A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a short note on the equivalence of the ontic and the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Georg Schollmeyer Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU) A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View on Data Imprecision for the Case of Stochastic Dominance for Interval-Valued Data


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View on Data Imprecision for the Case of Stochastic Dominance for Interval-Valued Data

Georg Schollmeyer

Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Our Working Group

Working Group Methodological Foundations of Statistics and their Applications:

  • Thomas Augustin
  • Eva Endres
  • Cornelia Fuetterer
  • Malte Nalenz
  • Aziz Omar
  • Patrick Schwaferts
  • Georg Schollmeyer

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View on Data Imprecision for the Case of Stochastic Dominance for Interval-Valued Data

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ontic vs Epistemic Data Imprecision

  • Epistemic view: A set-valued data point represents an imprecise
  • bservation of a precise, but not directlyobservable data point
  • f interest.
  • Ontic view: A set-valued data point is understood as a precise
  • bservation of somethinmg that is ’imprecise’ in nature.

3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

First Order Stochastic Dominance 1a: univariate case

amssymb amsmath

FY FX X ≤SD Y ⇐ ⇒ ∀c ∈ R : FX(c) ≥ FY (c) ⇐ ⇒ ∀c ∈ R : P(X ≥ c) ≤ P(Y ≥ c)

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

First Order Stochastic Dominance 1b: univariate case, sample analogue

amsmath amssymb

FY FX X ≤ ˆ

SD Y ⇐

⇒ ∀c ∈ R : ˆ FX(c) ≥ ˆ FY (c) ⇐ ⇒ ∀c ∈ R : ˆ P(X ≥ c) ≤ ˆ P(Y ≥ c)

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

First Order Stochastic Dominance 2: bivariate case

amsmath amssymb

b b b b b b b b b b b

X ≤ ˆ

SD Y ⇐

⇒ ∀U ⊆ R2 upset : ˆ P(X ∈ U) ≤ ˆ P(Y ∈ U)

(A set U ⊆ R2 is called upset iff ∀x ∈ U, y ∈ R2 s.t. yi ≥ xi(i = 1, 2) = ⇒ y ∈ U)

6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

First Order Stochastic Dominance 2: bivariate case

amsmath amssymb

b b b b b b b b b b b

X ≤ ˆ

SD Y ⇐

⇒ ∀U ⊆ R2 upset : ˆ P(X ∈ U) ≤ ˆ P(Y ∈ U)

7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

First Order Stochastic Dominance 3: general poset-valued case

  • Given a poset (V, ≤), a subset U ⊆ V is called upset iff

x ∈ U , y ≥ x = ⇒ y ∈ U.

  • X ≤ ˆ

SD Y ⇐

⇒ ∀U ⊆ R2 upset : ˆ P(X ∈ U) ≤ ˆ P(Y ∈ U)

b b b

U

b b b b b b

8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: univariate case, Epistemic view

amsmath amssymb

c X ≤ ˆ

SD Y ⇐

⇒ ∀x ∈ x, y ∈ y : ∀c ∈ R : |{i : xi ≥ c}| ≤ |{i : yi ≥ c}|

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Epistemic View

amsmath amssymb

b b b b b b b b b b b

X ≤ ˆ

SD Y ⇐

⇒ ∀X ∈ X, Y ∈ Y : ∀U ⊆ R2 upset : ˆ P(X ∈ U) ≤ ˆ P(Y ∈ U)

10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Epistemic View

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Ontic View

amsmath amssymb

c X ≤ ˆ

SD Y ⇐

⇒ ∀U uspet w.r.t. ⊑: ˆ P(X ∈ U) ≤ ˆ P(Y ∈ U) x ⊑ y : ⇐ ⇒ ∀x ∈ x, y ∈ y : x ≤ y

12

slide-14
SLIDE 14

First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Ontic View

amsmath amssymb

x ⊑ y : ⇐ ⇒ ∀x ∈ x, y ∈ y : xi ≤ yi; i = 1, 2 ∀U upset w.r.t. ⊑: ˆ P(X ∈ U) ≤ ˆ P(Y ∈ U)

13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Simple Fact

Epistemic and Ontic view lead to the same results w.r.t. the presence

  • f stochatsic dominance.

14