a scope of practice
play

A Scope of Practice Violence Focus on the individuals acute needs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2/24/2017 The Bullet as the Pathogen: Closing the Revolving Door of A Scope of Practice Violence Focus on the individuals acute needs then Concentrate on the broader context Rochelle A. Dicker, MD Professor of Surgery and Anesthesia


  1. 2/24/2017 The Bullet as the Pathogen: Closing the Revolving Door of A Scope of Practice Violence • Focus on the individual’s acute needs then • Concentrate on the broader context Rochelle A. Dicker, MD Professor of Surgery and Anesthesia • ASK BIGGER QUESTIONS Director Wraparound Project • Apply principles of public health and chronic Co-Director Center for Global Surgical Studies disease University of California, San Francisco • Observe patterns with an eye on the population in need Surgery and Public Health? Surgery and Public Health Perceptions of Surgery Public Health – Prevention approach – Curative – Focuses on Populations – Focus is on the Individual – Low-tech, variable skills – More cost-effective – High-tech, high-skills – Equity – Not Cost-effective 1

  2. 2/24/2017 NEARLY 6 MILLIONS LIVES Injury is a Public Health Problem Public Health Injury Surveillance Advocacy Research Services Policy Prevention & Control Evaluation Severity and Disparity of Homicide The San Francisco Story in Youth and Young Adults The Urban America Story #1 cause of death in young African Americans, 15-34 years old #2 in Latinos, 15-34 years old 53 per 100,000 African Americans 20 per 100,000 in Latinos 2

  3. 2/24/2017 Who Owns It? “ “ Violence is a public “ “ health issue ” ” ” ” Public Health C. Everett Koop , US Surgeon Injury Surveillance Advocacy General, 1984 Services Research Policy Prevention & Control Evaluation Surveillance 76% of homicide and assault victims had criminal histories African American men are 13 times more likely to be injured (15-34) 2 per 1000 AA men are injured from violence 4% of population and 60% of gunshot victims 3

  4. 2/24/2017 Social Determinants of Health • Complex interplay of social and economic systems – Social and structural systems in which people exist – Systems designed to address people’s health issues – Shaped by income, power, and resources • Globally, nationally, locally • What this means for PREVENTION • Health and Wealth: Population Health in 2050 and implications for the US Risk Factors for Violence: SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF Protective Factors HEALTH • Adult mentorship • Poverty • Substance abuse • Interpersonal skills • Family dysfunction • Lack of role models • Commitment to school • Access to Guns • Educational deficiencies • Access to resources • Mental Illness • Hopelessness • Community morés: • RECIDIVISM • Joblessness – Social cohesion + willingness to intervene for the common good = reduction in violence • Intergenerational • Environment - Science RJ Sampson, SW Raudenbush, F Earls. • Normalization Health and Chronic Vol 277; 15 August 1997 Disease 4

  5. 2/24/2017 APPROACHES TO PREVENTION Public Health Injury Surveillance Advocacy Services Research Policy Prevention & Control Evaluation Purtle J, Cheney R, Wiebe DJ, Dicker RA Injury Prevention 2015;21:140-141 The Trauma Center’s Role in Public Health and Prevention The Teachable Moment: Precedent for it Risk reduction strategies – Public Health Model – Culturally Competent Case Management – Community and City partnerships 5

  6. 2/24/2017 THE WRAPAROUND PROJECT: The Wraparound Project A HOSPITAL BASED VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM Cornerstones The Public Health Model for Injury Prevention Seizing the Teachable Moment AIMS – Provide intervention to reduce Long-term Culturally Competent Case Management recidivism and incarceration Providing Links to Risk Reduction Resources – Reestablish standard of care for violent injury in trauma centers serving communities affected by violence The Wraparound Project Target Population Cultural relevance Willingness to accept Sustainability Community “ “ “ ownership ” “ ” ” ” Permission to Seize the Teachable Moment Collaboration with Organizational collect data community Climate Access to… Willingness to accept Renewable $$$ “ “ Buy-in ” “ “ ” ” from leaders ” Fit with existing Leadership programs Positive image Strong host organization and staff Strong program advocates The Case Manager FEASIBILITY Resources • Working knowledge of urban violence Costs Training Space Evaluability Access to Available baseline data • Experience overcoming violence equipment and Access to clients over time Community Climate materials Simple program design Willingness to accept Incentives Access to statistical skills • Crisis management Fit with existing and funding Collaborative programs partners Permission to collect data • Positive force in the community Access to referral networks 6

