A Low Cost Bodyweight Support System to Improve Gait The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a low cost bodyweight support system
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Low Cost Bodyweight Support System to Improve Gait The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Low Cost Bodyweight Support System to Improve Gait The AccesSportAmerica Gait/Walk Trainer Jessica Ventura , PhD Spencer Roffee , BS Ross Lilley , CPT, Executive Director Katherine Roberts , EdD, MPH Ann Charrette , PT, DPT, MS, PCS, NCS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Low Cost Bodyweight Support System to Improve Gait

The AccesSportAmerica Gait/Walk Trainer

Jessica Ventura, PhD Spencer Roffee, BS Ross Lilley, CPT, Executive Director Katherine Roberts, EdD, MPH Ann Charrette, PT, DPT, MS, PCS, NCS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • AccesSportAmerica adapts sports and trains people living with disabilities

toward higher function since 1995.

  • Sports inspire individuals and families to see themselves as compelling

athletes – driving them to train for high function.

  • In 20 years of training, nothing improved gait like perfect form, weight

supported gait training on a treadmill.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Other Gait Training Methods

Manual Method

  • Hand over hand manipulation with therapists

sitting on side of treadmill.

  • Fatiguing and imprecise correction of gait.
  • Staff intensive.

The Lokomat

  • High-tech solution to correct form during weight

supported gait training on a treadmill

  • But, Expensive!
slide-4
SLIDE 4

AccesSportAmerica Gait/Walk Trainer

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170281999A1

slide-5
SLIDE 5

AccesSportAmerica Gait/Walk Trainer

  • Offers perfect form with variable stride length,

hip/knee flexion, and adjustable ankle rotation.

  • Requires only one monitoring trainer who can

also pedal to influence gait.

  • Inexpensive – under $5000 so individuals have

access for 3-4 times/week.

  • Versatile – users can walk and even run safely.
  • Athletes can train for over an hour at time for

benefits of conditioning and improving function.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Gait Study

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects that training on the ASA Gait/Walk Trainer has on walking speed and joint range of motion.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Participants

  • Our gym consists of 4 Gait/Walk Trainers.
  • 16 athletes with disabilities enrolled in the

study, with 11 completing it.

  • Participants come with a variety disabilities:

– Hemiparesis (7) – Head Injury (3) – Cerebral Palsy (1)

  • Training Frequency:

– 2 to 3 times/week – 2+ to 9 months

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Testing

  • 10 Meter Walk Test recorded using a webcam on a trolley
  • Videos analyzed in Dartfish (3 trials per participant)
slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • An average 22% increase in walking speed (46% in slower walkers)
  • Healthy walking speed = 1.1 m/s

Change in Walking Speed

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Spatiotemporal Changes

  • Increase in walking speed is largely due to decrease in step time

* * *

p=0.011 p=0.030 p=0.017

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • The capacity to increase walking speed is limited by impaired hip and ankle

power generation in lower functioning persons (doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.07.010)

  • No significant differences were found in joint angles after training.

Walking Mechanics

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Case Study: Joey November 2017

0.29 m/s

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Case Study: Joey May 2018

0.54 m/s

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Case Study: Joey May 2018

Solo!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

  • The ASA GaitTrainer elicits an increase in walking speed during
  • verground walking, as a result of increased cadence.
  • Changes in walking technique differs between participants.

– Walking will need to be assessed in the Biomechanics Lab to assess joint power generation.

  • More people with mobility disorders should have consistent

access to the ASA GaitTrainer.

– Regular exercise has a host of health benefits! – Most athletes regress during breaks in the training program.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Questions?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Regression

  • Walking speeds of 6 participants

from the 2017 study who also participated in the 2018 study:

– 2017 study Ended: June 2017 – 2018 study Began: Nov 2017

  • Between studies, 5 participants

regressed.

m/s June Nov 1 0.37 0.30 2 0.61 0.33 3 0.37 0.25 4 1.99 1.29 5 0.75 1.33 6 0.18 0.29 Avg 0.71 0.39