxy rates by roughly 20% each

 2.09% for annuity contracts,  2.45% for group life insurance contracts, and  9.2% for all other specified insurance contracts  But: drafting error means only the latter two rate categories

were modified; legislative correction may be needed

 Lengthens amortization period from 10 to 15 years

 Retains 5-year amortization schedule for smaller balances

DAC Tax: New Rules

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

 New rules apply to net premiums received after 12/31/17  Existing DAC balances continue on their current

amortization schedules; not re-amortized

DAC Tax: New Rules (cont.)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

 Life settlements

 Reporting is required for any “reportable policy sale,” which

generally means a person acquires, directly or indirectly, a life insurance contract where the acquirer has no substantial family, business, or financial relationship with the insured.

 The buyer must report information about the purchase to the IRS, to the

contract issuer, and to the seller.

 The issuer must report certain information to the IRS, the purchaser, and

the payee of any death benefit.  Exceptions to the transfer for value rule do not apply in a

reportable policy sale.

 Rev. Rul. 2009-13 is effectively reversed, regarding COI charges

reducing adjusted basis in a life insurance contract.

Other Life Insurance Reforms

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

 Definition of a life insurance contract

 The reasonable mortality rules are modified to conform to the

changes to the reserve rules, which repeal the definition of “prevailing commissioners’ standard tables” in the Code

 Determinations under Code § 7702 must be based on “reasonable

mortality charges which meet the requirements prescribed in regulations to be promulgated by the Secretary or that do not exceed the mortality charges specified in the prevailing commissioners’ standard tables.”

 The prevailing tables are defined in new Code § 7702(f)(10) in

the same manner as in current law, except that the definition

  • mits the provisions regarding regulations for contracts for which

there is no prevailing table and contracts to which multiple tables may be prevailing.

Other Life Insurance Reforms (cont.)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

 Small life insurance company deduction repealed  10-year spread rule for changes in a taxpayer’s basis for

computing life insurance reserves repealed

 Policyholder surplus account provisions repealed

 Any PSA balances in existence as of December 31, 2017,

will be taxed ratably over the next 8 years

Other Life Insurance Reforms (cont.)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

 Life / non-life consolidation  Ordinary / capital mismatch  Others?

Issues Unresolved

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

 Moves to a quasi-territorial system with a 100% dividends

received deduction

 Replaces the current worldwide system of taxation with a

dividend-exemption system

 Exempts from U.S. taxation 100% of the foreign-source

portion of dividends paid by a foreign corporation to a U.S. corporate shareholder owning at least 10% of the foreign corporation

International Reforms

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

 One-time tax on previously un-repatriated earnings

 Generally requires a 10% U.S. shareholder of a CFC to

include in income its pro rata share of the CFC’s pre-2018 accumulated E&P that has not previously been subject to U.S. tax

 The portion of the E&P comprising cash and cash

equivalents is taxed at 15.5% and the remainder at 8%

 There is an election to pay the tax over eight years

International Reforms (cont.)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

 Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse (BEAT) Tax

 Earnings stripping by certain foreign-headquartered

multinationals was long recognized as a problem by the U.S., with deductible royalty payments, interest payments, and service payments to a foreign parent reducing U.S. tax liabilities

 H.R. 1 potentially subjects businesses with more than $500

million in annual gross receipts and more than a de minimis amount of certain related-party payments to a new 10% minimum tax (5% for 2018 and 12.5% for tax years beginning after 12/31/2025), called the BEAT

International Reforms (cont.)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

 BEAT (continued …)

 The alternative tax base is similar to the regular tax base

except otherwise deductible payments to a foreign related party (base erosion payments and any NOLs attributed to such payments) are added back in arriving at the alternative tax base.

 Base erosion payments include deductible payments to

related foreign persons for certain reinsurance arrangements, but not for costs of goods sold or for services provided at cost.

 BEAT is not applicable to deductible payments to a foreign

corporation treated as a U.S. corporation pursuant to an election under section 953(d).

International Reforms (cont.)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

 Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI)

 H.R. 1 taxes U.S. corporate shareholders currently on their

portion of a CFC’s GILTI.

 GILTI generally is income that is low-taxed – roughly, less

than a 10.5% effective tax rate (ETR), grading up to a 13.125% ETR for tax years beginning after 12/31/25 – and generates a high rate of return.

International Reforms (cont.)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

 Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII)

 H.R. 1 effectively creates a new preferential tax rate for

income derived by domestic corporations from serving foreign markets.

 This is accomplished via a new deduction for FDII  A lower effective tax rate of 13.125% on routine income

arising from foreign markets provides a new benefit for

  • wning intangible property and conducting business
  • perations in the United States.

International Reforms (cont.)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

 FDII (continued …)

 The FDII deduction is available to domestic corporations

that are taxed as C corporations, including U.S. corporate subsidiaries of foreign-based multinationals.

 Foreign corporations with income effectively connected

with a U.S. trade or business, S corporations, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, partnerships, and individuals are not eligible.

International Reforms (cont.)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

 Passive Foreign Investment Companies (PFICs)

 H.R. 1 amends the PFIC exception for insurance companies to

apply only if the foreign insurance company has insurance liabilities that constitute more than 25% of its total assets.

 “Insurance liabilities” includes loss and loss adjustment expenses

and life and P&C reserves, but would exclude unearned premium, deficiency, and contingency reserves as reported on the insurer’s applicable financial statement.

 If the foreign insurer’s reserve percentage falls below 25% solely

due to run-off or rating-related circumstances, an alternate test would be available for a company whose insurance liabilities constitute at least 10% of its assets.

International Reforms (cont.)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

 The dramatic changes in the federal tax base (for both

individuals and businesses) impact states

 Many states conform their tax codes to the federal code  In opening state tax codes to address the federal changes,

states may contemplate broader actions that more directly impact the taxation of life companies or their policyholders

 Tax credits, premium taxation, etc.

Implications for State Taxes?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

 Tax reform significantly impacts life insurers’ risk-based

capital (RBC) ratios due primarily to the drop in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%

 In simplistic terms, RBC = available capital/required capital

 Required capital, which is based on loss contingencies, is

determined on an after-tax basis

 In a loss event, a lower corporate tax rate means the Federal

government’s share of the loss is reduced

 The drop in the corporate tax rate also decreases the value of

deferred tax assets (DTAs) included in available capital

 Elimination of the carryback period for life operating losses also

can lead to lower admitted DTAs

Risk-Based Capital

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

 Both of these factors drive RBC ratios down  Overall, life company RBC ratios could decline in the

range of 20%

 The industry is advocating that the effect of tax rate

changes on required capital be recognized in 2019 along with some other, perhaps offsetting, changes the NAIC is considering

Risk-Based Capital (cont.)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

 SAB 118 (issued 12.22.17, the same day President Trump

signed H.R. 1) addresses reporting effects of the new tax law for public companies

 Provides important relief to companies filing 12.31.17

financial statements:

 Allows them to take a reasonable period to determine and

recognize the effects of the new tax bill

 Addresses the challenges entities may face in accounting for

and reporting on the effects of the new tax bill because of incomplete information and accounting

Financial Reporting (SEC)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

 On 1.10.18, FASB held a public board meeting and indicated

they would adopt the SEC reporting approach for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes

 FASB also gave more specific guidance on financial reporting

issues related to tax reform, including how to properly restate deferred taxes on unrealized gains and losses on securities recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income, as requested by ACLI on 12.21.17

 FASB subsequently issued guidance on the financial

accounting treatment of repatriation tax liabilities, AMT tax credit refund receivables, the BEAT and GILTI

Financial Reporting (FASB)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

 On 1.11.18, the NAIC exposed revisions to statutory

accounting principles to reflect the effects of tax reform

 On 1.30.18, the NAIC Statutory Accounting Principles

Working Group released an interpretation that would allow for relief similar to SAB 118 for 2017 statutory annual statement filings

Financial Reporting (NAIC)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Questions