Address Theme and National Address Database Update NSGIC 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NSGIC 2017 Midyear Meeting Presented by Steve Lewis, Department of Transportation Lynda Liptrap, Census Bureau

Address Theme and National Address Database Update

March 1st, 2017

Topics

 NAD update  Theme management process  NAD Federal User Requirements Workshop

2

Theme Management Process

3

 Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC)  Portfolio of A-16 Themes and Datasets  National Geospatial Data Assets (NGDA)  NGDA Management Plan

Roles and Responsibilities

4

 Address Theme Leads

 DOT - Steve Lewis  Census Bureau – Lynda Liptrap

 Address Theme Subcommittee

 DOT – Steve Lewis  Census Bureau – Mark Lange

 NAD Dataset Manager

 Census Bureau – Matt Zimolzak

 Technology Operations Manager

 DOT - Steve Lewis

Address Theme Subcommittee

5

 16 Agency Members

Department or Agency Department or Agency Census Bureau Department of Labor Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Department of Transportation Department of Education Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Energy Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security National Technical Information Service Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Management and Budget Department of the Interior U.S. Postal Service Department of Justice Social Security Administration

Address Theme Subcommittee

6

 25+ Non-federal Partners

Partner Partner State of Arkansas State of North Carolina State of California State of New Hampshire District of Columbia National States Geographic Information Council Commonwealth of Massachusetts State of Oregon State of Michigan Oakland County, Michigan State of Minnesota City of Philadelphia State of Montana Urban and Regional Information Systems Association National Association of State 911 Administrators State of Vermont State of New Jersey Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Address Theme and NAD Goals

7

 Develop Theme Definition  Finalize Subcommittee Charter  Establish Theme Community on the GeoPlatform  Gather and Refine NAD User Requirements  Assess the DOT Pilot Database  Develop a Theme Strategic Plan

FGDC Theme Management

8

Components and Deliverables

 Theme Strategic Plan  Theme Implementation Plan  NAD Lifecycle Maturity Assessment  Provide annual updates to the FGDC Coordination Group and Steering Committee

Theme Implementation Plan

9

LMA Stages and Questions

10

Performance Dashboard on GeoPlatform

11

NAD Federal User Requirements Workshop

12

Workshop Process

 Pre-workshop questionnaire

 Content  Metadata  Functional

 Presentations

 Address theme management and NAD background  Results from the questionnaire

 Breakout sessions

 Review questionnaire results  Add requirements if necessary  Prioritize requirements

 Summary of breakout sessions

13

Results and Analysis

14

NAD Uses

2 4 6 8 10 12 Total Address Verification/Inventory Decision-Making/Policy Development Planning Emergency Response Impact Analysis Fraud Detection Other 1 Survey Execution Service Delivery Facility Management Risk Assessment Mailing List Funding Allocation Compliance Notification Enumeration

Results and Analysis (Continued)

15

6 4 2

Data Management Model

No Preference Distributed Centralized

2 4 6 8 10 12

Total

Residential Commercial Governmental/Public Other

Address Type

6 3 2 1

Update Frequency

Annually Quarterly Continuously Biannually

3 3 2 2 1 1

Address Point Location

Front Door Only Building Footprint Centroid Parcel Centroid No Preference All Doors Post Office Mail Receptacle

Content Requirements

16

 Key take-away points

 Federal agencies identified additional requirements  NAD Pilot minimum content met the needs of

• ther Federal agencies

 Top five additional content needs

 Alternate street names  Unit type  Postal City/State abbreviation  Multi-unit structure flag  Geocode confidence and accuracy

Metadata Requirements

17

 Key take-away

 Top three needs are essential, remaining are desirable

 Top five metadata needs

 Address coordinate reference system  Coordinate reference system authority  Indicator of quality  Unique IDs  Address lifecycle

Functional Requirements

18

 Key take-away points

 Bulk download serves 90% of agencies needs  Functionality beyond tools on Geospatial Platform would be useful

 Top five functional needs

 Feedback mechanisms

• Error correction
• Functionality development

 Download tools such as subset download, queuing  Anytime access via cloud  Batch geocoding service  Ability to feed updates to classified systems

Topics for Further Discussion

19

 Overall workflow

 Maintenance

 Quality  Unique IDs  Linkages to other datasets

 Infrastructure points (manholes, fire hydrants)  Building footprints, parcels, etc.

Next Steps

Report of workshop findings and recommendations Continue discussions on NAD and address topics at monthly Address Subcommittee meetings

20

Address Theme and NAD Team Contacts

Matt Zimolzak matthew.a.zimolzak@census.gov Mark Lange mark.d.lange@census.gov Steve Lewis steve.lewis@dot.gov 202-366-9223 Lynda Liptrap lynda.a.liptrap@census.gov 301-763-1058