  7. 2/24/2017 Key Partnerships Intervention Program Design • Community morés: – Social cohesion + willingness to intervene for the INJURY Initial Trauma Care common good = reduction in violence • Community Response Networks • Glide Memorial Church Teachable Assessment by Case HOSPITAL • Carecen tattoo removal Moment Managers at Bedside CARE • Family Mosaic of Bayview Low Risk High Risk • Arriba Juntos • Community GED Programs • Instituto Familia de la Raza RECOVERY Referral to Appropriate • Healthright 360 The Resources • Trauma Recovery Center Wraparound Project Vocational Training Program with AT and T Advocacy Center Friends of the Urban Forest • Teaches victims of violence skills and • Tutorial Services knowledge to be arborists • Partnership with School District • Life skills • GREAT job opportunities • Success Center Job Readiness • Project Rebound at SFSU • Funded by Metta, Bank of America, Hearts • Men’s Group 7

  8. 2/24/2017 Public Health Injury Surveillance Advocacy Services Research Policy Prevention & Control Evaluation COMPONENTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION F ORMATIVE EVALUATION INDEPENDENT P ROCESS PREDICTORS EVALUATION OF SUCCESS I MPACT EVALUATION Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2013; 74:976-982 O UTCOME EVALUATION 8

  9. 2/24/2017 Specific Aims Need Success Rate 1. PROCESS EVALUATION: To determine the screening, Mental Health 86% approached and enrollment rates of clients Employment 86% 2. IMPACT EVALUATION: To determine capacity at Housing 75% meeting individual risk reduction needs 3. OUTCOME EVALUATION: To determine the overall Education 72% injury recidivism rate and compare it to our Family Counseling 80% historical institutional control Court Advocacy 76% Driver ’ s License 4. To determine which risk reduction resources are Vocational Training 70% independent predictors of program completion and success 89% Other 66% Need Success Rate Odds Ratio Case Manager Dose Mental Health 86% 5.97 SUCCESS Employment 86% 4.41 Housing 75% 1.12 Education 72% 0.63 Family 80% 2.26 Counseling Court Advocacy 76% 1.29 Driver ’ s License Vocational 70% 0.69 Training 89% 3.53 Other 66% 1.48 9

  10. 2/24/2017 Conclusion • Providing mental health care and employment opportunities Is predictive of success. • The value of early “ high dose ” intensive case management is essential. • 466 clients enrolled • Most common needs: Mental health, housing, employment • Recidivism rate: 50% less than historical controls • Meeting education needs was associated with success • Housing: A risk factor? 10

  11. 2/24/2017 • Hospital Care • Skilled Nursing $282 Billion Physical Physical • Rehabilitation • Functional Each Year Impairment JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY The The VOLUME 78, NUMBER 2 Costs of Costs of Economic Economic Emotional Emotional Violence Violence • Hospital • PTSD • Depression Costs • Lost Wages • Anxiety • Fear Societal Societal • Unsafe Neighborhoods Specific Aims Markov Analysis 1. To determine the mean cost of trauma per individual at our institution Injured Victim 2. To determine the mean cost of our hospital- centered violence intervention program per individual No Intervention Intervention Program 3. To compare the cost-utility of hospital-based Program violence intervention programs to no intervention in young adults victims of interpersonal violence Reinjured Rehabilitated Reinjured Rehabilitated 11

  12. 2/24/2017 WHO FUNDS THIS? What do they want to see? • Hospital-centered • Mayors and Supervisors • Departments of Public Health violence intervention programs cost money • Foundations but cost less than caring • Federal government for patients after re- • Private donors injury. • …POLICY CHANGE National Network of Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programs Public Health Injury Surveillance Advocacy Services Research Policy Prevention & Control Evaluation 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend