1
A Leading Intermediate Copper Producer September 2014 1 Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Leading Intermediate Copper Producer September 2014 1 Cautionary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Leading Intermediate Copper Producer September 2014 1 Cautionary Note Forward Looking Information This presentation, and the documents incorporated by reference herein, may contain forward - looking information within the meaning of
2 2
This presentation, and the documents incorporated by reference herein, may contain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this document and Capstone does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required under applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect our expectations or beliefs regarding future events. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, the realization of mineral reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs
- f production and capital expenditures, the success of our mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses and title disputes. In certain cases, forward-looking
statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases, or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative of these terms or comparable
- terminology. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements
to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to inherent hazards associated with mining operations; future prices of copper and other metals; counterparty risks associated with sales of our metals; our ability to raise capital; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates; changes in general economic conditions; uncertainties and risks related to the potential development of the Santo Domingo Project; increased operating and capital costs; challenges to title to our mineral properties; operating in foreign jurisdictions with risk of changes to governmental regulation; compliance with governmental regulations; dependence on key management personnel; compliance with environmental laws and regulations; reliance on approvals, licenses and permits from governmental authorities; impact of climatic conditions on our Pinto Valley, Cozamin and Minto operations; potential conflicts of interest involving our directors and officers; aboriginal title claims and rights to consultation and accommodation; limitations inherent in our insurance coverage; land reclamation and mine closure obligations; labour relations; increasing energy prices; competition in the mining industry; risks associated with joint venture partners; and our ability to integrate new acquisitions into our operations. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those described in our forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause our results, performance or achievements not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that our forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.
Alternative Performance Measures
“C1 Cash Cost”, “Cash Cost” and “Adjusted Net Earnings” are Alternative Performance Measures. Alternative performance measures are furnished to provide additional information. These performance measures are used by management to monitor performance, to plan and to assess the overall effectiveness and efficiency of mining operations. These performance measures may not be comparable to similar data presented by other mining companies. These performance measures should not be considered in isolation as a substitute for measures of performance included in the Company’s unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Currency
All amounts are in US$ unless otherwise specified.
Cautionary Note Forward Looking Information
3 Minto
Yukon, Canada
Pinto Valley
Arizona, US
Cozamin
Zacatecas, Mexico
Santo Domingo
Region III, Chile
Kutcho
BC, Canada
Head Office
BC, Canada
Stable cash flow generation from three mines Financial flexibility to fund growth Proven track record of sustainable growth Low-risk copper producer focused on the Americas
About Capstone
A leading intermediate copper producer
4 4
Portfolio
PRODUCTION
Three operating mines
Production assets located in stable geographies in the Americas producing >100 k tonnes of copper annually
- Santo Domingo
Region III, Chile CS 70%; KORES 30%
- Kutcho
British Columbia, Canada
DEVELOPMENT
Growth Projects
Disciplined approach to construction, offering significant growth in planned copper production over next five years
- Chile
- SQM - option to earn up
to 70% of Project Providencia (3,500 sq km)
- CS 70%; KORES 30%
- 6 properties
EXPLORATION
Portfolio
Early-stage base metals exploration properties
Short term Long term
- Pinto Valley
Arizona, US 66.3 k tonnes copper1
- Cozamin
Zacatecas State, Mexico 20 k tonnes copper1
- Minto
Yukon, Canada 18.5 k tonnes copper1
1.±5%; see news release dated March 26, 2014.
5 5
Two-Tiered Growth Strategy
Capstone is well-positioned for profitable growth, supported by considerable financial flexibility
- 1. Robust organic growth potential
- Increasing production at Cozamin and Minto
- Potential increase at Pinto Valley - PV3 scoping study underway
- Further exploration opportunities at operating mines
- Advancing the Santo Domingo project
- Building the exploration portfolio
- 2. Growth through strategic acquisition
- Maintain disciplined approach with a conservative and
flexible balance sheet
- Low-risk, mining-friendly jurisdictions in the Americas
6 6
Pinto Valley Mine
- Operating copper mine in Globe-Miami
district of Arizona:
- Asset diversification into one of the
world’s most favorable mining jurisdictions for tax, regulation and labour
- Fully permitted with established
infrastructure and skilled workforce
Producing Copper Mine Acquired in October 2013
7 7
2012 Restart Capital Cost ($US M)1
Mine Fleet $63.8 (33%) Processing $43.7 (22%) Owner Cost $27.1 (14%) Infrastructure $21.2 (11%) EPCM $14.2 (7%) SMARRCO $11.4 (6%) Contractors' Indirect (2) $8.9 (5%) Mine $3.9 (2%)
1.Source BHP Copper. 2. The cost of employing contractors during project execution.
$194M restart capital incorporated lessons learned from previous restart
- Acquired new mining fleet
- Upgraded electrical and controls
- Significantly improved plant
conditions to HSEC standards
- In-sourced mining
Pinto Valley operations have been elevated to world-class standards
8 8
Pinto Valley Mine
Open Pit Mine in Arizona, US
Mine life (years) 12.3 Production – 2014 Guidance (k tonnes Cu ±5%) 66.3 Production3 – Six Months 2014 YTD (k tonnes) 34.7 C1 cash cost1 – Six Months 2014 YTD ($/payable lb Cu) $2.10 C1 cash cost1 – 2014 guidance ($/payable lb Cu) $1.90 - $2.00 Measured & Indicated resources2 (M tonnes) 1,563 Copper grade (%) 0.30 Measured & Indicated contained copper2 (k tonnes) 4,765 By-products Mo, Ag
Pinto Valley adds 57 thousand tonnes of copper annually for over 12 years
Key Points
- PV2 mine plan represents only 16% of the total M&I resource
- Work underway to evaluate possible mine life extension beyond 2026 and potential increase in throughput
- Potential for meaningful impact on production and growth
- PV2 PFS does not include all the projected impact of process improvements
- 1. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure, which is net of by-product credits as well as treatment and selling costs. See Forward-Looking
Statements slide for 43-101 information. 2. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate, March 2014, at 0.18% Cu Cut-off Grade. 3. Includes concentrate and cathode.
9 9
PV2 Pre-Feasibility Summary – March 2014
Summary of March 2014 PV2 PFS Mine Life (years) 12.3 Mineral Resources 1,563mt@0.30%(1) Mineral Reserves 232mt@0.33% Planned Throughput (ktpd) 50 - 52
- Avg. Annual Production
– Contained in Concentrate (M lbs) 119.5
- Avg. Annual Production
– Cathode (M lbs) 6.3
- Est. LOM Avg. C1 Cash Costs
$2.00 LOM Sustaining Capital ($ millions) $187.9 After-tax NPV, 8% ($M) $738
- 1. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate, March 2014, at 0.18% Cu Cut-off Grade.
10 10
PV2 Mine Plan
0.00% 0.05% 0.10% 0.15% 0.20% 0.25% 0.30% 0.35% 0.40% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Copper Grade %
Material Mined (M t/year)
Total Material Moved
Capital Expenditure ($M) 47 62 12 12 9 11 14 6 5 5 3 2 Payable Copper (k tonnes) 64.1 54.8 65.1 55.8 56.2 54.1 57.0 56.1 54.7 52.3 59.7 41.0 12.0
11
Current Permits
Aquifer Protection Permit (APP) AZPDES Discharge Permit Air Permit Mined Land Reclamation Plan (MLRP)
Pinto Valley Permitting
Source: Google maps.
Town of Miami
Pinto Valley
Freeport Miami KGHM Carlota BHP Copper Cities BHP Miami
Pinto Valley Mine Commenced Operation in 1975
Local regulatory and community support demonstrated during prior
- perations – no public
comments received on any permit changes for recent restart.
Capstone’s PV2 optimized mine plan requires minor modifications
12
Ramp-up to 50 ktpd Stabilize at 50 ktpd
2012-2013 Restart 2014 Stabilize
Increase throughput to 52 ktpd
2016+ Optimize
Pinto Valley Improvement Strategy Underway
- Engage and empower workforce to improve site
performance
- Leverage existing organizational structure to facilitate
continuous improvement
- 30-week project scope:
- Communication, Alignment & Training
- Production Planning
- Mine Operations
- Mobile Maintenance
- Plant Maintenance
- Concentrator Production
- Supply
Upcoming Catalysts
- Focus on improving
reliability and costs
- Scoping study for PV3
- Expanded
production
- Extended mine life
13 13
Cozamin Mine
Underground Mine in Zacatecas State, Mexico
Mine life remaining (years) 6.5 Production – 2014 guidance (k tonnes Cu ±5%) 20.0 Production – Six Months 2014 YTD (k tonnes) 10.3 C1 cash cost1 – Six Months 2014 YTD ($/payable lb Cu) $1.23 C1 cash cost1 – 2014 guidance ($/payable lb Cu) $1.30 - $1.40 By-products Zn, Pb, Ag
- 1. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure, which is net of by-product credits as well as treatment and selling costs. See Forward-
Looking Statements slide for 43-101 information.
Ongoing exploration program
2014 2015
Silver stream sale expires April 2017 to significantly improve economics
(currently ~1.5M oz/year)
2017+
14 14
- 1. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure, which is net of by-product credits as well as treatment and selling costs. See Forward-
Looking Statements slide for 43-101 information.
Mine life remaining (years) 9 Production - 2014 guidance (k tonnes Cu ±5%) 18.5 Production – Six Months 2014 YTD (k tonnes) 10.3 C1 cash cost1 – Six Months 2014 YTD ($/payable lb Cu) $2.20 C1 cash cost1 –2014 guidance ($/payable lb Cu) $2.45 - $2.55 Life of mine projected C1 cash cost1 $1.92 By-products Au, Ag
Open Pit & Underground Mine in Yukon, Canada
Minto Mine
Higher grade ore feeding mill until mid-August. Permit application filed for all remaining mineral reserves. Minto North high-grade ore to feed mill by mid-year.
2014 2015
Significant production from high-grade Minto North pit.
2016
15 15
Santo Domingo Project
Copper-Iron Development Project in Region III, Chile
Diego de Almagro Project Area
- Superior infrastructure
- 7 kms from town, power lines & sub-station
- 110 kms from port
- Low elevation (~1,000 masl)
- Paved road access
- Low environmental risk
16 16
Santo Domingo – July 2014 Feasibility Study
- Unlevered Internal Rate of Return of 17.9% (27.3% assuming
$1B project debt or 60% leverage)
- $797 million after-tax NPV, discounted at 8%
- 18-year mine life
- Off-take agreements committed for 50% of Cu and Fe LOM
- LOM by-product C1 cash costs1 negative $0.06/lb payable Cu
- LOM co-product C1 cash costs1 $1.50/lb payable Cu
- Attractive opportunity in a community that demonstrates
strong support for the project
Confirms the value as a robust, low cost copper project A long-life, low cost copper project
- 1. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure. C1 Cash Cost on a by-product basis includes gold and iron credits. See appendix for 43-101 information.
17 17
Santo Domingo – July 2014 Feasibility Study Summary
Summary of July 2014 FS1,2
Mine life (years) 18 Average annual production LOM Avg: 128M lbs Cu, 4.2 Mt Fe, 16 koz Au First 5 years: 248M lbs Cu, 3.3 Mt Fe, 35 koz Au Planned throughput (tpd) LOM Avg: 60,500 First 5 Years: 65,000 Development capital $1.7B Investment return (after tax) IRR: 17.9% NPV @ 8% discount rate: $797M Payback: 4.2 years By-products Fe, Au Metal price assumptions Cu: $2.85/lb Fe: $1.31/dmtu ($85/t conc. @ 65% Fe) Au: $1,275/oz
- 1. Source: Santo Domingo Project; Region III, Chile; NI 43-101 Technical Report on Feasibility Study dated July 8, 2014, 100% basis. 2. The report was compiled by
AMEC’s Santiago office with an accuracy range of -10% to +15% for capital and operating costs. The estimates presented in the FS are current as of October 2013. 3. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure. C1 Cash Cost on a by-product basis includes gold and iron credits. See appendix for 43-101 information.
Estimated C1 cash cost3
LOM Avg: $ per payable lb of Cu produced $-0.06 First 5 years: $ per payable lb of Cu produced $0.49
Low-risk and relatively low-cost approach to increase value and maintain optionality
18 18
Santo Domingo FS– CAPEX & Funding
CAPEX1,2
- Initial cost $1.7B
- Sustaining Capital: $368M
Mine $157M Process Plant $380M Pipelines $172M
Plant / Mine Infrastructure
$163M Port $180M Contingency $242M EPCM $115 Indirect Costs $290
- 1. Source: Santo Domingo Project; Region III, Chile; NI 43-101 Technical Report on Feasibility Study dated July 8, 2014, 100% basis. 2. Accuracy range
- f -10% to +15% for capital costs and operating costs. 3. Illustration based on feasibility study capital of $1.7B and assumed project debt of 65%.
Partnership & Funding Structure3
- Owned 70% Capstone and 30% Korea Resources
Corporation (KORES)
- KORES largest Capstone shareholder (11%)
- LOM off-take agreement for 50% of Cu & Fe magnetite
concentrate on then prevailing market terms
- KORES to participate in arranging debt financing
65% Project Debt $1,105M CS Equity $416M KORES Equity $179M
19
Santo Domingo Project - Development Plan
Decision on if, how, and when to proceed will depend on many factors
- Power and infrastructure
- Attractive economics
- Financing
- Strong social license & regulatory support
- Other attractive production opportunities
- 1. Subject to the commercial and regulatory environment in Chile and not within Capstone’s control. Various decisions are dependent on the
availability of low cost power as well as regulatory approval, and clear demonstration of an economically viable project with appropriate financing in place and a supportive environment for development.
