A new method for directly determining the adhesive strength of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a new method for directly determining the adhesive
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A new method for directly determining the adhesive strength of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A new method for directly determining the adhesive strength of conductors on micro structured MID H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT 4M2007 Conference on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture 3-5 October 2007 Borovets, Bulgaria www.hsg-imat.de Overview


slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.hsg-imat.de

A new method for directly determining the adhesive strength of conductors on micro structured MID

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

4M2007 Conference on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture 3-5 October 2007 Borovets, Bulgaria

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

2

Overview

Research objective Established methods for determining the adhesive strength New measuring principle Design of the new measuring device First results Summary

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

3

10 mm Rotation angle sensor in MID LDS technology (BMBF-Verbundvorhaben IMDAKT )

Directly determining the adhesive strength of conductors on MID (Moulded Interconnect Devices) Adhesive strength is important for the reliability and hence an important quality feature. Typical geometry of conductors on MID:

  • approx. 200 – 500 µm width, 10 – 20 µm thick

Established measurement methods are not suitable.

Research objective

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

4

Established methods for determining the adhesive strength

Fpull

substrate Metal layer/ conductor adhesive hook Pull test Metal areas with several mm² are required. FPeel movement of the substrate Peel test Layer thickness > 20µm Required width > 0,5mm Required length > 30mm conductor soldered eye peel off hook

For geometry reasons these methods are not suited for determining the adhesive strength on MID parts

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

5

New measuring principle

Detection of conductor profile and substrate tilt by scanning the conductor surface Peel off the conductor with a micro peel off chisel Acquisition of paths and forces Extraction of the adhesive strength of the conductor

z y

Conductor- substrate interface

substrate metal layer micro peel

  • ff chisel

movement Fz Fy

Reproduction of the force situation of peeltest and pull-sheartest with different peel off chisel geometries and resolution

  • f the force
slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

6

Requirements for the measuring device

Suitable for conductors with 200 – 1000 µm width and 5 – 30 µm thickness Range of forces to be detected approx. +/- 50 N, smallest forces ≈0,01 N Very stiff mechanical design (≈1 N/µm) High accuracy of the positioning system Semi-automated measurements Compensation of substrate tilt by profile detection

  • f the conductor and substrate

Basic comparability to established measurement procedures

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

7

Sensor and peel off unit

Sensor housing Housing reinforcement Magnetic clamp Parallel spring suspension with piezoelectric load cell (z-component) Holder for the LVDT-deflection sensor for the profile detection Peel off chisel Parallel spring suspension with piezoelectric load cell (y-component)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

8

Design of the measuring device

Granite rack High accuracy positioning system with multiple axes Sensor and peel off unit Peel off chisel Optics for substrate adjustment and monitoring Characteristics

Linearity: +/- 1.5 % FSO Stiffness: ≈ 1 N/µm

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

9

Peel off chisel geometry

Cutting edge radius rβ: <2µm Chip angle γ: 10°

  • 60°

Different force situations

  • n the chisel blade

small angle: Fy correlates

with shear force

big angle: Fz correlates

with peel force Manufacturing

  • 1. Milling
  • 2. Hardening
  • 3. Grinding

Chisel cutting edge α γ β substrate rβ

z y Fy

  • shear force

Fz ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ 0 small chip angle Fy < Fz Fz

  • peel force

big chip angle

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

10

Results of peeled off copper conductors on FR4 substrate

Conductor length: 5 mm, width: 500 µm, thickness: 35 µm, chip angle: 60°

y forces z forces

y axis position [µm] force [mN]

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

11

Comparison of z forces with peel forces

Conductor length: 50 mm, width: 500 µm, thickness: 35 µm The z forces are displayed as the absolute value of the z-forces

peel forces z forces

force [mN] y axis position [µm]

slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

12

Results of peeled off conductors

  • n MID substrate

Conductor length: 5 mm, width: 500 µm, thickness: 10 µm, chip angle: 60° Cu/NiP/Au on liquid crystal polymer (LCP) made by Laser-Direct- Structuring (LDS)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

13

Results of peeled off conductors

  • n MID substrate

Substrate after peel off process

100 µm

Peeled off conductor segments

Chisel was moving in the substrate- conductor interface.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

14

Results of peeled off conductors

  • n MID substrate
  • 1000
  • 500

500 1000 1500 2000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Y-Tisch-Position [µm] Kraft [mN] YKraft [mN] ZKraft [mN]

force [mN] y axis position [µm]

y forces z forces

slide-15
SLIDE 15

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

15

y forces z forces

Approaches for interpreting the results

  • 1. Analysis of the maximum force of one segment
  • 2. Energy analysis of the complete conductor
  • 3. Energy analysis of single segments

segment width 1. 2. 3.

  • 1000

1000 2000 3000 500 1000 1500 2000 Y-Tisch-Position [µm] Kraft [mN]

force [mN] y axis position [µm]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

16

Approaches for interpreting the results

Comparison of approach 1 and 2 with results from the peel test

  • Correction factor for

correlating with peel test necessary

average adhesive strength [N/mm]

Approach 1 Approach 2 Peel test

slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

17

Summary

A device with a new measuring principle for determining the adhesive strength of conductors has been developed and built-up. Results from conductors on printed circuit boards (FR4) of the new measuring principle show good correlation with the well known peel test. Cu/NiP/Au-conductors on MID substrates crack into segments while being peeled off. Forces during peel off process on MID-substrates are in the same magnitude than the forces during the peel test a correlation via correction factor appears possible.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.hsg-imat.de

  • H. Willeck, HSG-IMAT

18

Thanks for your attention!