Activity presentations are considered intellectual property These - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

activity presentations are considered intellectual
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Activity presentations are considered intellectual property These - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Activity presentations are considered intellectual property These slides may not be published or posted online without permission from Vindico Medical Education (cme@vindicocme.com). Please be respectful of this request so we may continue to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Activity presentations are considered intellectual property

These slides may not be published or posted online without permission from Vindico Medical Education (cme@vindicocme.com). Please be respectful of this request so we may continue to provide you with presentation materials.

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Optimal Neuromuscular Blockade Management

  • J. Ross Renew, MD, FASA, FASE

Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL

slide-8
SLIDE 8

AP = adductor pollicis muscle; PTC = post-tetanic count; TOFC = train-of-four count; TOFR = train-of-four ratio. Adapted from: Naguib M, et al. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(1):71-80.

Nomenclature

Level of Blockade Depth Objective Measurement at AP Subjective Evaluation With PNS at AP 5 Complete block No PTC No PTC 4 Deep block PTC > 1, no TOFC

PTC ≥ 1, no TOFC

3 Moderate block TOFC = 1-3 TOFC = 1-3 2b Shallow block TOFR < 0.4 TOFC = 4 with fade detected 2a Minimal block TOFR = 0.4-0.9 TOFC = 4 with no fade detected 1 Acceptable recovery

TOFR ≥ 0.9

Unable to detect

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PPV = positive predictive value. Cammu G, et al. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(2):426-429.

Nomenclature

Clinical assessment:

  • Inability to smile, swallow, speak; PPV = 0.47
  • General weakness; PPV= 0.51
  • Inability to lift head for 5 seconds; PPV= 0.51
  • Inability to lift leg for 5 seconds; PPV= 0.50
  • Inability to sustain hand grip for 5 seconds; PPV= 0.51
  • Inability to perform sustained tongue depressor test 5 seconds; PPV= 0.52
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Viby-Mogensen J, et al. Anesthesiology. 1985;63(4):440-443.

Nomenclature

Peripheral nerve stimulator:

  • Tactile assessment slightly more sensitive than visual
  • Inexperienced anesthesiologists cannot detect fade when TOFR > 0.3
  • Majority cannot detect fade when TOFR > 0.4
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Murphy GS, et al. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(3):389-398.

Objective Monitoring

  • Hand-held versus monitoring incorporated

into anesthesia workstation

  • Monitors:

– Acceleromyography (AMG) – Kinemyography (KMG) – Electromyography (EMG)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ACh = acetylcholine; IV = intravenous. Neostigmine methylsulfate. Product information. American Reagent. 2017.

Neostigmine

  • Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that prevents breakdown of

ACh to overwhelm postsynaptic nicotinic receptors

  • Requires co-administration with antimuscarinic agent
  • 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate IV for each 1 mg neostigmine IV

(similar onset time)

  • Edrophonium (0.5 to 1 mg/kg) + atropine (7 to 14 µg/kg IV)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Naguib M, et al. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(Suppl 1):16-37.

Neostigmine (cont’d)

  • TOFC > 2

Recommend 70 µg/kg

  • TOFC = 4

Recommend 20-50 µg/kg

  • Ceiling effect at 5 mg
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Kim KS, et al. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(4):1080-1085.

Neostigmine (cont’d)

  • Recommend administration with at least TOFC = 3
  • Median time to recovery with TOFC = 3 is 15.6 minutes

(7.3 to 43.9)

  • Median time to recovery with TOFC = 4 is 9.7 minutes

(5.1 to 26.4)

  • Can be prolonged with inhalation anesthesia, hypothermia,

acidosis, electrolyte disturbances, hypercarbia, and patient age

slide-15
SLIDE 15

NMBA = neuromuscular blocking agent. Debaene B, et al. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1042-1048; Goldhill DR, el al. Anaesthesia. 1989;44(4):293-299; Murphy G, et al. Anesthesiology. 2018;128(1):27-37.

Spontaneous Recovery

  • Unpredictable response to NMBA
  • 37% of patients had residual weakness 2 hours after

intubating dose of intermediate-acting NMBA

  • Do not omit NMBA antagonism if one cannot demonstrate

adequate recovery (quantitative monitoring)

  • Neostigmine administered in the absence of NMB can cause

paradoxical reduction in TOFR

  • 40 µg/kg after spontaneous recovery had no increase in

adverse events (it actually had less diplopia)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ICU = intensive care unit; PACU = post-anesthesia care unit. Berg H, et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan. 1997;41(9):1095-1103. Murphy GS. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2006;72(3):97-109. Murphy GS, et al. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):130-137.

Residual Neuromuscular Blockade

  • Subjective feelings of weakness
  • Oropharyngeal dysfunction
  • Prolonged PACU stay
  • Postoperative pulmonary complications
  • Respiratory collapse requiring reintubation/ICU care
slide-17
SLIDE 17

RNMB = residual neuromuscular block. Brull SJ, et al. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(1):173-190.

Strategies to Avoid RNMB

  • Use of short- or intermediate-acting NMBA
  • Use quantitative monitoring to guide redosing and confirm

adequate recovery

  • Administer NMBA antagonists at appropriate depth of blockade
  • Extubate the trachea once adequate recovery has been confirmed
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Current and Emerging Neuromuscular Blockade (NMB) Reversal Agents

Anthony L. Kovac, MD

Kasumi Arakawa Professor of Anesthesiology University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City, KS

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Objectives: Agents for Rapid Recovery of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade (NMB)

  • New class  selective relaxant binding agents (SRBA):

Selectively binds & terminates non-depolarizing NMB relaxants

  • Sugammadex  efficacy and safety data  benefits and risks
  • I mpact/ utility of rapid recovery on surgical practice:

A.

Reverse deep and intense NMB

B.

Improves patient safety, intubation time, postop residual curarization, muscle recovery, OR efficiency

  • Preclinical/ clinical data of emerging agents: gantacurium, CW002, and CW0011, calabadion

OR = operating room.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Slide courtesy of AL Kovac, MD.

1.

Deep NMB useful during:

Laparoscopy

Robotic surgery

Microscopic surgery

Bariatric surgery

2.

I mprovement of:

Patient safety

Muscle strength

Postoperative intubation time

Risk of respiratory complications

Postoperative residual curarization

OR efficiency: turnover times

I mpact/ Utility of Rapid Recovery

  • n Surgical Practice
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Heerdt PM, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015;28(4):403-410. Hunter JM. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(suppl_1):i53-i62.

  • Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors  reverse low levels of NMB

(neostigmine)

  • Encapsulating agents  reverse all levels of NMB

– Sugammadex  reverses steroid NMB agents – Calabadion  reverses steroid and benzylisoquinoline NMB agents

  • L-Cysteine adduction  reverses gantacurium and CW002

Agents for Reversal of Nondepolarizing NMB

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Block Depth: I ntense

TOF = 0 PTC = 0

Deep

TOF = 0

PTC = ≥1

Moderate

TOF = 1-3

PTC = ≥1

Recovery

TOF = T4/T1

Levels of Block After a Normal I ntubating Dose of a Non-depolarizing NMB Agent

PTC = post-tetanic count; TOF = train of four. Fuchs-Buder T, et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;51(7):789-808.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Naguib M. Anesth Analg. 2007:104(3):575-581. Google Patents: Sugammadex sodium. Filed January 23, 2017. Accessed October 9, 2020. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2018136013A1/en

Cyclodextrin Characteristics

  • Encapsulating agents

(sugammadex)

  • Interior lipophilic (OH)
  • Interior hydrophobic

Exterior hydrophilic (COO) Allows strong binding to hydrophobic molecules to stabilize or solubilize

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Rocuronium and Sugammadex Complex Radiograph Crystal Structure

Gijsenbergh F, et al. Anesthesiology. 2005:103(4);695-703. Reprinted With Permission. https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology

+ =

Rocuronium Sugammadex

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Naguib M. Anesth Analg. 2007:104(3);575-581.

Sugammadex Characteristics

  • Binds at 1:1 ratio
  • Reduces amount of NMB agent to bind to nicotinic receptor
  • Affinity for steroidal non-depolarizing NMB agents
  • Affinity: rocuronium > vecuronium
  • No affinity for succinylcholine, cisatracurium
  • Half life = 100 minutes
  • Renal excretion; no metabolism
  • Over 24 hours, 60%-80% excreted in urine
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sugammadex Reversal Doses at Different NMB

  • Light to moderate block: TOF ≥ 1  2 mg/kg
  • Deep block: TOF = 0, PTC ≥ 1

 4 mg/kg

  • Intense block: TOF = 0, PTC = 0  16 mg/kg

Naguib M. Anesth Analg. 2007:104(3):575-581. Hristovska AM, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Review. 2017;8(8):CD012763.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Gijsenbergh F, et al. Anesthesiology. 2005:103(4);695-703. Reprinted With Permission. https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology

Sugammadex Rapidly Reverses NMB

TOF tracings after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg and placebo Or Sugammadex 4.0 mg/kg; deep NMB TOF=0, PTC=1

slide-28
SLIDE 28

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Rocuronium + sugammadex Vecuronium + sugammadex Rocuronium + neostigmine Vecuronium + neostigmine Rocuronium + placebo

Kaplan–Meier curves showing time to recovery to train-of-four ratio of 0.9 after study drug administration at reappearance of second twitch (T2), by treatment group and neuromuscular blocking agent (intent-to-treat population). Gray vertical dotted line represents recovery time of 5 minutes.

Time to Recovery (minutes) Cumulative Recovery Rate

Adapted from: Herring WJ, et al. J Clin Anesth. 2017;41:84-91. Vecuronium + placebo

Sugammadex Efficacy for Reversal of Rocuronium- and Vecuronium- induced NMB: Pooled Analysis

  • f 26 Studies
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Sugammadex

16 mg/ kg Dosing After Rocuronium 1.2 mg/ kg I ntense NMB TOF = 0, PTC = 0

Roc = rocuronium. Naguib M. Anesth Analg. 2007:104(3):575-581. Reprinted With Permission. https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Sugammadex: Benefits

  • Rapidly encapsulates rocuronium > vecuronium, reverses deep

and intense block

  • Well tolerated
  • Effective & safe in elderly, pediatric, cardiac, renal, and pulmonary

disease patients; no bronchospasm

  • Helps improve surgical conditions  optimize surgical space conditions

during laparoscopic surgery

  • Helps minimize postoperative complications  reduces inadequate

reversal (residual paralysis)

Naguib M. Anesth Analg. 2007:104(3):575-581. Bruintjes MH, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(6):834-842.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Sugammadex: Possible Risks at High Doses (16 mg/ kg)

  • Hypotension
  • Bradycardia
  • QT interval prolongation
  • Drug interaction(s) with steroid compounds (estrogens)
  • Anticoagulation
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Hypersensitivity reactions

Honing G, et al. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18(10);883-891.

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Asymmetric alpha-chlorofumarate
  • Ultra-short nondepolarizing NMB
  • Onset = 90 seconds
  • Ultra-short duration = 10 minutes
  • Minimal or no hemodynamic effects
  • No histamine release
  • Inactivation by L-Cysteine adduction
  • Organ independent metabolism

Preclinical/ Clinical Data of Emerging Agents: Gantacurium

Heerdt PM, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015;28(4):403-410. Hunter JM. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(suppl_1):i53-i62.

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Amino acid with thiol side chain
  • Targets are the novel isoquinoliniums 

gantacurium, CW002 & CW0011

  • Adducts to fumarate moiety 

Reversal at any time with same dose

L-Cysteine

Heerdt PM, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015;28(4):403-410. Hunter JM. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(suppl_1):i53-i62.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Cysteine Gantacurium

Gantacurium Reversal

Heerdt PM, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015;28(4):403-410.

Gantacurium – L-cysteine Adduct

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Preclinical/ Clinical Data of Emerging Agents: CW002 and CW0011

  • Symmetric alpha-chlorofumarate
  • Structure similar to gantacurium, except no chlorine atom at the

fumarate double bond

  • Intermediate nondepolarizing NMB (greater potency than gantacurium)
  • Onset = 90 seconds, intermediate duration = 40 to 60 minutes
  • Minimal or no hemodynamic effects
  • No histamine release
  • Inactivation by L-cystine adduction
  • Organ independent metabolism

Heerdt PM, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015;28(4):403-410. Hunter JM. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(suppl_1):i53-i62.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Adapted from: Savarase JJ, et al. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(1):58-73.

Gantacurium CW002

Comparison of Gantacurium, CW0011, CW002, and L-cysteine Adduction of CW002

CW0011 NB 1043-10 L-cysteine Adduct of CW002

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Acyclic cucurbituril  binds to all NMB quaternary amines

Heerdt PM, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015;28(4):403-410. Hunter JM. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(suppl_1):i53-i62. Image: Czarnetzki C. Dissertation. University of Geneva; 2017. Accessed October 9, 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325205759_Drug_interactions_in_the_context_of_neuromuscular_blockade_clinical_implications_and_safety_issues

Preclinical/ Clinical Data of Emerging Agents: Calabadion 1 and 2

slide-38
SLIDE 38

I mportance of a Multidisciplinary Approach

  • Teams versus tribes…
  • The basic obstacle to a multidisciplinary approach…
  • Territoriality and organizational obstacles
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Components of a Multidisciplinary Approach

  • Surgical team—office staff, house staff, surgeons
  • Anesthesia team—anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists,

residents, technicians

  • OR nursing team
  • Preoperative holding
  • PACU
  • Day stay or inpatient unit (where applicable)

PACU = post-anesthesia care unit.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Epstein NE. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5(Suppl 7):295-303.

Advantages of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Perioperative Care

  • Minimizes the risks of errors
  • Is more efficient
  • Improves outcomes
  • Is essential for “enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS)

pathways

  • Because of the standardization associated with this

approach, it creates a superior teaching environment

slide-41
SLIDE 41

VTE = venous thromboembolism. Whiteman AR, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2015;116(3):311-314. Image created by Arafat Uddin from the Noun Project.

I mportance of Effective Communication Within the Team

  • This should seem obvious and intuitive
  • Efficiency
  • Safety—minimizes risk of errors
  • Improved outcomes
  • As one reviews the factors contributing to

surgical complications (particularly VTE and wound complications), the need for communications, standardization, and a team approach becomes apparent

Improving Outcomes and Decreasing Complications

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Examples of a Successful Team Approach

  • Large paraesophageal hernias—listed separately because of the

need for diaphragmatic relaxation

  • Specimen extraction following laparoscopic appendectomy,

colectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, and distal pancreatectomy

  • Laparoscopic inguinal and ventral hernia
  • These are all examples of cases which quickly

transition into wound closure Case Conclusion After Deep Neuromuscular Blockade

Image created by Arafat Uddin from the Noun Project.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

MIS = minimally invasive surgery. Staehr-Rye AK, et al. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(5):1084-1092.

The Specific Challenge of Low Pressure MI S

  • As a topic this has been discussed but inadequately researched;

it is most likely procedure specific

  • Many studies address “working space” in pelvic MIS
  • Definitely a “tribal-biased” posture in the literature
  • Physiology—perfusion and high intra-abdominal pressure, hypercarbia: impacts upon pH,

cardiopulmonary performance, and renal function; impact upon postoperative pain

  • Risk of high pressure aerosol in COVID transmission

Maintaining an Intra-abdominal Pressure of 8 mm Hg or Less

slide-44
SLIDE 44

The Goals of I ntegration

  • How can newer and emerging reversal agents be

integrated into a team approach?

  • Can these agents impact the specific challenges of

low pressure MIS?

  • Can these agents improve outcomes, patient safety,
  • perating room efficiency, and positively impact costs?
  • Should these agents be integrated into the concept of

ERAS pathways?

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The Goals of I ntegration

  • How can newer and emerging reversal agents be

integrated into a team approach?

  • Can these agents impact the specific challenges of

low pressure MIS?

  • Can these agents improve outcomes, patient safety,
  • perating room efficiency, and positively impact costs?
  • Should these agents be integrated into the concept of

ERAS pathways?

slide-46
SLIDE 46

The Goals of I ntegration

  • How can newer and emerging reversal agents be

integrated into a team approach?

  • Can these agents impact the specific challenges of

low pressure MIS?

  • Can these agents improve outcomes, patient safety,
  • perating room efficiency, and positively impact costs?
  • Should these agents be integrated into the concept of

ERAS pathways?

slide-47
SLIDE 47

The Goals of I ntegration

  • How can newer and emerging reversal agents be

integrated into a team approach?

  • Can these agents impact the specific challenges of

low pressure MIS?

  • Can these agents improve outcomes, patient safety,
  • perating room efficiency, and positively impact costs?
  • Should these agents be integrated into the concept of

ERAS pathways?