A Study on Avoiding Cream- Skimming Effects in CDM Madoka Yamaryo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a study on avoiding cream skimming effects in cdm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Study on Avoiding Cream- Skimming Effects in CDM Madoka Yamaryo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Study on Avoiding Cream- Skimming Effects in CDM Madoka Yamaryo Tokyo Institute of Technology Cream-Skimming Effect in CDM Annex I countries implement only low cost CDM projects. Implemented projects do not contribute to the sustainable


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Madoka Yamaryo Tokyo Institute of Technology

A Study on Avoiding Cream- Skimming Effects in CDM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cream-Skimming Effect in CDM

Annex I countries implement only low cost CDM projects. Implemented projects do not contribute to the sustainable development of developing countries.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

AIJ Project Report UNFCCC(2000)

Abatement Costs of AIJ Projects Implemented in Developing Countries

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 project type abatement cost (US$/t-CO2) total cost of the project cost as AIJ project

forest agriculture & fugitive gas capture energy efficiency renewable energy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Past Analysis and Problems

Quantitative Analysis on CDM

Use the same framework as emissions trading.

Projects of lowest marginal abatement costs are being implemented first.

Participation of Private Companies

Active participation is expected

Private companies prefer projects of low abatement cost.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Aims of This Study

Argue on the importance of implementing CDM projects of high cost Find incentives for Japanese private companies to invest in high cost CDM projects

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Settings of the Model Analysis

GTAP database 1995-2020( recursive) time period of the analysis Japan, China, rest of the world regions CO2 emitted from fossil fuels GHG considered Japan 2001 China & row 2016 starting year of GHG abatement 2001-2010 investing period affforestation, energy saving projects in the iron and steel sector CDM projects considered China host country Japan investing country

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CO2 Emission Constraints

none until 2015, fixed to the 2015 emission from 2016 emissions are gradually reduced to 94% of the 2010 emission in 2020 2011- 2020 none abatement starts from 2001, emissions are reduced to 94% of the 1990 emission in 2010 2001- 2010 China & rest of the world Japan Period

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Treatment of CDM Projects in the Model

emissions right

CO2 emissions constraint

Production Consumption fossil fuels electricity

CO2

iron & steel sector CDM Project investment iron & steel sector with CDM equipments

CO2

conventional iron & steel sector

CO2

JAPAN CHINA

forest sector CDM capital Chinese domestic capital

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Scenarios in the Analysis

scenarios with CO2 emissions constraints

× ○

afforestation

○ ○

energy saving 2

○ ○

energy saving 1

○ ×

domestic

× ×

no constraint investment in affforestation by China (from 2015) CDM Project explanation of scenarios Scenario

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Abatement Costs of Projects

afforestation energy conservation in electric furnace used for ferro-alloy refining coke dry quenching facility

Reference 5.2 Afforestation 37.5 Energy saving 2 30 Energy saving 1 Abatement Cost (US$/t-CO2) Scenario

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Scale of CDM Projects

two cases: Japan receives the emissions right of

1%

5%

  • f the 1990 Japanese CO2 emission in 2010

investment in 2010 (in 1995 million US$)

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 energy saving 1 energy saving 2 afforestation 1% 5%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Result for Japan

Recovery of GDP in 2010 comparing to the

“domestic” scenario

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% energy saving 1 energy saving 2 afforestation GDP recovery 1% 1% considering CDM investment 5% 5% considering CDM investment

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Result for China - 1

index: average increase of CO2 emission / average GDP growth between 1995 and 2010

0.650 0.649 0.649

  • 5%

0.651 0.650 0.651

  • 1%
  • 0.651

0.648 none afforestation energy saving 2 energy saving 1 domestic no constraint scenario CDM investment

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Result for China - 2

Difference of GDP between scenarios with CO2 abatement and “no constraint” scenario in 2020 (1995 trillion US$)

  • 225.00
  • 220.00
  • 215.00
  • 210.00
  • 205.00
  • 200.00
  • 195.00

domestic energy saving 1 energy saving 2 afforestation 1% 5%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Aim of the Questionnaire – What are the incentives for the companies to invest in high cost CDM projects?

What are the incentives that mainly relate to costs?

ex.) the cost of the project itself becomes cheaper the cost of the project is cheaper than other ways of reducing GHGs the cost of the project is cheap in the long run

What are the incentives that do not mainly relate to costs?

ex.) able to save time of procedures rules of CDM force companies to invest in high cost projects conventional investment activities are admitted as CDM projects

  • btain more business opportunities in developing countries
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Companies visited

2 Trading 1 Paper manufacturing 2 Iron and steel manufacturing 2 Electric power distributing Number of companies visited Sector

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results of the Questionnaire

“To find advantages other than reducing GHGs

in high cost CDM projects so that other bodies bear a part of the cost” was supported by all the companies that have answered the questionnaire. Companies regard costs as very important. Incentives that do not mainly relate to costs: Could not find strong incentives.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusion - 1

For Japan, it is better to invest in low cost CDM projects such as afforestation. However, Japan still obtains benefits by investing in relatively high cost CDM projects such as energy efficiency projects. China benefits more from high cost CDM projects not only economically but also in terms of environment and future actions taken by itself against global warming.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Companies regard costs of CDM projects as very important. In order for Japanese private companies to invest in high cost CDM projects, it is effective to find advantages other than reducing greenhouse gases so that other bodies bear a part of the cost.

Conclusion - 2