Power purchase agreement Finalize maritime concession for port location Stage-gate 1 - EIA approval (Q1) Stage-gate 2 – Engineering 60-65% complete (Q3)
2014 2015
Stage-gate 3 - Engineering effectively complete (Q1) Production estimated +2 years from construction decision
2016+
Next Steps1 Proceeding in a disciplined manner with a stage-gate process for decision making
20 20
- 1. Assumes a positive construction decision on Santo Domingo with commissioning in 2017 (Capstone 70% ownership – based on FS dated July 8, 2014);
does not include by-product metal production at any mine or project. 2. C1 cash costs for 2015 and beyond do not factor in deferred stripping and movements in ore stockpile for Minto. 3. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure. See Forward-Looking Statements slide for 43-101 information.
Cu Production (k tonnes) C1 Cash Cost/lb3 of Payable Cu Produced
2,3,4
Projected Five-Year Production Profile1
Potential for significant cash flow generation
3
$0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 50 100 150 200 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Cozamin Minto Pinto Valley Santo Domingo 70% C1 Cash Costs3
2
21 21
Short term
- Pinto Valley
Focus on cost efficiencies and potential mine life extension
- Cozamin
Reliable production with ongoing exploration
- Minto
Mine plan to optimize production and minimize cost
- Santo Domingo
Advance engineering and secure power; next stage-gate decision point in Q1 2015 (upon approval of EIS)
2014 and beyond
Capstone Is Well-Positioned For Profitable Growth
A leading intermediate copper producer
22 22
Appendix
1. Board of Directors 2. Senior Management Team 3. Financial & Operating Results 4. Revolving Credit Facilities 5. C1 Cash Costs 6. 2014 Operating Guidance
- 7. 2014 Capital Expenditure Guidance
8. Historical Financial Performance 9. Historical Operating Performance 10. Record of Growth in Mineral Resource Base 11. History of Pinto Valley Mine 12. Minto Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Areas 13. Minto Mineral Resources and Underground Development 14. Proposed Power Expansions in Regions of Santo Domingo 15. Project Providencia - Key Deposits in Analogous Metallogenic Settings 16. NI 43-101 Information
23 23
Board of Directors
Lawrence Bell Former Chairman & CEO of BC Hydro, Director of Silver Wheaton George Brack - Non-Executive Chairman Mining & investment banking, former industry head of Scotia Capital Chantal Gosselin Former VP & Portfolio Manager of Goodman Investment Counsel. Previously with Sun Valley Gold LLP, Blackhawk Mining & Pan American Silver GookHo Lee Executive Advisor for KORES. Formerly with LS-Nikko Copper Inc., LG-Nikko Copper Inc. & LG Metal Co. Ltd. Kalidas Madhavpeddi President of Azteca Consulting LLC & CEO of Forex Investment Group. Former Sr. VP Business Development of Phelps Dodge Dale Peniuk - Audit Committee Chairman Financial & board expertise, former Partner with KPMG Darren Pylot - President, CEO & Director Founder of Capstone Mining Corp. Richard Zimmer Former President & CEO of Far West Mining. Previously with Teck & Bow Valley Industries
24 24
Senior Management Team
Darren Pylot - President, CEO & Director Founder of Capstone Mining Corp. Jim Slattery – Sr VP & CFO Former CFO of Imnet Mining, CFO of Wescast Industries & Canadian General Tower Gregg Bush - Sr VP & COO Former COO of Minefinders, Mine GM & Operations of Barrick/Placer Dome, 12 years in Chile Brad Mercer – Sr VP Exploration Formerly with Sherwood Copper Corp., Miramar Mining & Royal Oak Robert Blusson – VP Finance Formerly with Lundin Mining & EuroZinc Cindy Burnett - VP IR & Communications Formerly with Western Lithium, Skye Resources, Ivanhoe Energy & Nova Chemicals Peter Hemstead - VP Marketing & Treasurer Formerly with Sherwood Copper Corp. & PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Jason Howe - VP Business Development Co-founder & former CFO of Silverstone Resources Corp. Wendy King – VP Legal, Risk & Governance Former Sr. VP General Counsel, Government Relations, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary with Central 1 Credit Union & Weyerhaeuser Company Guy Le Bel – VP Evaluations Formerly with Quadra Mining Ltd, BHP Billiton Base Metals, Rio Algom & Cambior Inc. Gillian McCombie - VP Human Resources Formerly with Placer Dome, Hunter-Dickinson & TELUS David Sinitsin – VP Technical Services Formerly with Canaco Resources, Silver Standard Resources & Freeport- McMoRan Brad Skeeles - VP North American Operations Formerly with Newmont Mining, INCO & BHP Billiton
25 25
Financial & Operating Results
- 1. These are Alternative Performance Measures. See Forward-Looking Statements slide for 43-101 information.
Q2 2014 Q2 2013
Revenue ($M) $171.7 $58.3 Copper in concentrates produced (tonnes) 27,212 8,765 Copper cathode produced (tonnes) 526
- Payable copper produced (tonnes)
26,785 8,419 C1 cash cost1 ($ per payable lb of Cu produced) $2.03 $1.70 Copper sold (tonnes) 24,563 7,783 Realized copper price ($ per lb sold) $3.36 $3.16 Net earnings ($M) Per common share: $16.6 $0.04 $9.2 $0.02 Adjusted EBITDA1 ($M) Per common share: $64.8 $0.17 $28.8 $0.08 Operating cash flow before changes in working capital1 ($M) Per common share: $56.5 $0.15 $28.6 $0.08 Net debt (cash)1 ($M) $181.0 ($456.3)
26
Senior Secured Senior Secured Reducing Amount $200 million $200 million Term 4 years from October 2013 2.5 year from October 2013 Interest Rate US Libor + 2.5% Standby Fee 0.56% Payment Schedule Interest only 8 equal quarterly payments starting April 4, 2014 Covenants EBITDA/Interest Expense ≥ 3.00:1:00 Senior Secured Debt/EBITDA not more than 3:00:1:00 Total Debt/EBITDA not more than 4:00:1:00 Initial Use $87.2 million supporting letters of credit for PV reclamation, remainder fully drawn for Pinto Valley purchase and working capital purposes Fully drawn for Pinto Valley purchase Balance as at June 30, 2014 $133 million $178 million
Revolving Credit Facilities
At December 31, 2013
27 27
C1 Cash Cost1 Q2 2014
Pinto Valley Minto Pinto Valley + Cozamin + Minto
$1.24 $0.33 ($0.34) $1.23 $2.35 $2.46 $1.76 $2.03
Total Consolidated C1 Cash Cost1 ($ per payable lb of Cu produced)
Operating costs + By-product credits = Treatment & selling costs - C1 Cash Cost/lb1 $0.27 $0.39 ($0.12)
$0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 Cozamin
$1.74 $0.44 $2.13 $(0.05) $(0.16)
- 1. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure, which is net of by-product credits as well as treatment and selling costs.
28 28
2014 Operating Guidance
- 1. This is an alternative performance measure, please see “Alternative Performance Measure” definition at the beginning of this presentation.
Pinto Valley Cozamin Minto Total Tonnes milled (M) 18.2 1.2 1.4 20.8 Copper grade (%) 0.39 1.85 1.49 0.55 Copper recovery (%) 88.5 93.4 92.4 89.0 Production (contained in concentrates) Copper (tonnes) 63,500 20,000 18,500 102,000 Copper cathode (tonnes) 2,800
- 2,800
Zinc (tonnes)
- 9,000
- 9,000
MoS2 (000s lbs) 660
- 660
Lead (tonnes)
- 1,700
- 1,700
Silver (million ounces) 0.3 1.6 0.2 2.1 Gold (ounces)
- 17,670
17,670 C1 cash costs per pound of payable copper produced net of by-product credits and selling costs1 $1.90 - $2.00 $1.30 - $1.40 $2.45 - $2.55 $1.90 - $2.00
29 29
2014 Capital Expenditure Guidance
- 1. Pre-stripping of Minto North is set to begin on August 15, 2014, contingent upon receipt of the necessary permits and licenses.2. Represents Capstone’s
70% share of capital expenditure.
Capital Expenditure Breakdown ($M) Pinto Valley Cozamin Minto Santo Domingo2 Kutcho Total Sustaining 22.0 18.0 17.4
- 57.4
PV2 Capital 24.8
- 24.8
Brownfield Exploration
- 3.0
- 3.0
Deferred Stripping1
- 16.1
- 16.1
Development Projects
- 20.9
0.9 21.8 Total 46.8 21.0 33.5 20.9 0.9 123.1
Pinto Valley $46.8 Cozamin $21.0 Minto $33.5 Santo Domingo $20.9 Kutcho $0.9
2014 Capital Expenditure Guidance
- $123.1M budgeted for capital
expenditures in 2014
- $26.5M spent six months 2014 YTD
- An additional $10.1M budgeted for
greenfield exploration in 2014
- $3.5M spent six months 2014 YTD
30 30
Historical Financial Performance
$162 $250 $301 $353 $306 $332 $333 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD
Revenue3 ($M)
$36 $117 $103 $146 $142 $106 $121 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD
Adjusted EBITDA1,3 ($M)
$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD
Capital Additions2,3($M)
- 1. This is an Alternative Performance Measure. 2. Includes deferred stripping at Minto. 2008 capex includes $13 million from old Capstone for 9 months in 2008. 3. The
total 2008 information only includes results from the Cozamin Mine from November 24, 2008 to December 31, 2008. Year end 2010, 2011 and 2012 in accordance with
- IFRS. 2008 figures pro forma for combination with Sherwood Copper to include Cozamin and Minto for the full year.
$28 $94 $75 $120 $114 $86 $105 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD
Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital3 ($M)
$33 $59 $56 $85 $121 $123 Deferred Stripping Capital Additions $27
31 31
Historical Operating Performance
29,892 38,691 33,022 35,879 35,834 45,405 51,164 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD
Copper Sold (tonnes)
$2.36 $2.31 $3.42 $3.90 $3.66 $3.30 $3.17 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD
Realized Price/lb of Copper Sold ($)
$1.25 $1.03 $1.40 $1.45 $1.50 $1.72 $1.96 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD
C1 Cash Cost1,2 ($ per payable lb of Cu produced)
$1.11 $1.28 $2.02 $2.45 $2.16 $1.58 $1.21 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Six Months 2014 YTD 47% 55% 59% 59% 48% 63% 38%
Cash Margin/lb of Copper Sold ($)
- 1. This is an Alternative Performance Measure. * Commencing in 2011, financial results in accordance with IFRS. 2. The total 2008 information only
includes results from the Cozamin Mine from November 24, 2008 to December 31, 2008, except for the C1 Cash Cost per pound of payable copper which are for the full year.
32 32
Proven Track Record of Growth in Mineral Resource Base
Minto
Cozamin
CS Total
* Includes Mineral Resources and Reserves as at December 31, 2013 for Cozamin and Minto. Mineral Resources as at March 26, 2014 and Mineral Reserves as at January 1, 2014 for Pinto Valley. 70% share of Santo Domingo Mineral Resources as at August 31, 2012 and Mineral Reserves as at May 2, 2014. Kutcho as at Dec. 31, 2010.
Minto Kutcho
Santo Domingo
Minto
Cozamin
CS Total Kutcho Minto
Cozamin Santo Domingo
CS Total CS Total CS Total CS Total
Santo Domingo Santo Domingo Cozamin Cozamin
Cu tonnes in Mineral Reserves* Per Share Cu tonnes/share (basic)
Kutcho Kutcho
Santo Domingo
Kutcho Minto
Cozamin Pinto Valley
0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD
Cu tonnes in M&I Mineral Resources* Per Share Cu tonnes/share (basic)
383%
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD
1084%
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD
1107%
Thousands (tonnes) Cu tonnes in Mineral Reserves* Cu tonnes in M&I Mineral Resources* Thousands (tonnes)
Minto
Cozamin
Minto Kutcho
Santo Domingo
Minto Kutcho Minto
Cozamin Santo Domingo Santo Domingo Cozamin Cozamin
Kutcho Kutcho
Santo Domingo
Kutcho Minto
Cozamin
Pinto Valley Minto
Cozamin
Kutcho
Santo Domingo
Pinto Valley
Santo Domingo
Kutcho Minto
Cozamin Santo Domingo
Pinto Valley
Santo Domingo
Kutcho
Cozamin
Minto
Cozamin Cozamin Cozamin
Minto Minto Kutcho Minto
Cozamin
Kutcho Minto Minto
Cozamin Cozamin
Minto Kutcho Kutcho
0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD
314%
33 33
History of Pinto Valley Mine
Pinto Valley Historical Production / Copper Prices
Source: BHP Copper
34 34
>3% Cu over ≥5m >2% Cu over ≥5m >1% Cu over ≥5m >0.5% Cu over ≥5m All other drill holes >50 Deposit Area Exploration Corridor Fault All Weather Gravel Road Creeks and Streams Mineral Reserves & Resources Other Deposits Mining Complete
LEGEND
Mill Camp
N
500 meters
Inferno North
(extension of Minto North)
Minto North Inferno Fireweed
(extension of Minto East)
Minto South Minto Main Area 2/118 Copper Keel
A’ A
Wildfire/ Copper Keel NE Minto East
Key Points
- Current mineral resource/reserve
has a 3.5 km strike length
- Other underground geophysical and
geological targets exist
Minto Mineral Reserve & Mineral Resource Areas
Ridgetop
35 35
Mineral Reserves and Resources
Minto Main Area 2/118 Copper Keel Minto East Wildfire
N S
Fireweed
Mining Complete
Inferno North
700masl 500masl 900masl
Ridgetop Minto North
Minto Mineral Resources & Underground Development
Minto Permitting and Mining Phases
- I – III: Minto Main pit mining completed Q2 2011, stockpiles processed until Q2 2012
- IV: Current Mining - Area 2/118 mined by open pit and underground
- V: Minto North to be mined by open pit; Minto East by underground
- VI: PFS Q3 2012 added Copper Keel and Wildfire underground mineral reserves
Other Deposits
36 36
Proposed Power Expansions in Region of Santo Domingo
Connecting to Australis Power led Octopus Project at Penco (700 MW) and Alto Maipo hydro project (531 MW) Codelco (780 MW) and BHP (540 MW) natural gas-fired plants; GDF Suez (750 MW) coal plants and 500 kW line Endesa Punta Alcalde coal-fired plant approved Jan 17, 2014 (740MW, SIC, US$1.4B) Transelec substation upgrade
LINES - kV Under construction Proposed 110 66 or less Node TO SANTIAGO
HUASCO COPIAPO DIEGO DE ALMAGRO CHAÑARAL
SANTO DOMINGO
MEJILLONES Cardones TALTAL Senate approves SIC-Sing interconnection Jan. 9, 2014. Includes both operating and in-construction projects (1,500 MW, US$700M, 610 km)
37 37
Project Providencia – Region III Chile
2
Key Deposits in Analogous Metallogenic Settings
1 IOCG Deposits – (Jurassic Volcanic Arc)1,3
- Mantoverde District
- Santo Domingo
- Julia Reventon
2 IOCG Deposits - (Cretaceous Volcanic Arc)1,3
- Candelaria
- Mantos Blancos
- Casualidad
- Teresa De Colmo
- Franke
- Altamira
2 & 3 Porphyry Deposits – (Cretaceous Volcanic Arc)2,3
- Spence Mine
- Virgo Sierra Overa
Younger Older
IOCG Casualidad Porphyry Virgo S.O.
- 1. Chile’s IOCG deposits are related to early - mid Cretaceous magmatic activity but the host rocks may be older. 2. Late Cretaceous Age. 3. The
blue, green and pink rocks in belts 1 & 2 are highly prospective for IOCG and for Cretaceous Age porphyry Cu deposits. These prospective rocks are inferred to continue under gravel cover (clear areas) and beneath Paleocene-Eocene volcanic rocks (dark greens on east side of map).
Option Boundary
Atacama Fault
IOCG? Franke Altamira
1 3
IOCG Julia Reventon
120 kms 145 kms
Project Providencia lies ~80 kilometres north of Santo Domingo
(3,500 sqkm)
38 38
Unless otherwise indicated, Capstone has prepared the technical information in this presentation (“Technical Information”) based on information contained in the technical reports and news releases (collectively the “Disclosure Documents”) available under Capstone Mining Corp.’s company profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Each Disclosure Document was prepared by or under the supervision of a qualified person (a “Qualified Person” or “QP”) as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 43-101”). For readers to fully understand the information in this presentation, they should read the Technical Reports (available on www.sedar.com) in their entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exclusions that relate to the information set out in this presentation which qualifies the Technical Information. Readers are advised that mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The Disclosure Documents are each intended to be read as a whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The Technical Information is subject to the assumptions and qualifications contained in the Disclosure Documents. The technical information in this presentation has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators ("NI 43-101") and reviewed by Brad Skeeles, P.Eng. VP of North American Operations (Technical Information related to mining and production) and Brad Mercer, P. Geol., Senior Vice President, Exploration (Technical Information related to mineral exploration activities), and reviewed and approved by Gregg Bush, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Capstone Mining, all QP’s under NI 43-101. This presentation summarizes some of the information contained in the PV2 PFS project that was directed by Capstone with contributions from Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. (geology, Resource estimation), Independent Mining Consultants Inc. (reserve, geotechnical, mine design and schedule, equipment