a sustainable energy transition
play

a sustainable energy transition Linda Steg University of Groningen, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 1 Human dimension of a sustainable energy transition Linda Steg University of Groningen, Department of Psychology faculty of behavioural psychology and social


  1. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 1 Human dimension of a sustainable energy transition Linda Steg University of Groningen, Department of Psychology

  2. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 2 Commission proposes new rules for consumer centred clean energy transition Consumers are active and central players on future energy markets http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/news/commission-proposes-new-rules-consumer-centred-clean-energy-transition

  3. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 3 3 SSH and energy transition Sustainable energy transition requires behaviour changes and public support: Adopt and use renewable energy sources  Adopt and use of energy efficient technology  Refurbishment  Adopt and use monitoring/control technology  Adopt and use storage facilities  Change user behaviour: reduce and balance  Changes and policy need to be acceptable 

  4. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 4 4 Understand behaviour and policy acceptability › Individual factors: e.g. values, norms, motives, perceptions › Contextual factors: e.g. institutions, policy, spatial, economics, technology, culture, law › Normative analysis, ethics › Interdisciplinary approach

  5. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 5 Steg & De Groot (2012); Steg, Perlaviciute, Van der Werff & Lurvink (2014)

  6. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 6

  7. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 7 Values and preferences Egoistic and biospheric values: › Define what is important  consequences for self or environment › Shape overall positive or negative views › Help maintain positive or negative views  Motivated cognition – I support (or oppose) it, so it has many (dis)advantages Perlaviciute & Steg (2014, 2015)

  8. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 8 Value conflict › Sustainable energy behaviours can be costly, effortful or inconvenient › Reduce value conflict  Make sustainable energy behaviour beneficial  Target biospheric values Steg, Bolderdijk, Keizer, & Perlaviciute (2014); Steg (2015, 2016)

  9. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 9 Environment Control Money Bolderdijk, Steg, Geller, Lehman & Postmes (2013)

  10. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 10 Eudaimonia › Acting sustainably feels good as it is meaningful › Positive self signal › Encourages consistent sustainable actions Meaning of Positive Sustainable energy Feeling good behaviour self-signal behaviour about behaviour Venhoeven (2016); Venhoeven, Bolderdijk & Steg (2013, 2016)

  11. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | Sustainable energy behaviour and warm glow Taufik, Bolderdijk & Steg (2014)

  12. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | Positive self-signal Taufik, Bolderdijk & Steg ( 2014 )

  13. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 13 Environmental self-identity Biospheric values Sustainable Environmental energy self-identity behaviour Past behaviour Van der Werff, Steg, & Keizer (2013a; 2013b)

  14. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 14 Symbolic value Importance ratings Beliefs 7,0 Instrumental 6,0 n.s. 5,0 β = .38 Signal 4,0 β = .25 3,0 Interest in LE Environmental 2,0 R 2 = .35 1,0 Instrumental Environmental Signal Noppers, Keizer, Bolderdijk & Steg (2014)

  15. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 15 Contexts affects whether people act upon biospheric values › Context may facilitate or inhibit behaviour › Context affects which consequences considered  Norm (dis)respect cues  CER Ruepert et al. (under review); Steg, Bolderdijk, Keizer & Perlaviciute (2014); Steg (2015, 2016)

  16. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 16

  17. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 17 Graffiti versus no graffiti Flyer at handlebar of bicycles How many people litter the flyer? Keizer, Lindenberg, & Steg (2008)

  18. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 18 No graffiti (N= 77) 33% Graffiti (N=77): 69% Keizer, Lindenberg, & Steg (2008)

  19. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 19 Keizer, Lindenberg, & Steg (2013)

  20. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 20 Clean environment 40% Picking up soda can 64% Sweeping 82% Keizer, Lindenberg & Steg (2013)

  21. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 21 Corporate Environmental Sustainability More sustainable energy behaviour: › when employees strongly endorse biospheric values › when they believe their organisation is committed to CER › CER particularly encourages sustainable energy behaviour when employees do not strongly endorse biospheric values Ruepert, Keizer & Steg (under review)

  22. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 22 Conclusions › Reduce value conflicts › Target situational factors that activate and support biospheric values  Reminders of previous sustainable energy behaviour  ‘ Good ’ behaviour of others  CER › Normative route: solid base and cost efficient Steg, Bolderdijk, Keizer & Perlaviciute (2014); Steg (2016)

  23. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 23 23 Mission PERSON Platform for Energy Research in the Socio-Economic Nexus To unite and advise on European top-class SSH energy research on the human dimensions of sustainable energy transitions to promote a secure, clean and efficient energy system. See: person.eu

  24. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 24 24 Aim PERSON 1. Establish platform top SSH research Dialogue: non-SSH, industry, ETPs, government,  civil society 2. State of the Societal Energy Union Interdisciplinary state of the art  3. Strategic Integrated Research Agenda (SIRA) Share with EC, science foundations, funding agencies  Promote implementation of SIRA  4. Yearly meeting EU Sustainable Energy Week, June 22 2017 

  25. faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences Date 18-11-2013 | 25 25 Strategic Integrated Research Agenda 2016 1. Understanding energy use behaviour 2. Promoting sustainable energy use 3. Acceptability energy systems and policies 4. Multi-method approach 5. Cross-cultural research 6. Interdisciplinary research

  26. Thank you! faculty of behavioural psychology and social sciences e.m.steg@rug.nl Date 18-11-2013 | 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend