a potential animal feed
play

a Potential Animal Feed Resource David Galligan ,VMD MBA Professor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Consumer Food Waste - a Potential Animal Feed Resource David Galligan ,VMD MBA Professor of Animal Health Economics Zhengxia Dou Professor of Agricultural Systems Animal Agriculture providing our dinner or taking our lunch ?


  1. Consumer Food Waste - a Potential Animal Feed Resource David Galligan ,VMD MBA Professor of Animal Health Economics Zhengxia Dou Professor of Agricultural Systems

  2. Animal Agriculture • “providing our dinner” or “taking our lunch” ? • Competes for use of resources (land, water, .. .) for other activities. Our Focus: • What is the “appropriate role” of animal agriculture in a sustainable system? • Can they play a synergistic role?

  3. Historical approach to improving animal efficiency • Increase yield/animal unit Mechanism • Dilution of animal maintenance cost • More yield/animal, requires fewer animals, fewer replacement animals and fewer resources proportional to animal numbers. Link to Milk Intensity PDF

  4. New dim imensions of f efficiency – use of human food waste as animal l feed • 30% of Human Food Production is used as by products in animal feeding systems • However Food Waste in U.S. is very large

  5. The Magnitude of f the Problem FLW along the food chain Processing Consumption On Farm Manufacturing Stage 9.1 Mt 0.9 Mt 47 Mt

  6. The Magnitude of f the Problem Retail and consumer food loss by food group Dairy products 64% 11.5 36% 11.4 28% Vegetables 72% 39% 61% Grain products 8.4 8.4 32% 68% Fruit 27% 73% 7.6 Added sugars… Meat, poultry,… 18% 82% 7.0 Retail loss 45% 4.5 Added fats and… 55% Consumer loss\1 1.3 Eggs 25% 75% Tree nuts and… 0.2 36%, 64% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Million metric tonnes

  7. Resources and Fin inancial Drains wit ith Retail and Consumer Le Level FLW • 27% of cropland • 25% of irrigation water • 26% of fertilizer • 25% of energy • Retail value of $161.6 billion • Intangible impacts, e.g. water pollution, GHGs, biodiversity, and habitat loss

  8. FLW Reduction, , Recovery ry, and Recycling U.S. 2030 FLW Reduction Goal: 50% Seattle, New York City San Francisco Boulder Austin States with food waste regulations Cities with food waste regulations

  9. FLW Reduction, , Recovery ry, and Recycling The Hierarchy Source reduction Reduction/ Prevention Food rescue for people Feeding animals Recovery/ Diversion Industrial uses Composting Incineration Recycling AD Landfill Disposal

  10. Majo jor Data on Food Waste Prevention and Recycling Hierarchy Mt Notes Prevention 0.32 Manufacturer donation (rescue/donation) to feed 0.30 Retail/wholesale donation people 0.008 Farm gleaning 1-2 Mt 0.19 Donation, Feeding America data 0.56 Donation from consumer and retail Diversion 13.9 Manufacturer diversion to feed nonhuman beneficial use animals 0.1 Retail/wholesale diversion to feed animals 15 Mt 1.1 Restaurant grease recovery Recycling 5.0 Manufacturer-reported composting 0.53 Retail/wholesale reported composting 7-8 Mt 1.42 EPA data on composting 1.66 Survey response of 24 states

  11. Interpretive Analysis In Ch Changing food-wasting behavior • No one buys food to throw it away but... • Our decisions and actions are not necessarily rational or straightforward… • Nudging for behavioral change… Maintenance Action Preparation Contemplation Precontemplation

  12. In Interpretive Analysis Technolo logies and th the 50% reduction goal • Composting • Reduced volume, moisture, and pathogens • Compost as soil amendment • Anaerobic digestion (AD) • Biogas as a source of renewable energy • Digestate as soil amendment • Efficacy, costs-benefits, scale-up? • Tradeoffs?

  13. In Interpretive Analysis A game ch changer? Energy Water Processing Consumption Agricultural Fertilizer manufacturing crops stage Land 47 Mt 1 Mt Soil erosion 9 Mt N&P losses Livestock GHGs animals Biodiversity Grain spared Save resource ReFeed Reduce pollution

  14. Conclusions • Sustainable food consumption must be taken into account of the food security and sustainability agenda. • Food waste prevention is a top priority; changing consumer wasteful behavior is essential. Still, need all workable solutions. • Technologies have a critical role to play. Research must evaluate the overall impacts of different technologies on food, energy, water, other resources, economic viability, and environmental-climate outcomes.

  15. Questio ions/Discussion Zhengxia Dou douzheng@vet.upenn.edu This CAST Issue Paper is available at www.cast-science.org/ publications .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend