A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Science Center 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a randomized controlled trial
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Science Center 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

USE OF A WEB-ENABLED APP FOR BREAST CANCER ILANA GRAETZ, PhD Department of Preventive Medicine SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT AND MEDICATION ADHERENCE: University of Tennessee Health A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Science Center 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

USE OF A WEB-ENABLED APP FOR BREAST CANCER SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT AND MEDICATION ADHERENCE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

ILANA GRAETZ, PhD Department of Preventive Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Co-authors

UTHSC: Caitlin N. McKillop, PhD Vector Oncology: Edward Stepanski, PhD West Cancer Center: Gregory A. Vidal, MD, PhD and Lee S. Schwartzberg, MD

Funded by the UTHSC Clinical and Translational Science Institute

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

BREAST CANCER AND ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY

1 in 8 women diagnosed with breast cancer  Most with hormone receptor-positive tumors Long-term use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET):  Lowers risk of recurrence  Increases survival  Lowers risk of hospitalizations

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ADVERSE SYMPTOMS DRIVE AET NONADHERENCE

Symptoms usually occur early Low adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy  1 in 3 stop taking within 5 years  Black women have lower AET use and adherence Real time monitoring of adverse symptoms could improve adherence and provide better health

  • utcomes

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a pilot randomized controlled trial of a web- enabled application (app) to provide real-time symptom and adherence monitoring with built-in alerts between visits among women new aromatase inhibitor (AI) prescription

slide-6
SLIDE 6

APP INTERVENTION

Patients used the app weekly to report symptoms and AI adherence for 8 weeks Alerts: Adverse symptoms and AI nonadherence triggered email alerts to patient’s care team Eligibility: Adult women with diagnosis of early stage (I-III) hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving their first prescription for an AI in the West Cancer Center in Memphis, TN

slide-7
SLIDE 7

RANDOMIZATION AND OUTCOMES

Randomized into two groups:

  • App+Reminder: Weekly reminders to use the app
  • App: Asked to use the app, but no reminders

Outcomes

  • 1. App Use: Number of logins/weeks enrolled
  • 2. AI adherence: 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence

Scale (MMAS-4)

  • 3. Changes in symptom burden: Functional Assessment of

Cancer Therapy Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) Outcomes based on self-administered surveys collected from all participants at baseline and follow-up

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assessed for eligibility (n=56) Excluded (n=9)

  • Inclusion criteria not met (n=3)
  • Declined to participate (n=6)

Analyzed (n=21) Discontinued intervention (n=1) Allocated to App+Reminder & received intervention (n=22) Lost to follow-up (n=1) Discontinued intervention (n=2) Allocated to App & received intervention (n=25) Analyzed (n=22) Allocation Analysis (N=43) Follow-Up Randomized (n=47) Enrollment

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PARTICIPANT CHARACTERISTICS

9

Total App+Reminder App

N (%) 44 (100.0) 21 (47.7) 23 (52.3) Age: 18-49 11.4 9.5 13.0 50-65 56.8 52.4 60.9 Over 65 31.8 38.1 26.1 Race/Ethnicity: White 75.0 81.0 69.6 Black 22.7 14.3 30.4 Hispanic 2.3 4.8 0.0 Lower Health Literacy 27.5 36.8 19.1 No Degree/HS/Some College 60.0 57.9 61.9 Income: ≤150% FPL 36.4 23.5 50.0 >150% to <400% FPL 27.3 35.3 18.8 ≥400% FPL 36.3 41.2 31.3 Married/Long-Term Relationship 73.8 70.0 77.3 Stage I at diagnosis 54.5 61.9 47.8

FPL=Federal Poverty Level. No significant differences between App and Usual Care groups (t-tests for group comparison)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

38% 27% 42% 73%* 90%* 71%*

Overall Black White

Overall

App+Reminder

App

APP USE

App Percent Use (Logins/Weeks Enrolled)

Low app use without reminders With reminders, App use high for both White and Black participants

p<0.05 comparing App vs Usual Care groups

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

38% 27% 42% 73%* 90%* 71%*

Overall Black White

Overall

App+Reminder

App

APP USE

App Percent Use (Logins/Weeks Enrolled)

Low app use without reminders With reminders, App use high for both White and Black participants

p<0.05 comparing App vs Usual Care groups

slide-12
SLIDE 12

p<0.05 comparing App vs Usual Care groups

AROMATASE INHIBITOR ADHERENCE

Adherence higher among App+Reminder group Lower adherence among Black participants in the App group

73% 57% 80% 100%* 100%* 100%*

Overall Black White

App App+Reminder % with High Reported AET Adherence

slide-13
SLIDE 13

p<0.05 comparing App vs Usual Care groups

AROMATASE INHIBITOR ADHERENCE

Adherence higher among App+Reminder group Lower adherence among Black participants in the App group

73% 57% 80% 100%* 100%* 100%*

Overall Black White

App App+Reminder % with High Reported AET Adherence

slide-14
SLIDE 14

45.3 49.2 54.4 65.9

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Baseline Follow-up

App+Reminder App

DID = 7.6 (p=0.191)

RESULTS: SYMPTOM BURDEN

  • Trend suggests smaller

symptom burden increase among App+Reminder group

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS

“It was beneficial - I actually used it for a symptom… I was having and the nurse called me back right away … I wasn’t expecting that, so that was nice to have someone call to check on you, so I feel like it was beneficial for that reason and because I could do it in my own privacy, like, at home, you know, that was nice.” “I can go in and note my symptoms before I went to see the doctor and, so I wasn’t sitting in there [in the clinic] and trying to fill it out really quickly on their

  • iPad. I felt like if I could go to the apps

and fill out my symptoms right away, so I wouldn’t forget. Having to wait for three weeks or whatever to fill out my symptoms makes it hard to remember.”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS

“It was beneficial - I actually used it for a symptom… I was having and the nurse called me back, right away … I wasn’t expecting that, so that was nice to have someone call to check on you, so I feel like it was beneficial for that reason and because I could do it in my own privacy, like, at home, you know, that was nice.” “I can go in and note my symptoms before I went to see the doctor and, so I wasn’t sitting in there [in the clinic] and trying to fill it out really quickly on their iPad... Having to wait for three weeks or whatever to fill out my symptoms makes it hard to remember.”

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LIMITATIONS

Small sample and short follow-up Self-reported measure of adherence Single clinic, limited generalizability English-only

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CONCLUSIONS

App use low without reminders

  • With reminders, app use high overall and among Black and White patients

App with weekly reminders improved short-term AI adherence

  • Adherence high among both Black and White patients

Trends in symptom burden suggestive of better symptom management among App+Reminder group

slide-19
SLIDE 19

IMPLICATIONS

If short-term gains in adherence persist, this low-cost intervention could improve survival outcomes

  • May help curb growing breast cancer mortality disparity

Future studies should include a longer follow-up period and capture potential impact on patient outcomes and disparities in outcomes

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Thank you!

Any questions?

Contact Information ILANA GRAETZ, PhD Department of Preventive Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center 66 N Pauline, Suite 608 Memphis, TN 38162 Phone: (901) 448-2285 Email: igraetz@uthsc.edu

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ADHERENCE: MMAS-4 AMONG (APP GROUP ONLY)

18% 14% 10% 0% Sometimes if you feel worse when you take your medicine, do you stop taking it? Do you ever forget to take your medicine? Do you ever have problems remembering to take your medication? When you feel better, do you sometimes stop taking your medicine?

21

App

All participants in App+Reminder group reported high adherence

slide-22
SLIDE 22

IMAGE CREDITS

From the Noun Project

 Taking medicine by Gan Khoon Lay  Headache by Gan Khoon Lay  Headache by Lisole  Bump by Gan Khoon Lay  Hospital by Royyan Wijaya  Doctor by Artem Kovyazin  Text by romzicon  Warning by Rockicon

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Patient: Symptom Experience Perception of symptoms Response to symptoms:

  • AI Adherence
  • App real-time reporting

Care Team: Management Strategies Evaluation of symptoms

  • Built-in alerts
  • EHR-integration
  • Clinical management
  • Call, change/add Rx

Outcomes

  • Short term: Symptom Burden
  • Long term:
  • Survival
  • Disparities
  • Cancer recurrence

Adapted from Dodd and colleagues (2008)

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Adapted from the Symptom Management Model

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MMAS-4 QUESTIONS

  • 1. Do you ever forget to take your medicine?
  • 2. Do you ever have problems remembering to take your

medication?

  • 3. When you feel better, do you sometimes stop taking

your medicine?

  • 4. Sometimes if you feel worse when you take your

medicine, do you stop taking it?

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FACT-ES QUESTIONS

1. I have hot flashes 2. I have cold sweats 3. I have night sweats 4. I have vaginal discharge 5. I have vaginal itching/irritation 6. I have vaginal bleeding or spotting 7. I have vaginal dryness 8. I have pain or discomfort with intercourse 9. I have lost interest in sex

  • 10. I have gained weight

25

  • 11. I feel lightheaded (dizzy)
  • 12. I have been vomiting
  • 13. I have diarrhea (diarrhoea)
  • 14. I get headaches
  • 15. I feel bloated
  • 16. I have breast sensitivity/tenderness
  • 17. I have mood swings
  • 18. I am irritable
  • 19. I have pain in my joints

Response options: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much)

Below is a list of statements that other people with your illness have said are important. Please indicate your response as it applies to the past 7 days.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Total App+ Reminder App Patients N (%) 44 (100.0) 21 (47.7) 23 (52.3) Age: 18-49 11.4 9.5 13.0 50-65 56.8 52.4 60.9 Over 65 31.8 38.1 26.1 Race/Ethnicity: White 75.0 81.0 69.6 Black 22.7 14.3 30.4 Hispanic 2.3 4.8 0.0 Low Health Literacy 27.5 36.8 19.1 No Degree/HS/Some College 60.0 57.9 61.9 Income: ≤150% FPL 36.4 23.5 50.0 >150% to <400% FPL 27.3 35.3 18.8 ≥400% FPL 36.3 41.2 31.3 Married/Long-Term Relationship 73.8 70 77.3 Stage I at diagnosis 54.5 61.9 47.8 Perceived Poor/Fair Health 29.3 31.6 27.3 AI type: Anastrozole 65.9 61.9 69.6 Arimidex 25.0 23.8 26.1 Exemestane 9.1 14.3 4.3