selection), KWM Consulting Inc. (metallurgy, mill operation), AMEC Environment & Infrastructure Inc. (tailings), Stantec (Infrastructure and PFS report compilation), SRK (US), Inc. (environmental), and Adam M Consulting Inc. (financial modelling). Personnel from each of these companies will be signing off as a QP as defined in NI 43-101 for their specific responsibilities. The following QP’s will author the technical report: Mel Lawson, P.E. of Stantec, Garth Kirkham, P.Geo. of Kirkham Geosystems Ltd., John Marek P.E. of Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., Ken Majors P.Eng. of KWM Consulting Inc, Tony Freiman, P.E. of AMEC Inc., Adam Majorkiewicz, P.Eng of Adam M Consulting Inc. and Cori Hoag C.P.G. of SRK. The March 2014 Mineral Resource estimate reported herein for the Pinto Valley property was prepared by Garth Kirkham, P. Geo, Kirkham Geosystems Ltd., an independent QP. Based on the Mineral Resource Estimate, a standard methodology for pit limit analysis, mining sequence, and cut-off grade optimization, including application of mining dilution, process recovery, economic criteria and physical mine and plant operating constraints, has been followed to design the Pinto Valley pit and determine the Mineral Reserve Estimate dated March 2014. This presentation summarizes some of the information contained in the NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Cozamin Mine, Zacatecas, Mexico dated July 31 , 2014. The following QP’s were responsible for the preparation of their relevant portions of the Technical Report: Patrick Andrieux, PhD., P.Eng. (Itasca Consulting Group. Inc), Dave Hallman, PE (Tetra Tech, Inc), Jenna Hardy, P.Geo. (Nimbus Management Ltd.), Mel Lawson, SME-RM (Stantec Consulting International LLC), Ken Major, P.Eng. (KWM Consulting Inc.), Vivienne McLennan, P.Geo. (Capstone Mining Corp.), Allan Schappert, SME-RM (Stantec Consulting International LLC), Ali Shahkar, P.Eng. (Lions Gate Geological Consulting Inc.), Robert Sim, P.Geo. (Sim Geological Inc.), Brad Skeeles, P.Eng. (Capstone Mining Corp.), and Jeremy Vincent, P.Geo. (Capstone Mining Corp.). This presentation summarizes some of the information contained in the Minto Phase VI Preliminary Feasibility Study Technical Report dated January 2012. Qualified Persons under National Instrument 43-101 responsible for this report: John Sagman, BASc., P.Eng., PMP, Wayne Barnett, Pr.Sci.Nat., SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc., John Eggert, P.Eng, Eggert Engineering Ltd; Bruce Murphy, P.Eng., SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc.; Bill Hodgson, P.Eng., Genivar Inc.; Garth Kirkham, P. Geo, Kirkham Geosystems Ltd; Michael Levy, PE, SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc.; Brad Mercer, P.Geol. Capstone Mining Corp.; Pooya Mohseni, P.Eng. Minto Exploration; Marek Nowak, P.Eng., SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.; and Colleen Roche, P.Eng. Capstone Mining Corp. who are responsible for certain sections of the PFS as detailed in the PFS. This presentation summarizes some of the information contained in the Santo Domingo Project; Region III, Chile; NI 43-101 Technical Report on Feasibility Study dated July 8, 2014, 100%
- basis. The following QP’s were responsible for the preparation of their relevant portions of the Technical Report based on the Feasibility Study: David Frost, F.AusIMM (AMEC Ingeniería y
Construcción Ltda.), Hans Gopfert, P.Eng (AMEC Ingeniería y Construcción Ltda.), Joyce Maycock, P. Eng (AMEC Ingeniería y Construcción Ltda.), Vikram Khera, P. Eng (AMEC Ingeniería y Construcción Ltda.), Anna Klimek, P.Eng (AMEC Ingeniería y Construcción Ltda.), Roy Betinol, P.Eng. (BRASS Chile S.A.) -- Seawater and Magnetite Concentrate Pipeline System, Carlos Guzmán, F.AusIMM (NCL Ingeniería y Construcción Ltda.) -- Mineral Reserve Model, Mine Equipment and Mine Development , Tom Kerr, P.Eng. (Knight Piésold S. A.) - Tailings Storage Facility, David Rennie, P. Eng (Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.) -- Mineral Resource Model. The technical information in the July 8,2014 report was reviewed by Court Muggli, P.E., Project Director, Capstone Mining Corp., and Gregg Bush, P. Eng., Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Capstone Mining Corp., both QP’s under NI 43-101.
Compliance with NI 43-101
39
For additional information, please visit capstonemining.com
- r contact us at:
Phone: +1-604-684-8894 Toll Free: 1-866-684-8894 Email: info@capstonemining.com
Last updated September 2, 2014